Supreme Court Seems Skeptical About Cable Claims In Brand X
Grok Headline matches for Supreme Court Seems Skeptical About Cable Claims In Brand X
Supreme Court to try Brand X
Supreme Court to try Brand X
03/28/2005 11:29 PMIndependent ISPs argue cable companies should be forced to lease
lines, but what's really on trial is the concept of communication.
Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation
Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation
03/28/2005 11:56 PMTuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear opening arguments
in the fight to classify what constitutes an "information service,"
and whether cable companies and voice over IP providers deserve to be
treated differently under a separate set of government regulations.
Supreme Court Will Rule on ISP Cable
Access
Supreme Court Will Rule on ISP Cable
Access
03/25/2005 06:54 PMThe long battle over whether cable services should be treated as
telecommunication or information services comes to the Supreme Court,
where a previous FCC ruling will be tested.
Supreme Court to hear cable modem case
Supreme Court to hear cable modem case
03/25/2005 07:02 PMA group of ISPs (Internet service providers) on Tuesday will ask the
U.S. Supreme Court to require broadband cable providers to share their
networks with competitors, just as incumbent U.S. telecommunications
carriers were required to share their DSL (Digital Subscriber Line)
networks during the past five years.
Cable Equal Access Case Goes to Supreme
Court
Cable Equal Access Case Goes to Supreme
Court
03/24/2005 02:36 PMSupreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem
Regs
Supreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem
Regs
03/29/2005 11:45 PMInternet News Mar 30 2005 3:56AM GMT
Cable Modem Case Heads to the Supreme
Court (PC World)
Cable Modem Case Heads to the Supreme
Court (PC World)
03/28/2005 10:13 AMPC World - Court will examine whether broadband cable networks must be
open to competing ISPs.
FCC receives stay; will appeal cable
ruling to the Supreme Court
FCC receives stay; will appeal cable
ruling to the Supreme Court
04/11/2004 09:27 AMFCC hopes the Supreme Court will overturn a ruling on the definition
of cable internet services.
Appeals Cable Broadband Ruling to
Supreme Court (Reuters)
Appeals Cable Broadband Ruling to
Supreme Court (Reuters)
08/30/2004 04:04 PMReuters - The U.S. government has asked the
Supreme Court to reverse an appeals court ruling that could
lead to heavier regulation of cable companies' high-speed
Internet service.
Supreme Court asks why cable broadband
lacks regulation
Supreme Court asks why cable broadband
lacks regulation
03/29/2005 08:35 PMWASHINGTON - U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday questioned why the
U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would classify cable
modem broadband as unregulated, while it regulates DSL (digital
subscriber line) and other services offered by large
telecommunications carriers.
Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit
Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit
03/30/2005 08:56 PMCBS MarketWatch Mar 31 2005 12:31AM GMT
Government appeals in Brand X broadband
cable case
Government appeals in Brand X broadband
cable case
08/31/2004 12:48 AMSiliconValley.com Aug 31 2004 4:18AM GMT
What is going on at the Supreme Court?
What is going on at the Supreme Court?
06/29/2004 11:59 AMThomas and Scalia are the most conservative conservative Justices.
Breyer is on of the liberal Justices. (Admittedly the least
liberal,…
The Supreme Court says no
The Supreme Court says no
03/24/2005 11:52 AMThe justices deny a request for an order to re-insert Terri Schiavo's
feeding tube. Is this the end?
The porn must go on - US Supreme Court
The porn must go on - US Supreme Court
06/29/2004 11:40 PMFor now . . .
Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice
Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice
06/29/2004 12:05 PMIn a close vote, the justices rule that a federal law designed to
restrict Internet pornography violates Americans' free-speech rights.
Dems on the Supreme Court
Dems on the Supreme Court
01/11/2004 07:56 AMSo an underplayed aspect of this campaign has been how the Democratic
candidates would differently select the Supreme Court. On NPR's
debate
, Senator Lieberman pointed to Justice Souter as a model. Congressman
Kucinich plugged Justice Ginsburg. I've gotten a couple pings asking
what the right answer is.
