What's wrong with binary logic?
Grok Headline matches for What's wrong with binary logic?
Hey now, you're rock star! Apple
releases Logic Pro 6 and Logic Express 6
Hey now, you're rock star! Apple
releases Logic Pro 6 and Logic Express 6
01/16/2004 10:58 AMApple announced
Logic Pro 6 for professional in pro audio while
providing
Logic Express 6 for amateurs.
Like Pixels? Check out
MacDesignNews: Apple takes pre-orders for Logic,
Logic Express 7.1
News: Apple takes pre-orders for Logic,
Logic Express 7.1
04/06/2005 03:15 PMApple is now taking pre-orders for the next major update to the
companies professional grade music applications, Logic and Logic
Express. The update, which brings both applications to version 7.1,
will ship on DVD and will cost US$19.95.
Apple takes pre-orders for Logic, Logic
Express 7.1 (MacCentral)
Apple takes pre-orders for Logic, Logic
Express 7.1 (MacCentral)
04/06/2005 03:47 PMMacCentral - Apple is now taking pre-orders for the next major update
to the company's professional grade music applications, Logic and
Logic Express. The update, which brings both applications to version
7.1, will ship on DVD and will cost US$19.95.
NAMM: Apple introduces Logic Pro 6,
Logic Express 6
NAMM: Apple introduces Logic Pro 6,
Logic Express 6
01/16/2004 10:58 AMAt this week's NAMM show in Anaheim, Calif., Apple announced that it's
streamlining its pro audio production software line with Logic Pro 6.
It's also introducing Logic Express 6, aimed at students and
educators. To find out more about this and a related announcement
about new technology coming to new versions of Logic Pro, MacCentral
spoke with Apple's vice president of Applications Marketing Rob
Schoeben and senior director of pro applications, product marketing,
Richard Kerris.
Apple offers Logic, Logic Express 7.1
pre-order
Apple offers Logic, Logic Express 7.1
pre-order
04/06/2005 03:51 PMApple is now taking pre-orders for Logic 7.1 and Logic Express 7.1,
the next versions of the company's powerful music creation
applications...
Apple Launches Logic Pro 6, Logic Pro
Express
Apple Launches Logic Pro 6, Logic Pro
Express
01/16/2004 11:04 AMLogic Pro 6 consolidates 12 pre-existing, groundbreaking products into
one comprehensive package. (MacNN via MyAppleMenu)
Logic Pro 7, Logic Express 7, and Jam
Packs Released
Logic Pro 7, Logic Express 7, and Jam
Packs Released
10/07/2004 04:11 PMApple announces Logic Pro 6, Logic
Express 6
Apple announces Logic Pro 6, Logic
Express 6
01/16/2004 11:33 AMApple today announced Logic Pro 6 for professional musicians and Logic
Express 6 for students and educators...
Apple Announces Logic Pro 6, Logic
Express
Apple Announces Logic Pro 6, Logic
Express
01/16/2004 11:03 AM"The wrong war in the wrong place at the
wrong time"
"The wrong war in the wrong place at the
wrong time"
09/06/2004 12:55 PMIt's about freaking time Kerry said this! Resolved: Howard Dean didn't
have enough influence on the Democratic candidate's campaign. Oh,,
and, yes, Kerry's statement is consistent with his vote to authorize
the war....
Shark Tank: Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
Shark Tank: Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
05/08/2004 01:18 PMCounty office moves from dumb terminals to networked PCs so swiftly
that there are lots of misadjusted monitors and keyboards with cables
that don't reach. So why shouldn't employees fix things themselves?
Logic Pro 6, Logic Express and
Soundtrack 1.2
Logic Pro 6, Logic Express and
Soundtrack 1.2
01/16/2004 01:05 PM
Apple announced updates to their audio applications today:
Logic Pro 6 - Logic Pro 6 consolidates 12 pre-existing, groundbreaking
products into one...
Logic Pro 6, Logic Express 6 Announced
Logic Pro 6, Logic Express 6 Announced
01/16/2004 11:33 AMApple has announced
Logic Pro 6 for professionals and
Logic Express 6 for students and educators. Logic
Pro combines 12 separate audio tools into one comprehensive package
for audio professionals. Logic Express provides a more basic set of
tools and capabilities.
Logic Pro 6 will retail for $999, while Logic Express 6 will retail
for $299. Both packages will be available in March.
"Kerry on Iraq: 'Wrong War, Wrong Place,
Wrong Time'"
"Kerry on Iraq: 'Wrong War, Wrong Place,
Wrong Time'"
09/07/2004 02:02 PMWrong question, wrong answer
Wrong question, wrong answer
08/10/2004 06:05 PMBinary Boy v1.94
Binary Boy v1.94
05/17/2004 03:15 PMDownload files from multiple news servers or from other users.
Subject cache speeds up searches and preserves bandwidth. NZB support.
Browse manually or schedule a search to collect files while you sleep.
Hyper-Threading compatible. Search using single words, wildcards or
AND, OR and NOT logic. Apply custom search rules to each newsgroup.
Decode damaged or incomplete mpg movies for previewing. yEnc, MIME,
QP-Lite, etc. [Shareware $29.95 30 Days 768 KB]
Binary XML
Binary XML
10/28/2003 11:07 PMMig
uel comments on the "Binary XML" postings from Omri and Dare,
pointing out that only two standards would probably be needed (one for
size, one for speed) to cover the majority of scenarios. I think
this is correct, but in my opinion it's not the number of encodings
that is a problem, but simply the existence of any "standard"
encoding beyond XML 1.0.
If you can remember just five short years ago, it was
once a major decision for IT developers to choose what encoding
to persist and send their data:
- Should it be fixed-width or delimited?
