Windows more reliable than Linux?
Grok Headline matches for Windows more reliable than Linux?
Microsoft: Windows More Reliable than
Linux
Microsoft: Windows More Reliable than
Linux
04/06/2005 09:56 AMExtreme Tech Apr 6 2005 1:36PM GMT
Study Finds Windows More Reliable than
Linux
Study Finds Windows More Reliable than
Linux
04/06/2005 11:56 AMA Microsoft-sponsored study finds Windows Server 2003 is more reliable
and robust and allows IT administrators to execute various tasks more
quickly than those using Red Advanced Server 3.0 running on the same
hardware.
A Linux Island in a C:\ of Windows: Part
3, Playing in the Windows World
A Linux Island in a C:\ of Windows: Part
3, Playing in the Windows World
03/14/2005 05:25 PMNow that your Linux VM is up, running and connected to the company
network, it's time to move corporate work to the Linux side.
Real World Linux - The Big Move From
Windows to Linux
Real World Linux - The Big Move From
Windows to Linux
06/26/2002 01:02 PM"I have recently jumped over to Linux from Windows, after putting it
off for far too long, and thought it might be worth sharing my
experience in order to encourage others in the same boat."
[IBM.com] Windows-to-Linux roadmapPart
1. Thinking in Linux
[IBM.com] Windows-to-Linux roadmapPart
1. Thinking in Linux
12/10/2003 05:26 PMIntroducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux
for Windows, No Less
Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux
for Windows, No Less
04/12/2004 02:06 PMA month ago, a trial version of a little-known Linux application
called "CoLinux" was released that is the first working free and open
source method for optimally running Linux on Microsoft Windows
natively. It's the work of a 21 year-old Israeli computer science
student and some Japanese open source programmers; in Israel, analysts
are already saying it could help transform the software world.
to be quite reliable:
to be quite reliable:
01/06/2005 07:49 PMBush Rejects Bad News .. The Nelson
Report
airamericaradio.com/weblogs/alfrankenshow/index.php?/franken/
bush_rejects_bad_news
track this
site | 4 links
When Computing Was Reliable
When Computing Was Reliable
03/19/2003 10:27 PMLast week, vendors of some high-profile open source products were
taken to task for newly discovered flaws in their code that required
yet another round of software patching. In the rush to embrace
complexity, computer users have given up some of the most important
computing tools of the last 50 years.
Proc-Reliable-1.15
Proc-Reliable-1.15
11/14/2003 04:42 AMOnly reliable phones need apply
Only reliable phones need apply
03/19/2003 10:41 PMTimothy
Appnel:
There are zero occurrences of the word asynchronous
in the current JSR 172 (J2ME Web services) draft
specification.
Wikipedia, a reliable source?
Wikipedia, a reliable source?
06/01/2004 05:29 PM
Wik
ipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? (pdf file)
From the
5th international Symposium on Online
Journalism comes this rather interesting analysis of the Wikipedia
both as a news source and as a living draft of history. A surprisingly
readable article.
Creating Reliable Software (pdf)
Creating Reliable Software (pdf)
12/19/2002 02:33 PMThis is a presentation detailing how to go about software
walkthroughs, code inspections, correctness proofs. Here's the google
html version.
What's interesting to me (you have to go to the last page) is that
using mathematics, Peter Naur proved that a specific algorithm was
correct. Unfortunately the specifications were flawed so the algorithm
would never have worked, so Peter Naur actually
proved that garbage in, garbage out.
Once again, this shows that code reliability issues are so closely
interwined with people issues that you cannot talk about reliable
software without talking about reliable developers.
"zeldman.crnl"
Web Host OLM.net Received Most Reliable
Award
Web Host OLM.net Received Most Reliable
Award
04/14/2005 02:12 AMOLM Has Been Named Among Top Three Most Reliable Web Hosts For March
By Independent Review Panel Netcraft. [PRWEB Apr 14, 2005]
that it provides a thoroughly reliable
fact-check function
that it provides a thoroughly reliable
fact-check function
09/15/2004 08:56 PMTech Central Station Notes Carter Peace Center Failure .. further
lessons:
techcentralstation.com/091504H.html
track this
site | 4 links
Rumor sites see drop in reliable sources
Rumor sites see drop in reliable sources
03/22/2005 03:31 PMEarlier this month, a California judge ruled that Apple has the right
to subpoena the records of the three Macintosh sites that recently
published details on an unreleased Apple product. Apple filed a
lawsuit against anonymous individuals who leaked details about new
products by posting information on the Internet in December. In the
company's seven-page civil complaint, Apple said that it did not know
the "true names or capacities, whether individual, associate,
corporate or otherwise," of the defendants.
The Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge ruled that Apple's
interests in protecting trade secrets outweighed any interest the
public may have in the information. "The public has had, and
continues to have, a profound interest in gossip about Apple," Judge
James P. Kleinberg said. "Therefore, it is not surprising that
hundreds of thousands of 'hits' on a Web site about Apple have and
will happen. But an interested public is not the same as the public
interest."
Though only three rumor sites are involved in the litigation, other
rumor sites have recently seen the number of reliable anonymous
sources drop. "We noticed that some of our annonymous sources, which
were informing us with reliable information on Mac OS X development,
stopped sending us information," Alexandros Roussos of MacosXrumors
told Spymac.
With increased interest and demand for Apple rumors, many of these
sites are receiving a surge of information from more sources. This
increase of information increases the amount of unreliable information
the sites receive, so sites have to be more careful about what they
publish.
"The site has been very successful since the beginning but really saw
its traffic exploding during 2004, when we started daily news and
rumours reporting," Roussos said. "Along with the success, more and
more sources appeared but there were a lot more fake rumors too. We do
our best to verify the information we receive by discussing it with
some regular sources or by comparing with other reports and other
factual information found on documentation or corporate sites."
MacosXrumors has improved its source reliability since its early days
but, according to Roussos, there is still more work to do. "Sometimes
we are frustrated when we have taken too much time to verify our
rumors and we see the story breaking elsewhere though. Now it's really
an investigation job. It's easier to do for us than it used to be
when the site was launched, as we have more sources and experience,
but it takes much more time than it did."
Stay tuned next week to find out more about how operations on other
rumour sites are being influenced by recent litigations against Apple
rumor sites.
New Spec Makes Bluetooth Faster, More
Reliable
New Spec Makes Bluetooth Faster, More
Reliable
11/07/2003 03:13 AMThe Feature Nov 7 2003 2:05AM ET
Developing Reliable Software with
Scripting Languages
Developing Reliable Software with
Scripting Languages
12/18/2002 12:08 PMIn this interview of William Guttman, a professor of economics and
technology at Carnegie Mellon University who is director of The
Sustainable Computing Consortium, I was struck by this statement:
Q: Are certain types of products or software vendors worse than others
in terms of their record on quality?
Guttman: I have a colleague who says bugs are agnostic. No matter the
type of application it is, you can count on finding 30 bugs per 1,000
lines of code on average.
I then found Prof. Thomas Huckle, saying much the same thing:
INTEL: no more than 80-90 Bugs in Pentium.
Standard Software: 25 bugs per 1000 lines of program.
Good Software: 2 errors per 1000 lines.
Space Shuttle Software:
This seems to be a pretty good justification for using scripting
languages. Of course, we still need to plan and be aware of the
software engineering issues in developing reliable software. Here are
a few things that occured to me. I'm sure you can think of more:
1. Scripting makes it too easy to slap up a piece of code quickly. I
would suggest you slap your design first. Use a design methodology.
The use of popular techniques such as OOP (or structured programming)
provides a more disciplined approach to developing software. Informal
evidence suggests that using object-oriented programming forces the
developer to be more careful in the design of the software. Scripting
languages that provide good OOP facilities should be encouraged.
2. Scripting languages have more options than bisexuals because they
have polymorphic types (I have never liked the term weak-typing
because it suggests something inferior. I prefer polymorphic typing --
it has the cachet of a poly-syllable adjective :-). One of the
criticism with this approach is that very little parameter checking is
done by the compiler. To me this is a benign vice, but I agree that
with large teams where well-defined interfaces are important that this
is an issue. I have three suggestions here:
(a) Use classes to store important variables, because then you can use
set and get methods for type-checking, and pass instances of these
classes around instead of variables. To promote heterosexuality i have
this example:
function Reproduction($father,$mother)
{
$sperm = $father->GetSperm();
$egg = $mother->GetEgg();
return "$sperm meets $egg";
}
In the above example, we have type checking of $father and $mother (at
run-time), because $father has GetSperm() and $mother must have
GetEgg().
(b) Use intelligent IDE's that display the function prototypes as you
type (what is the best one for PHP - does anyone know?)
(c) Programming by contract. Techniques such as this provide
additional assurance about the quality of the code (note that
programming by contract is as applicable to C or Java or Fortran as
scripting languages).
See also what Bertrand Meyer has to say.
3. Scripting languages need fewer raging egos and more team players.
What i mean by this is that scripting languages need to balance the
needs of hackers who want a quick fix with software managers who need
good support for team development, in particular offering effective
ways (methodologies?) for separating code and content, data and
presentation, and neat software engineering concepts such as data
hiding and namespace support.
In conclusion, as Tom DeMarco pointed out in his book PeopleWare, it
is not technology that prevents software success, but people. So
higher level tools that aid people in their work are to be encouraged.
