Cool potential for Orkut or Friendster
Grok Headline matches for Cool potential for Orkut or Friendster
Watch out Friendster, here comes
Google's Orkut
Watch out Friendster, here comes
Google's Orkut
01/22/2004 09:51 PMNews.com says: Google tip-toed into the hot market of online social
networks with the quiet launch of Orkut.com on Thursday, CNET News.com
has learned. The search company, which is expected to go public this
year, is flexing its power with its Internet fans by constantly
offering new services, including comparison shopping and news search.
Orkut could be the clearest signal that Google's aspirations don't end
with search. "Orkut is an online trusted community Web site designed
for friends. The main...
Google Launches Orkut to combat
Friendster
Google Launches Orkut to combat
Friendster
01/24/2004 03:30 AMI4U Jan 24 2004 8:10AM GMT
Google debuts Friendster-clone Orkut
Google debuts Friendster-clone Orkut
01/22/2004 11:04 PMExclusive Will you be my friend?
Orkut members launch Orkut Paranoia
community about Orkut TOS on Orkut
Orkut members launch Orkut Paranoia
community about Orkut TOS on Orkut
02/10/2004 10:42 PMGeez. My head is spinning. Anyway, BoingBoing reader Adam fields
points us to a new "Orkut community" (one of many online affinity
groups within the social networking service), called "
Orkut
Paranoia" (link requires free membership). Adam says, "This
formed out of some interesting discussion we've had about what's going
on... summarized in this blog post:"
1) Orkut claims irrevocable unlimited license rights to everything you
post. Most people don't understand what that means. One example of
this is that many of my friends have posted pictures that I've taken.
This is probably not a problem, generally, but they've granted Orkut a
license to use them without consulting me, and created a legal tangle
should I have a problem with that, forcing me to have to perform a
legal struggle with Orkut, because of their unwitting actions. I think
this is rude behavior on the part of Orkut, but their prerogative to
demand.
2) Orkut may share personal information with Google in an unrestricted
way. Google is unwilling (so far) to discuss what use they may make of
that information.
3) Google's privacy policy possibly has some holes in it with regards
to data collected by way of means other than use of the google.com
website.
I suspect that Orkut is a way for Google to gather personal
information about their clientele for marketing purposes, and to try
to form a more solid relationship beyond "I just use Google for search
because it's convenient". This is not terribly nefarious, but the kind
of data that could be collected to do so has wide potential for abuse,
and people should be aware that that's what's going on. Some may not
care, but many people I know are signing up without reading or
understanding the implications of the above three points.
Link
Company Claims Orkut Stole Orkut Code
Company Claims Orkut Stole Orkut Code
06/30/2004 07:19 PMIt's not like it's particularly difficult to write a social networking
systems. These days, at the rate new ones are coming out, it
practically seems like a typical first year CS student's project.
Still, a company named Affinity Engines that builds social networking
products for universities (that just so happens to have been founded
by Orkut Buyukkokten - the creator of orkut.com) is now
suing
Google for stealing their code. From the article, it sounds like
they have a pretty solid claim. First, it's obvious that Orkut had
access to the code. He even continued to work on it while he was at
Google. According to the lawsuit he promised repeatedly that he
wasn't going to work on a similar app for Google, but then did so
anyway. The real damaging point, however, is that Affinity Engines
claims they've found nine identical bugs in Orkut that are also in
their own system -- which certainly makes it quite likely the basic
code is the same.
Orkut
02/10/2004 02:53 AMWell, this thing seems to be taking off. Nat threw in the first
invite, so I signed up, and another half-dozen or so folks have fired
off invites. This is another one of those networking site things, and
I've decided that while I'll go accept invites from anyone I know (I
really need to get a picture up--I'd throw the rainbow parrot pic I
use for iChat, but the TOS seem to indicate that'd be ill-advised) I
don't think I'm going to go to much trouble to actively go search
people out. These things are always interesting to look at,...
There's no place like law.cool.cool.fun.
