RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft Published
Grok Headline matches for RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft Published
OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics
Working Draft Published
OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics
Working Draft Published
11/11/2002 03:18 PM31 July 2002: The Web Ontology Working Group has released an updated
Working Draft of OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics. The draft is a
high-level description of the OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 and its
subset OWL Lite. Automated tools can use common sets of terms called
ontologies to power services such as more accurate Web search,
intelligent software agents, and knowledge management. OWL is used to
publish and share ontologies on the Web. Read about the W3C Semantic
Web Activity. (News archive)
RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax Working
Draft Published
RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax Working
Draft Published
11/12/2002 06:47 PM12 November 2002: The RDF Core Working Group has released a Working
Draft of the Resource Description Framework (RDF) Concepts and
Abstract Syntax (formerly named Concepts and Abstract Data Model). The
draft defines the abstract graph syntax on which RDF is based. It
discusses design goals, the meaning of RDF documents, key concepts,
character normalization and handling of URI references. Read about the
Semantic Web Activity. (News archive)
The W3C RDF Data Access Working Group
has published the first public working
draft of SPARQL Variable Binding
The W3C RDF Data Access Working Group
has published the first public working
draft of SPARQL Variable Binding
01/02/2005 11:31 AMxmlhack Jan 2 2005 1:45PM GMT
SVG 1.2 Working Draft published (W3C)
SVG 1.2 Working Draft published (W3C)
11/18/2002 11:57 AMxml:id Working Draft Published
xml:id Working Draft Published
04/09/2004 04:00 PM2004-04-08: The XML Core Working Group has released the First Public
Working Draft of xml:id Version 1.0. The specification introduces a
predefined attribute name that can always be treated as an ID and
hence can always be recognized. Comments are welcome. Visit the XML
home page. (News archive)
CSS 2.1 Working Draft Published
CSS 2.1 Working Draft Published
01/29/2003 03:04 PM29 January 2003: Answering comments received during Last Call, the CSS
Working Group has released an interim Working Draft of Cascading Style
Sheets, Level 2 Revision 1 (CSS 2.1). Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) is
a language used to render structured documents like HTML and XML on
screen, on paper, and in speech. The draft brings CSS2 in line with
implementations and CSS2 errata, and removes obsolete features. Visit
the CSS home page. (News archive)
XML Events Working Draft published (W3C)
XML Events Working Draft published (W3C)
08/14/2002 09:16 AMXHTML 2.0 Working Draft Published
XHTML 2.0 Working Draft Published
08/05/2002 10:43 PM5 August 2002: The HTML Working Group has released the first public
Working Draft of XHTML 2.0. XHTML 2.0 is a relative of the Web's
familiar publishing languages, HTML 4 and XHTML 1.0 and 1.1, and is
not intended to be backward compatible with them. The draft contains
the XHTML 2.0 markup language in modules for creating rich, portable
Web-based applications. Comments are welcome. Visit the HTML home
page. (News archive)
HLink Working Draft Published
HLink Working Draft Published
09/13/2002 07:27 AM13 September 2002: The HTML Working Group has published the first
public Working Draft of HLink. The draft gives the XHTML Family the
ability to specify which attributes represent hyperlinks, and how
those hyperlinks should be traversed. Comments are welcome. Visit the
HTML home page. (News archive)
CCXML Working Draft Published
CCXML Working Draft Published
10/15/2002 10:30 PM15 October 2002: The Voice Browser Working Group has published the
second public Working Draft of Voice Browser Call Control: CCXML
Version 1.0. CCXML, the Call Control eXtensible Markup Language,
provides telephony call control support for VoiceXML and other dialog
systems. Comments are welcome. Visit the Voice Browser home page.
(News archive)
XForms Working Draft Published
XForms Working Draft Published
08/21/2002 11:03 AM21 August 2002: The XForms Working Group has released a Working Draft
of XForms 1.0 incorporating all issues received during Last Call.
Comments are welcome through 4 September. More flexible than previous
HTML and XHTML form technologies, the new generation of Web forms
separates purpose, presentation, and data. Visit the XForms home page.
