stargeek
PHP news website logo.
home    PHP scripts    articles    seo tools    links    search    contact    shop    realtors


Surfing property rights







Surfing property rights

Surfing property rights 08/10/2004 02:05 PM

Great blog entry about the rules regarding surfers' "property rights" of ocean waves and how the surfing community enforces them.

How do surfers enforce their wave rights? For the most part, they rely on the gentle arts of social suasion. Surfers bobbing in the line-up make up a community of sorts, one often strengthened by the presence of locals who know and look out for each other. Getting the stink-eye for dropping in on somebody else’s wave stings badly enough. Sanctions against repeat offenders may escalate to sharp words or, in extraordinary cases, to physical violence. When someone dropped in on me recently, for instance, I first forebore the offense, then took alarm at his unsafe proximity and verbally warned him to back-off. Finally, when that proved unavailing, I put my hand on the punk’s chest, shoved him off his board, and finished out my ride.
Link (via Hit and Run)




This is a GrokNews Entry: (what is grok?)





Similar Items

Surfing property rights

Grok Headline matches for Surfing property rights

"property rights of surfing"


"property rights of surfing" 08/10/2004 02:30 PM

Im Riding a What?... An Intellectual
Property Attorneys Guide To Patents and
Surfing


Im Riding a What?... An Intellectual
Property Attorneys Guide To Patents and
Surfing
08/31/2004 08:14 AM
Mondaq Aug 31 2004 11:04AM GMT

IPR - Intellectual Property Rights


IPR - Intellectual Property Rights 02/10/2004 05:10 AM
EurActiv.com Feb 10 2004 8:35AM GMT

The Hill's property rights showdown


The Hill's property rights showdown 06/22/2004 09:09 AM
With the DMCA under attack from all quarters, Congressman Rick Boucher says it's time to rethink the controversial law.

Seminar on intellectual property rights


Seminar on intellectual property rights 09/16/2004 07:46 AM
Assam Tribune Sep 16 2004 10:48AM GMT

Intellectual Property Rights and
Counterfeiting


Intellectual Property Rights and
Counterfeiting
06/05/2005 11:43 PM
World Customs Organization Jun 5 2005 2:18AM GMT

Cambridge in row over intellectual
property rights


Cambridge in row over intellectual
property rights
05/10/2004 11:30 AM
Guardian Unlimited May 10 2004 3:51PM GMT

Intellectual property rights safeguarded


Intellectual property rights safeguarded 11/18/2003 12:43 PM
China Daily Nov 18 2003 10:11AM ET

11,173 Violate Intellectual Property
Rights


11,173 Violate Intellectual Property
Rights
06/28/2004 04:52 AM
Hankooki Jun 28 2004 8:58AM GMT

Free Culture and Property Rights


Free Culture and Property Rights 02/10/2004 02:47 AM
Over at the Progress and Freedom Foundation blog, James DeLong attempts to prove that the "Free Culture Movement" (FCM) led by people like Larry Lessig is part and parcel of the political left:

"The FCM does not think that production and consumption of intellectual creations should be organized by property rights and markets. Instead, it favors a mechanism of production based on the open source software movement...."

This is a nice case of simply asserting what the author is allegedly attempting to prove.  In fact, Free Culture is eminently consistent with markets and property rights.  Lessig's Creative Commons and successful open source projects are based on well-defined software licenses.  In other words, property rights that function in a market.  The network infrastructure piece of Free Culture, open spectrum is expressly built on the idea of a market in wireless devices replacing a system of government spectrum micro-management.  And it was the Framers of the US Constitution, hardly anti-property radicals, who decreed that copyrights be for a limited period of time. 

The property rights maximalists are the true radicals here.  They have defined any challenges to the status quo as a frontal attack on property rights.  As political propaganda, this effort may have some success.  But the ultimate strength of the Free Culture Movement, or whatever one calls it, lies in this: It is an internal critique of the dominant ideology, not an external challenge to markets like communism. 

The Free Culture proponents, who offer suggestions like returning to the copyright terms of the 1790s, are the true conservatives in this debate.

What happens when you give gamers
intelectual property rights?


