O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
Grok Headline matches for O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
Using PHP 5 SimpleXML
Using PHP 5 SimpleXML
01/17/2004 10:45 PMPosted on O'Reilly Network this article shows how to use SimpleXML to
read an XML file, parse the results into a useful form, and query the
document with XPath ...
Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
01/17/2004 10:45 PM
Unless you've worked with SGML, you may find it ironic that XML
can be hard to parse. Most choices boil down to event-based parsing,
bulky tree-walking, or writing more XML. The upcoming PHP 5 has
another option, SimpleXML, that can take the pain out of simple and
common XML uses. Adam Trachtenberg explains.
SimpleXML + POST
SimpleXML + POST
09/15/2004 07:50 AMNelson Minar: If you're comfortable parsing XML, you're comfortable
parsing doc/lit SOAP. But SOAP also offers the possibility of
automatic
data bindings (no parsing required) and WSDL (service description).
Alas, those technologies still don't work so well in Perl, Python, or
PHP where doc/lit support is weak. It does work pretty well in Java
and
.NET. Automatic data bindings is not as important in dynamically typed
languages. Parsing XML in PHP is pretty easy with things like
SimpleXML. Taken together, this leads to the conclusion that a
toolkit approach may not be required. At the moment, in PHP if you
want
to do an HTTP POST, you need to use functions like fsockopen. A
built-in function that made it easier to do a arbitrary POST would be
useful in its own right.
Zend: An Introduction to SimpleXML
Zend: An Introduction to SimpleXML
04/29/2004 07:56 AMZend has a new tutorial posted this
morning covering one of the more anticipated features of PHP5 -
SimpleXML.
PHP Wiki: An Introduction to SimpleXML
PHP Wiki: An Introduction to SimpleXML
08/20/2004 08:31 AMFor some, starting out with the new
SimpleXML functions can be a
bit of a challenge. It's not quite the same as the "old ways" of
parsing, and might take a little getting used to. Well,
this new article on
the PHP Wiki should help shed some light on the subject.
DevShed: An Introduction to SimpleXML
DevShed: An Introduction to SimpleXML
06/23/2004 07:39 AMDevShed.com has a new article
posted highlighting one of the features in the upcoming PHP 5 release
-
SimpleXML.
SimpleXML Tutorial by Sterling Hughes
SimpleXML Tutorial by Sterling Hughes
04/30/2004 06:14 AMStraight from the horse's mouth. Sterling is one of lead developers of
SimpleXML.
Community News: Some SimpleXML Docs
Community News: Some SimpleXML Docs
02/10/2004 02:51 AMNuCleuZ wrote in to tell us about some
SimpleXML
documentation that has yet to reach the manual.
Fractured Realities: SimpleXML - A
Fool's Hope
Fractured Realities: SimpleXML - A
Fool's Hope
06/09/2004 09:07 AMMost people are looking forward to the release of a PHP version
containing the full SimpleXML extension, but it seems that
Davey Shafik doesn't
quite share that opinion.
O'Reilly Network: O'Reilly Network --
2004 Emerging Technology Conference
Coverage [Jan. 16, 2004]
O'Reilly Network: O'Reilly Network --
2004 Emerging Technology Conference
Coverage [Jan. 16, 2004]
02/11/2004 08:18 AMO'Reilly Network: O'Reilly Network -- 2004 Emerging Technology
Conference Coverage [Jan. 16, 2004] .. the DDTI's own aggregation
page
oreillynet.com/et2004
track this
site | 6 links
MIT vs. Tim O'Reilly
MIT vs. Tim O'Reilly
02/10/2004 02:56 AMThe MIT technology review just published this interesting article on
the 10 Emerging Technologies That Will Change Your World (registration
required). It's a good article to read in preparation for the O'Reilly
Emerging Technologies Conference that I'm going to next week. It is
interesting to contrast Tim O'Reilly's vision with MIT -- O'Reilly is
much more centered around software and the sociology and politics of
software, with a little bit on hardware and biology, while MIT's
article selects technology to highlight from a somewhat broader
field....
