''Firefox Hacks'' Released by O'Reilly

Grok Headline matches for ''Firefox Hacks'' Released by O'Reilly

"Mac OS X Unwired" Released By O'Reilly

"Mac OS X Unwired" Released By O'Reilly 12/08/2003 07:09 PM
(MacNN via MyAppleMenu)

SitePoint Lifts the Lid on ''Firefox
Secrets''

SitePoint Lifts the Lid on ''Firefox
Secrets'' 06/17/2005 04:40 PM
SitePoint, provider of fun, practical, and easy-to-understand content for Web professionals, today announced the release of "Firefox Secrets," a need-to-know guide to the inner workings of the web's...

[~ This is just a sample, visit MacMerc.com for the full story! ~]

Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition
Released by O'Reilly

Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition
Released by O'Reilly 04/10/2005 09:52 PM
Wi-Fi Technology Forum Apr 11 2005 1:39AM GMT

iPod & iTunes: The Missing Manual, Third
Edition released by O'Reilly

iPod & iTunes: The Missing Manual, Third
Edition released by O'Reilly 04/11/2005 04:59 PM



O'Reilly today announced iPod & iTunes: The Missing Manual, Third Edition (USD$24.95) by New York Times tech columnist J. D. Biersdorfer and edited by Missing Manual series creator David Pogue. This new edition promises to help you get more out of an iPod, put much more into it as well as other tips, tricks, and troubleshooting.

O'Reilly Network: O'Reilly Network --
2004 Emerging Technology Conference
Coverage [Jan. 16, 2004]

O'Reilly Network: O'Reilly Network --
2004 Emerging Technology Conference
Coverage [Jan. 16, 2004] 02/11/2004 08:18 AM
O'Reilly Network: O'Reilly Network -- 2004 Emerging Technology Conference Coverage [Jan. 16, 2004] .. the DDTI's own aggregation page

oreillynet.com/et2004
track this site | 6 links

MIT vs. Tim O'Reilly

MIT vs. Tim O'Reilly 02/10/2004 02:56 AM
The MIT technology review just published this interesting article on the 10 Emerging Technologies That Will Change Your World (registration required). It's a good article to read in preparation for the O'Reilly Emerging Technologies Conference that I'm going to next week. It is interesting to contrast Tim O'Reilly's vision with MIT -- O'Reilly is much more centered around software and the sociology and politics of software, with a little bit on hardware and biology, while MIT's article selects technology to highlight from a somewhat broader field....

maybe o'reilly will shut up

maybe o'reilly will shut up 08/11/2004 02:55 AM
The producer strikes back. After crowing Monday about how he made mincemeat of NYT columnist Paul Krugman on The Factor, O'Reilly gets rebutted on Tuesday via quicktime on the blog of Outfoxed co-producer Jim Gilliam.

O'Reilly Network:

O'Reilly Network: 07/30/2004 02:58 AM
O'Reilly has a page up about their new magazine called Make

make.oreilly.com
track this site | 6 links

CC at O'Reilly Etech

CC at O'Reilly Etech 02/10/2004 02:41 AM

Creative Commons will be an exhi bitor at the O'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference in San Diego next week.

Etech is regarded by many as the best tech conference of the year, always in step with the latest creations and aspirations of the alpha geeks, having evolved from the Peer-to-Peer Conference in early 2001 and P2P & Web Services in late 2001 to the current multi-tracked annual conference starting two years ago. (Incidentally, the Creative Commons concept was in troduced at ETCon 2002. How time flies.)

Matt Haughey and Mike Linksvayer will be attending. Stop by the Creative Commons booth, or better yet our parti cipant session (time and location yet to be announced). We'll be introducing a new CC metadata-enhanced application. Hint: it's described in one of our tech challenges, heretofore unmet.

If you're in the area but not an attendee, you can still reg ister for a free exhibits pass, or an exhibits plus keynotes and birds-of-a-feather (participant sessions) pass for only $50. Hope to see you there!

Five New Books From O'Reilly

Five New Books From O'Reilly 12/10/2003 10:25 AM

O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML

O'Reilly: Using PHP 5's SimpleXML 01/16/2004 10:58 AM
NuCleuZ wrote in to tell us about a new article posted over on the O'Reilly Network for all of those out there looking forward to the quick and easy XML features coming in PHP 5.

