Swastika still controversial, shocker
Grok Headline matches for Swastika still controversial, shocker
Microsoft's Swastika Oops
Microsoft's Swastika Oops
02/11/2004 04:17 PMMicrosoft Loses the Swastika
Microsoft Loses the Swastika
12/13/2003 06:03 AMAfter a Microsoft customer discovers two Swastikas included in
Office's 'Bookshelf Symbol 7' font, the software company says a
utility will be immediately available on its website to remove the
offending characters.
Microsoft Removes Swastika from Software
Microsoft Removes Swastika from Software
02/15/2004 03:46 AMPA News via The Scotsman Online Feb 15 2004 8:15AM GMT
MS tears swastika from roof of Office
MS tears swastika from roof of Office
02/11/2004 12:18 PMCritical update strikes at heart of darkness
Swastika attack on French mother
Swastika attack on French mother
07/11/2004 01:26 PMPoliticians react with horror after an anti-Semitic attack on a woman
and her baby on a French train.
Swastika attack woman 'lied'
Swastika attack woman 'lied'
07/13/2004 08:53 PMA French woman who said she had been the subject of an anti-Semitic
attack invented the story, police say.
Wired News: Microsoft Loses the Swastika
Wired News: Microsoft Loses the Swastika
12/14/2003 12:06 AMMicrosoft Loses the Swastika .. Read article ..
reports
wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,61587,00.html
track this
site | 5 links
Microsoft to delete swastika symbol from
new versions of Office software
Microsoft to delete swastika symbol from
new versions of Office software
12/12/2003 10:05 PMHaaretz Dec 12 2003 9:30PM ET
Shocker: E-Bay to Buy Pay Pal
Shocker: E-Bay to Buy Pay Pal
07/08/2002 08:42 AM"Reuters: eBay said it will swap 0.39 eBay share for each PayPal
share. The deal values PayPal at about $23.61 per share based on eBays
closing Nasdaq stock price on Friday of $60.55. "
gawker shocker!
gawker shocker!
01/08/2004 08:11 PMthe feds are trying to find out who tipped off choire. I'll visit you
in prison, my friend!
RFH: Battery shocker
RFH: Battery shocker
11/25/2003 10:32 PM[RFH= Request for Help] I bought a big, fat Sony lithium-ion battery
(NP-FS21) for my digital video camera two years ago. Now, after fairly
minimal use, it's dead, Jim. When I plug it into the recharger, the
charge light comes on for about 15 seconds. The thing just doesn't
take a charge. Any ideas about how to regenerate it? Failing that,
does anyone have any recommendations for offbrand batteries that
actually work from vendors who don't suck?...
Creative bath ad shocker
Creative bath ad shocker
04/22/2004 06:33 AMLetters Readers dead
angry
Shocker: DVR Users Use DVR Functionality
Shocker: DVR Users Use DVR Functionality
06/17/2004 08:53 PMIt turns out, believe it or not, that people who have DVR devices like
TiVo
actually
(gasp!) dare to use them to watch TV when they want to. The
writer of this article about a study on DVR usage sounds surprised
that people who own them don't tend to watch TV programs when they
air, but prefer to wait, even if just to be able to skip commercials.
Of course, while TiVo users may
see
more ads as they fast forward through them, it does sound like
plenty of users do still end up watching ads. It's just that they're
more picky about them. 38% of users do say they fast forward through
all the ads they see, but that still leaves plenty who don't.
However, it seems pretty clear that the ads need to at least get their
attention. People are no longer passive consumers of media. That
doesn't mean that video-based ads are dead, but just that they
need to
get more creative.
Cisco's Job Shocker (washingtonpost.com)
Cisco's Job Shocker (washingtonpost.com)
05/12/2004 12:45 PMwashingtonpost.com - Silicon Valley, prepare for an earthquake.