The O'Reilly Factor
The O'Reilly Factor
12/19/2004 03:40 PMI'll get back to the history tomorrow (Saturday). For now, though, I
want to tell you about my experience tonight as a guest on the Bill
O'Reilly show. I received a call this afternoon (Friday) from the
producer inviting me to debate O'Reilly on the question: “Is dissent
disloyal?” After the producer and I discussed this issue, O’Reilly
(according to the producer) decided to redefine the question: “Can an
American want the United States to lose the war in Iraq and still be
patriotic?”
Of course, this is a loaded question. It not-so-subtly implies that
those who oppose the war want the United States to lose and, even
worse, want American soldiers to die. One of Joseph McCarthy’s
favorite tactics was to imply that anyone who believed in the social
or economic principles of communism also supported the violent
overthrow of the government. The tactic of guilt-by-inference is
all-too-familiar in American history. (I'll return to McCarthyism in
my next entry.)
In any event, in our “debate” O’Reilly insisted on his “narrow”
framing of the question and, when I called him on the issue, denied
that he intended to imply anything about those who merely oppose the
war. I accepted his framing of the question (it is, after all, his
show) and argued that a patriotic citizen could in principle want the
nation to lose a war if the war is unjust and if losing meant that
fewer American soldiers would die for no good reason. O'Reilly
maintained that losing a war necessarily means that more American
soldiers will die than continuing the war and that no one could
therefore patriotically wants the nation to lose. O’Reilly tossed out
such ugly phrases as “despicable,” “traitor,” and “disloyal” to
describe those who would disagree. The purpose, of course, was to
excite his audience.
After the show, I received dozens of emails, most of which were along
the following lines:
“You ought to be arrested, tried, convicted of wartime treason. And I
don't have to tell you the penalty for that.”
“I hope they are checking you out for being a traitor!!!”
“You are not only despicable, but should go ahead and move out of the
USA.”
“I must imagine, Mr. Stone, that you will look over your shoulder a
little bit, because maybe some soldier in a foxhole somewhere might be
a tad angered with you and your lunacy. There may be a few G.I.s in
Chicago even that would like to ‘speak’ with you.”
“There is the tendency for citizens to take the law into their own
hands in these cases. Decent, ordinary people, not of the left, are
angry enough at the far left to be willing to go along with things you
would consider unconscionable.”
“You're a despicable Piece of feces, A Gutless Traitor. and I strongly
suggest that you get your Terrorist Sympathizing Worthless ass out of
this country while you can still walk and talk.”
And so on. What do you make of all this in light of our on-going
conversation?
maybe o'reilly will shut up
maybe o'reilly will shut up
08/11/2004 02:55 AM
The producer strikes back. After crowing Monday about how he
made mincemeat of NYT columnist Paul Krugman on The Factor, O'Reilly
gets rebutted on Tuesday via quicktime on the blog of
Outfoxed co-producer Jim
Gilliam.
Hacks.O'Reilly.com
Hacks.O'Reilly.com
03/11/2003 09:43 AMThe full-blown version of O'Reilly's Hacks Series site is now up at
hacks.oreilly.com. In
addition to
info about the current crop of books (Linux Server, Google, Mac OS X),
there are
listings of
published hacks,
some
complete hacks, and each has its own discussion forum.
Gotta Hack? Got a non-obvious solution to an interesting problem?
Throw
your hack into the ring and it just might be in a Hacks
book-to-be. Not a hacker yourself but have a hack or Hacks book you'd
like to see?
Suggest
it and perhaps it will be so written.
Five New Books From O'Reilly
Five New Books From O'Reilly
12/10/2003 10:25 AMI Hacked at O'Reilly
I Hacked at O'Reilly
03/19/2003 10:24 PM
The
O'Reilly Hacks site now
has a hacks page for each contributor; mine's
here.
O'Reilly: Why PHP 5 Rocks!
O'Reilly: Why PHP 5 Rocks!
07/16/2004 08:27 AMNew from the
O'Reilly PHP
Development Center is an article about
Why
PHP 5 Rocks!
