Partnership boom from depressed IT spending?
Grok Headline matches for Partnership boom from depressed IT spending?
Retailers welcome spending boom
Retailers welcome spending boom
06/27/2004 04:42 AMScotland's retailers look at ways to encourage investment and growth
on the back of healthy sales figures.
Telecom gear suppliers bank on spending
boom
Telecom gear suppliers bank on spending
boom
06/24/2004 02:26 PMEquipment makers salivate over prospect of more spending from
carriers, but not everyone will get an equal slice of the pie.
Depressed
Depressed
09/10/2004 08:45 AMLooking at the course of this election, can you find anything left of
our democracy?...
Depressed over Daisy
Depressed over Daisy
06/22/2005 02:54 AMYou know, seeing open source projects like
Daisy make me just
want to stop
JSPWiki
development altogether. It's simply just too good, and I feel like
there's no way I can compete.
Daisy will be a winner.
Update and a bit of soul-searching:
Heh. Thanks for your kind
words, Steven. FWIW, I'm not quitting JSPWiki development, but
frankly, I was in awe while looking at what Daisy has accomplished.
It really fills a gap that has been in the software space, and it has
learned quite a few lessons from Wikis.
The thing is, Daisy being Java makes it far more interesting to
corporations. Individuals prefer to deploy PHP or other light-weight
apps that can be easily installed on web hotels, and so far the
JSPWiki niche has been in corporate intranet deployments. Something
like Daisy will surely eat into that niche, and it makes me think if I
should refocus my attentions elsewhere. Find perhaps a new focus for
JSPWiki, or something.
The other thing is that I have quite a lot of ideas I would like to
put into reality. JSPWiki's code base is (still) pretty healthy, and
there's much life still in it - in fact it seems that jspwiki.org is
finally running on its own without my constant watch. There are some
professional developers contributing very good quality code, and many
people seem to like the whole project. But since nobody is paying me
to work on it (any volunteers? :), I am using something like two hours
a day on it. Which amounts to quite a lot of work over the years, but
I still know that I can't match the power of professionally employed
developers working 8/5 on an OSS project. And that sort of makes me
sad, because I would like to match the quality - to have an even race,
so to speak.
It's kinda like seeing your neighbour buy a new, powerful Ferrari,
while you still drive an old, crumbling Fiesta because you don't have
any money. You kinda feel happy for him, but you also feel jealous.
You kinda want to deride him for it, and want to say mean things, but
at your heart you still know that you would do the exact same thing if
you could.
Daisy's really good. I'm just a bit jealous at the people who get
to work on something like that full-time. In my current dayjob I get
to do little hands-on stuff. I mean, it's interesting in every
possible way, and I like many things about it, and the people I work
with are some of the smartest people I've ever met, and I would have
the opportunity to drive many things, but still I find that my heart
is not completely into it.
After all, I'm a tinkerer at heart. I get delight on the beauty of
code; I enjoy the feeling of making things 'click'. I like to
simplify things so that other people find use in them - maybe because
that solicits feedback. The beauty of open source for me is that you
can't hide anything: when you put it out there, people will see it for
what it is really worth. It's like a painting, or sculpture: it's
naked and visible for anyone to see and judge - you don't hide parts
of it under a blanket and just show the good bits. And getting
positive feedback on something like that is one of the few things that
can really make my heart tick.
The Bush Boomlet: "the Bush boom rests
more on hope than hard data—and on a
pretty weak definition of a boom." 10/31
The Bush Boomlet: "the Bush boom rests
more on hope than hard data—and on a
pretty weak definition of a boom." 10/31
10/31/2003 08:16 AMIs the economy really booming? .. this one by Daniel Gross .. This
Salon article .. another
slate.msn.com/id/2090498
track this
site | 6 links
CoD United Offensive boom boom
CoD United Offensive boom boom
09/20/2004 07:05 PMLuigi Auriemma (Sep 18 2004)
ITtoolbox Spending Survey Shows IT
Spending On The Rise
ITtoolbox Spending Survey Shows IT
Spending On The Rise
06/27/2004 04:51 AMThe results of the second annual ITtoolbox IT Spending Survey
demonstrate that IT budgets have increased over 2003. The survey,
which was sponsored by Hewlett-Packard, was conducted by ITtoolbox,
the leading provider of information for professionals in the IT
workplace. The purpose of the survey was to provide insight into
current and future purchasing trends of corporate IT departments
worldwide. [PRWEB Jun 27, 2004]
Limited's Depressed Express?