The Strange Case of the Shocker
The Strange Case of the Shocker
09/22/2004 10:11 AMStrange history of how a shocking hand gesture rocked a small
Pennsylvania town .. going to town with one in the brown .. The
Strange Case of the Shocker .. all you guys check this out .. three
fingers .. [meer]
rotten.com/library/language/the-finger/shocker
track
this site | 3 links
Shocker: People Don't Think They Should
Be Sued For Downloading
Shocker: People Don't Think They Should
Be Sued For Downloading
06/29/2004 09:49 PMA new study shows that completely unsurprising results that
most people don't think the RIAA should be suing people for
downloading. While the majority of those over 55 had no problem
with the lawsuits, under that age barrier they felt the RIAA was going
too far. Of course, the RIAA lawsuits
are not about
downloading. Every one of the lawsuits so far have been about
offering songs (i.e., potentially uploading songs) rather than
the actual downloading of songs. Still, it certainly suggests that
people are getting fed up with the RIAA's heavy handed tactics.
Shocker: Cameraphone Photos Not Printed
Shocker: Cameraphone Photos Not Printed
12/28/2004 02:51 PMApparently printer makers are freaking out that, even as cameraphone
popularity grows,
no one is actually printing out cameraphone photos. Of
course, in reading this, it seems like they're skipping a step. Are
people printing out
any digital camera photos, whether or not
they're from cameraphones? While some people definitely do, plenty of
people (especially of the younger generations who are more likely to
jump on the cameraphone bandwagon) are probably perfectly happy in
most cases to simply store their photos online for viewing. Printing
out photos seems sort of archaic. Trying to convince people to print
them out, as the printer makers are apparently doing, seems sort of
pointless. It's like convincing new automobile owners that they
should hook up a horse to pull the vehicle.
Sun delivers Unix shocker with DTrace
Sun delivers Unix shocker with DTrace
07/08/2004 05:22 PMAnalysis It slices, it dices, it spins, it whirls
Yesterday's Shocker Is Today's Must Read
Yesterday's Shocker Is Today's Must Read
09/10/2004 08:50 AMThe formerly outré, freaky and unthinkable now constitute business as
usual in popular culture. And these have become outright selling
points for books that eagerly capitalize on their kinks.
Shocker: Study Shows No One Keeps Your
Data Secure
Shocker: Study Shows No One Keeps Your
Data Secure
03/29/2005 02:05 PMIn what was either a well-timed release, or a hastily put together
study, one research group has released a study saying that
most
companies don't do a very good job protecting your private info.
Given the number of stories coming out over the past couple of months
about companies leaking your data, this seems like a "well, duh" sort
of study. Financial service firms, retailers and insurance firms were
apparently "the worst" at keeping your data private -- which might
make you wonder who's left who's actually good at protecting your
data? According to the article, it turns out that it's airlines and
travel companies who tend to be
better at keeping your data
private -- but apparently that all goes out the window
when the government comes calling. Basically, if you hadn't
realized it by now, you should know that your data is out there, and
you pretty much have no control over it at all. Realizing that, it
makes the entire idea of
being
able to watch back make a lot more sense.
Labour MP backs Captain Cyborg shocker
Labour MP backs Captain Cyborg shocker
03/24/2005 08:28 AMVote Tory before it's too late
Cable, telcos face Internet shocker
Cable, telcos face Internet shocker
08/09/2004 04:21 AMNational Post Aug 9 2004 8:46AM GMT
Arbitron shocker: Franken beats Limbaugh
Arbitron shocker: Franken beats Limbaugh
06/01/2004 10:38 AMShocker: Spammers Don't Protect Privacy
Of Buyers
Shocker: Spammers Don't Protect Privacy
Of Buyers
03/19/2005 03:17 AMThere are more stories every day about various companies not doing an
adequate job protecting people's privacy. However, at least those
companies act like they
wanted to keep the data private. At
the other end of the extreme are spammers, who are
gleefully s
elling all of the private info they have collected from those
ignor
ant people who buy from spam. There are, of course, those who
believe that anyone stupid enough to buy from a spammer
deserves whatever else happens to them, but it's unlikely
those people realize that their data is getting passed around. While
the old wisdom was that people who bought from spammers had just their
email addresses put on "suckers lists" that got sold around, today's
spammers are giving up all sorts of info, including "home addresses,
telephone numbers, dates of birth, Internet protocol (IP) addresses,
and prescription histories." One more reason (as if you needed any
more) to avoid buying from spam. That last link also includes the
idea that any time a spammer is successfully caught -- anyone who
bought from that spammer should be publicly humiliated. Might be one
way to cut down on spam buyers -- though, probably not a particularly
legal one.
