Atom-JavaScript-0.4
Grok Headline matches for Atom-JavaScript-0.4
Atom-JavaScript-0.1
Atom-JavaScript-0.1
12/17/2003 11:51 PMAtom-JavaScript-0.2
Atom-JavaScript-0.2
12/18/2003 06:09 PMProfessional JavaScript for Web
Developers: JavaScript in the Browser,
Pt. 1
Professional JavaScript for Web
Developers: JavaScript in the Browser,
Pt. 1
06/22/2005 02:51 AMWeb browsers have come a long way over the years and can now handle a
variety of file formats, not just conventional HTML. Here, you'll
learn how JavaScript fits into HTML, other languages, and some basic
concepts of the Browser Object Model (BOM). By WROX Press. 0620
Cars To Be Assembled Atom By Atom
Cars To Be Assembled Atom By Atom
06/20/2004 12:47 PMJavaScript, son of JavaScript
JavaScript, son of JavaScript
03/17/2005 04:00 AMFrom SxSW, Molly writes about The Return of JavaScript: …one
conversation that keeps coming up among many of my colleagues is the
question as to whether the timing is right to re-examine the
importance of the DOM and scripting, and...
Javascript-MD5-1.04
Javascript-MD5-1.04
07/29/2004 06:40 AMJavascript-MD5-1.03
Javascript-MD5-1.03
04/28/2004 05:53 AMXML-RSS-JavaScript-0.3
XML-RSS-JavaScript-0.3
10/29/2003 11:31 PMJavaScript-RPC-0.03
JavaScript-RPC-0.03
01/25/2004 05:46 AMJavascript-MD5-1.02
Javascript-MD5-1.02
04/13/2004 06:05 AMJavaScript-RPC-0.05
JavaScript-RPC-0.05
08/12/2004 12:44 AMGoing JavaScript-less?
Going JavaScript-less?
02/18/2004 02:19 AMHow many people actually shut off JavaScript in their browsers? In
the Web development world, you're constantly advised not to depend on
JavaScript because "[insert double-digit percentage here] of Web
surfers shut off JavaScript."
I have never known someone who shut off JavaScript. I have used a
lot of computers in my life — many not my own — and never
in one case have I noticed that JavaScript was intentionally disabled.
I have never had anyone I know tell me that they shut off JavaScript
to solve a problem. I have never even been remotely tempted to do
this myself.
Is there anyone out there who has actually shut off JavaScript in
their browser? Can you tell us why?
Click here to comment on this entry
Javascript-MD5-1.00
Javascript-MD5-1.00
03/06/2004 02:03 AMXML-Atom-0.09
XML-Atom-0.09
07/30/2004 07:06 AMRT-Atom-0.02
RT-Atom-0.02
08/03/2004 11:45 PMXML-Atom-0.05
XML-Atom-0.05
01/06/2004 05:39 AMThe Atom API
The Atom API
10/28/2003 11:06 PMIn his latest Dive into XML column Mark Pilgrim explains the basic
operations of the Atom API, with special reference to the precedent
APIs.
Atom API in MT3
Atom API in MT3
08/07/2004 05:27 PMben's docs are great, and all the API features are the same in TypePad
sam on atom
sam on atom
12/30/2003 01:16 AMSam posts his
thoughts and plans regarding Atom and how he will maintain RSS
support for his weblog. Thanks Sam! Every bit of information
helps.
XML-Atom-0.06
XML-Atom-0.06
04/25/2004 12:16 AMHave Atom
Have Atom
12/22/2003 09:07 AMAt the moment this information will be useful to a small roomful of
people, but this site is now serving an Atom 0.3 feed here. It
should v
alidate.
I’d planned all along to fold Atom support into
rhymes-with-vexed-slattern; I’ve finally got around to it now
that the spec is looking pretty solid with version 0.3.
For those to whom this is all Greek, Atom is a new form of AI
technology that listens to all websites simultaneously, looking for
anyone badmouthing you and those batting for your team; Atom responds
by firing back custom-made insults and denunciations including but not
limited to accusations of hypocrisy and pot-kettle-black.
What Are RSS and Atom?
What Are RSS and Atom?
04/17/2004 03:19 PMRSS and Atom are formats for syndicating lists of items. Items can be
anything and each item typically contains a... (63 words)
Atom + CSS
Atom + CSS
10/29/2003 12:31 PMI tried some
minimal css
on an
experimental
Atom feed and the results started to look promising - on
Mozilla. View source to see how it was done.