Limited's Depressed Express?
05/17/2004 12:07 PMThe Express and Limited chains show first-quarter weakness.
European Stocks Depressed Ahead of Intel
European Stocks Depressed Ahead of Intel
08/31/2004 07:50 AMAP via ABCNEWS.com Aug 31 2004 12:35PM GMT
Depressed? Diabetic? Try skin patches
(Reuters)
Depressed? Diabetic? Try skin patches
(Reuters)
04/16/2004 10:23 AMReuters - Patients with depression and diabetes may soon join those
getting pain relief, birth control hormones
and help quitting smoking through skin patches that can deliver
medication for days at a time.
Iraq's PM Says Saddam Depressed, Begs
for Mercy (Reuters)
Iraq's PM Says Saddam Depressed, Begs
for Mercy (Reuters)
09/20/2004 08:40 AMReuters - Deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is
depressed and has begged the Iraqi government for mercy, Iraq's
Prime Minister Iyad Allawi said in an interview published
Monday.
Depressed? New York City Screens for
People at Risk
Depressed? New York City Screens for
People at Risk
04/12/2005 11:12 PMThe practice is one that health officials hope will become a routine
part of primary care, much like a blood pressure test.
"Depressed French wine producers bomb
Government offices"
"Depressed French wine producers bomb
Government offices"
04/06/2005 03:08 AM"Sullen, Depressed President Retreats
Into Private, Paranoid World"
"Sullen, Depressed President Retreats
Into Private, Paranoid World"
08/02/2004 08:42 AMDepressed Annan close to quitting over
UN scandals - Sunday Times - Times
Online
Depressed Annan close to quitting over
UN scandals - Sunday Times - Times
Online
03/27/2005 04:55 AMDepressed Annan close to quitting over UN scandals - Sunday Times -
Times Online .. a sad tune coming
on
timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1543360,00.html
track this
site | 5 links
"Depressed Annan close to quitting over
UN scandals
KOFI ANNAN, the United
Nations secretary-general, is said to be
struggling with depression and
considering his future. Colleagues have
reported concerns about Annan ahead of
an official report this week..."
"Depressed Annan close to quitting over
UN scandals
KOFI ANNAN, the United
Nations secretary-general, is said to be
struggling with depression and
considering his future. Colleagues have
reported concerns about Annan ahead of
an official report this week..."
03/27/2005 06:21 PMNew: The Boom Box
New: The Boom Box
06/22/2005 02:00 AMRoxio released The Boom Box, a bundle of five audio programs: CD Spin
Doctor, Audio Hijack, iPodderX, MusicMagic Mixer, and iSpeak It.
Boom Boom Box
Boom Boom Box
07/16/2004 11:47 AM
Sure, it's cheesy, but
there's a surprising amount of potential use to be had from this $20
Boom Boom Box. Four AA batteries power built-in stereo speakers inside
a water-proof casing that even comes with a hanger so you can hook it
on your shower curtain rod or nozzle, turning almost any portable
audio player into a waterproof shower stereo. Put your $500 portable
player inside at your own peril, of course.
And it's not like you have to use it in the shower, either.
There's something to be said for a cheap, hard-plastic case that lets
you share your sound whenever, wherever you want. (Thanks,
Rachel!)
Read - Product
Page [DreamGear]
Boom 1.4.4
Boom 1.4.4
10/29/2003 10:29 PMBOOM is an arcade game in the grand tradition.
Ka-boom Boom (12:02 PM)
Ka-boom Boom (12:02 PM)
02/26/2003 03:39 PMThursday night I went out into the snow and bought Grand Theft Auto 3.
After spending a large chunk of the weekend playing, I have
Boom 1.5
Boom 1.5
06/15/2004 07:01 AMBOOM is an arcade game in the grand tradition.
BOOM!
BOOM!