(News archive)
XML Events Working Draft Published
XML Events Working Draft Published
08/13/2002 07:01 AM12 August 2002: The HTML Working Group has released an updated Working
Draft of XML Events that incorporates comments received during Last
Call. The specification defines a module used to associate behaviors
with document-level markup for XML languages, and supports the DOM
Level 2 event model. Comments are welcome. Visit the HTML home page.
(News archive)
RDF Schema Working Draft Published
RDF Schema Working Draft Published
11/13/2002 05:07 PM13 November 2002: The RDF Core Working Group has released an updated
Working Draft of RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema.
The specification describes how to use RDF to describe RDF
vocabularies, and defines a basic vocabulary and conventions that can
be used by Semantic Web applications. Read about the Semantic Web
Activity. (News archive)
XFrames Working Draft Published
XFrames Working Draft Published
08/06/2002 12:53 PM6 August 2002: The HTML Working Group has released the first public
Working Draft of XFrames. Replacing HTML frames, XFrames is an XML
application for composing documents together that makes the content of
framesets visible in their URIs. It addresses the usability, search
and security problems associated with HTML frames. Comments are
welcome. Read more on the HTML home page. (News archive)
EARL 1.0 Working Draft Published
EARL 1.0 Working Draft Published
12/06/2002 04:08 PM6 December 2002: The Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group has
released the first public Working Draft of the Evaluation and Report
Language (EARL) 1.0. The specification explains how to use EARL, a
general-purpose language for expressing test results, and defines a
basic vocabulary. Feedback is welcome. Read about the Web
Accessibility Initiative. (News archive)
XFrames Working Draft published (W3C)
XFrames Working Draft published (W3C)
08/08/2002 11:58 AMDOM Level 3 Core Working Draft published
(W3C)
DOM Level 3 Core Working Draft published
(W3C)
10/23/2002 03:12 PMDOM Level 3 Core Working Draft Published
DOM Level 3 Core Working Draft Published
10/22/2002 05:54 PM22 October 2002: The DOM Working Group has released an updated Working
Draft of the Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Core Specification.
The Document Object Model (DOM) allows programs and scripts to update
the content and style of documents dynamically. The draft introduces
two new interfaces: TypeInfo and DOMConfiguration. Read about the DOM
Activity. (News archive)
Ink Markup Language Working Draft
Published
Ink Markup Language Working Draft
Published
03/06/2004 01:50 AM2004-02-23: The Multimodal Interaction Working Group has released a
second Working Draft of the Ink Markup Language (InkML). The InkML
data format is used to represent ink entered with an electronic pen or
stylus. Ink-aware Web applications can process and exchange
handwriting, gestures, sketches, music and other notational languages.
Visit the Multimodal Interaction home page. (News archive)
XML Accessibility Guidelines Working
Draft Published
XML Accessibility Guidelines Working
Draft Published
10/08/2002 07:08 AM3 October 2002: The WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group has
released an updated Working Draft of XML Accessibility Guidelines. The
draft is a guide for tools designers and authors of XML formats. It
explains how to design accessible XML applications that lower barriers
to Web accessibility for people with disabilities. Comments are
welcome. Read about the Web Accessibility Initiative. (News archive)
DOM Level 3 Events Working Draft
Published
DOM Level 3 Events Working Draft
Published
02/21/2003 03:41 PM21 February 2003: The Document Object Model (DOM) Working Group has
released a Working Draft of the DOM Level 3 Events specification.
Comments are welcome. Language and platform neutral, the system allows
registration of event handlers, describes event flow through a tree
structure, and provides context for each event. Read about the DOM
Activity. (News archive)
OWL Test Cases Working Draft Published
OWL Test Cases Working Draft Published
02/18/2003 06:20 PM18 February 2003: The Web Ontology Working Group has released an
updated Working Draft of Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases.