O'Reilly OS X Conference Day One
O'Reilly OS X Conference Day One
10/29/2003 12:13 AMO'Reilly OS X Conference Day Two
O'Reilly OS X Conference Day Two
10/29/2003 02:21 AMO'Reilly OS X Conference Day Three
O'Reilly OS X Conference Day Three
10/30/2003 12:34 PMO'Reilly Network:
O'Reilly Network:
07/30/2004 02:58 AMO'Reilly has a page up about their new magazine called
Make
make.oreilly.com
track this
site | 6 links
The O'Reilly Radar
The O'Reilly Radar
10/29/2003 12:13 AMO'Reilly Intro
O'Reilly Intro
02/10/2004 02:51 AMChanging the world by spreading the knowledge of innovators. Digital
Democracy is an emerging area of innovation. Wonderful moment to hear
from the pioneers. Joe is the Edison of the Movement (Brit Blaser),
although we are not sure if he...
O'Reilly Radar
O'Reilly Radar
02/10/2004 01:17 PMI've heard this talk a couple of times, so Im just listening for
something new and cool Timisms. One bit of commentary, its great that
wikis are on the O'Reilly Radar, but there is an even better reason
for it...
CC at O'Reilly Etech
CC at O'Reilly Etech
02/10/2004 02:41 AMCreative Commons will be an exhi
bitor at the O'Reilly Emerging
Technology Conference in San Diego next week.
Etech is regarded by many as the best tech conference of the year,
always in step with the latest creations and aspirations of the alpha
geeks, having evolved from
the Peer-to-Peer Conference in early 2001 and P2P & Web Services in
late 2001 to the current multi-tracked annual conference starting two
years ago. (Incidentally, the Creative Commons concept was in
troduced at ETCon 2002. How time flies.)
Matt
Haughey and Mike
Linksvayer will be attending. Stop by the Creative Commons booth,
or better yet our parti
cipant session (time and location yet to be announced). We'll be
introducing a new CC metadata-enhanced application. Hint: it's
described in one of our tech
challenges, heretofore unmet.
If you're in the area but not an attendee, you can still reg
ister for a free exhibits pass, or an exhibits plus keynotes and
birds-of-a-feather (participant sessions) pass for only $50. Hope to
see you there!
Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop.
Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop.
07/24/2004 01:10 PMMr. O'Reilly,
You have declared a "war" on the New York Times. That's good for you,
good for them, and good for our democracy: Strong opinions deserve
strong spokesmen. Your battle will help sharpen a debate about matters
important to the Republic.
But in waging this "war," you are continuing to abuse a man whom you
have wronged, and to whom you owe an apology.
On February 4, 2003, Jeremy Glick was your guest on THE FACTOR. Glick
had lost his father in the attack of 9/11. He had also signed an ad
criticizing the war in Iraq. You were "surprised" that one who had
lost his father could oppose that war. And so you had him on your
show, presumably to ask him why. (Here's a
clip
from
Outfoxed putting this story
together.)
You might not remember precisely what you said on that interview, or
more importantly, what Jeremy Glick said. So here's a
copy that you can watch. Nor may you remember precisely what the ad that
Jeremy Glick signed said. Here's a
copy
that you can read. And when you've watched what was actually said, and
read what was actually written, I'm sure you will see that the
statements you continue to make about Jeremy Glick are just plain
false. Not Bill Clinton "depends upon what is is" false, but false the
way most Americans learned growing up: just not true.
For example:
- in the February 4th interview, you
said the ad "accused the USA itself of terrorism." Read the ad,
Mr. O'Reilly. It says no such thing.
- in the February 4th interview, you said the ad "equates the United
States with the terrorists." Read the ad,
Mr. O'Reilly. It says no such thing.
- in the February 4th interview, you said the ad "absolutely says"
that the United States is to be "equated" with the terrorists. Read
the ad,
Mr. O'Reilly. It says no such thing.
- on February 5th, you told your viewers that "Glick was out of
control." He may have been out of your control. But you and our
government have got to learn that just because someone disagrees with
you, he doesn't become a security threat. Again, watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He was not "out of control."
- on February 5th, you told your viewers that Glick was "spewing
hatred for this program." Watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He criticized you, not the program,
for unethically using sympathy for the 9/11 victims for your own
political ends. He was calling your behavior improper. You had not
earned his hatred.