I Hacked at O'Reilly

I Hacked at O'Reilly 03/19/2003 10:24 PM
The O'Reilly Hacks site now has a hacks page for each contributor; mine's here.

Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop.

Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop. 07/24/2004 01:10 PM
Mr. O'Reilly, You have declared a "war" on the New York Times. That's good for you, good for them, and good for our democracy: Strong opinions deserve strong spokesmen. Your battle will help sharpen a debate about matters important to the Republic. But in waging this "war," you are continuing to abuse a man whom you have wronged, and to whom you owe an apology. On February 4, 2003, Jeremy Glick was your guest on THE FACTOR. Glick had lost his father in the attack of 9/11. He had also signed an ad criticizing the war in Iraq. You were "surprised" that one who had lost his father could oppose that war. And so you had him on your show, presumably to ask him why. (Here's a clip from Outfoxed putting this story together.) You might not remember precisely what you said on that interview, or more importantly, what Jeremy Glick said. So here's a copy that you can watch. Nor may you remember precisely what the ad that Jeremy Glick signed said. Here's a copy that you can read. And when you've watched what was actually said, and read what was actually written, I'm sure you will see that the statements you continue to make about Jeremy Glick are just plain false. Not Bill Clinton "depends upon what is is" false, but false the way most Americans learned growing up: just not true. For example:

• in the February 4th interview, you said the ad "accused the USA itself of terrorism." Read the ad, Mr. O'Reilly. It says no such thing.
• in the February 4th interview, you said the ad "equates the United States with the terrorists." Read the ad, Mr. O'Reilly. It says no such thing.
• in the February 4th interview, you said the ad "absolutely says" that the United States is to be "equated" with the terrorists. Read the ad, Mr. O'Reilly. It says no such thing.
• on February 5th, you told your viewers that "Glick was out of control." He may have been out of your control. But you and our government have got to learn that just because someone disagrees with you, he doesn't become a security threat. Again, watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He was not "out of control."
• on February 5th, you told your viewers that Glick was "spewing hatred for this program." Watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He criticized you, not the program, for unethically using sympathy for the 9/11 victims for your own political ends. He was calling your behavior improper. You had not earned his hatred.
• on February 5th, you told your viewers that Glick was "spewing hatred for ... his country." Watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He said no such thing. He specifically distinguished the people he was criticizing from "the people of America." He, like the rest of us, loves our country, even if we disagree with its political leaders, or your political views.
• on February 5th, you accused him of using "vile propaganda." What does "propaganda" mean to you, Mr. O'Reilly? He was disagreeing with your views. Why is that "propaganda"?
• six months later, you said that Glick said that the Bushes "were directly responsible for 9/11." Again, watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. He said no such thing. Indeed, he twice denied it.
• eleven months later, you said Glick "came on this show and accused President Bush of knowing about 9/11 and murdering his own father." This, Mr. O'Reilly, is a total, if not pathological, fabrication. Glick said nothing about Bush "knowing" about 9/11. He said nothing about Bush "murdering" his own father. Watch the interview, Mr. O'Reilly. Your statements characterizing what Glick said are absolutely false.
• just last week, you again repeated the claim that Glick said that President Bush was "responsible for his father's death." He said nothing of the sort.
• just last week, you repeated the claim that Glick "implied that the United States itself was a terrorist nation." Glick said nothing of the sort.
• just last week, you said Glick said "America itself was responsible for the 9/11 attack." Glick said nothing of the sort.
• And finally, and most extraordinarily, just last week you repeated the claim that "security actually had to take the guy out of the building, he was that out of control." This, Mr. O'Reilly, you know to be absolutely false. Indeed, it was you who threatened physical violence against Mr. Glick after his interview, and your own staff that apologetically begged Mr. Glick to leave as quickly as he could, fearing that if you saw Glick again, as they said, you would "end up in jail."