Designed for OWL developers, the draft is a companion to the OWL
language definition. OWL is used to publish and share sets of terms
called ontologies, providing advanced Web search, software agents and
knowledge management. Read about the Semantic Web Activity. (News
archive)
Working Draft of QA Test Guidelines
Published
Working Draft of QA Test Guidelines
Published
12/20/2002 01:54 PM20 December 2002: The Quality Assurance (QA) Working Group has
released the first published Working Draft of the QA Framework: Test
Guidelines. The document defines a set of common guidelines for
conformance test materials for W3C specifications. Visit the QA home
page and read about the QA Activity. (News archive)
DOM Level 3 Validation Working Draft
Published
DOM Level 3 Validation Working Draft
Published
02/05/2003 06:24 PM5 February 2003: Based on feedback received during Last Call, the DOM
Working Group has released an updated Working Draft of the Document
Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Validation Specification. The Document
Object Model (DOM) allows programs and scripts to update the content
and style of documents dynamically. This module of DOM3 ensures that
documents remain or become valid. Comments are invited. Read about the
DOM Activity. (News archive)
Web Services Architecture Working Draft
Published
Web Services Architecture Working Draft
Published
11/14/2002 03:28 PM14 November 2002: The Web Services Architecture Working Group has
released the first public Working Draft of Web Services Architecture.
Software applications can communicate using Web services to present
dynamic context-driven information to the user. The reference
architecture identifies Web services components, defines relationships
among those components, and establishes constraints upon them.
Comments are welcome. Read about the Web Services Activity. (News
archive)
Delivery Context Working Draft Published
Delivery Context Working Draft Published
12/13/2002 03:19 PM13 December 2001: The Device Independence Working Group has released
the first public Working Draft of Delivery Context Overview for Device
Independence. Delivery context is a term used to describe user
preferences and the capabilities of user Web access mechanisms. Read
about the W3C Device Independence Activity. (News archive)
MathML 2.0 Second Edition Working Draft
Published
MathML 2.0 Second Edition Working Draft
Published
12/19/2002 11:29 AM19 December 2002: The Math Working Group has released a Working Draft
of the Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0 (2nd
Edition). MathML 2.0 is and XML application that allows mathematical
notation and content to be served, received, and processed on the Web.
The 2nd edition contains clarifications and errata corrections.
Comments are welcome. Visit the Math home page. (News archive)
QA Framework: Specification Guidelines
Working Draft Published
QA Framework: Specification Guidelines
Working Draft Published
08/26/2002 10:33 AM26 August 2002: The Quality Assurance (QA) Working Group has released
a Working Draft of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines. The
guidelines are designed to help W3C Working Groups write clearer, more
implementable, and better testable technical reports. This is a major
revision and comments are welcome. Visit the QA home page. (News
archive)
SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature Working
Draft Published
SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature Working
Draft Published
08/14/2002 11:18 AM14 August 2002: The XML Protocol Working Group has released the first
Working Draft of the SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature. This abstract SOAP
1.2 feature can be used as the basis for defining SOAP bindings that
support the transmission of messages with attachments. Comments are
welcome. Read more on the Web services home page. (News archive)
XML Protocol Abstract Model Working
Draft Published
XML Protocol Abstract Model Working
Draft Published
02/20/2003 03:54 PM20 February 2003: The XML Protocol Working Group has released a final
Working Draft of the XML Protocol Abstract Model. First published in
2001, the document was an evaluation and reasoning tool used to craft
SOAP Version 1.2. The Working Group believes the model has served its
purpose and plans no further work on it. Visit the Web Services home
page. (News archive)
Working Draft of An XHTML + MathML + SVG
Profile Published
Working Draft of An XHTML + MathML + SVG
Profile Published
08/09/2002 03:57 PM9 August 2002: The HTML and SVG Working Groups have published the
second Working Draft of An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile. The draft
enables mixing XHTML, MathML and SVG in the same document using the
XML namespaces mechanism while allowing validation. Comments are
welcome. Read about the HTML and the Graphics Activities. (News
archive)
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Working Draft Published
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Working Draft Published
08/22/2002 01:31 PM22 August 2002: The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
Working Group has released a Working Draft of the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Following WCAG checkpoints makes Web
content accessible to people with disabilities, and to a variety of
Web-enabled devices, such as phones, handhelds, kiosks, and network
appliances. Read about the Web Accessibility Initiative. (News
archive)
CSS3 Text Last Call Working Draft
Published
CSS3 Text Last Call Working Draft
Published
02/26/2003 03:38 PM26 February 2003: The CSS Working Group has released a second Last
Call Working Draft of the CSS3 module: Text incorporating all comments
from the first Last Call. The group welcomes feedback through 5 March.