- on February 5th, you told your viewers that Glick was "spewing
hatred for ... his country." Watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He said no such thing. He specifically
distinguished the people he was criticizing from "the people of
America." He, like the rest of us, loves our country, even if we
disagree with its political leaders, or your political views.
- on February 5th, you accused him of using "vile propaganda." What
does "propaganda" mean to you, Mr. O'Reilly? He was disagreeing with
your views. Why is that "propaganda"?
- six months later, you said that Glick said that the Bushes "were
directly responsible for 9/11." Again, watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He said no such thing. Indeed, he
twice denied it.
- eleven months later, you said Glick "came on this show and accused
President Bush of knowing about 9/11 and murdering his own father."
This, Mr. O'Reilly, is a total, if not pathological, fabrication.
Glick said nothing about Bush "knowing" about 9/11. He said nothing
about Bush "murdering" his own father. Watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. Your statements characterizing what
Glick said are absolutely false.
- just last week, you again repeated the claim that Glick said that President Bush was
"responsible for his father's death." He said nothing of the
sort.
- just last week, you repeated the claim that Glick "implied that the United States
itself was a terrorist nation." Glick said nothing of the sort.
- just last week, you said Glick said "America itself was responsible for the 9/11
attack." Glick said nothing of the sort.
- And finally, and most extraordinarily, just last week you repeated the claim that "security actually had to take the guy
out of the building, he was that out of control." This, Mr. O'Reilly,
you know to be absolutely false. Indeed, it was you who
threatened physical violence against Mr. Glick after his interview,
and your own staff that apologetically begged Mr. Glick to leave as
quickly as he could, fearing that if you saw Glick again, as they
said, you would "end up in jail."
I understand how someone
loses his temper, Mr. O'Reilly. I have done the same myself. But a
decent man apologizes for his lack of control, and he certainly
doesn't continue to abuse someone he has wronged.
Mr. Glick is not the New York Times. He will not earn more money from
higher ratings because you attack him so viciously. Neither he nor his
widowed mother get any benefit at all from seeing Glick slandered by
your on a regular basis.
You are wrong about the facts, Mr. O'Reilly. And you are wrong to
continue to do such harm. Have the courage to admit your error.
Apologize to Mr. Glick, and let him go back to a life that has been
made difficult enough by, as you said, the "barbarians" who killed his
father. This family has suffered enough from barbaric behavior.
O'Reilly and the Cold War
O'Reilly and the Cold War
12/19/2004 03:40 PMThanks for the amazingly thoughtful and interesting comments on the
O'Reilly show. I want to answer one questions about that because
several people raised it: Why would any sensible person agree to be a
guest on that show? Truth be told, I've always in the past declined to
be on the Factor and other shows like it. I agreed this time because
the issue "Is dissent disloyal?" is important, I've thought a lot
about it, and I thought I might be able to contribute something
useful. And I would have, had he not changed the issue! But, since the
main thrust of my guest stint on this blog is learning lessons from
past mistakes, I won't do it again! (The reason, by the way, is not
because it's unpleasant, but because no one should allow himself to be
used by a demagogue.)
Speaking of which, let's return to our history. We left off with the
Japanese internment. As several comments noted, the Supreme Court in
1944 upheld the internment in the case of Korematsu v. United States.
In effect, the Court held that, in wartime, we all have to make
sacrifices, and it couldn't say that the decision to internment these
people was not a rational military decision at the time it was made.
Korematsu has gone down as one of the most profoundly embarrassing
decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, and the nation has in
many ways confessed the unconstitutionality of the internment in the
sixty years since the decision. (As an interesting aside, by the way,
I sumbitted a friend of the Court brief on behalf of Fred Korematsu
--he is still alive and flourishing -- in the Guanatamo Bay, Hamdi,
and Padilla cases in the Supreme Court last spring.)
At the end of World War II, Americans were optimistic. We had the
strongest military in the world, we had just won a "great" war and we
had clearly been on the side of the angels. The world was at peace.
Within a short time, however, everything changed. Although the Soviet
Union had been our ally during the war, relations collapsed beween the
U.S. and the Soviet Union as the need for that alliance disappeared.
