Winning Argument
Grok Headline matches for Winning Argument
"Winning Argument"
"Winning Argument"
06/22/2004 04:03 AMOne More Argument for Security
One More Argument for Security
06/28/2004 01:18 PMIn an amusing instance of a less-than-brilliant criminal mind, a
Maryland man is busted for trying to extort a company via emails sent
from unsecured hotspots: In an effort to get back at a business that
competes with his own, this fellow used unsecured hotspots around town
to send threatening emails and demands for $17 million. Apparently he
figured that using the unsecured sites would keep him anonymous. The
trouble is, he slipped up when he instructed the recipients to write
the checks out to him. The FBI had tracked down the emails to the
hotspots but seeing as the owners of the hotspots had no connection to
the business receiving the emails, they were clearly not involved....
A Circular Argument
A Circular Argument
03/14/2005 06:21 PM
The Idea: A debate on how best to
deal with the pressing global problems of overpopulation and
overconsumption.
Dave talks to
himself.
We need to
reduce human population to sustainable levels -- no more than 1-2
billion people globally.
|
Why?
The problem isn't numbers of people, it's the amount of resources they
consume. And as nations become educated, they control their own
population. The global population is going to level off at 9 billion.
And no other method beside education has ever had any enduring effect
on birth rate anyway. You can't legislate it -- the need to reproduce
is an imperative in our DNA.
|
Well,
then, we need to reduce consumption. Today we are already consuming
resources and producing pollution and waste at a rate twice what the
planet can sustain, and as third world countries aspire to first world
living standards this is on track to rise to eight times what the
planet can sustain by the end of the century.
|
You
underestimate human ingenuity and invention. Technology has already
allowed us to increase crop yields enormously, to the point each acre
of land can produce far more food than anyone ever expected. That same
ingenuity will solve other shortages -- replacing oil with renewable
sources, finding ways to refresh water, enabling us to put more people
on each acre and still keep our cities pleasant and habitable, even
growing food indoors.
|
So
then what. You have a whole planet packed with people, cities covering
every square inch of the planet, and no room for any other species of
life.
|
In
the first place, if the 9 billion all lived in healthy, well-designed
cities, even cities full of trees and parks, those cities would still
only take up 10% of the Earth's surface. The other 90% would leave
tons
of room for other species of life,
|
But
that's just idealism. The reality is that people don't live in
well-designed cities, they sprawl out and clearcut and poison all the
land available to them.
|
Well,
that's human nature. We want room. But historically people have
actually flocked to cities, and are still doing so. If you make a city
attractive, people actually prefer to live there rather than in the
country. The key is reinventing our cities. Europe is showing how to
do
that now, and the rest of us will learn.
|
Not
everyone wants to live in cities. And much of the land outside the
cities is used up and despoiled in order to provide people in the
cities with what they want and need.
|
Yes,
and we'll have to learn to be more efficient. Europe basically ran out
of land a century ago, and since then they have been pioneers:
achieving population stability and even reducing population,
reclaiming
land as wilderness to increase biodiversity, making cities more
livable
and more efficient and self-sufficient with wind turbines etc. so the
land outside the cities need not be used up and despoiled. We can even
invent proteins that have the same flavour, texture and appearance as
animal proteins, and free up the 70% of arable land now used for
grazing animals and growing food for those animals.
|
What you're
describing violates the laws of thermodynamics. The stuff these 9
billion people consume has to come from somewhere.
|
Yes,
and right now it comes from a lot of wasteful and inefficient
processes. We're still learning how to live properly. We will learn to
reduce, reuse, recycle, to live within our means and consume no more
than we produce.
|
How can you
be so optimistic? Open your eyes, and all you will see is evidence to
the contrary.
|
I
guess you see what you want to see. I think we've come a long way from
the middle ages. There is less barbarity now. There is more knowledge
and understanding. We are much better connected and aware of what
needs
to be done. How can you be so pessimistic?