Shocker: Online Breast Enhancement
Solution May Be Fake
Shocker: Online Breast Enhancement
Solution May Be Fake
07/01/2004 01:49 PMWell, it was the obvious next step after someone tried to
sue
penis pill internet marketers for misleading claims. Now, the
Washington state Attorney General's Office is
suing a company offering "breast enhancement" solutions
online. What amazes me is that anyone actually believes these
companies in the first place. The AG's office noted that the company
talked about clinical tests that (surprise, surprise) didn't exist,
lies concerning FDA approval of the products, and lies about the fact
about whether the pills contained hormones. They're also going to go
through the (most likely made up) "testimonials" and try to determine
whether or not they're true. Anyway, I'm sure someone else has
already opened up an identical site somewhere else.
UK study shocker: "18" ratings not
keeping games from kids
UK study shocker: "18" ratings not
keeping games from kids
06/24/2005 03:33 PMA study shows that parents know about age ratings for games, but
they're not using them to make decisions about what kids play. The
kids also know about the ratings, and they are taking them into
consideration.

Shocker: Digital Files Easier To Find
Than Paper
Shocker: Digital Files Easier To Find
Than Paper
09/01/2004 03:14 PMWhile it is true that the paperless office is
someth
ing of a joke that doesn't mean there aren't advantages to digital
copies of things. In what might be the most obvious study seen this
week (it's actually scary how big the competition is for this award),
a new study has found that
it's easier to misfile paper than digital
documents. This should be completely surprising to the three or
four people in the world who have not yet discovered the ability to
"search" on a computer.
Shocker: Entertainment Industry Worried
About File Sharing
Shocker: Entertainment Industry Worried
About File Sharing
01/04/2005 03:17 PMIn what may be the most pointless study done in quite some time, a
research firm has determined that (no! really?!?) entertainment
industry executives are
worried about "digital
piracy." The study also found that many feel it's already
impacting their bottom line. Of course, what it doesn't say is that
just because they're afraid of something, doesn't mean it's bad. This
is the same industry that was once deathly afraid of the VCR and
claimed it would completely destroy the movie industry -- when it
actually revived an industry that was in trouble. Also, just because
something impacts your bottom line, it doesn't mean it's bad. The
automobile business impacted the horse and buggy industry, but most
people realized that was a good thing in the long run. If the horse
and buggy makers had realized they were in the "transportation
business" and not the "horse and buggy business," they would have made
out better. All it means is that the companies impacted need to
learn to adjust to the changes they face in the market. So far,
however, the entertainment industry hasn't shown the ability to do
that with these latest changes. Instead of realizing what the
"entertainment industry" really means, executives think that they're
in the business of selling content on a specific medium (CDs, film
etc.) rather than realizing that what they can provide encompasses a
much broader picture, which
opens
up many new opportunities, beyond just selling individual units.
Shocker: People Realize That Internet
Affairs Are Damaging
Shocker: People Realize That Internet
Affairs Are Damaging
04/19/2004 04:15 AMFor those who didn't yet figure it out, even an online "affair"
can damage a
relationship. That's what a new study says, though, I question
the methodology. They study was only conducted with students who may
have a fairly different definition of what constitutes a relationship
than those out of college and in the working world. Still, as the
study shows, even those who don't necessarily think of an online
affair as "cheating," most still realize that it would hurt their
partner to know about it. It seems pretty obvious that if something
you're doing would hurt your partner that it's probably not going to
do much good for the relationship.
Shocker: More People Prefer Online Car
Sales To Dealing With Dealers
Shocker: More People Prefer Online Car
Sales To Dealing With Dealers
04/11/2005 03:31 PMCan you possibly imagine that people wouldn't like going in to car
dealers and buying cars from a profession that seems to be defined by
its own sleaze? Indeed, it appears that the less sleaze-inducing
internet route for buying cars
is picking up
steam -- with plenty of car purchases originating online. Also,
person-to-person car sales have been increasing as the internet has
aided that process, and cut out the need for dealers to broker those
types of sales. Meanwhile, fewer people seem to be going to the old
newspaper classified section to find out about car deals, as it just
doesn't seem efficient any more. The car
sellers are
looking elsewhere and car buyers prefer going online and avoiding
dealers as much as possible as well.