There's no place like law.cool.cool.fun.
03/22/2005 11:38 PM
What's a namber? A
namber is a word that acts as a mnemonic for a number. For
example, 65 is
drum, and 181 is
push.
A
namber address uses an arbitrarily-chosen list of nambers
to represent each of the numbers from 0 to 255 in order to assemble
four words to represent any IP address. Metafilter.com's namber is
earth
.frog.brown.tooth, and mysteryrobot.com conveniently provides
translation and forwarding to the real IP
address.
R.I.P. Orkut
R.I.P. Orkut
06/10/2004 05:46 PM
Orkut is now a spam-filled waste and inappropriate for professional
use. What
a waste of a good opportunity. I am now starting to
appreciate LinkedIn's more
conservative approach.

orkut
orkut
01/23/2004 02:22 PMsocial-networking site .. Orkut
orkut.com
track this
site | 19 links
orkut - help
orkut - help
02/10/2004 02:54 AMhttp://www.orkut.com/join.html
Any orkut members out there? Me need Invite.... ;)
UPDATE: Got a ton of invites. Thanks :)
Orkut
Orkut
01/23/2004 04:12 PM
I
awoke this morning to an explosion of invitatons to a new social
network called Orkut.
Lots of things to say about it - first and foremost that it's a
really clean, functional and exciting site!
Second - when I tried to join Orkut - I clicked on the 'Join Orkut'
button and it told me - "Sorry you have to be invited into Orkut."
"Oh" I said. "Then why is there a button saying "Join
Orkut?"
That's pretty strange.
Now - the next thing is that Orkut is (apparently) created by Orkut Buyukkokten,
who works at Google and just happens to be the guy who created the
oriignal social network for Stanford - which is now part of Affinity Engines (who have a
new CEO - BTW.)
Orkut has a pretty conspicuos message at the bottom saying
"In affiliation with Google" - so if I was a betting
man, I'd say Google decided NOT to buy Friendster - 'cause they got
their employee Orkut - to roll their own internal system - which (just
happens) to be called Orkut.
That said - let's just hope that Orkut will support FOAF - so we
all can live happily together.
Orkut has Communities in it - so I created a few myself.
Here we go!
"Orkut"
"Orkut"
01/23/2004 05:24 PMOrkut the right way to go?
Orkut the right way to go?
01/26/2004 03:30 AMWhy Orkut Doesn't Work (Ross Mayfield). 
January 25, 2004
Why Orkut Doesn't Work
- Posted by Ross
Mayfield at 11:25 PM
Before we could learn to pronounce it, it was shut down.
Its not that the servers are melting with the rapid rise to
~3
million page views or 500th most popular site in a couple of days. Its
not a conspiracy of data collection or a learning curve.
orkut, which should really be named Oogle,
demonstrated that a high performance explicit social networking site,
well designed for digital immeadiate gratification (one local
engineer personally even complained they had to click from map to
profile to add a friend), supported by brand and with the right root
can unleash latent demand. I would say this is reflective of the
dearth of social capital in our society, but aside from such heady
stuff, frictionless whuffie fun, huh? Latent demand for what is the
question.
Internet researchers would die excruciating deaths in search of the
last days of data. I would venture a guess that most of the digerati
that was already pre-conditions by existing services, an
incomprehensible demographic that grants hypergrowth to the best,
grants the best feedback, but easily taketh away.
okurt doesnt work because it lacks constraints. Nothing holds
people back. Nobody knows what a friend means. No social capital on
the line. Its so fun and easy, choices and incentives are
irrational.
Normally this would raise questions. Some constraints make good
social compact. Some constraints on openness curb pollution (spam,
security). One of the better constraints is price because it lead to
profit.
However, AdSense is relatively frictionless. It adds new
constraints while adding value. Same could be said for other well
targeted forms of content, like blog posts
[Many-to-Many]
Here's what I just posted as a comment on Many-to-Many...