|
All
the wars and violence, poisoned food, water and land, preventable
disease and suffering, global warming, end of oil, factory farming,
government corruption, an economy dependent on unsustainable growth. I
could go on...
|
There
have always been problems. Look at the Spanish Inquisition, the
tyrannies of Stalin and Mao that together resulted in the deaths of
over 100 million people, the two world wars, the cold war with two
irrational fingers on the nuclear button. Somehow we seem to have the
survival instinct to pull back from the brink in time.
|
But
this time we're heading over the brink with a lot more mass and a lot
more momentum -- more, faster than ever before, like a heavily-laden
car careening out of control.
|
Maybe.
If you think so, you should recognize human nature for what it is,
very
adaptable, very resistant to change, and slowly maturing. And then
focus your attention on the "careening car's" vulnerabilities, areas
where change is most possible. Go teach people, especially women, in
the third world, and give them reliable, cheap, easy-to-use birth
control, so they 'grow up' to the European model faster. Make it not
worth their while to aspire to move to the West, and make them see
that
the Western European standard of living is a better model to emulate
than the North American one. And in North America, work in urban
planning to make sprawl and commuting unnecessary, to make urban
communities efficient, self-sufficient, self-managed, and delightful
to
live in. Work in renewable energy and remediation technology. Help
North Americans 'grow up' to see the value of the Western European
model of land use, not to see value in each owning their own personal
50 by 100 foot piece of chemical-laden grass.
|
There's not
nearly enough time for that.
|
It's
already happening. Third-world population growth rates, though still
too high, are dropping. India is starting to attract some of its
emigrants back. 'Smart Growth' models, though poorly named, and
telecommuting are helping to reduce sprawl and commuting in North
America. And if you're right and this won't be enough to avert
ecological disaster, well, then you might as well party, because no
top-down political act or peer-to-peer meme is going to cause people
to
change their behaviour before they're ready, before they have no
alternative. It's not in our nature.
|
Hey wait a
minute. I thought I was the pessimist.
|
You are. I
don't believe it will ever come to that.
|
There
are a lot of scientists and students of history who say it will. So do
my instincts. So I believe we need to take a precautionary approach,
using tax incentives and social and political pressure and technology
to get people to voluntarily reduce human population to sustainable
levels -- say, to 1-2 billion people globally.
|
Uh, I already
answered that.
|
|
Passing an Argument to an Executable
Passing an Argument to an Executable
09/19/2004 04:36 AMHere we have the final argument to be
made
Here we have the final argument to be
made
09/10/2004 06:43 PMnationalreview.com/hanson/hanson200409100700.asp
track this
site | 5 links
"A Few Notes from the Grokster Argument"
"A Few Notes from the Grokster Argument"
03/29/2005 11:44 PM"a nicely documented argument"
"a nicely documented argument"
04/29/2004 09:09 AMThe Republic of Texas Argument
The Republic of Texas Argument
04/14/2004 11:52 PMHeh... I worked 16+ hours today (sucks to be in a suit that long),
but got this email in my inbox from a buddy today and figured I'd
share it. Sort of tells the "why Texans think so much of their state"
story a little differently:
From: The People of Texas
To: All Concerned Voters
With the presidential campaign in full swing, Texas has a message
for all those complainers out there. After seeing the whiners, the
folks from Texas have decided that we might just take matters into our
own hands.
Here is our solution:
- Let Kerry become President of the United States (all 49
states).
- George W. Bush becomes the President of the
Republic of Texas.
So what does Texas have to do to survive as a Republic?
NASA is in Houston, Texas. We will control the space industry.
We refine over 85% of the gasoline in the United States.
Defense Industry - we have over 65% of it. The term "Don't mess
with Texas," will take on a whole new meaning
Oil - we can supply all the oil that the Republic of Texas will
need for the next 300 years. Yankee states - sorry about that.