What happens when you give gamers
intelectual property rights?
12/04/2003 07:15 AM
James Grimmelmann has penned a bloody brilliant essay about the issues raised by allowing (or not allowing) players to hold an intellectual property right to objects they create in games. Inspired by the Second Life announcement at last month's State of Play conference, Grimmelmann presents and synthesizes the positions of a variety of the world's leading thinkers on IP, game economics, and playability, and comes up with more questions than answers. There's fodder for a dozen sf novels here -- and just when I thought that stories about VR worlds where anything can happen (and hence nothing is interesting) were narratively dead in the water...
# Castronova cares about the game society, but not so much about the platform. He's thinking about these in-game values as things that we ought to encourage, perhaps by giving appropriate economic incentives to game owners. It's okay with him if the owners keep their game platforms locked down. As long as some owners give their players a rule-set that preserves in-game freedom, fairness, and community, it's all good.

# Benkler is more or less the opposite. He'd love to see some games ripped open at the level of the platform -- developed by distributed groups and run without a single centralized owner-god-wizard. In his writings on the regulation of communications infrastructure and media concentration, Benkler has consistently emphasized the view that avoiding such concentrations of power at the infrastructure level is the most important act -- from it, everything good flows.

# The agoraXchange people want both the platform and the game world to be open. Now, the question above tugs at apotential tension between these two forms of openness. When push absolutely comes to shove, the agoraXchange team will assert control at the platform layer if their core values are threatened in the game universe; otherwise, they walk the walk and quack the quack of freedom at every level.

# Bartle really doesn't care about either form of freedom. My caricature of him lives in what might be caricatured as the "game designer" paradigm: I want to be free to create whatever strange and twisted world I want. If players like it, they'll join and stay; if they don't like it, they'll go somewhere. Now, Bartle is a great designer, and as with the other great designers, his writings involve an exquisite level of sympathy for (and understanding of) players. But his is basically a "game"-centric view: if you build it, they will play. There aren't political questions here, except potentially if stupid lawyers come barging in and start treating games as something other than games.

Link

Chang'an's new model with intellectual
property rights


Chang'an's new model with intellectual
property rights
09/18/2004 05:27 AM
Peoples Daily Online Sep 18 2004 8:41AM GMT

Competition Policy & Intellectual
Property Rights


Competition Policy & Intellectual
Property Rights
12/21/2003 08:21 PM
Financial Express Dec 21 2003 7:35PM ET

china: Serious problems on intellectual
property rights


china: Serious problems on intellectual
property rights
04/26/2004 07:03 PM
Monday Morning Apr 26 2004 10:12PM GMT

IPI Provides Access to Loans on
Intellectual Property Rights


IPI Provides Access to Loans on
Intellectual Property Rights
12/15/2003 06:58 PM
dBusinessNews.com Dec 15 2003 5:28PM ET

Intellectual property rights promote
piracy


Intellectual property rights promote
piracy
07/13/2004 08:35 PM
East African Standard Jul 14 2004 0:28AM GMT

'Knowledge of intellectual property
rights crucial'


'Knowledge of intellectual property
rights crucial'
07/17/2004 09:36 PM
The Hindu Jul 17 2004 11:44PM GMT

EU Wants China To Act Tough On
Intellectual Property Rights


EU Wants China To Act Tough On
Intellectual Property Rights
11/16/2003 09:37 PM
Financial Express Nov 16 2003 8:16PM ET

Intellectual property rights breaches
resolved


Intellectual property rights breaches
resolved
03/30/2005 01:51 AM
Xinhua News Agency Mar 30 2005 3:42AM GMT

Gates Up To Old Tricks Over Intellectual
Property Rights


Gates Up To Old Tricks Over Intellectual
Property Rights
03/17/2005 03:46 AM
osOpinion Mar 15 2005 11:51PM GMT

BTG sues Amazon over intellectual
property rights


BTG sues Amazon over intellectual
property rights
09/16/2004 08:38 PM
Infomatics Sep 17 2004 0:37AM GMT

Intellectual Property Rights seminar
ends


Intellectual Property Rights seminar
ends
04/28/2004 06:07 AM
BruDirect Apr 28 2004 9:51AM GMT

Website on intellectual property rights
launched


Website on intellectual property rights
launched
02/10/2004 07:58 PM
Xinhuanet Feb 11 2004 0:34AM GMT