Trying to lock everything into a black or white -
"friend" or not - is the root of the problem (IMHO.)
That's why our
PeopleAggregator FOAF based
social network - has varying levels of degrees of explicit
'relationships'.
Starting from 'Close Friend' and then
'Friend' (both of which need email verification) we relax our
defintion of the relationships by calling the next relationship you
can have with someone - an 'Acquaintance', then a "Know by
Reputation" and then "Know in Passing". which (to me are
nice ways of lessening the quality and depth of the relationship,
while still acknowledging it's existence.
We then have a relationship type - called 'Related
to' (for family relationships) and finally - we end with a blank
"I don't know you, but I want to know you' kind of
acknowledgement of a desire to start a relationship. These 7 levels of
relationship certainly aren't perfect, the best or even a full range
of emotions (notice we stayed away from any sort fo negative
relationships.) But we DID create a scale of sorts - from very close
to not at all - that represents the REAL nature of relationships -
which answers the premise of Ross' complaint.
I agree that social networks need to go beyond just
offering someone to be "your friend" or not. Granualarities of
relationships are the way to go. It's the only way explicit digital
social networks will ever be successful.
Playing around with Orkut
Playing around with Orkut
01/26/2004 10:19 AMshortcomings of Orkut .. Martin Roell ..
3
roell.net/weblog/archiv/2004/01/25/playing_around_with_orkut.shtml
track this
site | 5 links
Orkut party
Orkut party
02/10/2004 02:47 AMAn
yone go to the orkut.om launch party last night at Suite 181?. Did
anyone go to the orkut.om launch party last night at Suite 181??? [The Social Software
Weblog]
Sure - I was there. Of course I was there!
I got to meet Orkut for the first time and I made sure that the
FOAF meme was firmly implanted into his cranium.
A lot of people are hoping that Orkut will support FOAF.
Orkut don't care about you
Orkut don't care about you
06/03/2004 12:37 AMOrkut
is too busy to play.... It seems the Orkut servers are overloaded
at the moment. I've not been able to login for the past hour.
Hopefully the Orkut team will invest in whatever is needed to help
scale their websites.... [The Jeff Pulver
Blog]
Um - somebody tell Jeff that Google/Orkut doesn't care about you or
the performance of the site. Orkut is a research project meant
to suck end-user behavior patterns and profiles. They don't care
about you.
Orkut Goes Dark, At Least For A Bit
Orkut Goes Dark, At Least For A Bit
01/25/2004 08:34 PMOrkut Circuit
Orkut Circuit
01/25/2004 10:32 AM
After my first lap (day) of Orkut, I got these to share.
It's supposedly writ
ten
in ASP.NET. That one surprised me.
It has many security and privacy issues just as other social
networking services
have. For example, one can send a message to thousands of
members with only
a few clicks. There could be some XSS (cross-site scripting)
problems as well.
But, overall, I have yet to see anything that can be resolved over
time given sufficient
technical and financial interests.
Invitation-only aspect of Orkut blew me away in terms of its effect
and its meaning.
Since you can't just register without an invitation from someone
within, it creates
a sense of value that drives people to signup.
As to the meaning, what invitation-only means is that everyone
who is a member
of Orkut knows Orkut himself through a string of friends.
It means you have
joined a six-degree of separation experiment where the starting end
is Orkut Buyukkokten.
I'll bet that was why it was named Orkut.
I am not yet convinced that there exists a workable revenue model
behind Orkut but
then I have similar opinions about Rovers in Mars.
Entertaining thoughts about
what might lie beyond the horizon with a bunch of geeky friends is
a reward enough
for now. To this end, I created an Orkut Community titled
“Orkut Design”
to examine Orkut in detail.

Orkut Experience
Orkut Experience
01/24/2004 09:27 PM
I just registered into Orkut,
thanks to an invitation
from Chris Pirillo --
thanks Chris!;-).
While the registration process was a bit tiring, Orkut UI and user
experience were
more pleasant than Friendster or LinkedIn.
