XFN - XHTML Friends Network

Grok Headline matches for XFN - XHTML Friends Network

Social Network Sites Are Making Friends
With Venture Funds

Social Network Sites Are Making Friends
With Venture Funds 11/18/2003 03:34 AM
Investors Business Daily Nov 18 2003 3:02AM ET

W3C HTML Working Group Publishes Updated
XHTML 2.0 Draft and XHTML FAQ

W3C HTML Working Group Publishes Updated
XHTML 2.0 Draft and XHTML FAQ 07/24/2004 02:24 PM
XMLMania.com Jul 24 2004 6:40PM GMT

Friends, Friends With Benefits and the
Benefits of the Local Mall

Friends, Friends With Benefits and the
Benefits of the Local Mall 05/29/2004 10:54 PM
Whatever happened to teen romance? Life inside the under-age sexual revolution.

SEO and XHTML/CSS

SEO and XHTML/CSS 03/22/2005 09:41 PM

XHTML 2.0

XHTML 2.0 07/23/2004 04:38 PM
W3C publishes the sixth draft of XHTML 2.0

w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722
track this site | 3 links

XHTML 1.1

XHTML 1.1 12/03/2002 11:46 AM

XHTML 1.0 Strict isn't that much different from XHTML 1.0, except for a few little things. So I figured I'd just upgrade to XHTML 1.1 as long as I was on a roll fixing my site. Plus, it didn't take me long at all.

The one thing that bothers me though is the removal of the name attribute in the a element, and the way that the replacement id attribute works. For a name attribute you could have called it anything. For an id attribute, it can't start with a number. What happens if I want my anchors to use the title of my entries instead of the padded entry id? Say for example I want my anchor to be like this <h3 id="2.4Ghz Router">2.4Ghz Router</h3>. Well too bad, I can't do it. I don't use anchors on this site, because I don't really need them, I have individual archives. But come on, we need a workaround to this problem, albeit a very small one. (For you that don't know what an anchor does, it allows you to link to a specific section on a page using a # after the page name, for example http://noeljackson.com/archives/2002/October/index.php#rssical_070.)

What's (really) new in XHTML

What's (really) new in XHTML 01/14/2003 09:37 PM
XHTML 2.0 has been a topic of much discussion lately, including two recent Working Drafts. This article collects the recent changes in one convenient place.

Will XHTML Ever Come of Age?

Will XHTML Ever Come of Age? 09/05/2002 01:17 AM
Dead protocol walking or the future?

"XHTML"

"XHTML" 02/19/2004 03:22 PM

Why You Should Use XHTML

Why You Should Use XHTML 07/23/2004 02:55 PM
Slashdot Jul 23 2004 6:52PM GMT

More on XHTML

More on XHTML 01/07/2004 06:48 PM
Following yesterday's post about XHTML validation and the script tag (which I assumed to be a browser problem, not a code problem) I got an email from megnut reader Maurice saying,

Script element should always have an end tag and really can't be considered a singular or "empty" type tag like, say, the Image tag or something. I guess it must be a minor glitch in the validator or something.

Since that didn't sound right to me, I decided to go to the source: XHTML 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language, Section 4.3: For non-empty elements, end tags are required. It says,

4.3. In SGML-based HTML 4 certain elements were permitted to omit the end tag; with the elements that followed implying closure. XML does not allow end tags to be omitted. All elements other than those declared in the DTD as EMPTY must have an end tag. Elements that are declared in the DTD as EMPTY can have an end tag or can use empty element shorthand

So I examine the DT D and see that <script> does not contain EMPTY, which would support Maurice's assertions that the code was in fact, not valid, and there was a glitch in the validator. But then I looked at the definition for <p> and it doesn't contain EMPTY either. But you can use <p /> instead of <p></p>. Or at least, I thought you could. Plus it seems weird since a <script> in reality can be empty, like in my example when it's linked to an external file. So why's the DTD saying it can't be? Anyone actually understand what's going on here?

XHTML Validator to RSS

XHTML Validator to RSS 09/19/2004 03:22 PM

Ben Hammersley built a tool which creates an RSS feed from the W3C's XHTML validation results. Nice work, Ben!

