Supreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem Regs
Grok Headline matches for Supreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem Regs
Supreme Court to hear cable modem case
Supreme Court to hear cable modem case
03/25/2005 07:02 PMA group of ISPs (Internet service providers) on Tuesday will ask the
U.S. Supreme Court to require broadband cable providers to share their
networks with competitors, just as incumbent U.S. telecommunications
carriers were required to share their DSL (Digital Subscriber Line)
networks during the past five years.
Cable Modem Case Heads to the Supreme
Court (PC World)
Cable Modem Case Heads to the Supreme
Court (PC World)
03/28/2005 10:13 AMPC World - Court will examine whether broadband cable networks must be
open to competing ISPs.
Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation
Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation
03/28/2005 11:56 PMTuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear opening arguments
in the fight to classify what constitutes an "information service,"
and whether cable companies and voice over IP providers deserve to be
treated differently under a separate set of government regulations.
Cable Modem Hackers unlock Cable Modem
Cable Modem Hackers unlock Cable Modem
02/10/2004 02:44 AMA very amazing article on the Register on how a group of hackers have
unlocked a certain brand of cable...
Supreme Court Will Rule on ISP Cable
Access
Supreme Court Will Rule on ISP Cable
Access
03/25/2005 06:54 PMThe long battle over whether cable services should be treated as
telecommunication or information services comes to the Supreme Court,
where a previous FCC ruling will be tested.
Cable Equal Access Case Goes to Supreme
Court
Cable Equal Access Case Goes to Supreme
Court
03/24/2005 02:36 PMSupreme Court Seems Skeptical About
Cable Claims In Brand X
Supreme Court Seems Skeptical About
Cable Claims In Brand X
03/30/2005 06:50 AMWhile most of the Supreme Court attention yesterday went to the
Grokster case, the Justices also heard the Brand X case, which was an
appeal on a
rulin
g from a few years back, saying that the FCC was wrong in
classifying cable broadband services as "information services" instead
of "telecom services" -- and, thus, opening up the cable companies to
forced line sharing rules. While it might not mean anything, the
initial reports suggest that the Justices were
skeptical of the cable companies claims, and
seemed to wonder why cable broadband and telco broadband were being
treated differently. Unfortunately, the case isn't quite as
straightforward as it might appear. The reason the telcos have line
sharing rules in the first place is because they came by their copper
lines through the breakup of a government granted monopoly. These
were systems built with government backing (though, as some have
pointed out, the cost of those lines should
be
next to nothing by now). Most of the cable systems were built by
private companies. That's a big distinction, and really is at the
heart of this case. While both sides claim that competition will be
stifled if the other side wins, that seems unlikely (either way).
With the FCC leaning
again
st line sharing, even if cable offerings are classified as telecom
services, they might not be required to share lines. However the
court decides, though, it is likely to
influence
many other FCC rulings that impact a variety of different
services, such as VoIP -- since it will set up the regulatory
framework by which the FCC can rule across both cable and DSL. If
both are aligned, it should also play into how they regulate wireless
broadband technologies as well. In other words, the specific decision
may not have a direct impact right away, but the eventual consequences
may be far reaching.
Appeals Cable Broadband Ruling to
Supreme Court (Reuters)
Appeals Cable Broadband Ruling to
Supreme Court (Reuters)
08/30/2004 04:04 PMReuters - The U.S. government has asked the
Supreme Court to reverse an appeals court ruling that could
lead to heavier regulation of cable companies' high-speed
Internet service.
Supreme Court asks why cable broadband
lacks regulation
Supreme Court asks why cable broadband
lacks regulation
03/29/2005 08:35 PMWASHINGTON - U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday questioned why the
U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would classify cable
modem broadband as unregulated, while it regulates DSL (digital
subscriber line) and other services offered by large
telecommunications carriers.
FCC receives stay; will appeal cable
ruling to the Supreme Court
FCC receives stay; will appeal cable
ruling to the Supreme Court
04/11/2004 09:27 AMFCC hopes the Supreme Court will overturn a ruling on the definition
of cable internet services.
My cable modem died.
My cable modem died.
12/12/2003 12:44 PMMy cable modem died last night before I was finished (it still is
down -- I'm now dialing in via MSN). But, Forgetfoo went off and
designed me a whole new look! See why CSS is cool? He can come up with
a new design very easily. Anyway, I will keep working on the design
this weekend. Who knows? I might just use Forgetfoo's design.
What's A Cable Modem, And Who Decides?
What's A Cable Modem, And Who Decides?
03/28/2005 12:56 PMForbes Mar 28 2005 5:22PM GMT
Other News: Cable Modem Hacking
Other News: Cable Modem Hacking
02/10/2004 02:42 AMAnd here's what's going on with cable modem hacking....