Within a stunningly short period of time, the American economy took a
nosedive, there were revelations of Soviet espionage, the Soviet Union
exploded its first atomic bomb, China fell to the Communists,
Americans began to build bomb shelters as they prepared by nuclear
bombs to rain down upon our cities, and the Korean War burst upon the
scene.
Who was to blame? How did the Soviets get the bomb? Why had China
fallen to the Communists? A group of anti-New Deal Republicans and
conservative Southern Democrats had the answer -- it was American
Communists who had sold us out and were working to further the Soviet
cause. Men like Richard Nixon in California and Joseph McCarthy in
Wisconsin began to play the Red Card in order to get elected, and they
did. In the 1946 elections, the Republicans, who now portrayed the
choice as one between Communism and Republicanism, picked up 54 seats
in the House. After being out of power for 16 long years, the
Republicans had found a strategy that could propel them back into
power.
Democrats, who were overwhelmed by the growing anti-Communist
hysteria, jumped on the bandwagon, afraid to resist. Within a few
short years the United States had a new federal loyalty program for
over four million government employees, the House Un-American
Activities Committee investigated thousands of individuals to
determine if they were secret Communists, state and federal
governments adopted their own loyalty programs, investigations,
blacklists, and anti-Communist laws. Tens of thousands of people were
threatened, intimidated, fired, humiliated, and even prosecuted.
Who were these people? Were they spies and sabotuers? No doubt, there
were Soviet agents in the United States. But they were almost never
the target of these actions. They were too well-hidden for that.
Rather, these actions were cynical efforts to make political hay by
taking advantage of, and exacerbating, the fear that was already upon
the land. So, who were these people?
After the Depression, many Americans began to search for answers to
what had happened to the nation. Many toyed with communism. At this
time, the Communist Part of the United States was a lawful political
party that ran candidates for public office throughout the nation. It
stood for such causes as women's rights, the rights of labor, and
public housing; it opposed the rise of fascism in Europe and racism at
home. As many as 250,000 Americans joined the CPUSA in this period.
Moreover, many millions more participated in CPUSA events or joined
other organization that shared some of the goals and programs of the
CPUSA. During World War II, we fought side-by-side with the Soviet
Union, and FDR encouraged Americans to see the Soviets as our allies
and friends.
After the war, though, all this fell apart. And suddenly the most
dangerous question in America was: "Are you now or have you ever been
a member of the Communist Party or a member of any organization that
is or was affiliated with the Commnist Party or have you ever attended
an event sponored by the Communist Party, or signed a Communist Party
petition, or attended a Communist Party rally, or read a Communist
book?" An affirmative answer to any of these questions would
immediately cast doubt on the patriotism and loyalty of the
individual. After all, how do we know you're not still a Commie who is
secretly working to subvert the government of the United States.
This was the heart of McCarthyism.
O'Reilly On What Happened To BountyQuest
O'Reilly On What Happened To BountyQuest
11/10/2003 11:19 PMSlashdot Nov 10 2003 11:36AM ET
Advanced PHP: O'Reilly on References
Advanced PHP: O'Reilly on References
09/13/2002 08:29 AMFree Books from O'Reilly
Free Books from O'Reilly
02/14/2004 11:51 PMwww.oreilly.com -- O'Reilly Open Books
Project: Did you know O'Rielly publishes some free books? Man, I
love free books.
Over the years, O'Reilly & Associates has published a
number of "Open Books" — books with various forms of "open"
copyright. The reasons for "opening" copyright, as well as the
specific license agreements under which they are opened, are as varied
as our authors.
There are a couple dozen, from gems like Using
Samba to curiosities like Programming the
Be Operating System and Embedding Perl in HTML with
Mason.
Click here to comment on this entry
O'Reilly: Simplify with PHP DataObjects
O'Reilly: Simplify with PHP DataObjects
08/06/2004 07:46 AMEver looked at your code and wondered if there was an easier way to
perform the basic SQL tasks (insert, update, delete, select) without
having to rewrite the SQL each time? Well,
thi
s new article from the O'Reilly Network aims to help you with just
that.
O'Reilly: What Developers Want (A Top 10
List)
O'Reilly: What Developers Want (A Top 10
List)
06/24/2005 03:03 PMIn
a new article on OnLamp.com (from O'Reilly) today, there's a bit
of talk on
what developers really want when it comes to how they do their
work.
