Media Consolidation, Continuing
Grok Headline matches for Media Consolidation, Continuing
There Is No Media Consolidation :: AO
There Is No Media Consolidation :: AO
12/29/2003 04:20 PM"The truth is that the average American has access to more news
sources today than at any time since the beginning of civilization."
Ted Turner on media consolidation
Ted Turner on media consolidation
07/22/2004 09:56 PMThe current issue of the Washington Monthly has a
great article by Ted Turner on the evils of media consolidation.
Let media consolidation fight itself
Let media consolidation fight itself
02/16/2004 01:29 PMDan Gillmor finds himself
reluctantly supporting a Comcast-Disney merger:
"Yet, oddly, I find myself hoping the
Comcast-Disney deal goes through.
The temptation to discriminate in favor of its own content will surely
be irresistible to the merged company. Perhaps that will finally wake
up the public, if not Congress, to the threat. Nothing else has, so
far."
Whether Comcast or someone else buys Disney, it will provoke a debate
about the implications of media consolidation and the marriage of
content and conduit. If the merger partners say (as they surely
will) that they won't discriminate against unaffiliated content and
applications, they should have no objection to a public commitment to
that effect.
Telecom/media consolidation: Hold on to
your seat!
Telecom/media consolidation: Hold on to
your seat!
02/12/2004 02:13 PMGet ready for the next wave of big telecom and media
consolidation. Not just the normal accretion deals, but the
potential game changers. AOL/Time Warner and Comcast/AT&T
Broadband were among the highlights the last merger wave.
Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Vodaphone was
considering a bid for Verizon, as a way to take control of Verizon
Wireless. That deal likely won't happen -- expect Vodaphone to
unwind its interest in Verizon Wireless in connection with a purchase
of AT&T Wireless -- but when a >$150 billion company like
Verizon is in play, watch out.
The next shoe dropped today:
Comcast is proposing to acquire Disney.
There is logic to the deal, though it's 1980s logic: combine content
and conduit at scale to squeeze more profits from the entertainment
bundle. That's not going to work in the emerging broadband media
ecosystem, where platforms, applications, and content are different
layers of the stack. Comcast-Disney would also have the same
challenge as AOL-Time Warner: a national content footprint mismatched
with a regional broadband infrastructure footprint. Nonetheless,
it's striking that Comcast, so soon after digesting AT&T broadband
to become the largest cable operator, is ready to return to the merger
trough.
This won't be the last huge deal proposed in the current wave.
Everyone is in play.
"article written by Ted Turner on the
subject of media consolidation"
"article written by Ted Turner on the
subject of media consolidation"
07/26/2004 04:08 AMContinuing the MT conversation
Continuing the MT conversation
05/16/2004 07:12 PMContinuing the discussion about MT licenses, Movable Type clarified
and changed some of their terms. Having looked at some of...
Continuing CES coverage
Continuing CES coverage
01/08/2004 08:15 PMIf you're looking for our coverage of this week's Consumer Electronics
Show, here's a roundup of related reports, dispatches, and product
announcements (though to be...
Continuing ever onward
Continuing ever onward
06/17/2005 03:43 PM As I go typing up notes and such, I figured I'd write this up as
well. A couple of days ago I made vague reference to the large number
of continuations $WORK_PROJECT creates when running reports, and its
heavy use of them in general. Since it's a pretty good example of
places that're worth using continuations, I figured I'd go into some
detail. Assume, for a moment, that you've got an interactive
application that has a built-in menu system. The user chooses a menu
option, a subroutine is called, and at some point control gets dropped
back to the...
Mr. Eldred's continuing wars
Mr. Eldred's continuing wars
07/20/2004 07:30 PMEric Eldred is in more trouble. As
this story reports, he's been trying to give away
public domain books away. The park service doesn't like it.
The Continuing Renaissance Of Apple
The Continuing Renaissance Of Apple
09/10/2004 10:58 AMThe IT industry and the PC industry, in particular, needs Apple to
succeed. By Robin Bloor, IT-Director.com (via MyAppleMenu)
River search for boy continuing
River search for boy continuing
08/14/2004 04:43 AMA search resumes for a 15-year-old boy who is feared drowned after
being swept away in a river.
The Continuing Decline of E-Mail
The Continuing Decline of E-Mail
01/28/2004 12:27 PMOnce again, a criminal or group of criminals has turned e-mail against
us. Wouldn't it be great, though, if we stopped helping. I have a rule
that I wish everyone would follow: I don't open any file attachment,
unless I have specifically requested it, am expecting it or have gone
to some lengths to assure it doesn't contain a harmful payload.
Period.
The continuing saga of Minotaur...
The continuing saga of Minotaur...