The document is a set of text formatting properties. Many address
international contexts, particularly East Asian and bidirectional
text. Visit the CSS home page. (News archive)
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema
Working Draft published (W3C)
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema
Working Draft published (W3C)
08/16/2002 11:06 AMPlatform for Privacy Preferences (P3P)
1.1 Working Draft Published
Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P)
1.1 Working Draft Published
02/11/2004 03:05 PM2004-02-11: The P3P Specification Working Group has released the First
Public Working Draft of the Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.1 (P3P
1.1). P3P simplifies and automates the process of reading Web site
privacy policies, promoting trust and confidence in the Web. Version
1.1 has new extension and binding mechanisms based on suggestions from
W3C workshops and the privacy community. Read about privacy and P3P.
(News archive)
XML Schema: Component Designators
Working Draft Published
XML Schema: Component Designators
Working Draft Published
01/09/2003 06:04 PM9 January 2003: The XML Schema Working Group has released the first
public Working Draft of XML Schema: Component Designators. The
document defines a scheme for identifying the XML Schema components
specified by the XML Schema Recommendation Part 1 and Part 2. Read
about the XML Activity. (News archive)
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema
Working Draft Published
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema
Working Draft Published
08/15/2002 11:41 AM15 August 2002: The HTML Working Group has released a Working Draft of
Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema. The draft provides a complete
set of XML Schema modules for XHTML, and allows document authors to
modify and extend XHTML in a conformant way. Visit the HTML home page.
(News archive)
Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide
Working Draft Published
Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide
Working Draft Published
11/08/2002 08:17 PM8 November 2002: The Web Ontology Working Group has published its
First Working Draft of the Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide. The OWL
Guide demonstrates the use of OWL to formalize a domain by defining
classes and properties of those classes; define individuals and assert
properties about them, and reason about these classes and individuals
to the degree permitted by the formal semantics of the OWL language.
Read about the Web Ontology Working Group. (News archive)
Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.2
Working Draft Published
Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.2
Working Draft Published
11/15/2002 06:50 PM15 November 2002: The SVG Working Group has released the first public
Working Draft of Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.2. Potential areas
of new work identified in SVG 1.2 include integration with other XML
formats, and text wrapping, printing, streaming, painting, rendering
model, and DOM enhancements. Visit the SVG home page. (News archive)
Grok Description matches for RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft Published
GrokA matches for RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft Published
Dyson DC15 'The Ball'
Dyson DC15 'The Ball'
03/14/2005 06:02 PM
UK suck
whiz James Dyson has announced The Ball, a new vaccuum cleaner
designed about what looks like a yellow plastic volleyball. The idea
of the DC15 The Ball is to speed up cleaning by "getting rid of teh
forwards/backwards motion," replacing it with a much more effecient
'forward to the left/backwards to the right' motion (or something).
Since it's a Dyson, it'll be extremely expense, very effective, and
look right at home taped to the underside of your X-Wing.
Dyson
reinvents the vacuum cleaner [Pocket-Lint]
Product Page [TheBallUK]
Sailing on a Dyson Sphere 0.80
Sailing on a Dyson Sphere 0.80
02/12/2004 03:32 PMA theme based on an original CG Image.
Esther Dyson Spams
Esther Dyson Spams
12/07/2003 02:59 PMShould I be honored? "You received this message because you are an
industry insider or have expressed interest in hearing from us. If you
wish to be removed from our list please e-mail us at
unsubscribe@edventure.com and we will not write to you again."
Bullshit. Oh, and get this post scriptum: "Sign up today and take
advantage of the early registration fee of $3595." Thanks, Esther -
I'll pass on this one....