The road to XHTML 2.0

The road to XHTML 2.0 03/19/2003 10:27 PM
I'm positioning myself to be "Mr. XHTML 2.0". Because, you know, what the world really needs is more irony. (83 words)

Implementing XHTML 2.0

Implementing XHTML 2.0 07/27/2004 08:02 PM
Well, I slept off most of my desire to blog about XHTML 2.0, but here's a post anyway. The thing is, I don't think implementing elements using behaviors is really a good idea, although I feel bad saying it while the W3C is linking to my test implementation. ?

Why Switch to XHTML?

Why Switch to XHTML? 06/10/2004 06:11 AM
For Web developers, the learning process never seems to end, especially with coding. As the web evolves, so do the standards, which are moving from HTML to XHTML. Learn why you should consider migrating to this new standard sooner than later. By Lee Underwood. 0610

"XHTML Validator to RSS"

"XHTML Validator to RSS" 07/04/2004 03:35 PM

Much of XHTML 2.0 works already

Much of XHTML 2.0 works already 07/23/2004 07:55 PM
A few days ago the W3C released the HTML and XHTML FAQ. I skimmed over it and saw no interesting things. So that was that. Just now I saw a dramatic increase of visitors to this site. I was a bit surprised because there hasn't been any news on my site lately, and I had seen no new interesting referrers. ?

URLs vs. XHTML

URLs vs. XHTML 03/11/2003 02:00 PM
After linking a few items on Amazon.com, my XHTML has been broken for who–knows–how–long. It popped up as I redesigned,...

"Valid XHTML "

"Valid XHTML " 02/17/2004 08:53 AM

A Question About XHTML

A Question About XHTML 03/12/2003 10:14 PM
Alex Jones asked me to pass along a question to webgraphics readers: In an upcoming redesign should I use XHTML...

XHTML 2.0 surfaces

XHTML 2.0 surfaces 08/12/2002 10:48 AM
The W3C has released Working Drafts of XHTML 2.0 and XFrames, as well as a second edition of the XHTML 1.0 Recommendation.

Beginning XHTML

Beginning XHTML 05/24/2002 11:27 AM

XHTML Overview

XHTML Overview 05/23/2002 10:39 PM

W3C Reformulates XHTML 1.0

W3C Reformulates XHTML 1.0 08/05/2002 10:43 PM
The World Wide Web Consortium tweaks XHTML 1.0, which was first recommended in January 2000.

XHTML 2.0 Summary

XHTML 2.0 Summary 08/08/2002 07:54 AM
The W3C have kindly released a working draft of the XHTML version 2.0 specification. As has been speculated in discussions here, frames have been dropped in favour of XFrames (an XML implementation of HTML Framesets) for which a working draft specification was published yesterday. Quite a few other things have changed and a lot of dead wood has been cleared. XHTML 2.0 is NOT intended to be backwards-compatible. -- Mike Golding

"zeldman.jg"

pentacle - XHTML CMS

pentacle - XHTML CMS 06/14/2004 02:51 PM
Started!

XHTML and the script tag

XHTML and the script tag 01/07/2004 06:49 PM
So for some odd reason, my alpha Kinja design that was visible in IE, Camino, Firebird, and Safari on IE and Mac suddenly stopped rendering on IE/Mac, IE/Windows, and Safari/Mac (didn't test the others, was too busy freaking out). I tried everything I could think of, validated the code (clean XHMTL 1.0 Strict), validated the CSS, had some friends take a look, and nothing. "View source" showed code, but nothing appeared on screen. Finally, after commenting out code line by line, I nailed it. In my header, I had:

<script src="/functions.js" type="text/javascript" />

While the validator liked this, and Camino had no problem, the other browers barfed big time and treated it as an unclosed tag, rendering nothing more. A quick change to:

<script src="/functions.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

and all is right with the world again. I write this because I'm sure I'll have this problem again, and then Google will help me (hi idiot Meg from the future making the same mistakes again!) In the meantime, it may help you.

Behind the Scenes with XHTML

Behind the Scenes with XHTML 07/30/2004 10:07 AM
In a previous article, we touched on the requirements for proper XHTML coding, especially in relation to HTML 4.01. Today, we look at what some of those requirements are in relation to the head portion of the Web page. By Lee Underwood. 0730

XHTML Services?