03/13/2003 10:14 AMShould I get my hopes up? Bugzilla Bug 173084 Minotaur is getting
resurrected again. Here is an updated config patch against the trunk.
More to come...hopefully......
The Continuing Fight for Digital Freedom
The Continuing Fight for Digital Freedom
08/27/2004 01:44 PMDirect and Related Links for
'The Continuing Fight for Digital Freedom'
From the EFF EFFector- “Induce Act Update - Turning Up the
Heat On August 19th, a federal court agreed with EFF and unanimously
ruled that creating file-sharing software doesn’t violate
copyright law. This is a huge setback for the entertainment
industry’s misguided fight against innovation, but it will also
become its rallying cry. Since the courts won’t freeze new
technology, copyright holders will focus their energy on convincing
Congress to pass the Inducing Infringement of…
Microsoft commits to continuing MVP
event
Microsoft commits to continuing MVP
event
01/04/2005 03:28 PMSearchVB.com Jan 4 2005 6:40PM GMT
Macs, passion, and continuing the
conversation
Macs, passion, and continuing the
conversation
06/06/2005 12:09 AMI got mentioned over on a Jupiter Research blog today by Michael
Gartenberg: Our Passion, Your whatever :) - Microsoft's Mediocre
Marketing. Sadly, he didn't actually link here. The backstory: I wrote
this piece in March about how early adopters...
The Continuing Hunt for PATRIOT Act
Abuses
The Continuing Hunt for PATRIOT Act
Abuses
03/14/2005 06:06 PMSolar Storms Continuing to Reverberate
Solar Storms Continuing to Reverberate
07/09/2004 03:00 AMThe massive solar storms that pummeled the Earth last fall have
continued almost to the edge of the solar system, causing disruptions
on other planets and other surprising effects.
The continuing saga of IE Security
Issues
The continuing saga of IE Security
Issues
04/09/2004 07:57 PMI have a simple question. Why can't a company that has 50 billion
dollars in reserve cash fix their damn...
California's Continuing Budget Mess
California's Continuing Budget Mess
05/18/2004 11:44 AMMercury News (reg req): Future
budgets sure to fall short, state analyst says. Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger's plan to balance the upcoming budget would exacerbate
California's long-term mismatch between spending and income, creating
a nearly $8 billion shortfall two years from now, the non-partisan
legislative analyst warned Monday. The governor has ``missed an
opportunity in good economic times to ensure that we are moving toward
fiscal stability,'' said Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill.
After campaigning on a promise to make the hard choices
and genuinely deal with this problem, Schwarzenegger has done exactly
what Gray Davis did before him: Punt.
Except that the current governor, unlike Davis, had the clout to
actually get something done. He's squandering the opportunity, and
California will suffer as a result.
The Legislature shares the responsibility for this ongoing debacle,
because the lawmakers are the ones who've enacted such ridiculous
budgets over the years and now refuse to face up to what they've done.
But the one person in Sacramento who could have broken the logjam has
declined. A shame.
from the
continuing-disappointment-that-is-the-NY
TIMES department
from the
continuing-disappointment-that-is-the-NY
TIMES department
04/10/2005 08:51 PMSo there's a view about the file-sharing debate held by most people
who don't know anything about the debate. It is a view the recording
industry likes most people to hold. It is a view far from anything
anyone interesting is saying.
The view - call it the uninformed stereotype (US) view - goes
something like this: that there are just two sides to this debate,
those who favor "piracy" and those who don't. Supporters of Grokster
are people who favor piracy, and who are against artists.
On Thursday, at the
NYPL, I
had the extraordinarily pleasure of being on stage with Jeff Tweedy
and Steven Johnson, for a discussion titled "Who Owns Culture?" The
evening started with 15 minutes of me and my "powerpoint" (actually,
Keynote), and then a 50 minute discussion with Tweedy and me,
moderated by Johnson. There was then time for questions from the
audience.
It was an extraordinary evening. I had the chance before to talk to
Tweedy, so I wasn't surprised. But he was extraordinary — funny,
subtle, smart about the issues, and deeply passionate. Suffice it that
neither he nor I (as is obvious to anyone on this page) subscribe to,
or fit, within the US view. I explicitly denounced "piracy"; Tweedy --
in context -- said nothing to support the view that people should
infringe the rights of other artists.
David Carr of the New York Times was at the event. He wrote a
review.
Everyone I've spoken to loved the piece. I think they loved it because
it was a piece printed in the Times, and we're a culture that loves
attention more than accuracy.
The review is filled with quotes from Tweedy, taken out of context, to
support the US view. Nothing in the article suggests anything was said
at all contrary to the US view. One reading the piece would think,
there they go again, those supporters of theft, and haters of artists.
