Validation by Instance
Grok Headline matches for Validation by Instance
A Single Instance of iTunes
A Single Instance of iTunes
02/10/2004 02:51 AMWhat's this nonsense about only being able to run a single instance of
iTunes at a time in an otherwise multi-user environment?
It's silly enough that I can share my tunes across my home network yet
I can't share them with someone on the same machine. Despite keeping
all my music in
/Macintosh HD/Users/Shared/Music, I still have
to wander from account to account adding each new CD or iTunes Music
Store purchase to each user's library just so that we can share _our_
(defined in the strictest sense) music. Surely your iTunes library on
the local machine should show up in my iTunes window just like any
other network-shared iTunes library?
You cannot open the application "iTunes" because another user has it
open.
Ask the other user to quit the application, then try again.
[OK]
No, not OK.
Should I mistakenly leave "my copy" of iTunes open and wander off for
a bit, there's no music for anyone until my return. No music for you!
Nobody but an administrator capable of killing off other logins and
processes has the ability to rectify this situation. Should every
user really need to be an administrator to truly share this multi-user
environment?
Bug or feature? If the former, it'd be a good one to squash. If the
latter, why doesn't this feature appear in iPhoto or any of other apps
(sans any DRM entanglements)?
Microsoft SQL Server 2000: Default vs
Named Instance
Microsoft SQL Server 2000: Default vs
Named Instance
07/09/2004 10:16 AMCSS Validation
CSS Validation
02/10/2004 02:45 AM As reported elsewhere this morning, if you use the Tantek hack in
combination with the screen media type, your CSS doesn't validate.
Long story short, it's because the validator is mis-reporting. It
should validate, but it doesn't. Well, at...
IT project validation
IT project validation
01/04/2003 01:58 AMCNET Jan 4 2003 1:02AM ET
The Search for Validation
The Search for Validation
07/06/2004 06:29 PMSmart Mobs
links to an
inte
resting article on how the teenagers are using blogs. The
following two paragraphs make me raise my eyebrows in not completely
unlike Spock -manner:
What's consistent throughout is the search for validation. Though most
say they write entries for themselves, it's a disappointment if no one
responds. One Evergreen student recently posted a message pleading for
feedback. "it makes me sad that no one leaves me comments. . . .
i write like these huge entries . . . about so much stuff . . . and no
one even says anything in return. and i go to all of your xangas or
whatevers and ALWAYS leave a comment.
...
Most teens abide by an unwritten code of the blogosphere: What happens
online stays online. Many have digital friendships with classmates but
never socialize in real life "because we don't hang with the same
crowd, as one Evergreen student explained.
The first one I've heard from many people also in the Finnish
blogosphere. Feedback is what keeps many people writing, though some
are still happy just to organize their own thoughts, and don't really
care if someone reads them or not.
But combined with the second one... It's amazing how naturally the
teenagers consider online life a completely separate arena, one that
has nothing to do with the real life. It makes me actually wonder
about things like the Finnish blog awards, or the blogger meetings that are occurring
everywhere. It is strange to meet fellow bloggers, indeed: many
people write only of a single aspect of their life online, be it their
angst at being alone or their hobbies, or their day-to-day life. Very
few people pour all aspects of their life into the internet, and even
then the "compression" of the bandwidth is very lossy: you
only see some things, with the less interesting bits removed.
Many people have told me that they like to read their own blogs. I
like to do it myself, sometimes (then again, I'm not very critical at
myself :). This is not really very surprising, as it most probably is
the kind of text you like to read - and also because it makes your own
life to look more interesting. It's kinda like doing social
pornography on yourself - something that all of us do anyway. It's no
more different than looking through old photographs, or resting your
eyes on your own furniture (you chose it, so it must be pleasing).
Who are you blogging really for?
Why do I write online?
I guess there is no simple answer to that. Part of me yearns for
validation: the "Hey, I read your entry the other day and I
liked it" -moments. Part of me is narcistic: I want to be known,
scream out that my life has not been in vain. Part of it is simply
about the engineers built-in desire to change things, to have impact
on the world - nibble away at the corner of a huge statue so that it
becomes more beautiful. Part of me wants a place to store my thoughts
in some coherent order, and an important part of me just needs
to write.
But I guess the most important thing are the people. Weblogs allow me
to share things with the people I love, allow other people to discover
me and perhaps - if I'm lucky - they become friends. What I write is
only a small part of me, but it is the part I want you to see. They
are things I consider important, or things that move me. Or things
that are just silly and make me laugh.
I like bloggers. Blogging is not yet tainted by rampant
commercialism, nor big corporations saying "we want this",
or "we monetize that". Blogging is about creating something
new, be it in the form of your life, or just repeating old things but
in a new order. Bloggers have their own voice, some of them beautiful, and some of
them not so beautiful
...