I understand how someone loses his temper, Mr. O'Reilly. I have done the same myself. But a decent man apologizes for his lack of control, and he certainly doesn't continue to abuse someone he has wronged. Mr. Glick is not the New York Times. He will not earn more money from higher ratings because you attack him so viciously. Neither he nor his widowed mother get any benefit at all from seeing Glick slandered by your on a regular basis. You are wrong about the facts, Mr. O'Reilly. And you are wrong to continue to do such harm. Have the courage to admit your error. Apologize to Mr. Glick, and let him go back to a life that has been made difficult enough by, as you said, the "barbarians" who killed his father. This family has suffered enough from barbaric behavior.

O'Reilly and the Cold War

O'Reilly and the Cold War 12/19/2004 03:40 PM
Thanks for the amazingly thoughtful and interesting comments on the O'Reilly show. I want to answer one questions about that because several people raised it: Why would any sensible person agree to be a guest on that show? Truth be told, I've always in the past declined to be on the Factor and other shows like it. I agreed this time because the issue "Is dissent disloyal?" is important, I've thought a lot about it, and I thought I might be able to contribute something useful. And I would have, had he not changed the issue! But, since the main thrust of my guest stint on this blog is learning lessons from past mistakes, I won't do it again! (The reason, by the way, is not because it's unpleasant, but because no one should allow himself to be used by a demagogue.) Speaking of which, let's return to our history. We left off with the Japanese internment. As several comments noted, the Supreme Court in 1944 upheld the internment in the case of Korematsu v. United States. In effect, the Court held that, in wartime, we all have to make sacrifices, and it couldn't say that the decision to internment these people was not a rational military decision at the time it was made. Korematsu has gone down as one of the most profoundly embarrassing decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, and the nation has in many ways confessed the unconstitutionality of the internment in the sixty years since the decision. (As an interesting aside, by the way, I sumbitted a friend of the Court brief on behalf of Fred Korematsu --he is still alive and flourishing -- in the Guanatamo Bay, Hamdi, and Padilla cases in the Supreme Court last spring.) At the end of World War II, Americans were optimistic. We had the strongest military in the world, we had just won a "great" war and we had clearly been on the side of the angels. The world was at peace. Within a short time, however, everything changed. Although the Soviet Union had been our ally during the war, relations collapsed beween the U.S. and the Soviet Union as the need for that alliance disappeared. Within a stunningly short period of time, the American economy took a nosedive, there were revelations of Soviet espionage, the Soviet Union exploded its first atomic bomb, China fell to the Communists, Americans began to build bomb shelters as they prepared by nuclear bombs to rain down upon our cities, and the Korean War burst upon the scene. Who was to blame? How did the Soviets get the bomb? Why had China fallen to the Communists? A group of anti-New Deal Republicans and conservative Southern Democrats had the answer -- it was American Communists who had sold us out and were working to further the Soviet cause. Men like Richard Nixon in California and Joseph McCarthy in Wisconsin began to play the Red Card in order to get elected, and they did. In the 1946 elections, the Republicans, who now portrayed the choice as one between Communism and Republicanism, picked up 54 seats in the House. After being out of power for 16 long years, the Republicans had found a strategy that could propel them back into power. Democrats, who were overwhelmed by the growing anti-Communist hysteria, jumped on the bandwagon, afraid to resist. Within a few short years the United States had a new federal loyalty program for over four million government employees, the House Un-American Activities Committee investigated thousands of individuals to determine if they were secret Communists, state and federal governments adopted their own loyalty programs, investigations, blacklists, and anti-Communist laws. Tens of thousands of people were threatened, intimidated, fired, humiliated, and even prosecuted. Who were these people? Were they spies and sabotuers? No doubt, there were Soviet agents in the United States. But they were almost never the target of these actions. They were too well-hidden for that. Rather, these actions were cynical efforts to make political hay by taking advantage of, and exacerbating, the fear that was already upon the land. So, who were these people? After the Depression, many Americans began to search for answers to what had happened to the nation. Many toyed with communism. At this time, the Communist Part of the United States was a lawful political party that ran candidates for public office throughout the nation. It stood for such causes as women's rights, the rights of labor, and public housing; it opposed the rise of fascism in Europe and racism at home. As many as 250,000 Americans joined the CPUSA in this period. Moreover, many millions more participated in CPUSA events or joined other organization that shared some of the goals and programs of the CPUSA. During World War II, we fought side-by-side with the Soviet Union, and FDR encouraged Americans to see the Soviets as our allies and friends. After the war, though, all this fell apart. And suddenly the most dangerous question in America was: "Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party or a member of any organization that is or was affiliated with the Commnist Party or have you ever attended an event sponored by the Communist Party, or signed a Communist Party petition, or attended a Communist Party rally, or read a Communist book?" An affirmative answer to any of these questions would immediately cast doubt on the patriotism and loyalty of the individual. After all, how do we know you're not still a Commie who is secretly working to subvert the government of the United States. This was the heart of McCarthyism.