Looking down at scripting languages because it lacks this or that is
short sighted because it is the now and the future of computing.
"tri" I've been drafting this essay for a while (this is my response
to the Bertrand Meyer quote on pointer arithmetic and reliability),
and it looks like the recent Multi-Tier debate makes it a good time to
release it, even though i think that it could still do with some more
shaving and fine-tuning.
"zeldman.shaver2"
Fed panel hears e-vote not fully
reliable
Fed panel hears e-vote not fully
reliable
05/06/2004 12:16 AMBoston Globe May 6 2004 4:26AM GMT
Dysons are the least reliable vacuums, a
report claims
Dysons are the least reliable vacuums, a
report claims
05/06/2004 08:40 AMBBC May 6 2004 12:51PM GMT
There's loads of medical data on
Internet, but is it reliable?
There's loads of medical data on
Internet, but is it reliable?
12/26/2004 07:28 AMStaronline.com - Sun Dec 26, 09:25 am GMT
Windows en Linux
Windows en Linux
04/24/2004 03:40 AMLinux vs. Windows
Linux vs. Windows
08/12/2004 11:39 AMLinux on Windows
Linux on Windows
04/13/2004 08:32 AMWhizzkid
develops Linux application for Windows: This apparently isn't a
new thing, but it's making the rounds of the tech blogs this
morning.
The significance of the development is that Linux and
Windows are able to work in parallel on the same computer or server.
To now, the computer world is divided into systems that operate either
with Windows or with Linux.
Click here to comment on this entry
Uploading accounting records from books
to computers, how reliable is it?
Uploading accounting records from books
to computers, how reliable is it?
08/01/2004 04:59 PMLanka Business Online Aug 1 2004 8:44PM GMT
Reliable Controls Donates to Penn
Colleges BBT Program
Reliable Controls Donates to Penn
Colleges BBT Program
04/15/2004 09:09 PMBC Technology Apr 16 2004 1:17AM GMT
Microsoft, IBM, BEA and TIBCO Announce
Reliable Messaging Specifications
Microsoft, IBM, BEA and TIBCO Announce
Reliable Messaging Specifications
03/13/2003 05:01 PMResearchers develop reliable laptop
battery gauge
Researchers develop reliable laptop
battery gauge
12/27/2004 07:17 PMglobetechnology.com Dec 27 2004 11:13PM GMT
"Care to elaborate on that slam on
Redwood Virtual? They‘re more
reliable..."
"Care to elaborate on that slam on
Redwood Virtual? They‘re more
reliable..."
12/27/2004 06:03 PMFast, Secure and Reliable, 3G and VoIP
Network Protection
Fast, Secure and Reliable, 3G and VoIP
Network Protection
04/06/2005 05:14 AM3G Apr 6 2005 7:46AM GMT
Linux riskier than Windows?
Linux riskier than Windows?
03/22/2005 09:36 PMZDNet Mar 23 2005 1:11AM GMT
Linux Takes on the Windows Look
Linux Takes on the Windows Look
01/23/2004 02:23 PMSnazzy desktops are everywhere at this week's LinuxWorld. But as
developers strive for a user-friendly interface, many roll out
products that bear a striking resemblance to Microsoft software.
Michelle Delio reports from New York.
Linux vs. Windows: What's The
Difference?
Linux vs. Windows: What's The
Difference?
07/01/2004 05:19 PMCoLinux: Linux y Windows a la vez
CoLinux: Linux y Windows a la vez
04/13/2004 07:42 PMLinux Can't Kill Windows
Linux Can't Kill Windows
04/14/2005 09:30 AM"Get the Facts on Windows and Linux"
"Get the Facts on Windows and Linux"
01/08/2004 07:18 PMRed Hat Linux boots Windows off PCs
Red Hat Linux boots Windows off PCs
06/09/2004 04:12 AMSilicon.com Jun 9 2004 8:17AM GMT
Windows vs. Linux Revisited
Windows vs. Linux Revisited
03/30/2005 08:41 PMSlashdot Mar 30 2005 11:18PM GMT
Linux Can’t Kill Windows
Linux Can’t Kill Windows
04/14/2005 10:07 PMIt's Linux vs. Windows in the POS
Market, Too
It's Linux vs. Windows in the POS
Market, Too
04/12/2005 05:06 PMNovell is working on a new version of its Linux-based point-of-service
product that is expected to ship in Q2 2005. Meanwhile, Microsoft also
is expected to launch its Windows Embedded for Point of Service
product by mid-year.
Grok Description matches for Windows more reliable than Linux?
GrokA matches for Windows more reliable than Linux?
Windows more reliable than Linux?