Irrespective of the language programmers choose for expressing
solutions, their wants and needs are similar. They need to be
productive and efficient, with technologies that do not get in the way
but rather help them produce high-quality software. In this article,
we share our top ten list of programmers' common wants and needs.
Among those on the list are: "Ease of Use and Short Learning Curves", "Seamless
Migration and Transparent Upgrades", "Comprehensive Functional
Modules", "Performance-Optimized Blueprints", and one that's gaining
more and more momentum - "Open Standards Compliance".
What kinds of things do you look for in your development environment
as you do your work? Is there a set of scripts that you just couldn't
live without?
"Those Who Trespass" by Bill O'Reilly
"Those Who Trespass" by Bill O'Reilly
02/17/2004 06:29 AMIn the Fox News celeb's resurrected 1998 novel -- yes, the one with
the bad sex writing -- a TV news personality addicted to fame becomes
a serial killer. Plus: To hook chicks, be a tough guy and a little boy
at the same time!
O'Reilly Wishes On a Star
O'Reilly Wishes On a Star
01/02/2004 11:03 PMMy Wired News
Wishes for 2004: Some great idea here. Tim for President.
I wish that the various web services data vendors
(including Amazon, Google, EBay, Salesforce.com, and many others)
would realize that they comprise the building blocks of a future
"internet operating system", and act accordingly, engaging with each
other to interoperate.
Click here to comment on this entry
Tim O'Reilly on Alpha Geeks
Tim O'Reilly on Alpha Geeks
09/04/2004 07:19 PM
Mark Frauenfelder:
MP3 audio transcript of a interview with Tim O'Reilly talking about
Alpha Geeks, who make things that aren't available, and as a result,
make them available to everybody.
So often, signs of the future are all around us, but it
isn't until much later that most of the world realizes their
significance. Meanwhile, the innovators who are busy inventing that
future live in a world of their own. They see and act on premises that
are not yet apparent to others.
In the computer industry, these are the folks I affectionately call
"the alpha geeks", the hackers who have such mastery of their tools
that they "roll their own" when existing products don't give them what
they need.
Link
O'Reilly: A Crash Course in MySQL (and
SQL)
O'Reilly: A Crash Course in MySQL (and
SQL)
12/24/2003 07:05 PMThe
O'Reilly Network has
posted the latest piece from John Coggeshall -
MySQL Crash Course.
O'Reilly Network: WURFLing Your Way to
WAP
O'Reilly Network: WURFLing Your Way to
WAP
04/15/2004 07:46 AMGiven that more and more people are connecting to sites with their
moblie devices (phones, PDAs, Blackberries, etc), more and more sites
are creating WAP-friendly versions of their own pages. Well, there's a
project that's talked about
over on
the O'Reilly Network that helps that effort in leaps and bounds.
Krugman vs. O'Reilly -- my clips
Krugman vs. O'Reilly -- my clips
08/12/2004 04:21 AMmore of O'Reilly being a blustering asshole .. The producer strikes
back .. Jim
Gilliam
jimgilliam.com/2004/08/krugman_vs_oreilly_my_clips.php
track
this site | 4 links
O'Reilly: PHP Web Services Without SOAP
O'Reilly: PHP Web Services Without SOAP
10/31/2003 09:26 AMWeb services have to be one of the most underused parts of web
development, especially in the corporate world. I can't say I've
really heard of an instance where a (non-internet) company was using
them for much of anything. Well, if you've been hesitant to leap into
this powerful tool because you had to learn your way around SOAP, then
thi
s new article might just interest you.
Grok Description matches for O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
GrokA matches for O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
Zend: Using ext/mysqli (Part 2) -
Extending mysqli
Zend: Using ext/mysqli (Part 2) -
Extending mysqli
05/31/2004 09:59 AMZend has a new article posted today
as a follow up to their previous "Using ext/mysqli" piece -
Using
ext/mysqli: Part II - Extending mysqli
SQL Script: Retrieve All Machines Unique
Identifiers
SQL Script: Retrieve All Machines Unique
Identifiers
08/12/2004 01:36 PMEmbed HTML in XML & Retrieve it with XSL
Embed HTML in XML & Retrieve it with XSL
06/04/2002 08:01 AMUse GUI Scripting to script the Repair
Permissions function
Use GUI Scripting to script the Repair
Permissions function
03/21/2003 10:17 AMA while ago I posted a request for help to the OS X Applescript
discussion area regarding GUI scripting the Repair Permissions option
in Disk Utility. No responses though, and so I struggled on.