"Kerry Photo Shocker: Candidate Teamed
Up With 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda"
"Kerry Photo Shocker: Candidate Teamed
Up With 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda"
02/11/2004 03:46 AMShocker: People Realize That Mobile
Carriers Won't Make Money From Music
Shocker: People Realize That Mobile
Carriers Won't Make Money From Music
04/15/2005 04:49 AMFor quite some time, a bunch of folks have been pointing out that the
mobile phone operators are being somewhat idiotic in their belief that
they
they
can be music and media moguls. They got this idea in their head
once ringtones started to take off, and rather than thinking they
might just be a fad, both the music industry and the mobile operators
start drooling over how much money they think they're going to make --
when neither of them seem to actually understand the other's business
very much. While the theme of the last few months in the mobile world
seemed to be unquestioned acceptance that "content is king" it appears
the backlash is starting, as even the folks at Business Week are
realizing
the mobile operators will
never make much money by selling music directly. The article
points out what everyone always seems to forget. Even for Apple, the
clear leader in selling music online,
selli
ng music is a loss leader. In other words, the carriers would do
better to team up with someone (such as Apple) to handle selling
music, and they should just be happy with the increased usage. Of
course, instead of that, the operators are complaining that
iTune
s on phones will take revenue away from them. And, of course,
this doesn't even touch on issues like network over-capacity and the
fact that
people don't
want different music services on their phones and on their
computers. Between the recording industry and the mobile operators,
about the only thing you can bet on is that both industries' short
term greed, and total lack of understanding of what users want, is
likely to screw up any offerings for quite a few years.
CBS on "controversial"
CBS on "controversial"
02/10/2004 02:53 AM
A great
letter to the editor in
the Boston Globe re CBS' judgment about what sort of controvesy it
should keep its viewers from. The site is flakey, so here's the text:
CBS's failure in judgment
We Americans need to rethink whether CBS and its
parent company Viacom should continue to be
trusted to broadcast on our publicly owned airwaves.
First, CBS turned down an ad by MoveOn.org discussing
the budget deficit because it was too controversial
for the Super Bowl. Then it proceeded to air an
obscene halftime show produced by MTV. The show
included Nelly urging women to take off all their
clothes, and Janet Jackson performing with dancers
wearing leather fetish outfits and lingerie, and
then closing her performance by exposing her breast.
MTV's website promised on Jan. 28 that Jackson's
performance would include shocking moments, so it
is clear that this was planned.
CBS deliberately suppressed and censored political
speech and public discourse, the core reason
behind the First Amendment, yet saw fit to air
sexually exploitive performances during a family
event. We cannot tolerate such failures in
judgment.
Christine Bolzan, Beverly, MA
"more controversial"
"more controversial"
05/16/2004 03:36 AMThe DMCA: Not controversial
The DMCA: Not controversial
08/03/2004 11:40 PMLast week I was chatting with a friend who now works on the House Ways
and Means Committee. Talk turned to the Australia-US Free Trade
Agreement, which Congress passed in July and which President Bush
ratified yesterday. "That DMCA and copyright term extension stuff," he
said to me, "None of...
Doonesbury to be dropped for being "too
controversial"
Doonesbury to be dropped for being "too
controversial"
07/23/2004 02:39 AMThe Continental Features comics syndicate has announced that it will
be dropping Doonesbury because the strip is "too controversial"
(lately, Trudeau has been using the strip to criticise the Iraq War
and Fox News).
The Continental head said he doesn't know exactly when "Doonesbury"
will leave the package; he's currently polling clients to see if they
want to replace it with "Agnes," "Get Fuzzy," "Pickles," "Zits," or
another comic.
Link
(
via Joi)
Controversial stamps get licked
Controversial stamps get licked
09/13/2004 01:03 PMNo more Unabomber stamps, thank you. Stamps.com limits customized
postage program to block controversial images.
"controversial and candid account"
"controversial and candid account"
09/25/2004 09:52 PMControversial Winamp creator resigns
from AOL
Controversial Winamp creator resigns
from AOL
01/26/2004 06:32 PMZDNet Jan 26 2004 11:06PM GMT
Grok Description matches for Swastika still controversial, shocker
GrokA matches for Swastika still controversial, shocker
Swastika still controversial, shocker