XHTML Services? 01/01/2004 04:33 AM

Jon Udell waxes nostalgic about the good old days of screen scraping HTML in order to build the first generation of Web services. That’s great and I’ve built my share of screen scraping applications as well. But then Udell goes on to propose that companies should abandon modern Web services technologies in favor of screen scrapes helped along by well-formed XHTML.

Udell’s reasoning is that Web services through SOAP is too complicated. "But if I’d had to register for an API key and locate WSDL documentation for each of the three services whose results I compared, I probably wouldn’t have bothered," he says. His entire argument is based on his experiences with the Google API and their specific SOAP implementation.

Google requires that anyone using their API register for and use an API key—an identifying token that lets Google track the usage of their API down to a specific user or application. Google requires it, but the SOAP protocol does not. Most SOAP services don’t have any sort of key and if you were building a tool for an intranet, you probably wouldn’t need or want such a scheme. Not only does Udell miss that point, but he also forgets that SOAP isn’t the only Web services technology.

Udell says that a primary threat to your intranet is disuse. If people find it too difficult to create and use information on the intranet, they won’t bother. That’s true; if you create onerous processes that content creators must follow, they’ll find ways around them, publishing their information in ways that you don’t expect. But Udell’s assertion that building data access through Web services will make it too difficult for people to use your data is preposterous. Screen scraping is more difficult and more apt to fail than using stable, published APIs. And with REST, the APIs are just as easy to access as any other Web document.

As an example, let’s use product data for my new camera. What’s easier—scraping product data from Amazon’s Web page or getting it in XML format from their REST interface? For each method I have a unique URL that I request to get the data. There aren’t any complicated steps to follow for either system. But the HTML version, even if it were well-formed XHTML, would be significantly harder to retrieve meaningful data from. And changes to the display of the information would often mean changes to the structure of the HTML, necessitating further changes to my screen scraping application. Amazon does require a developer’s token (an API key, essentially), but again, that’s only so they can control usage. There’s no reason at at all that a REST system like this couldn’t be built without it.

But doesn’t creating a REST interface mean more work for the content producers? Probably not. Presumably your corporate intranet is using some sort of content management system. Otherwise there’d be no way to enforce this XHTML-only rule. Furthermore, that content management system probably stores the content in a database somewhere separate from the presentation of said content. All you need to do is build one REST interface that retrieves the required content from that database and presents it as a pre-determined XML document instead of an HTML document. The content producers could go along creating content as they always have, blissfully unaware that they are also populating a Web service.

Udell’s XHTML scraping suggestion has significant risks as well. Remember that making the process of content creation difficult will ensure that people find other ways to create content—ways that you don’t control. But in advocating screen scraping, Udell says, "it’s true that creating XHTML pages requires more discipline than hacking out HTML, and it may incur some retraining costs." Not only are you going to make it difficult for people to build systems that automatically consume information, but you also propose making it more difficult to create it?

People will flock to things that are easy. RSS took off because it was easy to create and easy to consume. Sure, it would be possible to create screen scraping applications that would take any well-formed XHTML content source and pull that content into a newsreader. But it’s much easier for everyone concerned to create a simple, easy-to-understand format that contains all of the information in logical chunks and just run with it.

XHTML negotiation module 0.94

XHTML negotiation module 0.94 04/11/2004 03:01 AM
An Apache module that performs content-negotiation for XHTML content.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict 12/03/2002 11:46 AM

This site is XHTML 1.0 Strict valid. Dang am I happy about that. It took some time getting rid of my old align="center" and <b> tag games, but it sure is worth it.

Using XPath to mine XHTML

Using XPath to mine XHTML 10/28/2003 11:06 PM
Simon Willison: This morning, I finally decided to install libxml2 and see what all the fuss was about, in particular with respect to XPath. What followed is best described as an enlightening experience.

application/xhtml+xml dilemma

application/xhtml+xml dilemma 12/07/2002 03:37 PM
I decided that I wanted to serve this site in the type "application/xhtml+xml", if the user's browser supports it. I figured out simply how to do this with PHP, and everyone was happy. if ( strpos ( $_SERVER[ "HTTP_ACCEPT" ] , "application/xhtml+xml" ) ) { header ( "Content-type: application/xhtml+xml" ); } Or so I thought. It seems that when I use this code, all of my wonderful DOM compliant Javascript that brings you recent RSS feeds stops working. I can't figure out a concrete reason why, but I can only assume that when a page is interpreted with this content-type, it no longer is treated as a regular web document, but as strict XML. If anyone can shed some light on the situation, please e-mail me.