O'Reilly OS X Conference Day Three

O'Reilly OS X Conference Day Three 10/30/2003 12:34 PM

The O'Reilly Factor

The O'Reilly Factor 12/19/2004 03:40 PM
I'll get back to the history tomorrow (Saturday). For now, though, I want to tell you about my experience tonight as a guest on the Bill O'Reilly show. I received a call this afternoon (Friday) from the producer inviting me to debate O'Reilly on the question: “Is dissent disloyal?” After the producer and I discussed this issue, O’Reilly (according to the producer) decided to redefine the question: “Can an American want the United States to lose the war in Iraq and still be patriotic?” Of course, this is a loaded question. It not-so-subtly implies that those who oppose the war want the United States to lose and, even worse, want American soldiers to die. One of Joseph McCarthy’s favorite tactics was to imply that anyone who believed in the social or economic principles of communism also supported the violent overthrow of the government. The tactic of guilt-by-inference is all-too-familiar in American history. (I'll return to McCarthyism in my next entry.) In any event, in our “debate” O’Reilly insisted on his “narrow” framing of the question and, when I called him on the issue, denied that he intended to imply anything about those who merely oppose the war. I accepted his framing of the question (it is, after all, his show) and argued that a patriotic citizen could in principle want the nation to lose a war if the war is unjust and if losing meant that fewer American soldiers would die for no good reason. O'Reilly maintained that losing a war necessarily means that more American soldiers will die than continuing the war and that no one could therefore patriotically wants the nation to lose. O’Reilly tossed out such ugly phrases as “despicable,” “traitor,” and “disloyal” to describe those who would disagree. The purpose, of course, was to excite his audience. After the show, I received dozens of emails, most of which were along the following lines: “You ought to be arrested, tried, convicted of wartime treason. And I don't have to tell you the penalty for that.” “I hope they are checking you out for being a traitor!!!” “You are not only despicable, but should go ahead and move out of the USA.” “I must imagine, Mr. Stone, that you will look over your shoulder a little bit, because maybe some soldier in a foxhole somewhere might be a tad angered with you and your lunacy. There may be a few G.I.s in Chicago even that would like to ‘speak’ with you.” “There is the tendency for citizens to take the law into their own hands in these cases. Decent, ordinary people, not of the left, are angry enough at the far left to be willing to go along with things you would consider unconscionable.” “You're a despicable Piece of feces, A Gutless Traitor. and I strongly suggest that you get your Terrorist Sympathizing Worthless ass out of this country while you can still walk and talk.” And so on. What do you make of all this in light of our on-going conversation?

O'Reilly OS X Conference Day Two

O'Reilly OS X Conference Day Two 10/29/2003 02:21 AM

O'Reilly: Why PHP 5 Rocks!

O'Reilly: Why PHP 5 Rocks! 07/16/2004 08:27 AM
New from the O'Reilly PHP Development Center is an article about Why PHP 5 Rocks!

O'Reilly OS X Conference Day One

O'Reilly OS X Conference Day One 10/29/2003 12:13 AM

The O'Reilly Radar

The O'Reilly Radar 10/29/2003 12:13 AM

O'Reilly Radar

O'Reilly Radar 02/10/2004 01:17 PM
I've heard this talk a couple of times, so Im just listening for something new and cool Timisms. One bit of commentary, its great that wikis are on the O'Reilly Radar, but there is an even better reason for it...