When validation becomes fuzzy
When validation becomes fuzzy
05/29/2002 02:24 PME-mail Validation with PHP
E-mail Validation with PHP
06/18/2004 08:38 PMThis tutorial will show you how to check to see if an E-mail address
is valid.
New: NRG Address Validation 1.0
New: NRG Address Validation 1.0
07/21/2004 11:08 AMNRG Address Validation provides integrated address management and
validation for FileMaker Pro.
A New Source for Your Validation
A New Source for Your Validation
07/13/2004 08:37 PMSince I first implemented ccValidator late last year, I've been
encouraged by the amount of feedback and suggestions I've received.
Common-ers everywhere have pointed out bugs, suggested improvements
and encouraged it's development into a useful tool.
Today, ccValidator has a new home: validator.creativecommons.
org and a handful of new features. The validator now supports
metadata specified as a seperate file with a <link
...> tag, and hopefully provides some improved error
messages when it runs into problems. If you have any validation
links, don't worry: we're redirecting calls to the validator at yergler.net to it's
new home.
Go ahead, kick the tires, and drop me a line if you have a
suggestion or bug report.
Validation with JavaScript
Validation with JavaScript
12/02/2003 12:15 AM
Form validation can help to reduce the amount of bad data that
gets saved to your database. In this article, find out how you can
write a simple JavaScript form validator for basic client-side
validation, and learn a little bit about JavaScript OOP in the process
as well.
Validation, Moderation, Constipation
Validation, Moderation, Constipation
06/17/2004 04:37 PMValidation matters. No it doesn't. Validation is hard.
No it isn't. Standards are flexible. No they're not. Does this
conversation sound familiar?
DOM Level 3 Validation is a W3C
Recommendation
DOM Level 3 Validation is a W3C
Recommendation
01/27/2004 10:20 AM2004-01-27: The World Wide Web Consortium today released Document
Object Model Level 3 Validation as a W3C Recommendation. DOM Level 3
Validation is a module that provides guidance to programs and scripts
to dynamically update the content and the structure of documents while
ensuring that the document remains valid, or becomes valid. Learn more
about the DOM Activity. (News archive)
Client side validation
Client side validation
01/22/2004 03:09 AM
Brent
Simmons: What I could do—what I’d like to
do—is include Mark’s and Sam Ruby’s validator in
NetNewsWire.
+1. I'm in.
This will require some work, none of it hard. Prereqs are
Python 2.x and
pyxml. There
currently are three interfaces: a CGI/web interface, a command
line, and a web interface.
- The CGI/web interface contains a number of absolute paths and
direct references to the host. However, this is probably the
best place to start.
- The command line interface is designed primarily for
development use. However, something like this that returns
back a simple return code might be useful for your
optional
indicator.
- The web service interface accepts a simple HTTP POST,
optionally with SOAP envelope and body elements. This could
be evolved into something that does exactly the same as the above,
but without requiring any installation on the client. Of
course, this would require that the user be online at the time, and
would have quite different performance characteristics.
Overall, probably not the path to pursue in this case.
In any case, none of this work is difficult, and I would be glad
to do it.
Client-side validation
Client-side validation
01/22/2004 02:10 AMMark Pilgrim, in
If people won’t go to the validator, suggests running the
validator on the client rather than on the web.
Last week I got a surprising amount of requests from NetNewsWire users
who’d like to have a validator built in to NetNewsWire. (Many of
these people are people who test and monitor their own feeds with
NetNewsWire.)
What I could do—what I’d like to do—is include
Mark’s and Sam Ruby’s validator in NetNewsWire. The
validator would stay out of the way by default, but it would be there
for people who want it.
There’s an issue, though: the validator is open source, licensed
via the Python license, and I don’t know if I can include it
with NetNewsWire. (License gurus please clarify.)
But more importantly, licensing issues aside, I wouldn’t do it
without Mark’s and Sam’s agreement.
(In case you’re wondering about the technical details: the
validator would be included unmodified, as a set of files on disk, but
inside the app package, in Contents/Resources/).
CC Validation Without Instant
Verification?
CC Validation Without Instant
Verification?
12/07/2002 08:31 AM"If possible, they would like to bypass the stage of having credit
cards approved by an online processor. What they would like to do is
have an online shopping cart but then receive the details of the order
either via email or through a secure website and then process the
orders manually."
Character Repertoire Validation for XML
Character Repertoire Validation for XML
01/16/2004 10:57 AMThis article presents a schema language for limiting the range of
characters permitted in an XML document. It can be used to protect
legacy applications or to enforce restrictions in document workflows.