W3C reformulates XHTML 1.0
(internetnews.com)

W3C reformulates XHTML 1.0
(internetnews.com) 08/05/2002 10:43 PM

New Tool: w3c xhtml validator to RSS

New Tool: w3c xhtml validator to RSS 07/02/2004 09:55 AM
Here's a new tool for you. Like XHTML? Dig Validation? Building lots of pages and need to check for errors? You might rather love my W3C XHTML Validator to RSS widget. Well, I'm finding it useful anyway. Go on! Have...

XSLT for XHTML to Atom

XSLT for XHTML to Atom 02/17/2004 08:42 AM
if you know what all the acronyms mean, then you probably know i think this is cool as shit

XHTML 1.0 Second Edition Is a W3C
Recommendation

XHTML 1.0 Second Edition Is a W3C
Recommendation 08/05/2002 10:43 PM
1 August 2002: The World Wide Web Consortium today released XHTML 1.0: The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) as a W3C Recommendation. XHTML 1.0 is a reformulation of HTML in XML, giving the rigor of XML to Web pages. The second edition is not a new version; it brings the XHTML 1.0 Recommendation up to date with comments from the community, ongoing work within the HTML Working Group, and the first edition errata. Read more on the HTML home page. (News archive)

XHTML For Syndication Sucks

XHTML For Syndication Sucks 12/03/2002 11:46 AM

I've been reading a lot lately about using XHTML instead of RSS for syndication of a web site in a news aggregator. The statement is this:

All that would be needed is standardization of names and classes for page elements like DIVs and headers. A post/entry title would always be an H3, with a class set to "title", for example. Permanent links would always be P tags with their classes set to "permalink". Simple.

To me, this is not only a terrible idea, but a lazy idea. (But, then again, I could be speaking hastily.) How hard is it to create an RSS file? How hard is it to setup MT? Why would I want to give up the right to name my .title class .blogtitle or .articletitle? I like RSS, it works well, and is automatically generated for me, as well as for everybody who has a use for it.

So I guess the whole point of using XHTML for syndication is to get away from having to type in http://noeljackson.com/index.xml instead of just pointing your aggregator to the base URL (http://noeljackson.com). But wait a sec isn't that what the <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" href="http://www.noeljackson.com/index.xml" /> tag is for?

The only plus is not having to maintain multiple files. But the same problem occurs, you have to mark-up your XHTML according to someone elses specs, just like with RSS. Except with RSS you can separate your content from your design, which makes RSS syndication faster than XHTML and to me it seems like a "cleaner" idea. I don't know about you, but I definitely don't want to see XHTML become the next syndication form. Don't hate me for saying that, but I just think there are better ways to do it. Having pure XML and an XSLT stylsheet for XHTML and RSS seems like the best way to do it to me. I just wish XSLT stylesheets could be easier to implement on the client side. Oh bother, I sure hope RSS sticks around.

CSS+XHTML: Adiós a las tablas

CSS+XHTML: Adiós a las tablas 10/30/2003 11:57 PM

Grok Description matches for XFN - XHTML Friends Network
GrokA matches for XFN - XHTML Friends Network

AlstraSoft E-Friends

AlstraSoft E-Friends 03/06/2004 01:49 AM
Start You Own Social Networking Company: For $280!.

Start Your Own Social Networking Company: For $280!

Why are the venture capitalists investing millions in social networking startups when you can start your own SNA service for $280 (with 1 year updates, no less), courtesey of the nice folks at AltraSoft:

AlstraSoft E-Friends - Run your own online social networking community just like Friendster. Members create their own personal friends network, meet new friends, dating and join groups

AlstraSoft E-Friends

Cost (single license): [was $600] $280 (with 1 year updates)

Language: PHP
Platform: Unix
Release: Feb 15, 2004
Current Version: v3.0
Last Update: Feb 15, 2004

Product Overview

AlstraSoft E-Friends is an online social networking software that allows you to start your own site just like Friendster and Tribe.net. The E-Friends software allows members to connect to people in their personal networks and community, creating a new online interactive resource that is based on a trusted network of friends and associates on the internet.