Hacks.O'Reilly.com

Hacks.O'Reilly.com 03/11/2003 09:43 AM
The full-blown version of O'Reilly's Hacks Series site is now up at hacks.oreilly.com. In addition to info about the current crop of books (Linux Server, Google, Mac OS X), there are listings of published hacks, some complete hacks, and each has its own discussion forum.

Gotta Hack? Got a non-obvious solution to an interesting problem? Throw your hack into the ring and it just might be in a Hacks book-to-be. Not a hacker yourself but have a hack or Hacks book you'd like to see? Suggest it and perhaps it will be so written.

O'Reilly Intro

O'Reilly Intro 02/10/2004 02:51 AM
Changing the world by spreading the knowledge of innovators. Digital Democracy is an emerging area of innovation. Wonderful moment to hear from the pioneers. Joe is the Edison of the Movement (Brit Blaser), although we are not sure if he...

New O'Reilly magazine: Make

New O'Reilly magazine: Make 07/29/2004 10:02 PM
Today, at OSCON in Portland, Dale Dougherty and I announced a new O'Reilly magazine called Make. It'll be a quarterly, full-color magazine filled with fun projects and hardware hacks involving technology. (Dale is the editor and publisher, and I'm the editor-in-chief. Thanks to BB's own John Battelle for getting me involved!)

Make will have 5-minute tips you can use to improve your gadgets, networks, and computers, as well as much longer projects that might take several days (or weeks) to complete. The first issue is coming out in January. If you're interested, visit the web site and sign up for the newsletter. I'll also be running the Make blog on that page. I hope that a lot of BB readers become Make contributors, too. Please send me your ideas for hacks, tips, tricks, workarounds, neat things to build, useful tools, etc. Link

Beyond the XML mirage (O'Reilly Network)

Beyond the XML mirage (O'Reilly Network) 09/13/2002 06:40 PM

O'Reilly: PHP Web Services Without SOAP

O'Reilly: PHP Web Services Without SOAP 10/31/2003 09:26 AM
Web services have to be one of the most underused parts of web development, especially in the corporate world. I can't say I've really heard of an instance where a (non-internet) company was using them for much of anything. Well, if you've been hesitant to leap into this powerful tool because you had to learn your way around SOAP, then thi s new article might just interest you.

O'Reilly: Downloading Uniquely

O'Reilly: Downloading Uniquely 12/06/2002 10:02 AM

O'Reilly: Paving the Way for Permissions

O'Reilly: Paving the Way for Permissions 02/07/2003 08:40 AM

O'Reilly: Simplify with PHP DataObjects

O'Reilly: Simplify with PHP DataObjects 08/06/2004 07:46 AM
Ever looked at your code and wondered if there was an easier way to perform the basic SQL tasks (insert, update, delete, select) without having to rewrite the SQL each time? Well, thi s new article from the O'Reilly Network aims to help you with just that.

Lessig: Shame on you, O'Reilly

Lessig: Shame on you, O'Reilly 07/24/2004 04:14 PM
Larry Lessig has written a long open letter to Bill O'Reilly that opens "You have declared a 'war' on the New York Times. That's good for you, good for them, and good for our democracy: Strong opinions deserve strong spokesmen. Your battle will help sharpen a debate about matters important to the Republic." Lessig then proceeds to take O'Reilly to task, point-by-point for an ongoing campaign of pathological libel agaist Jeremy Glick, the son of a 9/11 victim who spoke out against the Bush Presidency and the war. Glick appears in Outfoxed, a new documentary that criticises O'Reilly and his network, and in answering the charges raised in Outfoxed, O'Reilly has chosen Glick as a symbol of what he hates, and in order to make his point, he has been lying repeatedly about what Glick said and did. Lessig's point is that attacking a giant media organisation is one thing, but using your on-camera bully pulpit to repeatedly slander someone who has already lost so much is unconscionable.

# on February 5th, you told your viewers that "Glick was out of control." He may have been out of your control. But you and our government have got to learn that just because someone disagrees with you, he doesn"t become a security threat. Again, watch the interview, Mr. O"Reilly. He was not "out of control."