Hard question for me. Of course neither Ginsburg nor Souter were on
the correct side (or the right side) of Eldred, but I certainly think
Justice Souter is a model justice -- serious, hard working, unburdened
by ideology, prepared. I never quite get the principle that guides
Justice Ginsburg's choice between activism and not, or principle and
not, so I'm waiting to see the genius in that selection by President
Clinton.
Justice Breyer of course wrote a brilliant dissent in Eldred --
brilliant, though not effective. He was
proud of the decision's embrace of economics as the standard by which the
Sonny Bono Act was judged. But while I'm a fan of the result, I've
been too deeply affected (scarred?) by the
originalism/textaulism/fidelity theories of Scalia to be enamored of
that method.
In my view, perhaps the best sitting justice is a Republican appointee
-- Stevens. And if candidates are looking for what makes the best the
best, then it is certainly his judges' judge-like character. There's
no simple line that predicts Justice Stevens' result -- certainly not
a political line. And if there is any quality this Court needs, it is
that -- following a line that does not seem a political line.
The most impressive judges not sitting on the Supreme Court are also,
um, Republicans. (What party am I again?) Judge
Kozin
ski is a great judge -- too young when appointed, but someone who
has matured brilliantly in the job. And while his views about how to
the interpret the constitution make me cringe, history will record the
greatest judge of our time as Judge
Posner. But I
doubt that this is the time that a President from either party will
pick greatness as the reason to select a Justice.
US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice
US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice
07/01/2004 02:04 AMZDNet Australia Jul 1 2004 5:44AM GMT
Showdown at the Supreme Court
Showdown at the Supreme Court
03/17/2005 03:27 AM“On March 29, the entertainment and technology industries will
descend upon Washington, D.C. to argue their respective sides before
the Supreme Court in the landmark case of MGM v Grokster. At stake:
the future of peer-to-peer technology, consumer electronics, software
design, and consumer rights in the United States. In April 2003, a
federal judge ruled that Streamcast Networks — the developer and
distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software, and Grokster
— the developer and distributor…
Direct and Related Links for 'Showdown at
the Supreme Court'
Supreme Court blocks web porn law
Supreme Court blocks web porn law
06/29/2004 07:10 PMIndependent Jun 29 2004 9:20PM GMT
Why the Supreme Court will hear Grokster
Why the Supreme Court will hear Grokster
08/22/2004 07:30 AMCory Doctorow: Over on Lessig's blog, Tim Wu has
enumerated 10 reasons that the Supreme Court is likely to hear the
Grokster case:
1. These is a stated legal conflict on the Sony standard as between
the 7th and 9th Circuits;
2. The 7th and 9th Circuits disagree (albeit in partially in dicta) on
the relevance of willful blindness to secondary liability;
4. The Court has these matters in hand: it has granted cert. in many
similar cases historically (Sony, 1980s, White-Smith (the Piano Roll
case) 1909, Teleprompter and Fortnightly (Cable / Broadcast, 1960s &
1970s);
5. The Court has a vague sense that some far-out stuff is going on in
the field of “Computer Law” that maybe it should check
out;
6. Law clerks use KaZaA & BitTorrent to plan basketball games;
7. Stevens and Breyer deeply dig this stuff;
8. Scalia likes anything having to do with property;
9. Souter got his first computer last week.
And most importantly,
10. The Court loves to be the center of attention, and this would make
it so.
LinkLessig on Supreme Court justices
Lessig on Supreme Court justices
01/11/2004 07:54 AMLarry
gives his opinion of the Supreme Court justices like a sommelier
describing a collection of fine wines.
Australian Supreme Court Looks At
Copyright Law
Australian Supreme Court Looks At
Copyright Law
09/14/2004 12:29 PMThe Supreme Court in Australia is now taking a look at
their version of the DMCA to see if people have the right to
modify hardware they've bought or to make backup copies of digital
media they purchased. In the old, pre-digital world, when you bought
a product, it was yours to do whatever you wanted with it. However,
thanks to recent law changes, any product that involves a digital
component seems much closer to a rental agreement, where the company
that "sold" you the product retains some sort of rights. For obvious
reasons, many people think this is unfair. In this particular case,
Sony went after a mod-chip trader, claiming that the mod-chips he
offered for the Playstation violated copyright law by letting users
play copied games, thereby violating anti-circumvention rules in
Australian law. It really becomes a question of whether or not
certain companies have the right to have their business models
protected by regulations, rather than forcing them to keep up with the
changing marketplace.