I then brought up the same page under IE, and it looks like IE
didn't support a number of CSS features. Worse, it seems to
be stripping and/or interpreting escaped markup. Finally,
view source is not available.
Poking around to see if there were any workarounds, I came
across
this
article by Tim Bray from 3.5 years ago...
Sigh.
XML-Atom-0.041
XML-Atom-0.041
12/15/2003 05:44 PMXML-Atom-0.04
XML-Atom-0.04
12/15/2003 04:42 AMXML-Atom-0.03
XML-Atom-0.03
12/05/2003 10:15 AMRSS, Atom...and SDF?
RSS, Atom...and SDF?
04/29/2004 09:16 AMDaniel Henry calls for unity in the syndication war by proposing a
new
format called SDF.
I haven't had a chance to really read the spec, but David has
obviously put a lot of effort into it. Although I'm certainly not
wild about yet another feed format, if SDF every gets widely used I'll
support in FeedDemon.
XML-Atom-0.10
XML-Atom-0.10
01/01/2005 12:54 AMXML-Atom-0.07
XML-Atom-0.07
05/16/2004 12:34 AMWhy We Need Atom Now
Why We Need Atom Now
04/04/2005 12:16 AMWe’re getting real, real close to sending the Atom data-format draft
off for general IETF review; the rest of the process can’t happen
too fast for me, because there are two big problems that bite me
every day that Atom will give the engineers the tools to
fix...
XML-Atom-0.08
XML-Atom-0.08
06/02/2004 05:31 AMAtom.NET 0.4.1
Atom.NET 0.4.1
05/13/2004 02:07 PMA library to generate and parse Atom XML feeds.
Atom use XML-RPC
Atom use XML-RPC
02/19/2004 11:26 AM
It's fascinating to read the comments on Russell Beattie's post
about the Atom API. His concern is that he won't be able to build a
client that talks to a weblog server through his Java toolkit because
it doesn't allow the HTTP methods the API calls for. Further, he notes
that the spec, which was openly developed, has a restrictive
copyright.
The best answer is obvious, imho, use XML-RPC because it
already has been adapted to and debugged in all the environments where
blogging APIs need to run. By cutting almost to the bottom of the
stack you will have to redo everything that took years to do. I
think it's going to take longer to redo because XML-RPC didn't need to
get any Java toolkits to change, it treaded more softly than the Atom
does.
There's a practical side to protocol and format design that's
missing in the Atom API. The goal is to make it easy for developers to
hop on the bandwagon and get them committed to developing for the
platform. Putting unnecessary hurdles in the way unnecessarily limits
adoption, and virtually guarantees either stagnation or massive
breakage. I can't imagine that either choice is what Google is looking
for.
XML-RPC was designed for what they want to do and it's stood
the test of time. Learn to love the pragmatic, it's how you're going
to win the wars with Yahoo, Microsoft and everyone else who wants to
eat your lunch.
W3C wants Atom
W3C wants Atom
05/13/2004 01:59 PMLooks like the W3C
wants the Atom community to work through them.
I'm undecided whether or not I'm for this. On the one hand, the
W3C certainly has the tools to promote and document Atom. On the
other hand, adding Atom to their semantic web effort could make Atom
even more complex - and simplicity is what makes RSS so great, despite
it's imprecise specification (via Scoble
a>).
Atom at W3C?
Atom at W3C?
05/14/2004 10:52 AMI wonder how the draft <a
href="http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/IetfCharter">IETF
Charter</a> would need to change in order to become a
<a
href="http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/W3cCharter">W3C
Charter</a>. It would seem to me that someone from
the W3C would be in the best position to answer this. Any
takers?
...
RT-Atom-0.01
RT-Atom-0.01
07/12/2004 05:30 PMJavascript-SHA1-1.00
Javascript-SHA1-1.00
04/28/2004 05:53 AMJavascript-SHA1-1.01
Javascript-SHA1-1.01
07/29/2004 06:40 AMJavascript-Menu-2.01.1
Javascript-Menu-2.01.1
05/29/2004 06:28 AMGrok Description matches for Atom-JavaScript-0.4
GrokA matches for Atom-JavaScript-0.4
Atom-JavaScript-0.4