# on February 5th, you told your viewers that Glick was "spewing hatred for this program." Watch the interview, Mr. O"Reilly. He criticized you, not the program, for unethically using sympathy for the 9/11 victims for your own political ends. He was calling your behavior improper. You had not earned his hatred.

Link

Free Books from O'Reilly

Free Books from O'Reilly 02/14/2004 11:51 PM

www.oreilly.com -- O'Reilly Open Books Project: Did you know O'Rielly publishes some free books? Man, I love free books.

Over the years, O'Reilly & Associates has published a number of "Open Books" — books with various forms of "open" copyright. The reasons for "opening" copyright, as well as the specific license agreements under which they are opened, are as varied as our authors.

There are a couple dozen, from gems like Using Samba to curiosities like Programming the Be Operating System and Embedding Perl in HTML with Mason.

Click here to comment on this entry

Lessig : Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop

Lessig : Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop 07/24/2004 06:07 PM

Lessig writes an open letter to Bill O'Reilly from the FOX News show The Factor. Lessig has been blogging a lot about OutFoxed, Richard Greenwald's film criticizing FOX News. Lessig links to a clip from the film, the original interview with Jeremy Glick and the offending anti-war ad. He takes on point by point the series of false accusations that O'Reilly has been making about Glick in an unfair smear campaign against his Glick.

Lawrence Lessig

Mr. O'Reilly, please just stop.

Mr. O'Reilly,

You have declared a "war" on the New York Times. That's good for you, good for them, and good for our democracy: Strong opinions deserve strong spokesmen. Your battle will help sharpen a debate about matters important to the Republic.

But in waging this "war," you are continuing to abuse a man whom you have wronged, and to whom you owe an apology.

On February 4, 2003, Jeremy Glick was your guest on THE FACTOR. Glick had lost his father in the attack of 9/11. He had also signed an ad criticizing the war in Iraq. You were "surprised" that one who had lost his father could oppose that war. And so you had him on your show, presumably to ask him why. (Here's a clip from Outfoxed putting this story together.)

You might not remember precisely what you said on that interview, or more importantly, what Jeremy Glick said. So here's a copy that you can watch. Nor may you remember precisely what the ad that Jeremy Glick signed said. Here's a copy that you can read. And when you've watched what was actually said, and read what was actually written, I'm sure you will see that the statements you continue to make about Jeremy Glick are just plain false. Not Bill Clinton "depends upon what is is" false, but false the way most Americans learned growing up: just not true.

Please read Lessig's entire post.

Comment - TrackBack

O'Reilly On What Happened To BountyQuest

O'Reilly On What Happened To BountyQuest 11/10/2003 11:19 PM
Slashdot Nov 10 2003 11:36AM ET

O'Reilly: Your Mac and PHP Make Magic

O'Reilly: Your Mac and PHP Make Magic 01/17/2003 08:32 AM

New AxKit Book From O'Reilly

New AxKit Book From O'Reilly 07/25/2004 04:27 AM
kingubu writes "At long last, O'Reilly Media has published XML Publishing with AxKit. Using the power of Perl (and mod_perl) to transform the Apache Web server into a fully-featured XML publishing and application enviroment, Apache AxKit is one of the ...

Advanced PHP: O'Reilly on References

Advanced PHP: O'Reilly on References 09/13/2002 08:29 AM

Tim O'Reilly on Alpha Geeks

Tim O'Reilly on Alpha Geeks 09/04/2004 07:19 PM
Mark Frauenfelder: MP3 audio transcript of a interview with Tim O'Reilly talking about Alpha Geeks, who make things that aren't available, and as a result, make them available to everybody.

So often, signs of the future are all around us, but it isn't until much later that most of the world realizes their significance. Meanwhile, the innovators who are busy inventing that future live in a world of their own. They see and act on premises that are not yet apparent to others.

In the computer industry, these are the folks I affectionately call "the alpha geeks", the hackers who have such mastery of their tools that they "roll their own" when existing products don't give them what they need.