Members can use this abundant network to make friends, find their love ones, locate jobs, buy and sell stuff, locate a roommate, and accomplish much more with the help of groups and individuals who they know and share the same interests.

Start your own social networking community just like Friendster and Tribe.net in minutes with AlstraSoft E-Friends now!

How does E-Friends work?

Once members are registered with E-Friends, they will be able invite people they know to join their personal or professional network. A member's friends will come to E-Friends and invite their friends. As the network grows, members will have more opportunities to interact easily with people they know, make friends, and use the E-Friends network to enrich their social life."

This is absolute proof that we have reached the bizarro stage of the social networking exponential buzz curve. [Get Real]

With Social Networking systems available for $280 - what's next - free, open source social networks?

Oh yah - that's what we're working on - it's called the PeopleAggregator.

I sure hope E-Friends supports FOAF!

Health Nutrition Guru Dr. Gary Null
Brings the Award Winning "The Gary Null
Show" to the Internet on the
VoiceAmerica Network

Health Nutrition Guru Dr. Gary Null
Brings the Award Winning "The Gary Null
Show" to the Internet on the
VoiceAmerica Network 12/30/2004 05:06 AM
SurfNet Media Group announced today the debut of "The Gary Null Show" broadcasting live five days a week beginning Monday, January 3, 2005 at Noon Eastern (9AM Pacific) on the VoiceAmerica Network and rebroadcast on VoiceAmerica Health and Wellness. [PRWEB Dec 30, 2004]

AlstraSoft EPay Pro v2.0 has file
include and multiple xss vulnerabilities

AlstraSoft EPay Pro v2.0 has file
include and multiple xss vulnerabilities 04/02/2005 05:37 PM
dcrab (Apr 01 2005)

google ipo > /dev/null

google ipo > /dev/null 08/20/2004 11:51 PM

Looks like Google stock is going to finally start trading tommorrow at $85.  Frankly, I don't know what all the hoopa over the IPO is about.  First of all, I don't think there is a real customer loyalty for Google.  Google is just a tool that became popular enough for the company name to become a verb.  Utility does not make customer loyalty nor brand value IMHO.

Google's search engine was effective in the past but it has failed to keep up with the changing environment such as the rising level of noise introduced by search engine optimization (SEO) hacks and blogging.  Big IPO means new competitors will spring up to pull a google on Google and, if they offer better results than Google, I expect Google users will happily flock out of Google's grasp.

Gmail is interesting but I think trying to make money off private information is like playing with fire.  Besides, others can and are doing the same.  Desktop search has more interesting possibilities, but they are vulnerable to counterattacks by Apple and Microsoft.

Finally, Orkut left a bad taste in my mouth.  I was favorable in the past toward Google's habit of offering experimental services, but those service didn't require me to invest substantial amount of time and attention.  Orkut did and I now feel like a spent laboratory rat.  While some people might laugh at Friendster, at least they are trying earnestly to make something out of it.

So, I am sending Google IPO to the null device.

Null Webmail 0.8.4

Null Webmail 0.8.4 04/26/2004 02:22 PM
A simple POP3/SMTP webmail CGI.

NS 5.5 Installation and a Non-Null
Password

NS 5.5 Installation and a Non-Null
Password 07/21/2004 06:01 AM

/dev/null/nethack Tournament 2003

/dev/null/nethack Tournament 2003 10/31/2003 05:11 PM
The NetHack season is upon us once again. Tonight (Halloween) at midnight Pacific U.S. Time, /dev/null's Fifth Annual NetHack Tournament opens. As with past years, the Tournament is open to anyone who'd like to play. We're also open to anyone who'd like to volunteer to run a game server since, though we have a four servers distributed around North America so far, play can be slow across the transoceanic links.

How to redirect output and errors to
/dev/null?

How to redirect output and errors to
/dev/null? 04/13/2005 04:35 AM
Handy little trick to ensure that both standard error, and standard output are redirected to /dev/null, so you never have to see error mails from your cron jobs again.

Strategies for approaching null values
with SQL Server

Strategies for approaching null values
with SQL Server 01/26/2003 01:54 AM
CNET Jan 26 2003 1:21AM ET

Florida voting records filed under
/dev/null

Florida voting records filed under
/dev/null 07/29/2004 01:15 PM
New concerns over e-voting reliability arises after it is learned that 2002 Florida voting records were destroyed in two computer crashes.