I'm not sure why there needs to be a NYTimes, if its role is simply to
reinforce what people already think, especially with pieces like this.
God forbid the Nation's paper of record should reflect something more
subtle or complex than the crudest view of an important debate.
"bl0g readership is continuing to
explode"
"bl0g readership is continuing to
explode"
01/05/2005 04:21 AMN. Korea Missile Site Movements Said
Continuing
N. Korea Missile Site Movements Said
Continuing
09/25/2004 05:22 PMReuters via Wired News Sep 25 2004 7:37PM GMT
continuing congressional confusion on
copyrights (ie, not just (c), or (cc),
or even (ccc) but (cccc))
continuing congressional confusion on
copyrights (ie, not just (c), or (cc),
or even (ccc) but (cccc))
07/07/2004 02:51 PMWord has it that the regulators in Washington are enamored of
Professor (in the School of Computing) Hollaar's recent paper,
So
ny Revisited, and that it is in part responsible for Congress'
current infatuation with the
Induce
Act. Professor Hollaar is a smart guy, and his paper is an
interesting and well-researched examination of secondary liability in
the context of copyright law. But if Congress thinks this justifies
the Induce Act, then there is some deep confusion somewhere. I suspect
there are two possible sources for this confusion.
(1) Hollaar discusses the scope of "inducement" liability in the
context of patent law. There are some in Congress who seem to think
that the Induce Act "merely" carries the same idea to copyright law.
This is just a mistake. The scope of the Induce Act as written is far
broader than the scope of inducing patent infringement as interpreted.
And if "all" Congress wants to do is extend patent inducement to
copyright law, then it should amendment the Induce Act to state
precisely that. That would be a vast improvement over the existing
proposal -- not enough to justify it in my mind, but it would make the
harm it will cause much much less significant.
(2) Hollaar discusses the purpose and meaning of the
Sony case. While his discussion is technically
correct enough (though the idea that copyright is the right to protect
a "business model" is really not right at all), imho, the Professor,
and in turn, the supporters of the Induce Act, are really missing the
point of Sony.
As everybody knows, Sony set the rule that when a new technology has
the "potential" to support "substantial noninfringing use" of
copyrighted material, the maker of the technology would not face
secondary liability for copyright infringement.
But what no one (in Washington, at least) seems to understand is
why Sony set that standard. It was not because the Supreme
Court is filled with copyright infringers who wanted to encourage
copyright infringement. It was instead because the Supreme Court was
filled with judges not eager to engage in the complex balancing
required to judge whether a technology creates more benefit than harm.
As the Court stated:
Sound policy, as well as history,
supports our consistent deference to Congress when major technological
innovations alter the market for copyrighted materials. Congress has
the constitutional authority and the institutional ability to
accommodate fully the varied permutations of competing interests that
are inevitably implicated by such new technology.
This is not an opinion about copyright law alone. It is an opinion
about separation of powers -- about which branch is best able to do
the necessary balancing that copyright law demands, "
within the
limits of the constitutional grant." Sony says, in effect, when a
technology is not simply a technology for violating the law, then it
is left to Congress to decide whether and how that technology is to be
regulated. Congress, not the courts.
Why is that a great idea? Because (isn't this obvious to Republicans?)
courts are awful, expensive, and slow institutions for judging
the economic effect of new technology. Soviet planners with better
lighting. And rather than bury innovators in years of litigation
before their innovation gets to market, the Sony rule says: let the
innovation go, if there is a potential for a substantial noninfringing
use, and if Congress wants to regulate it more, then let Congress
weigh the benefits of the technology against its costs.
Ignoring this extremely sensible separation of powers principle has
already cost Silicon Valley dearly. See, e.g., ReplayTV. ReplayTV is
the digital equivalent of the VCR. It does the job more efficiently,
and it promised to do some things the VCR couldn't do, too. But under
the principle of Sony (innovate first, regulate later), it should
plainly have been allowed into the market without intervention by the
courts. Yet precisely the opposite happened. Content owners sued
ReplayTV. It was dragged into federal litigation for many many months
defending its new technology. And before the case could be resolved,
the company effectively declared bankruptcy.
Is this the future Senators Hatch and Leahy want for all new
technologies that impact copyrighted material? Will every Apple be
forced to defend its innovation in a federal court? Will federal
judges become the arbiters of good technology? Will technology firms
be forced to spend more on lawyers than on R&D?
Whatever the lobbyists say about this bill, this is the single most
important fact that we should not forget: It is a lawyer employment
act. It will force technologists into court before they get to enter
the market place. It will shift responsibility for striking the
balance in copyright law from Congress to unelected federal judges.
That's not a bad thing for me, or my kind. I, after all, think the
courts have some role here (in setting the limits of copyright), and
I, after all, make lawyers for a living. But for an already
overregulated Silicon Valley, it is another nail in the coffin by the
regulating-obsessed in Washington.