Online Exclusive: Supreme Court
Online Exclusive: Supreme Court
09/27/2004 07:30 AMDailybusinessreview.com - Mon Sep 27, 10:54 am GMT
Supreme Court to hear P2P case
Supreme Court to hear P2P case
12/19/2004 03:46 PMThe biggest P2P case will be heard before the Supreme Court, and more
hangs in the balance than just the development of P2P-technologies.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
03/31/2005 09:11 AMLandmark Supreme Court Caseshttp://www.landmarkcases.org/
There is always a great demand for educational materials
regarding the most important US Supreme Court Cases and this website
is an outgrowth of that sustained interest. Developed by Street Law
and the Supreme Court Historical Society, this website was developed
in order to provide teachers with a full range of resources and
activities regarding such cases. The general teaching strategies
offered here include political cartoon analysis, moot court, continuum
exercises, and website evaluation. Some of the cases covered here
include Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona.
The site also offers some detailed explanations of important related
concepts, such as federalism, national supremacy, and judicial review.
Additional, the site provides background summaries of each case and
pertinent discussion questions for a variety of reading levels and
abilities. This has been added to
Legal Resources 2005
Internet MiniGuide. [From The Scout Report, Copyright Internet Scout
Project 1994-2004.
http://scout.wisc.edu/]
US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation
US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation
06/22/2004 11:04 AMThe US Supreme Court has ruled that Intel may eventually have to turn
600,000 pages of documents over to EU investigators as part of a
long-running inquiry into Intel's business practices in Europe.
AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court
AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court
06/22/2004 05:47 AMChip giant must now hand over documents to EC
U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right
U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right
06/21/2004 09:55 PMSupreme Court Case Previews Now
Available
Supreme Court Case Previews Now
Available
12/22/2004 01:27 AMThe Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School is
now offering free previews of high-provile Supreme Court cases before
the are argued and ruled on. The previews are available...
Supreme Court Says COPA Unconstitutional
Supreme Court Says COPA Unconstitutional
06/29/2004 01:38 PM"Suggesting there are less restrictive ways to protect minors from
harmful Web content, the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday ruled 5-4 that the
Child Online Protection Act (COPA) is a content-based restriction of
free speech. The case is on its way back to a lower court for further
review."
Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court
Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court
06/29/2004 05:18 PMIT Vibe Jun 29 2004 7:34PM GMT
Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality
Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality
03/28/2005 12:59 PMThe United States Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday a landmark case
that could have far-reaching consequences for both copyright holders
and the technology industry. At issue is whether two P2P network
operators, Grokster and StreamCast are liable for the copyright
infringement committed by their users.
Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on hold
Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on hold
06/29/2004 05:18 PMSan Jose Mercury News Jun 29 2004 7:45PM GMT
File sharing goes to the Supreme Court
File sharing goes to the Supreme Court
03/29/2005 06:49 AMPersonal Computer World Mar 29 2005 10:51AM GMT
Supreme Court quashes Net porn law
Supreme Court quashes Net porn law
06/29/2004 03:19 PMZDNet Jun 29 2004 6:45PM GMT
Supreme Court hears P2P case
Supreme Court hears P2P case
03/29/2005 11:57 AMJustices quiz attorneys for file-swapping software companies and
Hollywood studios in a landmark case.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling
"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)"
"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)"
06/29/2004 02:13 PMSupreme Court takes hard look at P2P
Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P
03/29/2005 02:25 PMJustices voice skepticism about both sides as file-swap companies do
legal battle with entertainment industry.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling
Grok Description matches for Supreme Court Seems Skeptical About Cable Claims In Brand X
GrokA matches for Supreme Court Seems Skeptical About Cable Claims In Brand X
Supreme Court Seems Skeptical About Cable Claims In Brand X