RE: Internet Explorer Remote Null
Pointer Crash(mshtml.dll)

RE: Internet Explorer Remote Null
Pointer Crash(mshtml.dll) 06/15/2004 04:28 PM
Thor Larholm (Jun 15 2004)

Oregon's Supreme Court Rules Gay
Marriages Null and Void

Oregon's Supreme Court Rules Gay
Marriages Null and Void 04/14/2005 05:05 PM
The court ruled that the county where 3,000 same-sex marriages were held a year ago had overstepped its authority.

BugTraq: RE: Internet Explorer Remote
Null Pointer Crash(mshtml.dll)

BugTraq: RE: Internet Explorer Remote
Null Pointer Crash(mshtml.dll) 06/15/2004 09:25 PM
SecurityFocus Jun 16 2004 1:40AM GMT

ASPR #2004-01-20-1: Internet
Explorer/Outlook double null character
DoS

ASPR #2004-01-20-1: Internet
Explorer/Outlook double null character
DoS 02/10/2004 01:32 PM
ACROS Security (Feb 10 2004)

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Internet Explorer
Remote Null Pointer Crash(mshtml.dll)

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Internet Explorer
Remote Null Pointer Crash(mshtml.dll) 07/28/2004 06:48 PM
Berend-Jan Wever (Jul 28 2004)

"The Gary Null Show" Debut Generates
Overwhelming Internet Listener Response
on the VoiceAmerica Network

"The Gary Null Show" Debut Generates
Overwhelming Internet Listener Response
on the VoiceAmerica Network 01/05/2005 03:23 AM
VoiceAmerica expanding server capacity to meet audience demand. [PRWEB Jan 5, 2005]

Friends of T. Rex?

Friends of T. Rex? 06/14/2004 09:32 PM
Researchers have brought the evolution of the solenodon, a shrewlike insect-eating animal, into sharper focus.

Net-Friends-1.01

Net-Friends-1.01 01/11/2004 07:09 PM

Net-Friends-1.00

Net-Friends-1.00 01/11/2004 07:09 PM

Net-Friends-1.03

Net-Friends-1.03 01/11/2004 11:40 PM

Net-Friends-1.02

Net-Friends-1.02 01/11/2004 11:41 PM

With Friends Like These...

With Friends Like These... 07/12/2004 05:44 PM
Okay, so maybe it wasn't the proper choice of words, but you would think that somewhere between this Australian man and woman meeting online and then meeting in person where she proceeded to tie him up, ransack his home with another man and steal his property, the two would cease being "pals" as described in the headline of the article. Not that writing headlines isn't a difficult enough job, but this is a pretty typical scam (unfortunately) and has little to do with (as the headline suggests) people robbing their friends.

Fox & Friends

Fox & Friends 07/28/2004 06:40 PM

foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95063,00.html
track this site | 3 links

Friends

Friends 06/11/2004 10:24 PM

view.airbeagle.com/friends
track this site | 6 links

Net::Friends 1.00

Net::Friends 1.00 01/11/2004 07:58 AM
A Perl extension for interacting with a GPSDrive friendsd server.

Who Needs Many Friends?

Who Needs Many Friends? 10/29/2003 12:12 AM
I've recently hit a bug in the iChat AV: I've been trying to add a new buddy, and it replied...

Friends in the End

Friends in the End 04/28/2004 02:35 PM
According to this lawsuit, Friends writers frequently pantomime masturbation, express desire for anal sex with Jennifer Aniston, and speculate about Courtney Cox "having dried twigs in her uterus." Now are you sorry it's ending? (04-28)

NBC.com > Friends

NBC.com > Friends 05/07/2004 04:54 AM
The new 'Friends' Theme Song: "...and if you should die, I might feel slightly sad, but I won't cry" - The Smiths .. the world is coming to an end tonight .. appear to be showing tonight .. Season Finale of Friends .. Friends .. Phoebe .. rachel .. Joey

nbc.com/Friends/index.html
track this site | 7 links

Best Friends

Best Friends 05/08/2004 05:00 AM
Social software for the party animal.

XFN - XHTML Friends Network

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: alstrasoft e-friends null