06/03/2004 11:25 PM
Nuclear
codes = 00000000 Remember Johnson's Daisy ad, which led to the
question whose finger do you want on the button? Well it seems it was
not the President's finger alone. SAC took it upon itself (if this
article can be believed) to set all the nuclear launch codes to
00000000 and then to tell all of the launch operators. Any one of
those crews could have by themselves started WWIII. Apparently, that
whole "nuclear briefcase" trick was nothing but a charade
for many years. YIKES! (via Geekpress and Slashdot).
Wireless boom
Wireless boom
12/04/2003 09:36 PMCNET Asia Dec 4 2003 7:53PM ET
The new Internet boom
The new Internet boom
06/03/2004 05:06 AMUSA Today Jun 3 2004 9:17AM GMT
Semicon boom
Semicon boom
01/02/2004 06:04 AMCNET Asia Jan 2 2004 4:51AM ET
Transmeta Looks For a Different PC Boom
Transmeta Looks For a Different PC Boom
12/08/2003 06:56 AMSiliconValley.Internet.com Dec 8 2003 6:27AM ET
Disney Goes Boom!
Disney Goes Boom!
09/01/2004 07:19 PMthe language boom
the language boom
12/07/2003 10:34 AM Language
tree rooted in Turkey. IDC: A Boom in VoIP
IDC: A Boom in VoIP
04/04/2005 09:45 PMInternet News Apr 5 2005 1:35AM GMT
Boom to bust ...but dot.com man would
still do it again
Boom to bust ...but dot.com man would
still do it again
01/18/2004 09:20 PMStraits Times Jan 19 2004 0:07AM GMT
Disk Goes Boom!
Disk Goes Boom!
01/30/2003 12:12 AMI hate it when crap like this happens. A few months ago, I built a new
server (with hardware from ASA Computers, highly recommended) to serve
as a backup/spare for family.zawodny.com (the machine that hosts my
blog and about 40...
Boom Of The iPod Add-Ons
Boom Of The iPod Add-Ons
02/01/2005 09:36 PMStratospheric iPod sales have created a vast opportunity for other
companies to sell companion gear, but the spoils have gone to those
able to keep pace with Apple, which has introduced at least a half
dozen kinds of iPods since the first model arrived in late 2001. By
Ina Fried, CNET News.com
Sonic's Retro Boom
Sonic's Retro Boom
01/04/2005 11:06 AMThe drive-in eatery proves that there's plenty of horsepower under its
hood.
XML-Deviant: Browser Boom
XML-Deviant: Browser Boom
07/14/2004 05:29 PMEdd Dumbill reports on the boom in web-browser innovation as well as
Mozilla and Opera's mysterious desertion of the W3C as a forum.
XM's Subscriber Boom
XM's Subscriber Boom
04/04/2005 01:50 PMThe satellite radio provider is nabbing subscribers at a quick pace,
but content will be the key in the long run.
Baby Boom Ahead?
Baby Boom Ahead?
03/19/2005 02:58 AM

The Idea: The
recent UN projection that global population will level off at 9.5
billion is based on the flawed assumption that a recent phenomenon --
families having fewer children than they want due to economic and
political constraints -- will continue throughout the century and
become a global phenomenon. Remove those constraints and the linear
growth of nearly a billion more people per decade will continue, and
precipitate a great ecological challenge to our planet.
Take a look at the historical
demographic trends and you see that, with only a few exceptions in
different places and times, people have the number of children they
want. During pioneer times in North America, fifteen children were
needed to run the farm, so that's how many most families had. In
Niger,
Africa today men want 12-15 babies each, and women want almost as
many,
and that's how many they have. In the last thirty years, a remarkable
and global gap has arisen between the ideal number of children wanted
and the number of children actually born. This gap has a number of
different explanations, all of them transient. There is no precedent
for such a gap continuing, and no reason to believe it will continue.
When that gap closes, the average number of children per family will
rise by between 0.50 and 0.75. The chart above shows what that will
mean to world population. The entire
basis for the projection that global population will peak at 9.5
billion and then level off is based on the assumption that this recent
anomaly -- families having 0.5 children fewer each than they want --
will continue as a global phenomenon for the rest of the century and
beyond.