Intellectual property rights information
day, Italy


Intellectual property rights information
day, Italy
04/14/2004 01:21 PM
Cordis Apr 14 2004 5:21PM GMT

The Trust and Distrust of Intellectual
Property Rights


The Trust and Distrust of Intellectual
Property Rights
09/22/2004 06:37 AM
The Trust and Distrust of Intellectual Property Rights by Peter K. YU
http: //papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=578563

Abstract By Author:

Abstract:
In the past, intellectual property issues were considered complex, obscure, and highly technical; they were only of interest and concern to intellectual property attorneys, legal scholars, technology developers, and rightsholders. Thanks to the Internet and new communications technologies, however, intellectual property has now begun to play a more significant role in society.

In December 2003, the first phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was held in Geneva. While the conference affirmed the importance of intellectual property rights and free access to information and knowledge, the resulting Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action fail to address issues concerning the recent expansion of intellectual property rights. Being vague and abstract, the documents also fail to provide concrete actions as to how the international community can improve the international intellectual property regime.

This book chapter examines the international intellectual property regime as it relates to the development of an inclusive global information society. Part I provides an overview of the various intellectual property rights and justifications for protecting these rights. Part II explores the increased distrust of the intellectual property system, especially among less developed countries, human rights advocates, development specialists, and those on the unfortunate side of the digital divide. Part III delineates five prerequisites for the development of a fair, balanced, and robust international intellectual property regime: (1) thorough understanding, (2) balanced debate, (3) effective dialogue, (4) fair regime, and (5) global solidarity. Part IV concludes by critically examining the intellectual property-related portions of the WSIS Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action.

Intellectual Property rights necessary
for international integration


Intellectual Property rights necessary
for international integration
09/14/2004 01:01 PM
VOVNews Sep 14 2004 3:20PM GMT

Intellectual property rights out of tune
with public interest


Intellectual property rights out of tune
with public interest
07/23/2004 04:19 PM
Melbourne Age Jul 23 2004 7:49PM GMT

Russian Musician Protects His
Intellectual Property Rights


Russian Musician Protects His
Intellectual Property Rights
07/23/2004 11:15 AM
Russian Information Agency Novosti Jul 23 2004 2:52PM GMT

US embassy holds workshop on
intellectual property rights


US embassy holds workshop on
intellectual property rights
01/17/2004 10:57 PM
Times Of Oman Jan 16 2004 10:36PM GMT

Does Violating Intellectual Property
Rights Make You A Terrorist?


Does Violating Intellectual Property
Rights Make You A Terrorist?
12/03/2003 06:14 PM
It used to be that any hope for a reasonable debate was ended the second anyone called someone else a "Nazi" (see Godwin 's Law). These days, perhaps it should be amended to include anyone calling someone else a "terrorist." Remember a few months back when the World Intellectual Property Organization cancell ed a meeting about open source along with a quote that open source was "contrary to the goals of WIPO." Apparently that wasn't a one-off statement. Instead of exploring issues related to intellectual property, WIPO seems to now firmly believe that there is one and only one way to use intellectual property: and that's to lock it up. WIPO's director, Kamil Idris, was quoted today saying that "Pira cy is like terrorism today." This leaves little (if any) room for an open debate on how there are ways to support intellectual property without having to lock it all up. While the quote is talking about counterfeit products that aren't up to the safety levels of original products, it's way too broad a statement. Certainly, these counterfeit products are dangerous and something should be done about them. However, simply equating all intellectual property violations with "terrorism" goes too far. In the same talk Idris claims that stronger enforcement of intellectual property rights could help developing nations improve their economies. This, of course, is exactly the opposite of what a few studies have found, saying that developing nations would be much stronger without such draconian intellectual property laws. But why should Idris rely on studies when he's in charge of WIPO and his opinion must be right on all things related to intellectual property?