Cable modem hackers conquer the co-ax
Cable modem hackers conquer the co-ax
02/10/2004 03:00 AMCable modem revenues jump
Cable modem revenues jump
12/03/2003 08:42 AMPersonal Computer World Dec 3 2003 8:36AM ET
U.S. Cable Modem Growth Slows, Opening
Door to DSL (Reuters)
U.S. Cable Modem Growth Slows, Opening
Door to DSL (Reuters)
02/19/2004 06:19 PMReuters - As the market for high-speed Internet
connections moves into many American homes, telephone companies
are finally starting to take market share from once-dominant
cable companies.
SMC’s Wireless Cable Modem Router Among
First to Receive CableHome 1.1
Certification
SMC’s Wireless Cable Modem Router Among
First to Receive CableHome 1.1
Certification
05/31/2004 02:06 PMSMC® Networks EZ Connect™ Wireless Cable Modem Router, SMC8013WG, has
received CableHome™ 1.1 certification from CableLabs®. [PRWEB May 27,
2004]
Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit
Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit
03/30/2005 08:56 PMCBS MarketWatch Mar 31 2005 12:31AM GMT
Motorola, Inc: Motorola Reaches Cable
Modem Milestone in EMEA
Motorola, Inc: Motorola Reaches Cable
Modem Milestone in EMEA
09/08/2004 05:05 AMUK Wire Sep 8 2004 9:29AM GMT
US Patent Office Grants Special Patent
Status to Private Inventor Regarding
Alleged Technology Infringement by
Acterna Corporation’s DSAM 2500 Cable
Modem Tester
US Patent Office Grants Special Patent
Status to Private Inventor Regarding
Alleged Technology Infringement by
Acterna Corporation’s DSAM 2500 Cable
Modem Tester
09/27/2004 03:30 AMRichard C. Jaworski announces that the US Patent Office has granted
his “Petition to Make Special” on his System of Testing the Upstream
Cable Modem Channel (TUCMC) patent application. The petition to the US
Patent Office alleged infringement of his technology by Acterna
Corporation in their DSAM 2500 Cable Modem Test Instrument. Mr.
Jaworski has written evidence that Acterna knew of the patent and the
technology prior to releasing the feature in the DSAM 2500. According
to patent law, triple damages are applicable for prior knowledge
infringement as soon as the patent issues. Due to its special status,
Jaworski expects the patent to issue in the immediate future. [PRWEB
Sep 27, 2004]
What is going on at the Supreme Court?
What is going on at the Supreme Court?
06/29/2004 11:59 AMThomas and Scalia are the most conservative conservative Justices.
Breyer is on of the liberal Justices. (Admittedly the least
liberal,…
The Supreme Court says no
The Supreme Court says no
03/24/2005 11:52 AMThe justices deny a request for an order to re-insert Terri Schiavo's
feeding tube. Is this the end?
Showdown at the Supreme Court
Showdown at the Supreme Court
03/17/2005 03:27 AM“On March 29, the entertainment and technology industries will
descend upon Washington, D.C. to argue their respective sides before
the Supreme Court in the landmark case of MGM v Grokster. At stake:
the future of peer-to-peer technology, consumer electronics, software
design, and consumer rights in the United States. In April 2003, a
federal judge ruled that Streamcast Networks — the developer and
distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software, and Grokster
— the developer and distributor…
Direct and Related Links for 'Showdown at
the Supreme Court'
Supreme Court to try Brand X
Supreme Court to try Brand X
03/28/2005 11:29 PMIndependent ISPs argue cable companies should be forced to lease
lines, but what's really on trial is the concept of communication.
US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice
US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice
07/01/2004 02:04 AMZDNet Australia Jul 1 2004 5:44AM GMT
Dems on the Supreme Court
Dems on the Supreme Court
01/11/2004 07:56 AMSo an underplayed aspect of this campaign has been how the Democratic
candidates would differently select the Supreme Court. On NPR's
debate
, Senator Lieberman pointed to Justice Souter as a model. Congressman
Kucinich plugged Justice Ginsburg. I've gotten a couple pings asking
what the right answer is.
Hard question for me. Of course neither Ginsburg nor Souter were on
the correct side (or the right side) of Eldred, but I certainly think
Justice Souter is a model justice -- serious, hard working, unburdened
by ideology, prepared. I never quite get the principle that guides
Justice Ginsburg's choice between activism and not, or principle and
not, so I'm waiting to see the genius in that selection by President
Clinton.
Justice Breyer of course wrote a brilliant dissent in Eldred --
brilliant, though not effective. He was
proud of the decision's embrace of economics as the standard by which the
Sonny Bono Act was judged. But while I'm a fan of the result, I've
been too deeply affected (scarred?) by the
originalism/textaulism/fidelity theories of Scalia to be enamored of
that method.
In my view, perhaps the best sitting justice is a Republican appointee
-- Stevens. And if candidates are looking for what makes the best the
best, then it is certainly his judges' judge-like character. There's
no simple line that predicts Justice Stevens' result -- certainly not
a political line. And if there is any quality this Court needs, it is
that -- following a line that does not seem a political line.