Every year a whole set of surveys are taken throughout the world on
what people consider the 'ideal' family size. Here are some of their
findings:
- In the US, adults say on average that ideal family size
is
2.6 children; those wanting children at all want an average of just
under 3.0; and younger Americans want an average of almost 0.5
children
more than the
previous generation had.
- In Canada, average ideal family size is also 2.6
children, and this number has been rising steadily since it bottomed out a generation
ago.
- In the UK, France and Germany, average ideal family size
among non-immigrants is 2.5, 3.3 and 2.3 children respectively (among
immigrants from South Asia and North Africa it is much higher).
- In India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Egypt, average
ideal family size is 2.7, 2.5, 4.1 and 3.1 children
respectively.
- In Latin America, ideal family size is 2.7 to
3.5 children.
- In most of Africa, ideal family size is 7.0
children.
- The UK and Germany are the only countries in the
world
where more than 10% of families hope to have 0 or 1 child (the
percentages in those countries are 12% and 11% respectively). Two or
three children are overwhelmingly preferred even in countries where
population is temporarily stable or declining, and 80% globally say
having children is essential to their personal
fulfillment.
- Immigrants from third world to first world
countries
typically plan to have at least two more children on average than
non-immigrants, and significantly more than the countrymen they left
behind.
These ideals are, on average, between 0.5 and 0.75 children more
than actual fertility rates. In other words, people are having fewer
children around the world than they would like to. The 2004 UN
population projection says "In the medium variant, fertility is
projected to decline from 2.6 children per woman today to slightly
over
2 children per woman in 2050. If
fertility were to remain about half a child
above the levels projected in
the medium variant, world population would reach 10.6 billion by 2050
and 14 billion by 2100".
The red line on the chart above shows therefore what global population
will be if people have the number of children they say they want. An
average of 2.6 children per family with growing average life
expectancies will double world population every 60 years.
What are the reasons for the recent phenomenon of families having 0.5
to 0.75 children fewer than
they want? They vary from country to country:
- In China, having more than one child is strongly
discouraged, and due to abortion and infanticide of girls the ratio of
girls to boys has now reached 0.84 to 1. That means there would be
about 50 million more young girls in China without the availability of
prenatal gender-detection technology (illegal in China but still
widespread) and without the social acceptability of female
infanticide.
- In India, the dowry system and perceived lower
labour value
of girls has produced the same situation as in China, with the ratio
of
girls to boys now as low as 0.77 to 1 in several areas of India. That
means there would be about 30 million more young girls in India
without
the availability of prenatal gender-detection technology (illegal in
India but still widespread) and without the social acceptability of
female infanticide.
- Throughout the world, as participation by
women in the
workplace has risen, driven mainly by economic necessity, women have
deferred their first pregnancy by an average of about five years from
when they hoped to initially conceive. Data suggests this delay of
first pregnancy might account for the entire drop in fertility rates in the past generation
in the third world.
- In the US, gender preference among
expectant parents has
the same male bias as in India. And over 40% of Americans say they
would have more children if they were wealthier.
- In Europe,
over 30% of women report they actually had fewer
children than they wanted, with affordability being the overwhelming
explanation for not having more.
From this data, a very troubling hypothesis presents itself. We have
taken great comfort from reports that correlate lower birth rates with
higher education, especially of women. But it appears we may have
missed the real cause and effect here: Higher rates of education for
women mean, as the Two-Income
Trap
so eloquently explained, higher rates of participation of women in the
workforce, which means more supply of labour relative to demand and
hence ability to offer lower wages, and also means more price-pressure
on housing in prestige areas especially near good schools, driving up
the price of housing and forcing women to stay in the workforce longer
and defer having children longer, or even until it is too late. So it
is possible that it is the cost of
living, not education, that has temporarily slowed soaring
human population.
That deferral will eventually start to crimp the availability of cheap
labour (although offshoring could sustain it a bit longer). When that
happens, wages will have to rise and women will once again be able to
leave the labour force long enough to have the children they want. And
then we'll see a baby boom, leading to the red line in the chart above
-- 14 billion people by the end of the century. That will happen even
with HIV and other epidemic diseases and famines -- historically human
population has always 'bounced back' from these setbacks by having
more
children to compensate for the ones that die young.