It could use some improvements here and there, but at least it was
pleasant enough
for me to invited a bunch of friends and collegues, something I
haven't done with
other similiar services.
Hmm. It might be interesting to mix PKI with social
networking. For example,
I could issue Friend of Don certificates to my friends
that basically say
“I know this person to be trustworthy, smart, and nice enough
to be my friend.“
What uses would such certificate have? Nothing in the horizon
but I am wondering
what might lie beyond that...
If you are my friend and haven't received an invite from me,
just send me an e-mail.
I just grabbed the names that were handy and definitely missed many
of you whom I
would be proud to call a friend.

Orkut Death
Orkut Death
03/06/2004 02:09 AMHuy
Zing:
My Orkut.com death was a slow painful one that lasted
1.5 hours starting at 20:44 on Monday, February 23, 2004. [via
Danah Boyd]
Exporting from Orkut
Exporting from Orkut
08/11/2004 11:30 AMDoc asks the same question we all want.....
Subtract
People are asking me to be their contact on Multiply. There was an error
processing your request. Please try again. it tells me, with
advice to "contact customer service." I'm not a customer. I don't have
the time. But I do wonder why we need yet another one of these
things.
Ah, one friend just told me Multiply promised to import
Orkut contacts, somehow. That's a good sell, if it can be
done, I guess. If it has other advantages over Orkut, which has become
too slow for me. In fact, it's busy not coming up right now.
[Doc Searls]
Me too! I wanna export from orkut - too!
But to export - we need to get explicit permission from each and
every person - with them 'opting into' the export process. That will
appear as a simple checkbox in folks' settings.
THEN Doc can use FOAFnet to import his social network into Multiply
- theoretically. All Multipl has to do is support the FOAFnet.org spec!
That's EXACTLY why we created it!
Orkut goes International
Orkut goes International
06/20/2004 11:55 PMSo I get this message today.....
Hi Marc,
We've just launched a new feature that allows you to specify the
primary language of your community.
Why would you want to do this?
1. So that everyone posts in one language! As orkut.com gains more
members from around the world, it makes it easier for you and everyone
in your community if people can read each other's posts. This is hard
to do if everyone's speaking different languages. 2. So that you can
search communities by language. This way, when you're looking for new
communities, you'll always find ones that you can read and participate
in.
I say - "right on!"
We all need to start thinking more international! I bet this is
really gonna make Orkut take off even more. Now if they only had
something to do in there.
HHHmmmm - maybe like Gmail, Blogger and Google News.....in the
valley of the search.
Alternative to Orkut
Alternative to Orkut
02/10/2004 02:51 AMOnePotMeal announces a new Artificial Social Network for those of us
griping about Orkut: Urkel....
Why Google needs Orkut
Why Google needs Orkut
02/10/2004 02:49 AMIn all the discussion of Orkut I've seen so far, most folks are busy
comparing Orkut to every other social networking web site around,
typically they mention Friendster ("it's so much faster!"), but as we
all know these sites are a dime a dozen these days. At least it seems
that way. What surprises me is that nobody has looked at it the other
way around: What problems might Orkut solve that Google would
otherwise find significantly more challenging? Those...
The edge of Orkut
The edge of Orkut
12/19/2004 03:06 PM
I just got the following message on Orkut.
Limit reached for
number of friends
You have 1024 friends. You can only have up to 1000 friends. Before
you can add more friends, you need to remove
friends.
Partially because I was getting sick of social
networks systems, partially because they were trying to be "exclusive"
with invite only and partially because it was easy, I took the policy
of saying yes to every friend request that didn't look like a
fakester. Now I've found the edge of Orkut. According to Orkut, you
can only have 1000 friends. I guess that's OK compared to the 150 or
so for AIM. This error message reminds me a bit of real life. I know
need to forget someone every time I meet someone I want to remember
because I'm having a buffer overflow on my people recognition
memory.
Now the question is... What do I do with my Orkut network now that
I'm "done"?