- Should it be delimited with tabs or commas? What about
quotes?
- Should it be binary or text? ASN.1? DXF? IGES?
Every system used a different encoding technique, and every time
you wanted to interop you had to write a parser. Most of
us have written at least a few parsers for formats like
IGES, W3C Log File, and so on. How much money was wasted by
people writing parsers?
Now fast-forward to 2003. When a system developer thinks
about persisting and sharing data, she automatically thinks
"XML". In 90% of cases, XML is the obvious choice and no debate
occurs. Do you think that this happens because XML is a superior
format based on size, speed, or any othe technical criteria compared
to the options available in 1998? Of course not! XML is
the obvious choice because programmers are lazy, many parsers are
freely available, and it's "good enough" for most uses. The fact
that XML is ubiquitous leads to plenty of parsing options being
available, and more parsing options and tools leads to greater
ubiquity. Developers can use XML in most cases and be confident
that everyone else in the world will be able to parse out their data
with trivial effort. Developers can argue about data schemas now
instead of wasting time bickering about parser code and
syntaxes. This is a huge contribution!
The thing that many people fail to understand, though, is that none
of this virtuous cycle could exist if XML parsers were not
trustworthy. XML depends on the fact that well-formed XML can be
processed by any parser, and non-wellformed XML can be processed by
none. People deploy XML because they know it will "just work" no
matter which parser is being used. People deploy XML because
they know it will work no matter whether it is IBM or Microsoft in
favor that week. Nothing about XML matters more than this
promise matters.
So, consider what happens when we introduce some new encodings
which are not wellformed XML 1.0, but we call them "XML" anyway.
When Jane in the IT department configures her EDI software to send an
"XML" file to a partner, and the partner's machine rejects it, who is
to blame? Jane will claim that "my vendor says that XML
1.0bin is a W3C spec, so your vendor is non-standard", while the
partner will claim "my vendor accepts XML 1.0 so your
vendor is non-standard". In fact, it is quite likely
that vendors with multiple XML-enabled products would end up in
situations where their own products failed to communicate with one
another. Note that this danger exists with any
variations from XML 1.0, and not just "binary XML".
Reasonable people might argue that this is OK, and that IT pros
will simply have to learn to distinguish between the four different
incompatible types of XML (XML 1.0, XML 1.1, XMLfast, XMLsmall) and
will have to manage the compatibility mismatches between all of their
systems. But that starts to look a lot like 1998 to me.
Developers will bicker about which XML to use, and will have
to switch parsers based on the choice of data format. Systems
will have to offer and consume multiple formats and negotiate formats
between one another. I have a good memory, and I remember how
badly things used to suck. Having a solid, reliable "obvious
choice" like XML 1.0 means freedom from pain for millions of
developers. Let's please don't mess with that too hastily.
Binary Search
Binary Search
02/21/2003 01:09 AMProgrammers can be so damned stupid sometimes. Take me for example.
I've been working to optimize and adjust some code at work. I can't
tell you what it does but I can tell you that it's too slow and
uses...
Parse-Binary-0.02
Parse-Binary-0.02
02/13/2004 06:37 PMParse-Binary-0.01
Parse-Binary-0.01
02/13/2004 06:37 PMConvert-Binary-C-0.54
Convert-Binary-C-0.54
07/01/2004 05:43 AMParse-Binary-0.03
Parse-Binary-0.03
02/14/2004 06:32 PMBinary DB insertion using PHP
Binary DB insertion using PHP
10/02/2002 01:58 PMConvert-Binary-C-0.53
Convert-Binary-C-0.53
05/25/2004 05:55 PMConvert-Binary-C-0.52
Convert-Binary-C-0.52
05/25/2004 12:39 AMParse-Binary-0.04
Parse-Binary-0.04
02/15/2004 11:45 PMParse-Binary-0.05
Parse-Binary-0.05
02/16/2004 06:41 PMParse-Binary-0.06
Parse-Binary-0.06
02/17/2004 06:25 PMTree-Binary-0.01
Tree-Binary-0.01
08/12/2004 06:18 AMSendDiff 1.0 (Binary)
SendDiff 1.0 (Binary)
08/18/2004 01:12 AMA script that provides notification about any change in a CVS
repository.
Binary Vortex v2.8
Binary Vortex v2.8
04/25/2004 07:17 PMBinaryVortex pulls down pictures from Usenet Newsgroups. It is fast,
efficient, reliable and easy to use. You can be up and running with
BinaryVortex after typing in only a few simple setup options.
[Shareware $19.95 30 days 779 KB]
binary-clock 0.5
binary-clock 0.5
09/08/2004 12:30 PMA console-based binary clock.
SendDiff 1.3 (Binary)
SendDiff 1.3 (Binary)
09/08/2004 10:59 AMA script that provides notification about any change in a CVS
repository.
Parse-Binary-0.08
Parse-Binary-0.08
09/08/2004 10:35 AMConvert-Binary-C-0.56
Convert-Binary-C-0.56
09/19/2004 05:41 AMBinary Converter
Binary Converter
01/05/2004 01:28 PMPardon my dust...
SendDiff 1.2 (Binary)
SendDiff 1.2 (Binary)
09/01/2004 09:55 AMA script that provides notification about any change in a CVS
repository.
Convert-Binary-C-0.48
Convert-Binary-C-0.48
11/02/2003 10:51 PMTree-Binary-0.04
Tree-Binary-0.04
08/31/2004 05:19 PMGrok Description matches for What's wrong with binary logic?
GrokA matches for What's wrong with binary logic?
What's wrong with binary logic?