Of course there's always the possibility that the Two-Income Trap
could
become a permanent and global phenomenon, with wage increases always
pushing housing and other prices up to negate any real increase, so
people will forevermore have fewer children, and start having children
later in life, than they would want to. Except that the Trap is not
sustainable without the pressure of more and more people competing for
wage-slave jobs and scarce resources. Alas, the 14 billion human
population isn't sustainable either.
I know readers of How to Save the
World
don't like my 'pessimistic' posts, and I suspect some will jump in
with
reasons why the red line forecast won't happen, or say I'm just being
an alarmist. I think expecting people to have the families they want
is
realism not pessimism, and while the idea of 14 billion humans
troubles
me, I think it makes sense to consider the possibility, and how to
deal
with the fact that our species, for the past several millennia, seems
predestined and biologically driven to procreate at more than
replacement levels until we hit a wall.
Sources: Gallup
International polls of ideal family size; the Guttmacher Institute
family values studies; papers to the 2004 World Congress on Bioethics;
Johns Hopkins INFO project reports; papers to the 2001 World
Population
Conference; the European Foundation quality of life studies; UN
Population Prospects 2004 Revision report.
|
IT industry to boom while others go bust
IT industry to boom while others go bust
03/30/2005 08:56 PMvnunet.com Mar 31 2005 12:32AM GMT
Shark Tank: Boom!
Shark Tank: Boom!
12/22/2004 01:18 AMIt's the late 1980s, and this support pilot fish is in the Air Force
and working the graveyard shift when he gets a 2 a.m. call from a
high-priority user who says his terminal just blew up.
Time for the Internet Boom Box
Time for the Internet Boom Box
07/12/2004 05:35 PMPC Magazine Jul 12 2004 9:25PM GMT
Grok Description matches for Partnership boom from depressed IT spending?
GrokA matches for Partnership boom from depressed IT spending?
Call of Duty: United Offensive comes to
Mac
Call of Duty: United Offensive comes to
Mac
09/16/2004 01:00 PMAspyr Media Inc. announced Thursday plans to publish a Macintosh
conversion of
Call
of Duty: United Offensive, an expansion pack for the hit World War
II-era first person shooter Call of Duty. The add-on, which requires
the original Call of Duty, will be released in November. Call of Duty:
United Offensive is under development at Aspyr's internal development
studios. It was originally developed by Infinity Ward and has been
licensed from ACtivision.
Call of Duty: United Offensive 1.5.1
Call of Duty: United Offensive 1.5.1
02/05/2005 09:18 PMThrusts players alongside their squadmates into more authentic action
across Fortress Europes most historic battlefields.
Call of Duty: United Offensive coming
for Mac
Call of Duty: United Offensive coming
for Mac
09/16/2004 11:25 AMAspyr today announced that it will publish Call of Duty: United
Offensive for Macintosh later this year...
Review: Call of Duty: United Offensive
(PC)
Review: Call of Duty: United Offensive
(PC)
09/15/2004 11:09 AMOverclockers Club Sep 15 2004 3:39PM GMT
Call of Duty: United Offensive SP Demo
Call of Duty: United Offensive SP Demo
09/16/2004 04:58 PMTelstra claims 3G boom
Telstra claims 3G boom
03/29/2005 11:28 PMDigital Connect News Mar 30 2005 3:38AM GMT
Biodiesel Boom Well-Timed
Biodiesel Boom Well-Timed
06/01/2004 05:41 AMAs the price of gas continues to climb, the appeal of an alternative
domestic fuel is growing. Biodiesel fueling stations, new EPA
emissions standards and a pending tax credit may help tip the balance
toward renewable fuel. By John Gartner.
Silicon Valley's next boom
Silicon Valley's next boom
01/25/2004 07:39 AMSan Francisco Chronicle Jan 25 2004 11:12AM GMT
San Francisco gay wedding boom
San Francisco gay wedding boom
02/14/2004 01:09 AMGay couples race to get married in San Francisco after the mayor lifts
a state ban on same-sex unions.
Retail in Review: More Bah Than Sis-Boom
Retail in Review: More Bah Than Sis-Boom
12/27/2004 11:32 PMAnalysts have offered their latest judgment of the Christmas shopping
season: good, but not great, although online sales set records.
Partnership boom from depressed IT spending?