W3C HTML Validation Service
W3C HTML Validation Service
04/17/2004 08:53 AMW3CMarkup Validation Service .. HTML 4.01 Transitional .. validator
over at W3C .. Validate your pages .. validate the XHTML .. validating
code .. W3's validator .. validates .. more .. v
validator.w3.org
track this
site | 4 links
TrackBack and XHTML Validation
TrackBack and XHTML Validation
03/13/2003 10:15 AMOne of the issues with TrackBack currently is that the RDF that
TrackBack inserts into pages breaks XHTML validation. Now,...
Form and Spelling Validation
Form and Spelling Validation
10/29/2003 02:22 AMMost dynamic web sites rely heavily on forms. From user authentication
to entry of news items, we use forms to accept user input. There are
many different ways we can validate data from the user. In this
tutorial, we will examine several of the more common items that need
validation and provide examples for each. We will also explore how to
check documents for misspelled words and suggest proper replacements.
Client-side validation with XML
Client-side validation with XML
07/15/2004 05:32 AMCNET Jul 15 2004 10:14AM GMT
When validation becomes fuzzy (xmlhack)
When validation becomes fuzzy (xmlhack)
05/30/2002 08:09 AMURI, URL and Email syntax validation
URI, URL and Email syntax validation
04/13/2005 03:49 AMWe're moving to SourceForge
Certified Server Validation
Certified Server Validation
12/19/2004 03:41 PMBrian Livingston of the Windows Secrets newsletter talks in this
article about Certified Server Validation, a proposed antispam
standard that will reduce spam by a lot without taking very computing
cycles on the server. Hello ‘Certified Server,’ Goodbye
Spam Have you ever experienced a difficult problem that seemed
unsolvable — until you realized at the last moment that a simple
solution was staring you right in the face? Something like that is
happening in the…
Direct and Related Links for 'Certified
Server Validation'
Validation is a process, not an action
(XML.org)
Validation is a process, not an action
(XML.org)
06/07/2002 08:34 AMValidation vs. Code Bloat
Validation vs. Code Bloat
06/18/2002 08:16 AMWe all know that with the browser wars starting to simmer again, that
code validation is more important now than it has been in several
years. However, code size is just as big an issue in speed sensitive
environment of the web.
Does W3C Validation Help In Search
Rankings?
Does W3C Validation Help In Search
Rankings?
09/23/2004 03:25 PMWebProNews Sep 23 2004 6:56PM GMT
Understanding ASP.NET Validation
Controls
Understanding ASP.NET Validation
Controls
09/06/2004 06:28 PMWebDevInfo Sep 6 2004 8:28PM GMT
XML-Deviant: Constraining Validation
XML-Deviant: Constraining Validation
08/27/2004 01:49 PMWhat's the difference between validation and business rules? XML
developers discuss how and why to use them.
Sympoll Input Validation
Sympoll Input Validation
08/06/2002 12:53 PMparking validation [Flickr]
parking validation [Flickr]
12/29/2004 01:10 AMmathowie
posted a photo:

stairs
Gallery Input Validation
Gallery Input Validation
08/12/2002 10:49 AMphpBB Input Validation
phpBB Input Validation
08/06/2002 12:53 PMHCL Launches Computer Systems Validation
HCL Launches Computer Systems Validation
09/01/2004 08:37 PMFinancial Express Sep 1 2004 11:58PM GMT
Formcat: form validation generator.
Formcat: form validation generator.
01/06/2005 12:15 AMFormcat 1.01 released
Wherefore Art Thou, Schema Validation?
Wherefore Art Thou, Schema Validation?
07/06/2004 03:08 PMOne kink I've recently noticed in a number of 'scripting languages'
geared towards producing web apps is the utter lack of support for XML Schema. I'm
surprised by this, since a good Schema validator can save a lot of
code when used properly.
Read on for ranting and raving.
Continue reading "Wherefore Art Thou, Schema
Validation?"
Click here to comment on this entry
GCF Validation for 3G WCDMA Test Cases
GCF Validation for 3G WCDMA Test Cases
02/17/2004 03:50 PM3G Feb 17 2004 6:08PM GMT
validate_form.js: HTML form validation
validate_form.js: HTML form validation
07/05/2004 03:44 PMvalidate_form.js: Version 1.9b released
User-Friendly Form Validation with PHP
and CSS
User-Friendly Form Validation with PHP
and CSS
04/23/2004 07:14 PM
Any non-trivial web application processes form data, and every
secure web application has to validate that data on the server.
Balancing security with user-friendliness can be tricky. Jeff Cogswell
demonstrates one approach.
Dynamically Typed: Validation with CType
Dynamically Typed: Validation with CType
05/12/2004 08:28 AMIn the latest post from
Dynamically
Typed, there's a new posting dealing with the standardization of
the CType functions into the
default PHP builds.
Grok Description matches for Validation by Instance
GrokA matches for Validation by Instance
Validation by Instance