Link

O'Reilly: Using and Abusing Directories
in PHP

O'Reilly: Using and Abusing Directories
in PHP 01/10/2003 08:50 AM

Tim O'Reilly: Amazon Web Services API

Tim O'Reilly: Amazon Web Services API 07/21/2002 11:37 PM
Web sites like Amazon and Google are applications. And Microsoft has demonstrated over and over again that a platform strategy beats an applications strategy every time. Once you have other companies building added value that relies on you, you have a kind of benign industry lock in that's a real competitive advantage. (That's why I bet that Microsoft's MapPoint eventually supplants AOL's MapQuest as the dominant resource for geographic information. Unless AOL gets off its duff and supports developers, of course.)

"zeldman.caryg"
Grok Description matches for ''Firefox Hacks'' Released by O'Reilly
GrokA matches for ''Firefox Hacks'' Released by O'Reilly

Mozilla 1.7.1, Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 and
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 Released

Mozilla 1.7.1, Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 and
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 Released 07/08/2004 08:25 PM

Introduction to Mozilla Firefox and
Mozilla Thunderbird for IE and Outlook
Express Users

Introduction to Mozilla Firefox and
Mozilla Thunderbird for IE and Outlook
Express Users 04/14/2005 04:08 PM

Mozilla Firefox Convert Robin Bloor
Switches to Mozilla Thunderbird

Mozilla Firefox Convert Robin Bloor
Switches to Mozilla Thunderbird 04/21/2004 05:07 PM

The History of Mozilla Firefox: From
Phoenix, to Firebird, to Firefox

The History of Mozilla Firefox: From
Phoenix, to Firebird, to Firefox 03/31/2005 07:27 AM

Mozilla Firefox 1.1, Mozilla Thunderbird
1.1 and XULRunner Release Plans

Mozilla Firefox 1.1, Mozilla Thunderbird
1.1 and XULRunner Release Plans 04/09/2005 09:58 AM

Gecko 1.8, Mozilla Firefox 1.1 and
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.1 Release Plans

Gecko 1.8, Mozilla Firefox 1.1 and
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.1 Release Plans 03/31/2005 08:53 AM

French Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla
Thunderbird Book Published

French Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla
Thunderbird Book Published 06/05/2005 11:15 PM

Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Download
Dialog Source Spoofing

Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Download
Dialog Source Spoofing 01/04/2005 11:22 AM
Description: Secunia Research has discovered a vulnerability in Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox, which can be exploited by malicious people to spoof the source displayed in the Download Dialog box. The problem is that long sub-domains and paths aren’t displayed correctly, which therefore can be exploited to obfuscate what is being displayed in the source field of the Download Dialog box. The vulnerability has been confirmed in Mozilla 1.7.3 for Linux, Mozilla 1.7.5 for Windows, and…

Direct and Related Links for 'Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Download Dialog Source Spoofing'

Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox User Interface
Spoofing Vulnerability

Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox User Interface
Spoofing Vulnerability 08/01/2004 10:04 AM

Direct and Related Links for 'Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox User Interface Spoofing Vulnerability'

“A vulnerability has been reported in Mozilla and Mozilla Firefox, allowing malicious websites to spoof the user interface. The problem is that Mozilla and Mozilla Firefox don’t restrict websites from including arbitrary, remote XUL (XML User Interface Language) files. This can be exploited to “hijack” most of the user interface (including tool bars, SSL certificate dialogs, address bar and more), thereby controlling almost anything the user sees….A PoC (Proof of Concept) exploit for Mozilla Firefox…

Mozilla Firefox 0.8 and Mozilla
Thunderbird 0.5 News and Reviews

Mozilla Firefox 0.8 and Mozilla
Thunderbird 0.5 News and Reviews 02/15/2004 03:46 AM

1.0 Branch Created for Mozilla Firefox
and Mozilla Thunderbird

1.0 Branch Created for Mozilla Firefox
and Mozilla Thunderbird 05/21/2004 02:11 PM

Radicati: Mozilla Thunderbird Not as
Successful as Mozilla Firefox

Radicati: Mozilla Thunderbird Not as
Successful as Mozilla Firefox 04/08/2005 09:59 AM

Mozilla Firefox Reaches 1.0PR, Still
Named Firefox

Mozilla Firefox Reaches 1.0PR, Still
Named Firefox 09/14/2004 02:50 PM

Firefox 1.0 Preview Release and
Thunderbird 0.8 Released - Mozilla
Foundation Adds New Features to Firefox
and Thunderbird as New Apps Near 1.0
Launch