[etech] George Dyson on von Neumann
[etech] George Dyson on von Neumann
03/17/2005 03:00 AMGeorge Dyson talks about "Von Neumann's Universe." Von Neumann came
from Hungary and was appointed to Princeton during the Depression. In
the office above him was Kurt Goedel who was stuck in a Catch 22
trying to emigrate. The Germans finally allowed Goedel to leave
Austria once they realized he wasn't a Jew, but he got classified as
an enemy alien by the US because Germany had conquered Austria. In
1943 he finally got his US citizenship and was immediately drafted.
Goedel was, however, paranoid. He would only eat food off his sister's
plate because he was worried about being...
Dyson DC06 Robotic UltraVac
Dyson DC06 Robotic UltraVac
05/07/2004 07:51 AMAlthough it's "currently on home trial," (so don't expect to purchase
it anytime soon) this Dyson DC06 robotic vacuum cleaner looks to
humiliate all the Roombas and Electrolux robots currently out there
eating up cat hair with its 'Dual-Cyclone' action. I'm not sure how I
feel about a powerful sucking...
Esther Dyson on Social Networks
Esther Dyson on Social Networks
12/02/2003 10:23 PMedventure.com/conversation/article.cfm?Counter=4143472
track this
site | 4 links
Dyson On The Paranormal or Expect A
Miracle
Dyson On The Paranormal or Expect A
Miracle
07/14/2004 10:09 AM
Expect a
miracle? Freeman Dyson on Littlewood's Law of
Miracles: "...the total number of events that happen to us is
about thirty thousand per day, or about a million per month. ...The
chance of a miracle is about one per million events. Therefore we
should expect about one miracle to happen, on the average, every
month." From his review of book debunking the paranormal (whose
views he isn't entirely willing to accept).
Via
Marginal
Revolution Dyson DC11 Telescope Vacuum Shipping in
U.S.
Dyson DC11 Telescope Vacuum Shipping in
U.S.
06/07/2004 10:22 AM
I don't know when they hit
U.S. retail channels, exactly, but it looks like the Dyson DC11
'Telescope' vacuum is now available in the U.S. Amazon has it for
$500. The idea behind Dyson vacuums is that a bagless 'cyclone'
section continually provides suction separate from the filter and
collection so that collected dust and dirt doesn't clog up the
airflow. Guess it is the DC11 I've been seeing on bus stops and not
the DC08. Also, I have no idea if they're any good -- I just like them
because they're yellow.
Read - Product Page [Dyson]
Read [Amazon]
Related
Dyson's Tiny DC12 Powerhouse Vacuum [Gizmodo]
Dyson DC06 Robotic UltraVac [Gizmodo]
ZDNet video interview with Esther Dyson
ZDNet video interview with Esther Dyson
04/22/2004 02:35 AMCNet gets some opinions out of its new editor-at-large
Dark matter, Dyson spheres, alien life
and New York
Dark matter, Dyson spheres, alien life
and New York
03/14/2005 04:33 PMAhem – what follows is the sort of thing that I can’t imagine
discussing in New York. So in honor...
Esther Dyson on Personal Health Records,
7 laws of identity
Esther Dyson on Personal Health Records,
7 laws of identity
06/17/2005 06:30 PMI'm starting a number of side projects lately. One of them is a series
of podcasts on Health Care IT. On the heels of the iHealthRecord
announcement, I interviewed Esther Dyson last month about the whole
idea of Personal Health...
British inventor Dyson unveils his
latest appliance of science in Japan
(AFP)
British inventor Dyson unveils his
latest appliance of science in Japan
(AFP)
05/25/2004 01:08 PMAFP - British inventor James Dyson unveiled his latest hi-tech gadget,
the world's smallest, most powerful -- and possibly most expensive --
vacuum cleaner, in a bid to clean up the Japanese market.