Comment -
TrackBack
Orkut in action
Orkut in action
02/11/2004 08:26 PMI did finally meet someone who went on dates with three people she
met on Orkut. So far so
good she reports.
Orkut is supplying me with a life so, via
orkut, I got comped into Etech, I got a meeting with VCs, 3 dates had,
three arranged, and lots of people have walked up to me and said, "oh!
hi!"
Orkut Follies
Orkut Follies
02/10/2004 02:51 AMMichael O'Connor Clarke is writing funnily (here and here) about the
foibles of Orkut. His Monopoly card reminds me of a fake screen
capture I used when talking about Artificial Social Networks (ASN)
such as Orkut. Click for larger view Just in case it's not obvious,
the point is that you can't get over ASNs' inherent binary nature by
adding more binary choices. That is, the problem isn't just that the
choices are too precise; the problem is also that the choices are
necessarily explicit. Social relationships depend on being implicit,
hidden, dark and unspoken....
Orkut for bitches
Orkut for bitches
02/11/2004 04:27 PMMany people email me inquiring after the hounds. How are they? What
are they up to? Do they rule? The answer, quite obviously, is that
they're busy doing Social Software. Networking, as it were, via the
might that is Dogster....
Orkut Bay Area Map
Orkut Bay Area Map
02/18/2004 10:49 PM
I know that Orkut is a tired topic already, but here is a map from
DataWhoreHouse showing
distribution of Orkut members who exposed their general location on
Orkut (via Scoble
a> and Liz at Many2Many).
Hmm, no, I didn't have to pay to get layed.
Mostly what I expected except Silicon Valley looks like Death
Valley for some reason.
A bug?

Orkut Needs Permachat
Orkut Needs Permachat
02/10/2004 03:02 AM
A community without communication is a dead community and
friendship is more than
just a wall of faces. Connections between people are born out
of interactions
between them and strength of connections are primarily based on the
amount and frequency
of interactions.
So it is communication that binds people and communities together
yet there is little
of that going on in Orkut. Yes, there is the message feature
but it's works
more like radio and discourages interaction. Communities have
topics, but topics
are little rooms one must make effort to enter and
compartmentalized conversations within
a group setting do not encourage others to join in uninvited.
To get around these problems. I think permachats should
be created
centered around individuals and communities. A permachat is
like IRC except
conversations takes place over much longer period, days even.
Visibility of
permachat should be limited to friends or friends of friends
only. Amount is
determined by rate of actvity.To promote interaction and to
encourage
the sense of conversation, sense of time is removed, leaving only
faces and names
next to each entry. Amount of activity within past 24 hours
should be displayed
in the 'view network' and 'my communities' pages using color hints
(i.e. red for hot).
Permachat allows people who know me to communicate with me as well
as others who know
me. This in turns allows them to become friends over time
instead of using more
explicit introduction based social networking. It also allows
interaction without
spammy messages invading private spaces and deteriorating sense of
friendship.
For communities, permachat serves as the single thread that binds
the community.
Topics is too focus-oriented to serve this function.
Permachat allows casual
conversations, encourages interaction, and informs every member
with minimal effort.
And, most importantly, permachat allows new friendship to be born
out these intereactions
among community members just as conversations among friends of an
individual helps
them form new friendships.
A working example of permachat is #joiito.
#joiito IRC channel not only binds the friendship network centered
around Joi,
but also builds a community in itself as people get to know each
other. Topics
come and go just as Joi comes and goes, but the conversation rolls
on and weaves its
social magic around everyone. I think Orkut use a bit of that
magic.

Orkut datamining
Orkut datamining
04/25/2004 08:27 AMSomewhat scary, but pretty interesting Orkut datamining. An Orkut density map
and a Orkut
Personal Network GeoMapper. Here's a map of my
network. It doesn't seem to map my complete network. It's also too
bad it's not global yet.