Firefox 1.0 Preview Release and
Thunderbird 0.8 Released - Mozilla
Foundation Adds New Features to Firefox
and Thunderbird as New Apps Near 1.0
Launch 09/14/2004 03:22 AM
The Mozilla Foundation today released the Mozilla Firefox 1.0 Preview Release web browser and Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 email client. Mozilla Firefox 1.0 Preview Release is an innovative, secure, lightning fast web browser that is rapidly gaining global market share. Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 is the Mozilla Foundation's next generation email client. These releases bring Firefox and Thunderbird one step closer to their much anticipated 1.0 releases, scheduled for later this fall. [PRWEB Sep 14, 2004]

Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Vulnerability

Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Vulnerability 09/18/2004 10:48 AM

Direct and Related Links for 'Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox Vulnerability'

“Software: Mozilla 0.x, Mozilla 1.0, Mozilla 1.1, Mozilla 1.2, Mozilla 1.3, Mozilla 1.4, Mozilla 1.5, Mozilla 1.6, Mozilla 1.7.x, Mozilla Firefox 0.x Description: WESTPOINT has reported a vulnerability in Mozilla / Mozilla Firefox, which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to conduct session fixation attacks. For more information: SA12341 Solution: Do not follow untrusted links.”…

Mozilla Firefox 1.0.3 and Mozilla 1.7.7
Coming

Mozilla Firefox 1.0.3 and Mozilla 1.7.7
Coming 04/05/2005 02:28 PM

Anonymous file sharing network not so
anonymous after all?

Anonymous file sharing network not so
anonymous after all? 12/02/2003 12:12 PM
An anonymous file-sharing network, "Winny," has proven to be not so anonymous for 2 Japanese men who were arrested for trading games and films.

Mozilla Firefox 0.9

Mozilla Firefox 0.9 06/15/2004 10:38 PM
An award winning preview of next generation browsing technology from The Mozilla Foundation.

Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3

Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3 08/04/2004 03:11 PM

Mozilla Firefox 1.0 PR

Mozilla Firefox 1.0 PR 09/16/2004 02:01 AM
A Mozilla-based browser.

A New Look At Mozilla Firefox 0.9

A New Look At Mozilla Firefox 0.9 06/14/2004 06:07 PM

Mozilla Firefox 0.9 RC

Mozilla Firefox 0.9 RC 06/09/2004 06:03 AM

Mozilla Firefox 1.0.2

Mozilla Firefox 1.0.2 03/23/2005 10:48 PM

Mozilla Firefox v0.8

Mozilla Firefox v0.8 02/10/2004 02:50 AM
Mozilla Firefox is a redesign of the Mozilla browser component, similar to Galeon, K-Meleon and Camino, but written using the XUL user interface language and designed to be cross-platform. [Freeware 6.19 MB]

Mozilla Firefox - Ads

Mozilla Firefox - Ads 02/10/2004 02:50 AM
really no reason to run Internet Explorer .. firefox promotional buttons .. Mozilla Firefox ad webpage .. banner ads .. hier

mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html
track this site | 5 links

New Firefox and Mozilla

New Firefox and Mozilla 04/17/2005 09:51 PM
TechSpot Apr 18 2005 12:53AM GMT

Mozilla FireFox 1.0PR

Mozilla FireFox 1.0PR 09/16/2004 08:56 PM
ZDNet Sep 17 2004 0:14AM GMT

Firefox 1.0.3 y Mozilla 1.7

Firefox 1.0.3 y Mozilla 1.7 04/16/2005 03:18 PM

The History of Mozilla Firefox

The History of Mozilla Firefox 03/31/2005 04:47 PM

:: Reviews : First Look at Mozilla
Firefox 0.9

:: Reviews : First Look at Mozilla
Firefox 0.9 06/16/2004 03:59 AM
Mad Penguin has posted their first look at FireFox 0.9 .. this review at MadPenguin.org .. Quote Source

madpenguin.org/cms/html/47/1695.html
track this site | 4 links

''Firefox Hacks'' Released by O'Reilly

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: "anonymous browsing" "mozilla firefox"