Amazon.com, Marc Andreessen, BV Capital,
Esther Dyson, Seth Goldstein, Josh
Koppelman, Howard Morgan, Tim
O’Reilly, y Bob Young estˇn
invirtiendo en del.icio.us
Amazon.com, Marc Andreessen, BV Capital,
Esther Dyson, Seth Goldstein, Josh
Koppelman, Howard Morgan, Tim
O’Reilly, y Bob Young estˇn
invirtiendo en del.icio.us
04/12/2005 12:03 AMUnion Square Ventures Leads Del.icio.us
Financing
lists.del.icio.us/pipermail/discuss/2005-April/002801.html
track this
site | 3 links
Microsoft Office 2003 Customers Boost
Productivity and Business Insight With
the Availability of Two New Office
Business Intelligence Accelerators
Microsoft Office 2003 Customers Boost
Productivity and Business Insight With
the Availability of Two New Office
Business Intelligence Accelerators
06/02/2004 12:06 PM Microsoft Corp. today announced the availability of two new Office
2003 Business Intelligence (BI) Accelerators, the Microsoft® Office
Business Scorecards Accelerator and the Microsoft Office Excel Add-in
for SQL Server (TM) Analysis Services. Designed for and built on the
Microsoft Office System and Windows Server System (TM) , the Office BI
Accelerators provide customers and partners with increased access to
data that is critical to maximizing business performance. Information
workers and industry partners can also use the accelerators to assess
performance in real time and reshape strategy and redeploy resources
as market conditions change, staying one step ahead of their
competition. By taking advantage of existing Microsoft technology
investments, the accelerators are a cost-effective way for end users
and partners to increase their business insight and automate formerly
manual business processes, providing greater efficiency, productivity
and enhanced decision-making.
Navtel Communications Announces the
Availability of Its PacketCable CMS Test
Solution
Navtel Communications Announces the
Availability of Its PacketCable CMS Test
Solution
06/17/2005 03:15 PMNavtel Communications Inc. a leading developer of test equipment for
the laboratories of network equipment manufacturers & operators is
pleased to announce the availability of its high-performance and
highly scaleable PacketCable™ Call Management Server [CMS] Test
Solution supporting NCS, Dynamic Quality of Service [DQoS] and
integrated IP Security. [PRWEB Jun 16, 2005]
Test-TAP-Model-0.02
Test-TAP-Model-0.02
04/15/2005 08:19 PMEclipse Test & Performance Tools
Platform Project Announces Availability
of Release 3.2
Eclipse Test & Performance Tools
Platform Project Announces Availability
of Release 3.2
12/24/2004 12:19 PMTPTP release 3.2 will be available on the Eclipse Foundation website
(www.eclipse.org) [PRWEB Dec 23, 2004]
Prostitutes See Sharp Drop in Business
(Reuters)
Prostitutes See Sharp Drop in Business
(Reuters)
05/11/2004 10:50 AMReuters - EU entry has not brought everyone in the
Czech Republic the promised economic advantages.
iHealthRecord free online service
launched
iHealthRecord free online service
launched
06/05/2005 11:21 PMIt's interesting that at today's Digital Identity World 2005
conference, I've heard no mention so far of iHealthRecord, a free
online service providing "secure and confidential interactive
personal health records," launched yesterday. There's an archived
video Webcast of the launch....
Dyson's Tiny DC12 Powerhouse Vacuum
Dyson's Tiny DC12 Powerhouse Vacuum
05/26/2004 10:40 AMDyson revealed a new vacuum cleaner yesterday, the DC12, which is
making a good claim to be the world's smallest vacuum cleaner. With
dimensions that would keep it inside an 8 by 10 by 12-inch cube, the
tiny vacuum also...
RSS Ads - The Business Model for RSS
RSS Ads - The Business Model for RSS
01/26/2004 02:19 AMRSS Ads - The Business Model for RSS .. RSSAds ..
Quote
rssads.com
track this
site | 4 links
Plaxo Does Have A Business Model... But
Not Really
Plaxo Does Have A Business Model... But
Not Really
05/24/2004 03:05 AMI'll admit that I have
not
been kind to Plaxo in the past. Ever since the service was first
announced, it sounded like a bubble era pointless dot com. There was
a lot of hype about the young founder (previously founded Napster!)