Intel sees strong demand continuing
Intel sees strong demand continuing
06/03/2004 06:50 PMSan Francisco Chronicle Jun 3 2004 10:10PM GMT
Al Qaeda Plot in U.S. Maybe Continuing
-- Reports (Reuters)
Al Qaeda Plot in U.S. Maybe Continuing
-- Reports (Reuters)
08/04/2004 08:39 PMReuters - New evidence, including recent
contact between an al Qaeda operative and someone in the United
States, suggests a plot to attack U.S. financial targets could
still be in the works, U.S. networks reported on Wednesday,
citing U.S. officials.
Exodus of Coca-Cola executives
continuing
Exodus of Coca-Cola executives
continuing
04/12/2004 06:17 PM"debt consolidation"
"debt consolidation"
05/30/2004 02:58 AMdebt consolidation
debt consolidation
05/30/2004 11:36 PMall-debt-consolidation.org
track this
site | 6 links
Consolidation Changes ERP Landscape
Consolidation Changes ERP Landscape
08/02/2004 06:47 AMThe takeover battle between Oracle and PeopleSoft is only one
indication of a shifting industry that has companies seeking to
provide a complete IT stack.
Dot Consolidation Is Back
Dot Consolidation Is Back
04/19/2004 03:01 AMIn case you hadn't noticed, while the dot com IPO market looks to be
heating up again, the busiest activity is
actually
over in the mergers and acquisitions area where internet companies
are looking for consolidation opportunities before the prices of
smaller companies get too out of hand again. Of course, there's no
guarantee that acquiring companies will do much better than they've
done in the past integrating a bunch of disparate companies into a
single compelling entity, but people tend to ignore that in the heat
of a merger opportunity.
Is Consolidation A Myth?
Is Consolidation A Myth?
12/23/2003 02:45 AMThought provoking piece over at Always-On suggesting that
al
l this fear about consolidation killing off competition is a big
myth. While there are plenty of examples of companies buying up
each other (and even areas where there are fewer companies within a
specific space than before) consumers have more choice than ever
before, leading to better products and lower prices. Sure, it may
seem like there are big media conglomerates, but there are also plenty
of independent websites that give people choice. Sure, there may be
fewer small local banks, but there are plenty more banks that have
expanded from other areas to serve a large population. Basically,
what appears to be happening is that the regional companies are being
eaten up, but there's plenty of competition on a global basis. Of
course, there are still some exceptions (I'm still limited in my
broadband connection choice, for instance), but these might be
temporary monopolies, rather than a permanent state of affairs. I'm
not sure it's completely true, but I do think some fears about
consolidation everywhere are overblown.
Wireless consolidation
Wireless consolidation
04/07/2005 05:52 PMZDNet Apr 7 2005 9:48PM GMT
Consolidation solutions
Consolidation solutions
02/16/2004 10:38 PMComputer Weekly Feb 17 2004 2:16AM GMT
Website: Mujahideen continuing holy
struggle they have pledged to God
Website: Mujahideen continuing holy
struggle they have pledged to God
06/20/2004 04:58 AMReuters.com - Sat Jun 19, 11:59 pm GMT
Texas is a barbaric hellhole, Part 2 in
a continuing series
Texas is a barbaric hellhole, Part 2 in
a continuing series
06/17/2005 03:22 PMJust in case you think I was being a bit intemperate yesterday, it's
even worse than you thought: Chicago Tribune: Old South racism lives
in Texas town: They picked up Billy Ray Johnson outside a convenience
store in this East...
Bill Ingalls: The Right Stuff:
Continuing A NASA Legacy
Bill Ingalls: The Right Stuff:
Continuing A NASA Legacy
04/08/2005 08:13 PM"The first thing I did was purchase a Macintosh." By Nancy Eaton,
Apple
Google to launch free email, continuing
expansion
Google to launch free email, continuing
expansion
04/09/2004 04:01 PM
Leading search engine Google announced
the impending launch of Gmail
, a free email service. Although it is not yet open to the public,
reports indicate that Gmail should offer one gig of
memory for each user, more than popular free email services now
provide. The cost
might be supported by keyword-related ads .
Google is facing
rising competition for the search leader role, as Yahoo has relaunched
its own , and Microsoft
develops a strategy.
Google's
offering for today is both more and less momentous.
EMC debuts e-mail consolidation
EMC debuts e-mail consolidation
09/22/2004 11:47 AMCNET News.com Sep 22 2004 3:28PM GMT
Grok Description matches for Media Consolidation, Continuing
GrokA matches for Media Consolidation, Continuing
Media Consolidation, Continuing