The most impressive judges not sitting on the Supreme Court are also,
um, Republicans. (What party am I again?) Judge
Kozin
ski is a great judge -- too young when appointed, but someone who
has matured brilliantly in the job. And while his views about how to
the interpret the constitution make me cringe, history will record the
greatest judge of our time as Judge
Posner. But I
doubt that this is the time that a President from either party will
pick greatness as the reason to select a Justice.
Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice
Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice
06/29/2004 12:05 PMIn a close vote, the justices rule that a federal law designed to
restrict Internet pornography violates Americans' free-speech rights.
The porn must go on - US Supreme Court
The porn must go on - US Supreme Court
06/29/2004 11:40 PMFor now . . .
In the first quarter of 2004, Taiwanese
cable modem shipment grew by 4.9% to
reach 2.3 million units, while shipment
value increased by 13.2%, reaching
US$76.3 million
In the first quarter of 2004, Taiwanese
cable modem shipment grew by 4.9% to
reach 2.3 million units, while shipment
value increased by 13.2%, reaching
US$76.3 million
06/25/2004 02:00 AMResearch and Markets are delighted to announce the addition of The
Taiwanese Cable Modem Industry, 1Q 2004 and Beyond to their offering
[PRWEB Jun 25, 2004]
Why the Supreme Court will hear Grokster
Why the Supreme Court will hear Grokster
08/22/2004 07:30 AMCory Doctorow: Over on Lessig's blog, Tim Wu has
enumerated 10 reasons that the Supreme Court is likely to hear the
Grokster case:
1. These is a stated legal conflict on the Sony standard as between
the 7th and 9th Circuits;
2. The 7th and 9th Circuits disagree (albeit in partially in dicta) on
the relevance of willful blindness to secondary liability;
4. The Court has these matters in hand: it has granted cert. in many
similar cases historically (Sony, 1980s, White-Smith (the Piano Roll
case) 1909, Teleprompter and Fortnightly (Cable / Broadcast, 1960s &
1970s);
5. The Court has a vague sense that some far-out stuff is going on in
the field of “Computer Law” that maybe it should check
out;
6. Law clerks use KaZaA & BitTorrent to plan basketball games;
7. Stevens and Breyer deeply dig this stuff;
8. Scalia likes anything having to do with property;
9. Souter got his first computer last week.
And most importantly,
10. The Court loves to be the center of attention, and this would make
it so.
LinkSupreme Court Case Previews Now
Available
Supreme Court Case Previews Now
Available
12/22/2004 01:27 AMThe Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School is
now offering free previews of high-provile Supreme Court cases before
the are argued and ruled on. The previews are available...
Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown
Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown
04/20/2004 06:00 AMForbes Apr 20 2004 10:16AM GMT
Web Guide to U.S. Supreme Court Research
Web Guide to U.S. Supreme Court Research
12/25/2003 07:52 PMWeb Guide to U.S. Supreme Court Researchhttp://www.l
lrx.com/features/supremectwebguide.htmGail Partin's
thorough and up-to-date guide provides annotated links to the most
reliable, substantive sites for U.S. Supreme Court research. Her focus
is predominantly on information that is freely or inexpensively
available on the Internet.
U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right
U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right
06/21/2004 09:55 PMAMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court
AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court
06/22/2004 05:47 AMChip giant must now hand over documents to EC
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
03/31/2005 09:11 AMLandmark Supreme Court Caseshttp://www.landmarkcases.org/
There is always a great demand for educational materials
regarding the most important US Supreme Court Cases and this website
is an outgrowth of that sustained interest. Developed by Street Law
and the Supreme Court Historical Society, this website was developed
in order to provide teachers with a full range of resources and
activities regarding such cases. The general teaching strategies
offered here include political cartoon analysis, moot court, continuum
exercises, and website evaluation. Some of the cases covered here
include Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona.
The site also offers some detailed explanations of important related
concepts, such as federalism, national supremacy, and judicial review.
Additional, the site provides background summaries of each case and
pertinent discussion questions for a variety of reading levels and
abilities. This has been added to
Legal Resources 2005
Internet MiniGuide. [From The Scout Report, Copyright Internet Scout
Project 1994-2004.
http://scout.wisc.edu/]
US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation
US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation
06/22/2004 11:04 AMThe US Supreme Court has ruled that Intel may eventually have to turn
600,000 pages of documents over to EU investigators as part of a
long-running inquiry into Intel's business practices in Europe.
Supreme Court quashes Net porn law
Supreme Court quashes Net porn law
06/29/2004 03:19 PMZDNet Jun 29 2004 6:45PM GMT
"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)"
"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)"
06/29/2004 02:13 PMGrok Description matches for Supreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem Regs
GrokA matches for Supreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem Regs
Supreme Court Questions FCC Cable Modem Regs