and the "service" itself didn't seem like much of a product. At most,
it was a feature of a larger product, and that larger product might
just turn out to be something like Microsoft Outlook. If the system
was remotely useful, you would think that Microsoft would just build
it in to Outlook. However, it didn't even seem that useful. If
anything, I expected it to be annoying - and has it ever been
annoying. I now block all Plaxo requests, but for a while, the amount
of Plaxo spam was ridiculous. Then, of course, there's the privacy
question. While Plaxo now goes to great lengths to swear up and down
that they keep your info private, they don't seem to understand the
real privacy complaint: when your friends give
your address to
some 3rd party service,
are
they violating your privacy? It's a question that's not entirely
clear. In the meantime, this was all made worse by the fact that
Plaxo still didn't have anything remotely resembling a business model
(shades of the bubble era again...). Well, now they claim they've
solved that issue, and have announced that their business model is a
$20/year paid version for which
you'll get such great features as... well, they actually don't seem to
know yet. You will get better
customer support though. It
always worries me when companies decide that better customer support
is a premium "feature," because they've just set up the incentives to
mean that they give the absolute worst customer support to anyone not
in that tier. This doesn't seem particularly compelling. They're
basically saying their new business model is that they'll annoy me
less if I pay? No thanks...
Overstock's Business Model
Overstock's Business Model
02/17/2004 01:15 PMHow does the company make money selling books and CDs at cost?
Plaxo's business model
Plaxo's business model
05/24/2004 01:46 AMStart-up
Plaxo sketches out business plan [CNET News.com - The Net]
OK - so now we know.
Whenever I've received an invitation to join Plaxo or to update my
profile info, I've used as an excuse - the nebulous answers that Plaxo
has given in the past as to their business model.
Well I guess I'll have to find a different excuse now.
I actually like the business model - charge for more advanced
features - but the only feature they mentioned in this article was
"better customer support". That actually sounds like a charge
for support" business model. HHmmm maybe they should talk to
Dave Sifry about that.
But then again - they only want $20 a year. Geesh. It
costs more to look at naked pictures. I guess they think lots of
people will sign-up - but if it's like any other service, they'll
only convert 5%.
So what's 5% of 2M? 100k users. Times $20 a year.
That $2M a year.
Geesh hasn't Plaxo raised like over $20M now - or something like
that?
What's wrong with the math here?
Into the valley of the Business Model -
yee shall go
Into the valley of the Business Model -
yee shall go
04/14/2005 03:33 PMMeetUp is now charging for organizing MeetUps.
$19 a month. I wonder how they came up with that number?
Jason
Lefkowitz reports his feelings on this.
One good thing they did - they put their faces next to
what they describe as "the bad news". Me - I don't consider it bad
news.
There's a time for every social experiment to grow up, smell the
mustard and get real. MeetUp has - congreats!
The Blogware business model
The Blogware business model
07/07/2004 02:41 AMI've been trying to get to know Roland Tanglao and Boris Mann and their company
Streamline. Here's
an interesting post I found on Roland's blog about Blogware's
business model..
Here's Roland......
A must read for prospective Blogware resellers and for
bloggers and people who don't understand why Blogware is not being
heavily promoted by Tucows. Summary: it's all about the resellers.
Resellers made Tucows #2 in domain registration and similarly
resellers will make Blogware a big player in the hosted blog
space.
From An
Open Letter to Blog Sceptic:
QUOTE
5/3/2/1. Ditch the
resellers/launch a hosted version/offer to specific verticals/promote
it...
Never gonna happen.
Here's why: Internet services providers represent the most
powerful distribution channel on the internet. No single company can
compete with the marketing muscle of 30,000 ISPs** who sit right in
front of end-users and assist them in making critical technology
choices and guide them as they dive into the internet - usually for
the first time. No other channel can put you in front of individuals
and the Fortune 500 simultaneously and no channel can better address
the fickle needs of their local markets in a more appropriate
fashion.
To get a better sense of this, take a look at our track record with
domain names. In 1997, we were (according to the most liberal
definitions) #85 in the domain name registration market. Today we are
solidly #2 and we've been there for a couple of years. How did we get
here? We dealt exclusively with internet services providers to the
exclusion of all other market opportunities and we nailed their
service requirements. By choosing and sticking to our distribution
model very early in the game (some would argue that it chose us) we
were able to focus on very specific attributes of our products and
processes and build some truly excellent structures around everything.