Via Sanford
The new Friendster
The new Friendster
02/05/2005 09:12 PM
I've been waiting a whiele to see what
happens with the new Friendster. So far - not much. But they do send
this nifty little newsletter nowadays - which has the status of some
of my friends in it.
What intrigues me about this - is how did they know which friends
to tell me about? Those who have updated recently? Those who are
'important' in the blogosphere - or what?
The reason I'm curious is that if you look at these peeps below -
you'll notice nobody less than danah boyd, Xeni Jardin, Tyler Ziemann,
Justin Hall and Scott Rafer.
Not a bad selection of peeps. So I'd say there's something going
on here - something that's determining who is 'important' in my life -
or something like that. Cause Julia Lolita is not known in the
blogspehere and Noah Glass is kind of but not that much. Julia is an
all-star in the SF/BM/LaLa party scene and Noah used to live with me
as a roomate.
Julia's company "Blood & Butter" productions has put on some of the
best parties ever - some of them at my house (with Noah particiapting
I may add.) So how did Friendster know how important Julia is to me?
Email traffic? And Jason is a friend of Julia's - I barely know him.
He's teh one man out in this elite list. Hmmm.
But I don't exchange email with Justin, Xeni or Scott on
Friendster? So I'm curious just how this list was determined.

F is for Friendster
F is for Friendster
11/16/2003 07:26 PMThe Internet has birthed the verbs “googling,” which means “searching
for information on Google.com,” and “blogging,” which means “keeping
or ...
I'm out of Friendster
I'm out of Friendster
09/01/2004 03:40 PMI've quit. I don't ever use it. I don't have a pressing need to be
registered at a site for daters and people with "open" marriages. I
wasn't impressed with the CEO throwing Friendster condoms into the
audience after giving a talk. I have a problem with the site's
disrespect for the implicit. And then Friendster fired an employee for
blogging. Click here to go to the cancellation form, if you're so
inclined. (Thanks to Jeremy Zawodny for the cancellation link. And
here's a great post by Jon Udell.)...
Lo-fi Friendster
Lo-fi Friendster
12/02/2003 01:07 AM"Theoretically, everybody who entered 111 Minna and plunked down a $5
cover for the happy-hour party had been e-mailed an invitation from a
friend. Of a friend. Of a friend....Four Bay Area women conceived the
Date My Friend idea in January by merging their original invite lists
of 50 friends each, hoping that their single pals would be put at ease
knowing that the guy asking for their number was somehow connected to
them in that six-degrees-of-separation fashion."
Friendster and PHP
Friendster and PHP
06/29/2004 11:45 PMCongrats to Joyce and the front-end team Friendster for pulling off
the JSP to PHP migration. Having the front end less tightly coupled
with everything else ought to make life a lot easier for some folks
there. Now, any bets as to when the "beta" label will come off their
logo?...
Here's something for Friendster
Here's something for Friendster
01/22/2004 02:34 AMEsther Dyson, queen of comedy.
I know I know - it is like poking a rattle snake with your foot.
But I am feeling feisty this morning. Now that Esther Dyson
doesnt really have anything to say about anything (smart guy in
her company is doing his own thing), she has decided that comedy is
the next big thing.
Dyson got the biggest laugh by suggesting a business model for
Sunnyvale-based Friendster, the popular social networking service and
a company that has yet to collect any revenue from its users.
Populated by lonely singles looking to line up dates, Friendster
should start a personal gift registry, Dyson said. The bottom line
would be: If you want to date me, this is what youve got
to buy me. (San
Jose Mercury News)
Yup, thats a new business model, so new that every generation
has been doing the same since Adam and
[
Om Malik on Broadband]
"Friendster goes PHP"
"Friendster goes PHP"
07/01/2004 02:00 AMLanguage Tempest At Orkut
Language Tempest At Orkut
07/17/2004 11:15 PMGrok Description matches for Cool potential for Orkut or Friendster
GrokA matches for Cool potential for Orkut or Friendster
Cool potential for Orkut or Friendster