Natural Gas - again we have all we need and it's too bad about
those northern states. Mr. Kerry will have to figure a way to keep
them warm.
Computer Industry - we currently lead the nation in producing
computer chips and communications: Small places like HP, Texas
Instruments, Dell Computer, EDS, Raytheon, National Semiconductor,
Motorola, Intel, AMD, Atmel, Applied Materials, Ball Semiconductor,
Dallas Semiconductor, Delphi, Nortel, Alcatel, Etc,Etc. The list goes
on and on.
Health Centers - We have the largest centers for Cancer research,
the best burn centers and the top trauma units in the world and other
large health planning centers.
We have enough colleges to keep us going: Texas A&M, U.T., Texas
Tech, Rice, SMU, University of Houston, Baylor, UNT, Texas Women's
University, etc. Ivy grows better in the south anyway.
We have a ready supply of workers. Just open the border when we
need some more.
We control a good portion of the paper industry, plastics,
insurance, etc.
In case of a foreign invasion, we have the Texas National Guard and
the Texas Air National Guard. We don't have an army, but since
everybody down here has at least six rifles and a pile of ammo, we can
raise an army in 24 hours if we need it. If the situation really gets
bad, we can always call Department of Public Safety and ask them to
send over a couple of Texas Rangers.
We are totally self sufficient in beef, poultry, hogs and vegetable
produce and everybody down here knows how to cook them so that they
taste good. Don't need any food from anywhere else.
This just names a few of the items that will keep the Republic of
Texas in good shape. There isn't a thing out there that we need and
don't have.
Now to the rest of the United States under President Kerry: Since
you won't have the refineries to get gas for your cars, only President
Kerry will be able to drive around in his 9 mile per gallon SUV. The
rest of the United States will have to walk or ride bikes.
You won't have any TV as the space center in Houston will cut off
your satellite communications. You won't have any natural gas to heat
your homes but since Mr. Kerry has predicted global warming, you will
not need the gas.
Signed,
The People of Texas
Grokster argument, the electronica mix
Grokster argument, the electronica mix
08/22/2004 07:30 AMCory Doctorow: MLFG, a techno artist, has set the
good guys' closing arguments in the Grokster case to music. This is
the dancing-est legal argument I've ever heard:
pub-pub-pub-pub-pub-pub-public domain materials. Seriously, this
rocks.
Part 1, 1.5MB MP3 Link,
Part 2, 970k MP3 Link
(
Thanks, Shawn!)
My Querystring Argument Neurosis
My Querystring Argument Neurosis
03/22/2005 04:32 PMI have a serious Web development neurosis: I hate querystring
arguments. You know the garbage after the page name in a URL? Like
this:
page.php?thisArgument=thisValue&andThisArgument=thisValue
I hate them. I think they're ugly, unweidly, and expose too much
of your application to the world. This is an utterly irrational
thing, I know, because querystring arguments work perfectly well. I
just need to get over myself.
But is the querystring argument falling out of fashion? A lot of
apps now run all requests through a single page, and they grab and
parse the URL themselves. For instance:
/products/hunting_gear/1
This would show page 1 of products in the hunting gear category.
There is no "products" or "hunting_gear" folder or file named simply
"1." Instead, this URL is mapped to an actual block of code. You can
do this with a RewriteRule pretty easily (you could do it with a PHP
auto-prepend file too).
In my PHP apps, I use an
AliasMatch rule to route everything to a single page and I have a
mapper like this:
/product/[0-9]+/edit = edit_product.php
This uses a regular expression to map a URL pattern to a file. If
the first "directory" is "product," the second is a number of some
kind, and the third is "edit," then send them to the page to edit a
product. That page will grab the number out of the URL and use it to
load an object.
J2EE does this too, to map URL strings to servlets (I forget what
the file is called..."web.config," maybe?). I have no doubt that .Net
has the same functionality in there somewhere. I think Rails does this too, from what
Joe tells me.
Using the A
cceptPathInfo directive for Apache, you can do things like
this:
index.php/this/is/some/extra/info
But that just looks sloppy to me. I don't know why. eZ publish does this by default, and it bugs
me to no end.
Finally, today I found this, and it's what prompted me to write
this little diatribe:
/messages.cfm/forumid:4/threadid:39092
So they're using AcceptPathInfo, but each "directory stop" along
the way is a key-value pair. I like this. It speaks to the aesthetic
in me, or to the neurotic, depending on how you look at it.
This last example perhaps proves that it's just the syntax I don't
like — all those &'s and ='s floating around are like
fingernails on a blackboard to me. This example is key-value just
like traditional querystring arguments, so the function is the same,
just the syntax is different. The colon-slash syntax just looks
cleaner to me.
Am I the only one with this problem? Does anyone else hate
querystring arguments as much as me?
mobl0gging a subway argument
mobl0gging a subway argument
08/27/2004 02:15 PMman, i'm glad i'm not *that* guy
Which side is out of line in the Harmony
argument?
Which side is out of line in the Harmony
argument?
07/29/2004 08:36 PMHas RealNetworks
adopted the tactics and
ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod? Or should Apple back
down and
let
consumers be the ones choosing what music goes on their iPod? Does
the
DMCA even apply to this issue?
Which side is out of line in the Harmony argument? --
post your
opinion in our online survey
Realistic Argument for Broadband Access
Realistic Argument for Broadband Access
04/29/2004 05:54 PMWhile many communities around the country vaguely hope that wireless
networks will bring business to town, this Indiana town has some very
real reasons for wanting broadband: Scottsburg, Ind. couldn't get any
kind of broadband access from the incumbents so it spent $350,000 to
build a wireless broadband network. The network equipment comes from
Alvarion, which means that it's probably proprietary gear based on
802.11. The network has a very tangible economic affect on the town.
Apparently, Chrysler promised to shut down the local Chrysler repair
shop, which employs 60 people, if they couldn't get fast Internet
access. Other local workers who telecommute threatened to move if they
couldn’t get high-speed Internet access. Plus, the school system is
saving a bundle with the new service. This Indiana town most certainly
isn't alone in wanting broadband but failing to get it from the
incumbents. While we already see lots of wireless ISPs serving these
small markets, clearly they aren't serving every community that wants
broadband. Perhaps WiMax will drive down prices enough to encourage
WISPs to build out in more small towns....
"explain the flaws in Scoble's argument"
"explain the flaws in Scoble's argument"
01/28/2004 03:36 PMMicrosoft disputes key Oracle argument
Microsoft disputes key Oracle argument
06/24/2004 12:53 PMIHT Jun 24 2004 5:15PM GMT
Grokster argument analysis from law
student
Grokster argument analysis from law
student
03/29/2005 05:20 PMCory Doctorow:
This law student who attended Grokster has written a stellar account
of the argument, giving a good, nuanced analysis of what the lawyers
and the judges were up to.
At least some of the Justices, Scalia in particular, seemed troubled
by how an inventor would know, at the time of inventing, how its
invention might be marketed in the future. How, some of the Justices
asked MGM, could the inventors of the iPod (or the VCR, or the
photocopier, or even the printing press) know whether they could go
ahead with developing their invention? It surely would not be
difficult for them to imagine that somebody might hit upon the idea of
marketing their device as a tool for infringement.
MGM's answer to this was pretty unsatisfying. They said that at the
time the iPod was invented, it was clear that there were many
perfectly lawful uses for it, such as ripping one's own CD and storing
it in the iPod. This was a very interesting point for them to make,
not least because I would wager that there are a substantial number of
people on MGM's side of the case who don't think that example is one
bit legal. But they've now conceded the contrary in open court, so if
they actually win this case they'll be barred from challenging
"ripping" in the future under the doctrine of judicial estoppel. In
any event, though, MGM's iPod example did exactly what their proposed
standard expressly doesn't do: it evaluated the legality of the
invention based on the knowledge available to the inventor at the
time, not from a post hoc perspective that asks how the invention is
subsequently marketed or what business models later grow up around it.
Link
(
Thanks, Donna!)
Update: Timothy sez, "I'm not
just a 'law student,' I'm an attorney with ten years of experience in
Supreme Court and appellate litigation."
Argument Over Game of Chess Ends Ugly
(AP)
Argument Over Game of Chess Ends Ugly
(AP)
07/27/2004 11:09 AMAP - An argument over a game of chess ended with a fight in which one
player rammed the other's head through a plate-glass window, St.
Tammany Parish authorities said.
"The Decline of Fashion Photography | An
argument in pictures. | B..."
"The Decline of Fashion Photography | An
argument in pictures. | B..."
01/10/2004 10:13 PMLotus Notes URL argument injection
vulnerability
Lotus Notes URL argument injection
vulnerability
06/28/2004 01:06 PMJouko Pynnonen (Jun 27 2004)
Bible Argument Spurs Boiling-Oil Charge
(AP)
Bible Argument Spurs Boiling-Oil Charge
(AP)
05/20/2004 04:07 PMAP - A woman is accused of pouring boiling oil on her boyfriend's face
in an argument over a Bible verse.
"The Poor Man's argument that the memos
must be OK because the Right is always
wrong"
"The Poor Man's argument that the memos
must be OK because the Right is always
wrong"
09/13/2004 03:42 AMJava Web Start argument injection
vulnerability
Java Web Start argument injection
vulnerability
03/19/2005 03:10 AMJouko Pynnonen (Mar 18 2005)
Final Argument Delivered by Unscathed
Auburn
Final Argument Delivered by Unscathed
Auburn
01/04/2005 01:56 AMNo. 3 Auburn completed an undefeated season with a 16-13 victory over
Virginia Tech in the Sugar Bowl, but the Tigers may not be any better
than No. 2 in the country.
The DRM argument and calling Wired
Editor to the Table
The DRM argument and calling Wired
Editor to the Table
12/31/2004 07:01 PMGreat article and a must read for all of you that are concerned
with where DRM is taking us. [
BoingBoing]
Rehashing the same stale file sharing
argument
Rehashing the same stale file sharing
argument
04/05/2005 11:48 AMOver on Dangerousmeta I saw a link to this Op-Ed by Daniel Henninger
from the Wall Street Journal,Can Justice Scalia Solve the Riddles Of
the Internet? Without profit even the digital world will break down.
Having recently read the excellent profile of Justice Scalia in The
New Yorker (which frustratingly doesn't appear to be online), I was
curious to read the article. I was disappointed to discover it
rehashed the same old fallacious arguments about people "stealing"
music online, and worse, that it got mired in questions of morals.
One would expect the article, beginning with its subtitle, "Without
profit even the digital world will break down," to espouse a pro
free-market stance (it is the Wall Street Journal, after all), but one
only has to read half of the piece before Mr. Henninger begins to crow
for old business models to be locked in place by the government if
"the people" (Pirates, I'm looking in your direction...) won't follow
the old rules:
[T]here will always be another wave of digitized aliens hacking
through the copyright walls. There has to be a better way.There is.
It's called right and wrong.It may seem quaintly old school to suggest
that people should stop downloading culture without paying simply
because it's the right thing to do. But that may be the best option
available.For starters, if "the people" don't solve this problem
themselves, Congress will, and you won't like the solution--unless you
enjoy the tax code.
Why it's up to "the people" to solve a problem that's surely not
theirs I don't know. Worse, the presumably pro free market writer Mr.
Henninger, (who is the deputy editor of The Wall Street Journal's
editorial page) threatens/encourages/suggests government intervention
rather than identify the real source of the problem: the media
companies themselves. Instead he hints that downloaders may just well
be a bunch of Commie freeloaders!
I would push this even further; it requires a moral or at least
philosophical commitment to the legitimacy of profit. Absent that,
there's no hope.
If only Mr. Henninger, the RIAA, and those enamored of their old
business models predicated on tangible media would stop litigating for
the past, they would see there's a whole lot of hope out there.
According to this Pew Internet & American Life Project March 2005
Data Memo (warning: pdf):
Current file downloaders are now more likely to say they use online
music services like iTunes than they are to report using p2p
services. The percentage of music downloaders who have tried paid
services has grown from 24% in 2004 to 43% in our most recent survey.
There are two things happening with online file sharing:
1. It's the market's way of saying not that it doesn't see profit, per
se, as legitimate but that the prices charged, for example, by BMG for
Shakira's CD don't reflect its perceived value.
2. People are willing to pay when there's a means available for them
to do so that embraces what's great about the digitization of media
(easy access, portability, recommendations/sharing with friends and
family, etc.).
Just because large companies chose to ignore this technology rather
than embrace it doesn't mean the market should as well. The market is
actually working as it should, and consumer demand is driving the
development of stores like iTunes. The people/market aren't wrong,
it's the companies who'd rather litigate instead of catching up, or
leading.
What if big media companies -- instead of pouring millions into
lawsuits like Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer v. Grokster -- invested money to:
1. Digitize all the content in their catalogues, and offer it for sale
through iTunes or some other online music store of choice. During the
2003 Eldred v. Ashcroft case, the Supreme Court found that 98 percent
of all copyrighted works are not commercially available. Digitize all
that, and suddenly there's a whole lot more to sell.
2. Continued to explore and expand ancillary revenue streams from all
the album extras like concerts and merchandise. I seem to recall from
a New Yorker article that this is where a lot of the money comes from
anyway, and a large amount isn't from CD sales.
3. Embrace the web -- not just to create a distribution mechanism for
the digital bits, but also for the fans. Create lively sites for each
artist, populate them with real consistent content, create
conversation space for aficionados (what fans have already done with
sites like green plastic radiohead, a fan site for the band Radiohead)
and build the traffic. Make money off of the ad revenue.
How hard is it to adapt and evolve one's business model to the
changing time? I think that's what irks me the most about all this --
taking it to the courts to ensure that because something once was, it
should (be legislated to) always be. All this "copyright" is just code
for "profit."
P.S. What about a bumper sticker that says, "Your failed business
model is not my problem"?
P.P.S. In retrospect, this is such a stupid article, I can't believe I
wasted any time responding to it, when I could be enjoying the glories
of Paris!
Poor argument blamed for Oracle victory
Poor argument blamed for Oracle victory
09/17/2004 02:44 AMDirect and Related Links for
'Poor argument blamed for Oracle victory'
“A flawed argument by The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
was ultimately responsible for a judge’s decision to allow
Oracle Corp. to pursue its hostile takeover attempt of rival
PeopleSoft Inc., Meta Group Inc. analysts said Tuesday during a
conference call with more than 700 listeners. Last week Oracle won a
lawsuit against the DOJ, which the DOJ initiated in order to block
Oracle’s hostile takeover attempt of PeopleSoft on the grounds
it would be…
RE: Java Web Start argument injection
vulnerability
RE: Java Web Start argument injection
vulnerability
03/23/2005 04:52 PMJames C Slora Jr (Mar 23 2005)
Microsoft Help and Support Center
argument injection vulnerability
Microsoft Help and Support Center
argument injection vulnerability
04/19/2004 05:57 PMJouko Pynnonen (Apr 13 2004)
Bill Gates Dusts Off The Communist
Argument For Those Who Don't Charge
Bill Gates Dusts Off The Communist
Argument For Those Who Don't Charge
01/06/2005 06:52 AMWhen Bill Gates first realized Netscape was a threat to the company --
and that people were getting it for free, he told a group of people
that Netscape was obviously being run by "communists," because
capitalists would never give out anything for free. Of course, he
eventually forgot this when he decided to bundle (read: give away for
free) Microsoft IE into Windows, but apparently the concept stayed in
the back of his head. Near the end of a mostly un-newsworthy
interview Gates gave News.com, he claims that those people who are
trying to change intellectual property laws
are modern day
communists. Of course, we just went through this basic argument,
but let's try to simplify it one more time. Intellectual property
laws are often
artificial barriers in the marketplace to
forcefully limit supply and increase the price of something over what
the market values it at. That sounds a lot more like the centrally
planned economies that are usually called "communist." Those who are
looking to free up the content are simply saying let's see what the
market can do when these products are freed from those government
mandated barriers. History has shown that the increased efficiency
usually broadens the market and offers new opportunities to make money
(for example, by bundling...). So, while I certainly don't think that
those who believe high intellectual property barriers are necessary
are "communist," I do think they're being quite shortsighted in their
economic analysis. And, while Bill Gates is obviously much richer
than I'll ever be, much of that success came from the benefits
Microsoft received from their use of "free" products (whether
authorized or unauthorized) that helped build lock-in and establish
Microsoft as the dominant platform in the market. To turn around and
call that same behavior in others "communist" is simply wrong.
Devils Advocate: Google an electronic
freedom argument
Devils Advocate: Google an electronic
freedom argument
11/03/2003 05:29 AMSilicon.com Nov 3 2003 5:21AM ET
[ GLSA 200503-28 ] Sun Java: Web Start
argument injection vulnerability
[ GLSA 200503-28 ] Sun Java: Web Start
argument injection vulnerability
03/25/2005 01:49 AMThierry Carrez (Mar 24 2005)
The Decline of Fashion Photography | An
argument in pictures. | By Karen Lehrman
The Decline of Fashion Photography | An
argument in pictures. | By Karen Lehrman
01/10/2004 01:33 AMThe Decline of Fashion Photography: An argument In pictures .. fashion
photography has been going
downhill
slate.msn.com/features/010510_fashion-slide-show/01.htm
track
this site | 5 links
[iSEC] Linux kernel do_brk() lacks
argument bound checking
[iSEC] Linux kernel do_brk() lacks
argument bound checking
12/02/2003 01:28 PMPaul Starzetz (Dec 01 2003)
Corsaire Security Advisory: BEA Tuxedo
Administration CGI multiple argument
issues
Corsaire Security Advisory: BEA Tuxedo
Administration CGI multiple argument
issues
10/31/2003 12:49 PMadvisories (Oct 31 2003)
Corsaire Security Advisory: PeopleSoft
PeopleBooks Search CGI multiple argument
issues
Corsaire Security Advisory: PeopleSoft
PeopleBooks Search CGI multiple argument
issues
11/13/2003 12:26 PMadvisories (Nov 13 2003)
NetBSD Security Advisory 2004-010:
Insufficient argument validation in
compat code
NetBSD Security Advisory 2004-010:
Insufficient argument validation in
compat code
12/19/2004 03:48 PMNetBSD Security-Officer (Dec 16 2004)
[Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE Security
Advisory 04.13.04 - Microsoft Help and
Support Center Argument Injection
Vulnerability
[Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE Security
Advisory 04.13.04 - Microsoft Help and
Support Center Argument Injection
Vulnerability
04/14/2004 03:47 PMidlabs-advisories_at_idefense.com (Apr 13 2004)
Are we winning?
Are we winning?
05/10/2004 02:43 PM
Internation
al Terrorism at a 35 year low, says U.S. Department of State. So -
does that mean that the war on terror is being won? (via
Anxiety
Culture)
Winning is everything
Winning is everything
07/27/2004 07:48 AMBill Clinton's impassioned paean to John Kerry caps a day of
Democratic unity -- and fires up a party determined to wrest back the
White House.
Grok Description matches for Winning Argument
GrokA matches for Winning Argument
Winning Argument