In other words, because we weren't trying to be all things to all
customers, we were able to do some very amazing things with some very
specific customer segments. And they responded in spades.
Our resellers kick serious a*s in the market place. This because
the Tucows way of doing things gives them the luxury of being able
to focus on very specific and important things. Think of every other
blogging company out there. They each have to a) be technical experts,
b) be sales experts and c) be marketing experts just to one unit to a
customer. Now take a look at the symbiotic nature of the relationship
between Tucows and its direct customers. Our resellers have to be
sales & marketing experts and develop strong customer service
skills and Tucows has to focus on maintaining world-class technical
services. Who would you bet on, the jack-of-all-trades or the team of
specialists?
The downside to this approach is that it lacks the glitz and glam
that retail oriented services employ. You will never see a full out PR
blitz from Tucows and Blogware will never be a household name. All
wasted money. Remember, we're not the marketing brains in this
relationship. We're the technical muscle.
Does that mean that our resellers are idly sitting by doing
nothing? Nope. Right now, they are working on developing the right
messages to direct at very specific markets - some are doing the
institutional angle, some are going after telecommunications firms,
others are targetting specific home-user verticals and others still
looking to make quick wins at the expense of those with existing
market share... And what I've seen so far looks great. Think of this
as true "end-to-end marketing" Marketing at the edges. Clue-train
compatible distribution. Teamwork. Focus. Whatever you call it, it
works.
UNQUOTE
"Business Model" Explained
"Business Model" Explained
06/24/2004 08:07 AMTwo companies might do the same thing, but with very different
business models.
Plaxo Business Model
Plaxo Business Model
05/24/2004 12:50 PMPlaxo is out trying to explain they have a business model and are
addressing privacy concerns. A premium service at $20/month that
includes support and, well, what else they are not saying or don't
know yet. Techdirt: They're basically saying...
A Business Model For WiFi Aggregation
A Business Model For WiFi Aggregation
01/09/2004 09:50 PMRobert X. Cringely's latest column discusses
his idea
for a killer WiFi aggregator business model that makes some sense
- but could be very difficult from some significant reasons. He
correctly points out the problems with current WiFi aggregator
business models: they have way too little coverage and way too many
players have their hands in the pie. For each dollar spent at a
hotspot, a portion needs to go to the hotspot owner, the owner of the
network and the aggregator (and potentially others) - and there just
isn't that much money being spent at hotspots in the first place. His
solution is that we need more hotspots, and the way to get more
hotspots is to give away the equipment free. Basically, have a
company that will give you free WiFi equipment in exchange for adding
your hotspot to their network
and giving you free access to the
entire network. This way, he believes, an aggregator would quickly
get to one million hotspots and pretty much guarantee the necessary
level of coverage. The money, then, would come from others who pay
the subscription fee to get on the network - and since the coverage is
so great, and the aggregator no longer needs to share that revenue
with the hotspots, people will be willing to pay up. Maybe. I'm
certainly a fan of leveraging "free" in a promotion to build a
business model, but not when that "free" is very costly. In order to
get this going, the company would need to give away those million
access points (and, probably, handle tech support for them) before
they start making money. While you can bet they'd get a volume
discount (and APs are getting cheaper every day), it's still a pretty
big capital chunk to eat. Then, there are two other big problems I
see. First, which he brushes off, most internet providers say sharing
your connection is a violation of terms of service. Sure, there's the
Speakea
sy exception, but it's still not too common, and I'm not so
convinced (as Cringely is) that they'll just rollover when they find
out what's happening. The second problem is much more fundamental. I
now have two choices if I want to use this fairly vast network of
access points: (1) pay a monthly fee or (2) offer to host my own
hotspot - where I get free equipment and free service. Guess what I'm
going to do? Is there any reason not to get their free equipment just
to get free access everywhere else? Who are the suckers who are
actually going to pay for this service instead of just signing up to
be a provider?
an alternate business model for gmail
an alternate business model for gmail
04/14/2004 05:12 PMnext, jason's going to start selling blogger accounts
RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft Published