Foreign firms still concerned about
intellectual property rights


Foreign firms still concerned about
intellectual property rights
05/21/2004 06:44 PM
Korea Herald May 21 2004 11:07PM GMT

N. Korea Acknowledges Intellectual
Property Rights of Individuals


N. Korea Acknowledges Intellectual
Property Rights of Individuals
01/22/2004 04:56 AM
Yonhap News Jan 22 2004 8:05AM GMT

HK urges citizens to help protect
intellectual property rights


HK urges citizens to help protect
intellectual property rights
09/25/2004 10:03 AM
Xinhua News Agency Sep 25 2004 12:37PM GMT

Lecture on enforcement of intellectual
property rights today


Lecture on enforcement of intellectual
property rights today
01/17/2004 10:57 PM
Jamaica Observer Jan 17 2004 8:31AM GMT

China's website on intellectual property
rights opens


China's website on intellectual property
rights opens
02/10/2004 01:16 PM
Xinhuanet Feb 10 2004 4:35PM GMT

Shanghai intellectual property rights
park opens


Shanghai intellectual property rights
park opens
04/19/2004 09:53 AM
Xinhua News Agency Apr 19 2004 2:14PM GMT

Intellectual Property Rights bill
introduced in parliament


Intellectual Property Rights bill
introduced in parliament
03/19/2005 02:27 AM
Daily Times Mar 19 2005 12:31AM GMT

Intellectual property rights development
necessary for integration: Deputy PM


Intellectual property rights development
necessary for integration: Deputy PM
09/09/2004 06:50 AM
VOVNews Sep 9 2004 11:11AM GMT

Shanghai opens intellectual property
rights park


Shanghai opens intellectual property
rights park
04/19/2004 09:47 PM
Xinhua News Agency Apr 20 2004 1:31AM GMT
Grok Description matches for Surfing property rights
GrokA matches for Surfing property rights

Surfing property rights

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry:

















Also check out:


Grok

Ipod Porn on the
Rise

Brief Abstract of
Wikipedia's
Mesothelioma Cancer
page

Get first aid
instructions in your
cell phone

IE is crap
JSPWiki gains
podcasting support

Corsaire Security
Advisory - Sygate
Secure Enterprise
replay issue

Corsaire Security
Advisory - Sygate
Enforcer
unauthenticated
broadcast issue

spamcop.net allows
everyone to grab
mail addresses and
reset passwords

Corsaire Security
Advisory - Sygate
Enforcer discovery
packet DoS issue

You've read the
book, now play in
the website!

Microsoft Releases
Digital Image Suite
10

Apple integrates
video apps in
Production Suite

Federal Reserve
raises rate by
quarter point

Editors' Picks: The
blogosphere: Are
blogs worth the
hype?

Oh, Sure, Now The
MPAA Settles With
321

Why Innovation And
Hoarding
Intellectual
Property Don't Mix

Meru Avoids Mixed
Traffic Penalties

Canesta Equinox 3-D
Sensor

Coordiated Anarchy
Tools at the RNC

Borland Packs New
Features into
JBuilder

Job Numbers in an
Election Year

Deep-fried
megacalorie snack:
"most dangerous food
in Britain"

Guerilla protest
tech at Republican
Convention

Mobile Profile: SVG
Tiny Version 1.2
Updated

In Vancouver
Maybe can we get
11th?

Microsoft wants to
improve your image

Apple puts edit
tools in one basket

Faulty fax gives out
details of Blair
visit (Reuters)

Company Reaches
Settlement on DVD
Issue (AP)

Google Sets
Registration
Deadline, Auction
Next (Reuters)

Dutch Retailer Beats
Apple to Local
Download Market
(Reuters)

DataPower Granted
Patent for Its Core
XML Processing and
Data Interchange
Technology

Microsoft expects
long fight with
Japanese antitrust
watchdog

Test results delayed
after mix-up

NI water reform in
pipeline

Bush takes McCain on
Florida tour

Four die in Austria
coach crash

Internode Nodemap
1.1

Photos 4.1
DOCSIS Config .1
Metasploit Framework
2.2

Balsa 2.2.2
lighttpd 1.2.5
ShellCAT 0.05
TWIG 2.8.0-alpha2
sn 0.3.8
Canny 0.1.0
DataPower Granted
Patent for XML
Processing
Technology

iTunes Catalog
Surpasses 1 Million
Songs

Techdirt's Has A
Quarterly Report?!

Microsoft Patents
Uploading Data

Ananova - Romanian
selling his penis

Democratic
Underground Forums -
Just on CNN: Gen.
Shalishkavili in
hospital--unknown
reason

to debunking the
spin techniques

what is grok?