Recently, lots of people hav...
Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
07/18/2002 08:24 AMvnunet.com Jul 18 2002 6:56AM ET
SMS Installer Walkthrough: Edit INI File
Script Action
SMS Installer Walkthrough: Edit INI File
Script Action
04/09/2004 04:08 PMA shell script to edit text files as
root in the GUI
A shell script to edit text files as
root in the GUI
08/31/2004 09:45 AMI often need to edit special (i.e. system-owned) files, and until
recently, the best method I could come up with was to find the file,
give myself Read/Write access, edit it, then restore the previous
rights. This becomes a l...
SMS Installer Walkthrough: Edit
System.ini Script Action
SMS Installer Walkthrough: Edit
System.ini Script Action
02/17/2004 06:32 PMBuilding PHP Applications With
Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
Building PHP Applications With
Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
12/18/2002 02:10 PMLooking for a RAD tool to help you quickly and efficiently
develop PHP-based Web applications? Or just new to PHP and MySQL in
general? You might want to spend some time with Dreamweaver MX,
Macromedia's latest revision of their venerable HTML editor, which
comes
with some nifty new ideas designed to minimize hand-coding of PHP
scripts.
DevShed: Making it with Macromedia
(Dreamweaver)
DevShed: Making it with Macromedia
(Dreamweaver)
12/19/2002 02:33 PMMacromedia Offers Dreamweaver Lite
Macromedia Offers Dreamweaver Lite
11/12/2002 12:28 AMExtreme Tech Nov 11 2002 11:19PM ET
Inspector Gadget: Macromedia Dreamweaver
MX
Inspector Gadget: Macromedia Dreamweaver
MX
02/05/2003 10:17 AMElectronic Telegraph Feb 5 2003 9:00AM ET
Macromedia releases details of
Dreamweaver bug
Macromedia releases details of
Dreamweaver bug
04/11/2004 10:21 PMSydney Morning Herald Apr 12 2004 1:16AM GMT
HTML Quick Edit Bar v1.3
HTML Quick Edit Bar v1.3
03/22/2005 04:42 PMLockergnome Mar 20 2005 3:21PM GMT
HTML-Template-Filter-Dreamweaver-1.01
HTML-Template-Filter-Dreamweaver-1.01
12/09/2003 06:06 PMMake Macromedia Dreamweaver MX work with
FileVault
Make Macromedia Dreamweaver MX work with
FileVault
01/03/2005 11:55 AMDreamweaver MX has some incompatibilities with FileVault. Most
notably, the Spell Checker will emit an unknown error accessing the
dictionary. It turns out the solution is simple. Just drag an alias
of ~/Library/Application...
'Intermediate Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
2004' released
'Intermediate Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
2004' released
04/19/2004 06:55 AMLynda.com has announced the release of "Intermediate Macromedia
Dreamweaver MX 2004," a 7.75-hour a movie-based tutorial for
Dreamweaver users looking to take their skills to the next level...
'Learning Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
2004' released
'Learning Macromedia Dreamweaver MX
2004' released
01/19/2004 09:35 AMLynda.com today announced the release of "Learning Macromedia
Dreamweaver MX 2004" with Garo Green...
Update: Taco HTML Edit 1.6
Update: Taco HTML Edit 1.6
05/19/2004 10:23 AMThe free HTML authoring software adds support for PHP, including
syntax checking and coloring for PHP, preview and live preview of
executed PHP code, and syntax checking of HTML from executed PHP code,
among other changes.
Adobe Systems to Buy Macromedia, Maker
of Dreamweaver, for $3.4 Billion
Adobe Systems to Buy Macromedia, Maker
of Dreamweaver, for $3.4 Billion
04/18/2005 04:50 AMBloomberg Apr 18 2005 7:18AM GMT
O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML
