stargeek
PHP news website logo.
home    PHP scripts    articles    seo tools    links    search    contact    shop    realtors


Disney World "pirate style" trousers on eBay







Disney World "pirate style" trousers on
eBay

Disney World "pirate style" trousers on
eBay
07/13/2004 04:58 AM

An eBay seller is getting rid of ten pairs of Disney World Animal Kingdom "pirate style" trousers -- 32" waists. I don't rightly remember there being pirates at the Animal Kingdom, but they are swell renfaire-esque pantaloons. Link




This is a GrokNews Entry: (what is grok?)





Similar Items

Disney World "pirate style" trousers on eBay

Grok Headline matches for Disney World "pirate style" trousers on eBay

Guilty plea for eBay pirate


Guilty plea for eBay pirate 02/10/2004 09:21 PM

EchoStar alleges Regina man sold pirate
satellite gear on eBay


EchoStar alleges Regina man sold pirate
satellite gear on eBay
04/10/2004 08:54 AM
Canadian Press Apr 10 2004 1:19PM GMT

MS, Hollywood: Mob rules pirate world


MS, Hollywood: Mob rules pirate world 03/14/2003 02:15 PM

News: MS, Hollywood: Mob rules pirate
world


News: MS, Hollywood: Mob rules pirate
world
03/15/2003 05:59 AM
testifying that software and movie DVD counterfeiting is an acute problem, .. Microsoft and Hollywood would lead you to believe!! .. MS, Hollywood: Mob rules pirate world .. supports terrorism .. evils of piracy .. funding

track this site | 7 links


eBay Today: Back To School In Style


eBay Today: Back To School In Style 09/03/2004 12:58 AM
Here's an item that looks like it never did hold a school lunch ...

eBay Today: Get Cooking, Star Wars Style


eBay Today: Get Cooking, Star Wars Style 12/22/2003 02:09 AM
With two official cookbooks, the Star Wars fan need not go hungry...

Walt Disney World podcast


Walt Disney World podcast 04/14/2005 12:48 PM
Cory Doctorow: Inside the Magic is a gossipy webcast about Disney World created by a Disney trufan who lives around the corner from the park and provides good insider dirt on the park and its undertakings. This week's most interesting news tidbit: no more asbestos in the It's a Small World ride! Link (Thanks, Richard! )


Battening down Disney World for Charley


Battening down Disney World for Charley 08/22/2004 07:30 AM
Cory Doctorow: Caines sez, "A guest at Walt Disney World on 8/13 and 8/14 snapped these shots of the MAgic Kingdom being prepared for Hurricane Charley. Signs being secured and kiosks being tethered. He was staying at the All-Star Sports Resort and his pics of some of the characters that were sent, guests swimming, and shots of the rain/wind from his hotel window. The last of the shots are trees and signs blown away." Link (Thanks, Caines!)

Taking the kids to Disney World


Taking the kids to Disney World 03/14/2005 06:24 PM

Tomorrow morning I'm catching a plane and taking my family to Disney World. My laptop is coming with me, but I suspect it won't be used all that much :)

I'll be back on Saturday (Feb 26), and I'll catch up with email and forum posts shortly after I return.

See you next week!


PhotoshopWorld attendees get Disney
World discount


PhotoshopWorld attendees get Disney
World discount
07/13/2004 12:17 PM
The National Association of Photoshop Professionals (NAPP), a sponsor of the upcoming PhotoshopWorld Conference & Expo, has arranged for significant savings off the price of Walt Disney World theme park tickets for conference attendees...

Unhappy Disney World visitors gallery


Unhappy Disney World visitors gallery 04/13/2005 11:51 AM
Cory Doctorow: This Flickr set is a collection of black-and-white photos of unhappy people at Disneyland Walt Disney World -- there's something practically eerie about this. Link (via The Disney Blog)


WiFi hotspots at Walt Disney World


WiFi hotspots at Walt Disney World 08/09/2004 11:46 AM
The number of WiFi hotspots in Disney World has mushroomed. I can't wait for my next trip there!
Disney's BoardWalk Resort: Convention Center Hallways/Common Areas, Resort Lobby, Main Swimming Pool Area, Concierge Lounges, Bellevue Lounge

Disney's Contemporary Resort: Front desk sitting area, 14th Floor Concierge - sitting area, Outer Rim Bar (near Concourse Steakhouse), 1st Floor Convention Center Lobby, 2nd Floor Convention Center Lobby, Feature Pool.

Disney's Coronado Springs Resort: Main Hotel Lobby, Convention Center Lobby area, Feature Pool, Francisco's Lounge.

Disney's Grand Floridian Resort & Spa: 1st Floor Lobby area including Tea Room, Convention Center Lobby area, 4th Floor Concierge area - sitting area.

Disney's Yacht & Beach Club Resorts: Main Lobby area (both resorts), Concierge sitting area (both resorts), Convention Center Lobby area, Stormalong Bay Pool.

Link (via The Disney Blog)

Disney World parade float kills
castmember


Disney World parade float kills
castmember
02/11/2004 08:33 PM
A parade-float has killed a castmember backstage near Walt Disney World's Splash Mountain. Link

ZEN-STYLE | Fool's World Map


ZEN-STYLE | Fool's World Map 08/04/2004 02:54 PM
How many hours does it take to go to Japan by car? .. Fools’ World Map

zen-style.com/#map
track this site | 3 links


"ZEN-STYLE | Fool's World Map"


"ZEN-STYLE | Fool's World Map" 08/05/2004 08:38 AM

"ending the world with style, yo ho!"


"ending the world with style, yo ho!" 10/29/2003 09:08 AM

ending the world with style, yo ho!


ending the world with style, yo ho! 10/29/2003 09:10 AM
flash animation

members.cox.net/impunity/endofworld.swf
track this site | 7 links


THINK
GLOBAL, ACT LOCAL: PETER SINGER'S
ONE
WORLD


THINK
GLOBAL, ACT LOCAL: PETER SINGER'S
ONE
WORLD
04/23/2004 09:24 AM
one worldIf you're a regular reader of this blog, you probably know that I'm opposed to unregulated 'free' trade, very worried about the extraterritoriality of the WTO, NAFTA, Davos and other corporatist captives, strongly opposed to domestic corporations 'offshoring' jobs, using influence with the Bush regime and other right-wing governments to circumvent social and environmental laws and responsibilities, and a great believer in taking the pledge to buy local, and in community self-sufficiency.

At the same time, I'm a strong supporter of the UN and other multi-lateral NGOs, and I believe that we each have a responsibility for the well-being of all the people and creatures of this world. Some readers have said this view is inconsistent, and I wasn't quite sure how to respond to such charges. Fortunately, Peter Singer, in his recent book on global ethics, One World: The Ethics of Globalization, has come to my rescue. Singer sees no inconsistency between strong local autonomy, community, and self-sufficient economies on the one hand, and global responsibility on the other. The book is based on the Dwight Terry lectures at Yale in 2000, but has been updated to incorporate reflection on the events of 9/11 and the appalling Bush social, environmental and economic record.

I'll have more to say next week about Bush's fraudulent and despicable Earth Day media blitz, and the major media's shameless lack of critical evaluation of the utter nonsense that his propaganda machine has been churning out this week on the environment -- newspeak of Orwellian proportions. The first part of Singer's book deals with environmental responsibility, and his prescription for increasing it -- immediate ratification of Kyoto by the US and other holdout countries, and introduction of an emissions trading mechanism to make the realization of Kyoto feasible (subject to the need for some oversight on the disposition of the proceeds of such trading when it involves autocratic governments).

The second part of the book deals with the global economy, and Singer adroitly tears apart the Economist's (and other neocons') naive assertion that economic globalization somehow benefits both rich and poor countries. He then goes on to prescribe a substantial reform of the WTO and the GATT, which could actually lead to more equitable distribution of wealth and more efficient production of economic goods, while safeguarding human rights, labour and the environment. Unfortunately, the multi-national corporations and corporatists who hold sway in the WTO would never tolerate Singer's prescription, since it would entirely divert the benefits of economic globalization from their pockets to those of the world's poor.

The third part of the book deals with international law, and Singer lashes out at Bush for his unconscionable refusal to ratify the International Court of Justice, and for the UN's continued hesitancy to accept a duty (not a right) to intervene in situations of genocide and other humanitarian crises, even within a single nation. Singer is sanguine about the limitations and dangers of 'global government', but supports strengthening the UN to enable it to act as a 'protector of last resort', and including in its mandate the responsibility to supervise elections in all member nations.

The fourth and final part goes back to ethical principles and proposes that countries must, in this world where national boundaries no longer have any logistic meaning, set aside national interest and embrace, once and for all, global interest, impartially. That does not mean cultural homogenization, but imposes a responsibility for the reduction of inequality, both of economic resources and personal rights and freedoms.

Always the pragmatist, Singer concludes by worrying out loud about how the responsibility for a global ethic could be managed:

It is widely believed that a world government would be, at best, an unchecked bureaucratic behemoth that would make the bureaucracy of the EU look lean and efficient. At worst, it would become a global tyranny, unchecked and unchallengeable. These thoughts have to be taken seriously. How to prevent global bodies becoming either dangerous tyrannies or self-aggrandizing bureaucracies, and instead make them effective and responsive to the people whose lives they affect? It is a challenge that should not be beyond the best minds in the fields of political science and public administration.

I'd like to believe that this was possible, because if it isn't, we're in serious trouble. We cannot expect national governments to set aside parochial interests, especially when this entails accepting a responsibility that would, for the richer nations, inevitably lead to a drastic redistribution of wealth to poorer nations and hence a sudden and sharp reduction in, at least, economic living standards (if not necessarily well-being). But as John Ralston Saul has so eloquently argued, larger organizations and institutions, whether public or private, are almost always, and inherently, less efficient, less agile, more resistant to change, more hierarchic, and less transparent than smaller organizations. So the challenge is to achieve the best of both worlds, having organizations of global scope and authority and responsibility, but broken up into sufficiently small, autonomous and dynamic units that they are sensitive, resilient, responsible and responsive to the people and communities they serve. We can only hope that "the best minds in the fields of political science and public administration", wherever they are, are up to the task.

TrouSerS 0.1.9 (Default branch)


TrouSerS 0.1.9 (Default branch) 03/19/2005 03:22 AM
TrouSerS is a Trusted Computing Group Software Stack (TCG TSS) implementation. TrouSerS complies with the TCG Software Stack Specification Version 1.1.
Changes:
The biggest changes between 0.1.8 and 0.1.9 are the addition of access controls to the TCSD (see the tcsd.conf file and man page for tcsd for details) and the exporting of the crypto and blob loading routines for use by apps. App writers can now include tss/trousers.h to get trousers specific routines which will hopefully be helpful. All trousers specific calls that have been exported are prefixed by "Trspi_".

The New York Times > Fashion & Style >
Fooey to the World: Festivus Is Come


The New York Times > Fashion & Style >
Fooey to the World: Festivus Is Come
12/24/2004 01:08 PM
Happy

nytimes.com/2004/12/19/fashion/19FEST.html?oref=login&oref=log in&pagewanted=all&position=
track this site | 3 links


Vodafone lets Sun wear the trousers


Vodafone lets Sun wear the trousers 06/28/2004 08:04 PM
Co-author! Live! 3G! Java! specification!

Whoops! Beware of your trousers
(Reuters)


Whoops! Beware of your trousers
(Reuters)
02/19/2004 08:48 AM
Reuters - Clumsy Britons risk life and limb keeping up with the latest trends such as wooden flooring and micro-scooters -- providing they survive putting their trousers on in the morning.

EBay Billing Glitch Angers Sellers (PC
World)


EBay Billing Glitch Angers Sellers (PC
World)
04/30/2004 03:19 AM
PC World - New software causes invoice errors the auction site is slow to correct, say some customers.

EBay Users Fight Ongoing Billing Hassles
(PC World)


EBay Users Fight Ongoing Billing Hassles
(PC World)
06/25/2004 02:28 AM
PC World - Double charges, erroneous invoices, and e-mail headaches reported; one user promises a protest.

German flasher tripped by dropped
trousers (Reuters)


German flasher tripped by dropped
trousers (Reuters)
03/06/2004 02:00 AM
Reuters - German police say they have arrested a flasher in the western university town of Bielefeld who stumbled over his dropped trousers during an aborted attempt to flee.

Welsh local govt website caught with
trousers down


Welsh local govt website caught with
trousers down
02/19/2004 06:42 AM
A bit like their poor kids, in this case

RE: eBay Account Phishing with eBay
Redirect - Ebay fixed this + related XSS
hole


RE: eBay Account Phishing with eBay
Redirect - Ebay fixed this + related XSS
hole
03/31/2005 07:14 PM
Rager, Anton (Anton) (Mar 31 2005)

Disney descendant quits the Disney Board
of Directors, and tells Eisner why


Disney descendant quits the Disney Board
of Directors, and tells Eisner why
12/02/2003 04:13 AM
Roy Disney's letter of resignation to Eisner .. email

craphound.com/roytoeisner.txt
track this site | 6 links


Disney Dream Desk PC - Disney glues Blue
Ears on PCs


Disney Dream Desk PC - Disney glues Blue
Ears on PCs
08/06/2004 04:29 AM
I4U Aug 6 2004 8:30AM GMT

"Disney descendant quits the Disney
Board of Directors, and te..."


"Disney descendant quits the Disney
Board of Directors, and te..."
12/02/2003 09:59 AM

"TalkToAliens.com" Sponsors eBay Auction
to Benefit SETI Institute. 100% of
Proceeds to be Donated to World-Renowned
Organization.


"TalkToAliens.com" Sponsors eBay Auction
to Benefit SETI Institute. 100% of
Proceeds to be Donated to World-Renowned
Organization.
03/28/2005 03:27 AM
Worldwide eBay auction to raise money for SETI Institute coordinated by "TalkToAliens.com" -- the world's first "Intergalactic Communication System." [PRWEB Mar 28, 2005]

Roy Disney resigns from Disney, slams
Eisner


Roy Disney resigns from Disney, slams
Eisner
12/02/2003 01:43 AM
Roy Disney has resigned from the Disney Board of Directors, and has sent a scathing email to Michael Eisner explaining, in exorciating detail, exactly why he's leaving the company his uncle founded.
1. The failure to bring back ABC Prime Time from the ratings abyss it has been in for years and your inability to program successfully the ABC Family Channel. Both of these failures have had, and I believe will continue to have, significant adverse impact on shareholder value.

2. Your consistent micro-management of everyone around you with the resulting loss of morale throughout the Company.

3. The timidity of your investments in our theme park business. At Disney's California Adventure, Paris and now in Hong Kong, you have tried to build parks "on the cheap" and they show it and the attendance figures reflect it.

Link (Thanks, Robynne!)

A THEORY OF
KNOWLEDGE, AND HOW IT COULD SAVE THE
WORLD


A THEORY OF
KNOWLEDGE, AND HOW IT COULD SAVE THE
WORLD
08/30/2004 05:29 PM
theory of knowledgeDuring my ten years as a Chief Knowledge Officer, I spent a lot of time trying to figure out how people should use knowledge, and to some extent how people learn, but it never occurred to me to develop an overarching 'theory of knowledge' until I decided to write a book called The Cost of Not Knowing. This article summarizes that theory.

This is not a new epistemology. I am disinterested in academic arguments that use language, a clumsy and artificial abstraction, to try to justify theories that to me are needlessly complex, counter-intuitive and of no practical use. For students of philosophy, and I'm sure this will come as no surprise to my regular readers, my theory is consistent with Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological view of epistemology. For those interested in the philosophical basis for this theory, I would recommend David Abram's Spell of the Sensuous, much of which is devoted to explaining Merleau-Ponty's philosophy. I'm merely interested in its practical implications, in work and in life.

My theory starts with learning. Learning is the process of direct and indirect experience and observation, and knowledge is simply the personal, collected, internalized result of learning. We learn in different ways (fig.1): The best way is through active participation, which engages all our senses in the learning experience. Next best is observation, where we see or hear but where some of our senses are not engaged. The least effective way is second-hand, through communication of reports from someone else. When a squirrel learns, by personal trial and error, how to defeat a baffle on a bird feeder, this is powerful knowledge, well retained and employed. When that squirrel instead watches another squirrel show how to do it, the knowledge is less valuable, less credible. The observing squirrel may not be able to replicate the other squirrel's moves, and the method may not be the best one for the observing squirrel, which may have a different body-weight or dexterity than the demonstrating squirrel's. And if one squirrel merely tells another, unfamiliar squirrel of the presence of food in a bird-feeder 'over there' that can be accessed by navigating around the baffle, that knowledge is even less valuable. The squirrel listening may doubt whether the baffle was or even can be overcome -- perhaps this second-hand report is merely bragging or a ruse on the part of the reporting squirrel.

In human activities, we now get almost all of our knowledge second-hand, through books, newspapers, television and online, and its relative lack of credibility causes us to develop and assign a trust 'rating' to different sources, based on how often, in our experience and that of others we trust, that report has turned out to be accurate or useful. A blogroll is one manifestation of that need to rate the trust-worthiness of second-hand sources of knowledge. Schools, unfortunately, now provide almost all learning second-hand, and it is not surprising that 'field trips' are so loved by students -- an experience to learn something first-hand. It is also not surprising that the most effective and credible form of second-hand report is the story, which conveys knowledge in a way highly analogous to the way we might have experienced it personally.

Why do we learn? The squirrel learns in order to survive -- by direct participation at first in play and then, often by observing its parents, in gathering food, building a nest etc. The squirrel draws as well on instinctive knowledge, which is coded in its DNA as an evolutionary advantage, which 'teaches' it the knowledge of its ancestors, for example to 'freeze' when it senses a predator species, which is often more effective than fleeing predators whose eyesight is attuned to motion, more than shape. That instinctive knowledge also tells it at what point, as the predator approaches, to flee, based on its ancestors' cumulative learnings of that point at which the probability of evasion through flight begins to exceed the probability of non-detection by the predator. Instinctive knowledge doesn't need to be learned, so it doesn't appear on fig.1 above. We're born with it.

In natural systems, where the community, the physical area in which animals spend their entire lives, is small and almost completely 'knowable', we learn only to survive and make a living, and because nature has evolved us, as an adaptive mechanism, to find learning fun (fig.2). In such closed systems, we can get almost all the knowledge we need from direct experience and observation, and from our instincts -- there is little need to rely on second-hand reports as a source of learning. As that physical area that we need to know to survive increases, we can no longer get by with direct experience and observation, so we need to evolve languages to convey more and more knowledge second-hand. Our society becomes inevitably more interdependent, and in addition to survival there are now three more reasons to learn:
  • To be a responsible citizen of that society we need to know as much as possible. Crows have fairly sophisticated and interdependent social structures, with 'travellers' that move back and forth between different crow communities, carrying information about the location of food and predators with them, and they have developed appropriately sophisticated languages to convey that second-hand knowledge. In fact, they have developed 'body' languages and sounds that communicate the location of food to other species (notably wolves and indigenous humans) on which they depend (since their claws are not strong enough to tear flesh and kill, they locate food for other species that can, and then eat the leftovers).
  • To be an intelligent consumer we need to know enough to evaluate our choices. In a society where you don't just eat what you kill and live where your ancestors did, there are often more choices than we can try out through direct personal experience.
  • To understand our purpose we need to learn as much as possible about our physical world and the history of life in it. We have an instinctive desire to understand how and why things are, which serves an evolutionary purpose -- it helps us to survive. As we assimilate more and more knowledge we assemble patterns and theories about how and why things are. These are belief systems (fig. 3). When early man observed how nature automatically corrected population and resource imbalances quickly and painlessly, he began to believe in a higher power. When more recently he invented civilization, a 'man-made' way to live apart from nature, he developed new, anthropocentric belief systems to justify and explain this new 'separate' purpose for living. Belief systems so powerful that they allow us to tolerate, and even celebrate, incredible suffering, and to ignore and disregard our intuitive knowledge, which is inconsistent with these belief systems.
So where does all this get us? Of what practical import is this theory? My prospective book is about the cost of not knowing, and that is the 'so what' of this theory:
  • Because we did not know the degree to which extreme and sustained suffering and outrage perverts the human mind, and the malleability of those minds, we allowed the slaughter of nearly a million innocent civilians in Rwanda in 1994, and of nearly 3000 in the US in 2001.
  • Because we did not know the consequences of reliance on catastrophic agriculture, we allowed millions to die in the Irish potato famine, eighty million more to die of starvation in China during Mao's Great Leap Forward, and the horrendous threats posed today by BSE (Mad Cow), the Asian bird flu, and as-yet-unevolved diseases and pests that prey on massive concentrated quantities of astonishingly homogenous, vulnerable human foods.
  • Because we did not know that nature uses diseases to winnow overcrowding, and that these diseases will always evolve faster than we can prevent or treat them, we allowed half the people of Europe to die in the Plague, and more than one billion to die of Smallpox, and despite 'clues' like AIDS of what is to come, future diseases we do not yet know, we still have not taken drastic steps to reduce human overcrowding on our planet.
  • Because we did not know the impact of our wasteful and thoughtless burning of hydrocarbons and forests on our planet's climate, we now face cataclysmic global warming and the paradoxical early triggering of the next ice age.
Not knowing led directly to the loss of biodiversity and much of the carrying capacity of our Earth, the demise of Enron and its auditors, the Great Depression, the dot com bust, the atrocities of Stalin, and the Great Extinctions that regularly obliterate much of life on our planet. And because we still don't know these things for sure, we allow ourselves to hesitate, to do nothing, to hope these problems will magically go away, to allow the conditions that almost certainly gave rise to these and other disasters to continue, to in fact continue to get worse.

I had dinner last evening with some of our neighbours, and we were talking about some of these immense problems, and one of my neighbours, a student of history, said that no problem in history has ever been solved until it got so bad for so many that there was a spontaneous revolution. What would it take, he asked, before these problems -- overpopulation, famine, oppression, violence, disease, resource scarcity, pollution, war, suffering, cruelty, misery -- got bad enough that people would rise up and demand immediate resolution?

I think the massive unrest and strife we see everywhere in the world indicates that we have already passed that point. However, in order to have a revolution there must be (a) consensus on the need for change, (b) consensus on the change that is needed, and (c) a simple process to bring about that change. Historically, the solution has been political -- to oust, violently if necessary, an identifiable oppressor, the cause of the problem, and replace him (or them) with new leaders committed to the consensus solution. And although billions have shown that they see Bush's corporatist imperialism, and the oligopolists' 'free' trade and globalization, to be causes of some of the major problems we face, once we get rid of these scourges, most of the biggest problems will remain. These more intractable problems have no identifiable enemy and, as yet, no consensus solution. They are systemic problems that can only be changed by a radical change to our entire global economic and political systems. And changes to these massive, entrenched and leaderless systems have historically almost never come about by political means, but rather by introduction of disruptive technology innovations that undermine the existing system, as the agricultural and scientific and industrial revolutions did. It is tempting to believe that scientists, not collective human energy and collaboration, are the only hope we have for saving us from ourselves, of rescuing us from our colossal ignorance.

What is the cost of not knowing when, even if we could communicate enough knowledge to achieve global consensus on the need for change and the change that is needed, there is still no simple process to bring about that change? If we were to magically and suddenly be able to bring knowledge to bear that would persuade the vast majority of people on the planet that unless we quickly reduce human population below one billion and reduce each human ecological footprint to no more than one eighth of the current Western footprint, would that be enough to precipitate a combination of voluntary abstinence, intense social pressures, and (over the objections of the very powerful elite) laws and taxes and sanctions, to ensure that these targets were met? We did bring about the end of slavery this way, and the end of the Vietnam War, and in much of the world women's suffrage. Is the intractability of our greatest problems really the lack of a simple, known solution, or is it rather the lack of consensus on the problem, and of its severity and urgency and what needs to be done to find a solution? -- The cost of not knowing.

Until the reactionary cult of leadership took over business thinking a few short years ago, there was a consensus that the best way to run a business was to agree on and articulate the business' objectives, get each employee to define their role in achieving those objectives, remove the obstacles that prevented them from fulfilling those roles effectively, and otherwise stay out of the way and trust the Wisdom of Crowds to produce better results than the arrogance of a few. Could the same principle, applied to the world's most challenging and threatening problems, work in society as a whole? And if not, why not?

It is the examples of slavery and the 60s peace movement and women's suffrage that have caused me, insufferable optimist that I am, to think that there is hope. The solution of reducing human population by 90% and ecological footprint by 10% (in the third world) to 90% (in the West) is daunting, but it's also a simple, clear, measurable objective. And if we have six billion people working on it, convinced that this is what must be done to save the world, there's no reason why it shouldn't be achievable. Women choose not to have babies if they know pregnancy would put their lives in danger, why wouldn't they choose likewise if they knew it put their world in danger? Would knowledgeable people agree to participate in an annual lottery for the right to have a baby, and live with the results, as they now compromise so many of their 'rights' for the greater good? Would they agree to a 100% tax on all wealth beyond sustainable consumption levels, to be distributed to the poor? Would they shut down permanently businesses that knowingly damage the environment? Would they abandon urban sprawl and big centralized governments in favour of self-managed, self-selected, self-sufficient communities if it could be shown that these are more socially and environmentally responsive, and responsible, political units? Would they wrench power, by citizen and consumer action, from unrepentant corporatists who refused to give up their excessive wealth and influence?

It is hard to give up old paradigms. I know a lot of people that see the salvation of the world in global government, to which all states will cede authority. I see no reason to believe that bigger more powerful governments, which largely got us into this mess, and which are more removed from the people they supposedly represent, would do anything but make the problems worse.

But as the Internet has shown, the real power in any system remains at the ends: The front lines, the communities, where people learn by direct experience what works and what does not, what makes sense and what does not. It is as individuals and as members of small communities that we define ourselves and establish our belief systems and commit ourselves to action and to change. As citizens and consumers and members of communities, if we only knew, we could accomplish what needs to be done.

It is time for a bloodless coup, the taking back of power and authority from central corporatist political and economic institutions and its reinstatement in local communities and in individuals. To bring it about, we need only accomplish these four daunting tasks:
  1. We need to communicate to everyone on the planet, one person at a time, that there is a better way to live: happier, healthier, safer, more egalitarian, more harmonious, more responsible, and sustainable for future generations. We need to tell everyone a new story of our planet's destiny.
  2. We need to achieve, by a great deal of open conversation, discussion, and sharing of knowledge, a huge consensus that there are two root causes underlying all the problems we face today and preventing us from achieving that better way to live: Overpopulation and overconsumption, and to set and agree upon deadlines and targets for solving these two problems. Just as in past we agreed that slavery and imperialism and suppression of women were our global enemies, we need to agree that overpopulation and overconsumption are our global enemies, a threat to everything we believe in and a threat to our future. With the right mix of empirical and intuitive knowledge, we can achieve this agreement.
  3. We need to organize six billion people to use their collective wisdom to tell us how to meet these deadlines and targets, and then free them to work in their communities to make it happen.
  4. We need to help each other clear away obstacles to success. That means a lot of humanitarian and peacemaking assistance, helping to build new infrastructure that will work in the new community-based world, redistributing resources from the rich to the poor, and disarming those that will try to establish new wealth and power hierarchies.
So maybe knowledge is power after all. About two centuries ago some new stories arose that were so compelling that they became the world's dominant religions, the basis for everything the vast majority of people on our planet believed, and still believe today. Those stories spread person to person, by word of mouth, before the printing press accelerated their influence. At that time the people of our planet were struggling with the new problems of civilization, like famine, disease, poverty, addiction and violence, and they were desperate for new knowledge, a new story, something to give them faith, purpose and direction. Today we face much greater problems on a much greater scale, but we also have powerful new resources for spreading knowledge, for telling a new story. We also have a much better sense of what the root causes of, and solutions to,  our problems are, and knowledge offers the most potent, perhaps the only, means to achieve global consensus and global mobilization to solve these problems.

The cost of not knowing is the end of our world. It's too great a cost to pay, and the answer, if we use the power of knowledge, is within our collective reach.

HOW TO
SAVE THE WORLD
READING LIST


HOW TO
SAVE THE WORLD
READING LIST
07/18/2004 03:41 PM
.In Beyond Civilization, Daniel Quinn says:

People will listen when they're ready to listen and not before. Probably, once upon a time, you weren't ready to listen to an idea than now seems to you obvious, even urgent. Let people come to it in their own time. Nagging or bullying will only alienate them. Don't preach. Don't waste time with people who want to argue. They'll keep you immobilized forever. Look for people who are already open to something new.

When presenting a new idea, you don't have to have all the answers. It's better to say 'I don't know' than to fake it. Make people formulate their own questions. Don't take on the responsibility of figuring out what their difficulty is. We each internalize information differently. If you don't understand a question, keep insisting they explain it until it's clear. Nine times out of ten they'll supply the answer themselves.

Above all, listen. Your close attention is sometimes more important than your articulateness in winning converts. And learning is always a good thing.

When I've talked to people about the ideas I've presented in this blog, I get the sense that maybe 10% really understand and appreciate what I'm saying. Perhaps another 40% are ready to listen and want to believe, but either my inarticulateness or their internalization mechanism garbles the message. After all, saving the world (or, as one recent commenter 'geo' put it more accurately "changing how humans live so we as a species can continue to survive") is not easy or obvious, or we'd all be busy doing it. This reading list is for that 40%, in the hope that better writers than I can convey more clearly and compellingly what we need to do and why. The remaining 50%, I suspect, are not ready. Five years ago someone gave me The Spell of the Sensuous and I gave up after five pages -- I just wasn't ready.

Here's the list -- 56 books and articles that forever changed my worldview, and my purpose for living::

What Life was Really Like Before Civilization: Revisionist History
  • Full House, by the late Stephen J. Gould. The presence of man on Earth was a random occurrence, and after the next Extinction Event life on the planet is likely to evolve differently. We are not the Crown of Creation.
  • The Wealth of Man by Peter Jay. The life of pre-historic man was easy, idyllic, and very pleasant. Hunt big slow game an hour a day, relax and enjoy the rest.
  • The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race, (online) essay by Jared Diamond Why the adoption of agriculture was 'a catastrophe from which we have never recovered'.
  • Original Affluence, by Marshall Sahlins. If you wanted to defend a new society that featured rigid hierarchy, agonizingly hard work, suffering, frequent starvation and slavery, wouldn't you try to portray the alternative life as 'short, nasty and brutish'?
  • Extinction, by Michael Boulter. Our planet's history is one of cycles punctuated by massive extinctions and new beginnings. Our only choice is whether to end this one sooner (a century) or later (several millennia).
  • The Axemaker's Gift by Jame s Burke and Robert Ornstein. How innovativeness has been increasingly corrupted to concentrate and retain power, instead of making the world better.
What's Going On Under our Noses: The Real News
  • The Unconscious Civilization, by John Ralston Saul. How and why we've become helpless slaves of the political and economic system we built.
  • Ockham's Razor, by Wade Rowland. What's wrong with our modern values, and where to look for new ones.
  • People Before Profit, by Charles Derber -- How rampant corporatism ravaged the vast majority of people worldwide in the 1800s, and is doing so again.
  • State of the World, by WorldWatch Institute, The 7 trends that most threaten eco-collapse: population growth, rising temperature, falling water tables, shrinking cropland per person, collapsing fisheries, shrinking forests, and the extinction of plant and animal species.
  • World Scientists' Warning (online), by the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course. No more than one or a few decades remain before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity immeasurably diminished. A great change in our stewardship of the Earth and life on it is required if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated."
  • Dream of the Earth by Thomas Berry. "We are in trouble just now because we do not have a good story. We are in between stories. The old story, the account of how we fit into it, is no longer effective. Yet we have not learned the new story."
  • The Future of Freedom, by Fareed Zakaria Why we can't change another country's culture from outside it.
  • The New Rules of the World, by John Pilger An accurate, devastating portrait of the world in 2003.
  • The Demon in the Freezer, by Richard Preston. How vulnerable we all are to individual acts of terror, chaos and sabotage.
  • Against the Grain, by Richard Manning. How grain monoculture evolved, and how it's ruining the Earth.
  • Population Projections, by US Census Bureau. They're no longer assuring us that US and Global Population will level out at 300 million and 9 billion. Would you believe 1 billion and 12 billion by the end of the century, and still rising?
  • Global Warming, by NOAA. An online synopsis of US scientists' consensus on the causes and consequences of global warming.
  • This Overheating World - Worried? Us? (online essay) by Bill McKibben. Article in the UK journal Granta explaining the psychology, and cynical political expediency, of denial.
  • Are Cities Changing Local and Global Climates?, (online) by NASA. Studies of urban microclimates and how they contribute to local climate change and instability.
  • Restoring Scientific Integrity (online) by Union of Concerned Scientists. The Bush regime's distortion of scientific research to forward its own political agenda.
  • Climate Collapse, by David Stipp (online article) from Fortune Magazine. The possibility and chilling implications of global warming producing sudden drastic climate shifts.
  • Conservative Myths on Global Warming (online) by Blogger Carpe Datum. A brief but thorough explanation of the science behind global warming, and the reasoning behind scientists' connecting it to human activity and worrying about the risks of resultant instability
  • The Empire Strikes Out, by Kenny Ausubel. Corporatism and acquisitiveness run amok are ruining our world, but nature always bats last.
  • The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garry Harding. The commons, that which belongs in common to all of us, is disappearing -- Why nobody really cares.
  • Elizabeth Costello, by JM Coetzee. Why we tolerate a holocaust against our fellow creatures on Earth.
  • The Machine in Our Heads, by Glenn Parton. How the ecological crisis is rooted in a human psychological crisis.
About Gaia: What Nature is Really About
  • When Elephants Weep, by Jeff Masson. Compelling scientific evidence that animals feel deep emotions.
  • Mind of the Raven, by Bernd Heinrich. Compelling scientific evidence that animals are intelligent, complex, rational and communicative.
  • The Sacred Balance by David Suzuki. A passionate explanation of James Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis, the need to redesign how we live, and the importance of spending more time in nature.
  • The Hidden Dimension, by Edward Hall. We need space and a natural environment to be healthy and human. When we're deprived of them, we get mentally ill.
  • The Spell of the Sensuous, by David Abram. How to reconnect with nature, and rediscover wonder.

Radical Analysis, Radical Solutions (these are the most important readings, but you probably won't 'buy' their arguments unless you've first read much of the material above)

  • Ishmael, The Story of B, and Beyond Civilization by Daniel Quinn. Also the IshCon discussion forum. The first two of these three books are fictionalized stories about human history from a different, anti-civilization perspective, with penetrating, astounding analysis and insight. Ishmael is more popular but I prefer The Story of B which recapitulates the entire theses in a series of 'lectures'. The two critical lectures are online here. Beyond Civilization is about what we should do about all this.
  • A Language Older Than Words, by Derrick Jensen. A profound and disturbing argument for why moderate answers to our current predicament won't work.
  • The World We Want, by Mark Kingwell. Why we are best served by trusting our instincts rather than what we are persuaded is moral or rational.

Toolkit for Change: Knowledge We Can Use to Save the World

  • Freeman Dyson's Brain (online interview), in Wired Magazine. The twin keys to building a better world are (a) establishing viable self-sufficient local communities to replace big centralized states and governments, and (b) selective more-with-less technologies like solar/wind energy coops and biotech medicines.
  • The Developing Ideas Interview (online) with economist Herman Daly. An economic and tax program that favours communities and commons instead of corporations, and a 'contract' to reduce our population and ecological footprint.
  • The Unconquerable World, by Jon Schell. Why non-violence and consensus-building are the only viable way forward.
  • The Support Economy, by Shoshana Zuboff A model for a post-capitalist economy.
  • Unequal Protection, by Thom Hartmann. The case for denying 'personhood' to corporations.
  • When Corporations Rule the World, by David Korten. The need to get corporations out of politics and create localized economies that empower communities within a system of global cooperation, overcoming the myths about economic growth and the sanctification of greed, and focusing instead on overconsumption, poverty, overpopulation, and reining in untrammelled corporate power.
  • Radical Simplicity, by Jim Merkel. How to free yourself from possessions and wage slavery without sacrifice.
  • The Tipping Point, by Malcolm Gladwell. What makes things change.
  • Ten Ways to Make a Difference, by Peter Singer. A pragmatic recipe for change.
  • The Truth About Stories, by Thomas King. The truth about stories is that that's all we are. Want a new society? Write a new story.
  • The Boycott List, by Responsible Shopper, and Good Stuff, by the WorldWatch Institute. What not to buy, and what to buy instead.
  • The Corporation, by Joel Bakan. An action plan for undermining corporatism.
  • Humans in the Wilderness, by Glenn Parton. How we might reintroduce humans, well-spaced-out, into a primarily wilderness Earth.
  • At Home in the Universe, by S tuart Kauffman. How self-organizing, self-managing systems work.
  • EarthDance (entire book online), by Elisabet Sahtouris. Eleven steps to cultural metamorphosis (my summary is here)
  • eGaia (entire book online), by Gary Alexander. How to achieve of peace, cooperation and sustainability (replacing war, competition and growth, the fuels of our current culture) and a future state vision with vignettes from individuals' lives in a balanced and harmonious future world.

MCMASTER
WORLD CONGRESS


MCMASTER
WORLD CONGRESS
01/17/2004 10:43 PM
mcmasterJust got back from the McMaster World Congress on Intellectual Capital and Innovation, where I made two presentations. I'll have more to say about the Congress in a few days. In the meantime, I welcome any Congress attendees that have found their way to How to Save the World. I'd like to direct them to:
  • The Table of Contents of Business Innovation, Entrepreneurship & Knowledge Management posts near the top of the left sidebar
  • The links to my McMaster papers on the Future of KM and the Next Economy, in downloadable Word format, also found in the left sidebar (my regular blog readers will have already read versions of these in my daily posts), and
  • The section entitled Business/KM Blogs under Blogs & Resources I Read, further down in the left sidebar, containing links to the weblogs of about 40 leading thinkers on Business, Social Networking, Innovation and Knowledge Management. Happy reading and congratulations on a great event.

HEEEE'S
BACK: WHAT'S COMING UP ON HOW TO SAVE
THE WORLD


HEEEE'S
BACK: WHAT'S COMING UP ON HOW TO SAVE
THE WORLD
07/16/2004 04:49 PM
no dell Apologies for my unannounced silence since last Saturday. The power supply on my Dell failed, draining the battery so I couldn't even back up my files to another computer. I just got it back now. More on this spectacular failure next week. This week has given me the chance to work on my novel, The Only Life We Know, and my book Natural Enterprise, as well as a chance to catch my breath and think about (a) what to blog about next, and (b) what to do with myself once the three books are finished.

Here are some of the things I'm planning on blogging about in the next few weeks. If there's anything else you'd like me to write about, let me know.
  • The Consequences of Failure: What Eco-Collapse Will Look Like (coming up later today)
  • Book Review - The Wisdom of Crowds
  • Why We Should Set Higher Standards for Everything
  • How to Save the World Reading List - Updated and Annotated
  • Book Review - Bird by Bird
  • Self-Selecting Communities: How We Might Build Some
  • Are There Any Large Innovative Companies Left?
  • How Can We Reconnect Children to Nature?
  • Natural Enterprise Chapter 7: Organic Financing
  • My Favourite Canadian Francophone Blogs / Mes Blogs Canadiens-Francais Favoris
  • Critical Thinking: More Than Just Adjusting for Spin
  • The Story-Maker as Cultural Anthropologist
Lots of thought-provoking stuff, so stick around.


IMF REPORT
SAYS US DEFICITS THREATEN WORLD
ECONOMY


IMF REPORT
SAYS US DEFICITS THREATEN WORLD
ECONOMY
01/10/2004 03:19 PM
diceThe N YT reports: "With its rising budget deficit and ballooning trade imbalance, the United States is running up a foreign debt of such record-breaking proportions that it threatens the financial stability of the global economy, according to a report made public today by the International Monetary Fund. In nearly 60 pages of carefully worded analysis, the report sounded a loud alarm about the shaky fiscal foundation of the United States, questioning the wisdom of the Bush administration's tax cuts and warning that large budget deficits posed significant risks not just for the United States but for the rest of the world."

I told you so.

Historically, this kind of fiscal mismanagement, and the commensurate warnings from the IMF if ignored (and the Bush administration has already said it will ignore them), trigger the following consequences:

  1. Collapse of the offending country's currency. This has already begun, and the only reason it hasn't been more precipitous is that so many countries are owed so much by the US, repayable in US dollars, that these other countries will do everything they can to mitigate the decline until they can be repaid.
  2. Inability of the offending country to borrow in domestic currency. Lenders, burned or threatened by the currency collapse, insist that future and replacement debt be denominated in a more stable, reliable currency. The obvious choice would be the Euro. When (not if) lenders insist on being repaid in Euros, they no longer have any reason to prop up the US dollar, which will then fall to a level commensurate with the near-bankrupt status of the US economy.
  3. Ballooning cost of borrowing for everyone. When a country tries to borrow more money than it can comfortably repay, the risk to the lender soars, and the interest rate jumps quickly to double digits. This flows through the domestic economy, since banks and investors aren't going to loan money to American companies and individuals at a lower rate than they can get loaning money to the US government. Mortgage and corporate and consumer loan interest rates therefore jump to double digits too. Foreclosures and bankruptcies soar.
  4. The domestic stock and bond markets crash. As bond yields soar to reflect higher cost of borrowing, bond prices fall to the floor. The cost of borrowing to American companies soars, wiping out margins. Profits disappear. Stock prices fall. And since P/E ratios reflect the opportunity cost of lower-risk debt investments, stock prices fall much faster than earnings. Layoffs soar. Savings and pensions are wiped out.
  5. Cutoff of credit by the IMF. The IMF under its charter is charged with regulating international borrowings to ensure stability of global financial markets. They did this to the UK during the Suez Crisis -- basically telling the UK that they could not borrow any more money abroad until the economic fundamentals improved to the point repayment was reasonably assured. They've done it to many African and Latin American countries since then, and few of the countries affected have yet recovered.
  6. With no ability to borrow abroad and domestic lenders tapped out, there is no alternative but to radically slash government spending. There is no money available for even basic programs. Tax cuts are history, and steep tax increases are imposed to get the money to pay back the crushing, now high-interest debt. Financing of foreign wars is out of the question.

This is not an exaggeration. Ask anyone in a country that has faced it. And while no one in the world wants to see this happen in the US (because it will have a domino effect, pushing the whole world into a depression), the world cannot afford to allow any country to borrow wildly beyond its means. Bush is playing brinkmanship here, rolling the dice and hoping that the economy will somehow recover and achieve unprecedented and sustained record prosperity for at least a generation to repay his staggering debt, before global investors lose their nerve and stop lending to the US, and the IMF is left with no alternative but to step in.

The Times reports: "Though the International Monetary Fund has repeatedly criticized the United States on its budget and trade deficits in the last few years, this report was unusually lengthy and pointed...Fund officials warned that the long-term fiscal outlook was far grimmer, predicting that underfinancing of Social Security and Medicare would lead to shortages as high as $47 trillion over the next several decades, or nearly 500 percent of the current gross domestic product in the coming decades."

This is the first warning from the IMF. It will be ignored, as it was in Argentina. The consequences, for all of us, will be devastating. You know who to thank.

THINKING
LIKE NATURE: WILLIAM MCDONOUGH REDESIGNS
THE WORLD


THINKING
LIKE NATURE: WILLIAM MCDONOUGH REDESIGNS
THE WORLD
05/26/2004 10:30 AM
mcdonoughVirginia reader Myke Myers kindly brought to my attention the work of his fellow Virginian William McDonough. McDonough is an architect and designer who has garnered a lot of press for his bold yet pragmatic view of design. In a recent interview with New Scientist he says:

Consider this: all the ants on the planet, taken together, have a biomass greater than that of humans. Ants have been incredibly industrious for millions of years, yet their productiveness nourishes plants, animals and soil. Human industry has been in full swing for little more than a century, yet it has brought about a decline in almost every ecosystem on the planet. Nature doesn't have a design problem. People do...

The Earth's natural systems can probably support a few hundred million of our species, but soon there could be 10 billion of us... Eco-efficiency, where you try to reduce everything to zero, is not much fun. And nature itself is not that efficient. It's effective. Take a cherry tree in the spring. It's not efficient - how many blossoms does it need to regenerate? But it is effective: it makes cherries. We celebrate the cherry tree not for its efficiency, but for its effectiveness - and for its beauty. Its materials are in constant flow, and all those thousands of useless cherry blossoms look gorgeous. Then they fall to the ground and become soil again, so there's no problem. We can celebrate abundance where it is ecologically intelligent. From my designer's perspective, I ask: why can't I design a building like a tree? A building that makes oxygen, fixes nitrogen, sequesters carbon, distils water, builds soil, accrues solar energy as fuel, makes complex sugars and food, creates microclimates, changes colours with the seasons and self-replicates. This is using nature as a model and a mentor, not an inconvenience. It's a delightful prospect.

When I'm working with business people I talk business. We talk about how much money can be made or saved, because that gets their attention. We never try to convert someone who is calcified: we never try to teach mules to play the violin. It sounds terrible and the mules don't like it.

McDonough maintains four websites: His firm's, his partnership's, his own, and his intelligent design site. The sites are as effectively designed as his buildings -- easy to browse, productive, engaging, and advancing the cause (the media are invited to select from ready-to-plagiarize materials that simplify writing about McDonough or his businesses). He's won awards as a visionary and environmentalist, and his firm's designs have won awards for eco-efficiency. And he's written a book, Cradle to Cradle (itself made of recyclable polypropylene, not paper), with colleague Michael Braungart, that explains the vision that underlies all his work. It is, simply: Learn from, and imitate, nature -- nature knows how to design and build things right, everything recycled, zero waste.

This is the kind of thinking we need -- assuming we can somehow solve the fact that there are at least ten times as many people on the planet as it can healthily support, and that our culture, and its political, legal and economic systems are utterly dependent on an unsustainable concentration of wealth, abuse of power, ever-accelerating growth in consumption of resources, and subjugation of human will and dignity.

McDonough calls himself an optimist, and thinks we can turn everything around by just redesigning our world. But I think sooner or later in this century, whether we solve the population and culture problems quickly and intelligently, or go crashing into the wall of eco-catastrophe, we are going to need to radically redesign and rebuild our culture, our economy, and our social systems. We can only hope that with guidance from people like William McDonough -- and also listening to nature and our own instincts -- we will design and build the next human culture more responsibly and intelligently than we did the current one. So that those of us lucky enough to live in that brave new world will know only balance, beauty, harmony, abundance and peace. Just as our ancestors lived for three million years before we invented civilization, and just as every other species on our world has always done. Imagine.

THE BEST
GAME IN THE WORLD


THE BEST
GAME IN THE WORLD
02/19/2004 12:47 PM
carcassonneI've always been a game player -- cards, pool, board games, and outdoor games and sports. For me, it's not about competition, or winning. It's about playing. The attributes of the best games are:
  1. Simplicity -- I don't want to have a degree to learn the rules, and I like games that children can play on an equal footing with adults.
  2. Speed -- A game should keep moving, and have a natural flow to it.
  3. Strategy -- I like to think, and a good game should provide some exercise for the mind.
  4. Sociability -- A good game deepens relationships and allows social discourse, and laughter, as it proceeds.
  5. Artistry -- Aesthetics, elegance, good design, all add a dimension to a game.
Here's my list of favourite games, and why I like them. Five years ago I'd probably have come up with a very different list, and I have yet to discover the best game in the world:
  • Dealer's Choice Poker -- Not that silly game they play in casinos where you only get two cards every hand, but the social Friday Night neighbourhood game where stakes are low, bluffing is key, and someone introduces a new variation every time you get together. Favourite variations: Pass the Trash and Do Ya.
  • Chase the Ace -- An elegantly simple game that children as young as five can play, and win, but which also enthrals the most demanding adults.
  • Connect / Rivers Roads & Rails / Metro -- These are the simplest tile-playing games, essentially extensions of dominoes. Easy to learn, elegant, and often producing a work of art in the final tableau. Our kids and grandkids love these games, and even many of our adult friends like them. I've been told I should try a more sophisticated tile-playing game called Carcassonne, and after looking at these lovely tiles I'm inclined to try it.
  • Beach Volleyball -- The world's simplest ball game, one of the few where physical strength, size and finesse are only a minor advantage. Fun for all ages, relatively safe, and good exercise. I prefer the 6-players-per-side game.
  • Personal Preference -- An innocuous commercial game that rewards you for knowing what your partner's personal preferences are. A great game for couples getting to know each other couples, and a great conversation starter.
  • Acquire -- One of the most popular and enduring commercial games, this one about building and investing in hotel chains. Educational, elegant, hard to master, and still easy to learn. Kids figure out the strategy of this game maddeningly quickly.
  • Joker Rummy -- The Joker variant of Rummy requires collection of runs and sets totalling at least 40 points before laying down. Until you have laid down, you cannot pick up the previous player's discard, and a joker (which carries a 100 point penalty if not laid down) cannot be used as part of the initial lay-down. For that reason, this two-deck Dutch variant is sometimes called Aggravation Rummy. Still, it's a great, easy to learn game. If anyone can find the rules online (maybe in Dutch?) please let me know. Contract Rummy isn't a bad alternative.
  • Balderdash -- The only word game on my list, simply because it's really a bluffing game, not a word game. Since I'm a serious cruciverbalist, no one in my local social circles will play word games with me. But any serious bullshitter can win at Balderdash.
  • Nine-Ball -- My favourite pool game. Also elegantly simple, it uses only the first 9 numbered balls, which must be struck (but not necessarily sunk) in order. But the twist is that only the nine-ball counts -- and wins the entire game. That means that defensive play can trump aggressive play, and strategy can trump skill.
  • Curling -- The token Canadian entry on the list. It's the consummate game of strategy, and old geezers like me can beat young athletes. When I was a kid we used to play on outdoor rinks with 'jam-pails' -- one gallon cans filled with cement with a coloured plastic handle on top. With properly pebbled indoor ice and smooth stones you need the 'free guard zone' rule to keep the game interesting.
So what are your favourite games (to play, not to watch)? What do you think is the world's best undiscovered or underrated game? And why is playing games so important to people all over the world, even as adults, an essential social activity?

Grok Description matches for Disney World "pirate style" trousers on eBay
GrokA matches for Disney World "pirate style" trousers on eBay

Disney World "pirate style" trousers on eBay

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry:

















Also check out:


Grok

Ipod Porn on the
Rise

Brief Abstract of
Wikipedia's
Mesothelioma Cancer
page

Get first aid
instructions in your
cell phone

IE is crap
JSPWiki gains
podcasting support

Sterling's
Singularity speech
audio

Gates talks with an
editor at Scientific
American

San Diego Advisor
Releases New Equity
Compensation Book
“Stock Options +
Grants: The
Executive’s Guide to
Equity Compensation”

Hooked on
blogosphere

Anti-Phishing Bill
Introduced Just To
Make It Even More
Illegal

In Defense Of
Commoditization

Status of the Linux
Standard Base

2004 Spending
Review: Cabinet
Office gets extra
cash to drive
e-Government

Criminal Justice IT
opening cheque book

SuliPortál magyar
iskolaportál

Source Parser
binarycloud
GETCD console
grabber/encoder

Giga Designs offers
new G4 dual
processor upgrades

Attn: Buyers of
MAILING LISTs -
MORTGAGE LEADs -
BUSINESS LISTs &
DIRECT MARKETING
SERVICEs : TOTAL
Marketing One -
TMONE launches
Direct Mail List and
Sales lead business
unit and becomes one
of the most
competitive list
marketing agencies.

Protect Your PC from
Spyware and Trojans

China tosses out
Viagra patent

Old-school
Transformers as
homemade, detailed
3D models

Radiators from
England with much
sexiness

Braille t-shirts
with anti-groper
countermeasures

DoCoMo to Invest in
Texas Instruments
for Joint LSI
Development

DoCoMo Develops Dual
Network Handset

Postponing Democracy
Ex-GI Jenkins Phones
Home After 40 Years
in N.Korea (Reuters)

TkNotePad 0.7.9
(Stable)

aMule 2.0.0rc4
AcpiTool 0.2
Mbedthis AppWeb 1.2
(Stable)

Vocabulary Builder
1.3

Dilbert for 13 Jul
2004

DIGISTOR Announces
Industry’s Smallest
TV Tuner

Egg gets out of
France

Longmont Area
Economic Council
Releases Annual
Industry Survey
Results; Annual
report surveys
industry in Boulder
and Weld Counties

The Cyborgization Of
Humans And What This
Means For Our Lives
In The Future And
Today

Epok Selects Nadel
Phelan as Public
Relations Agency of
Record

.com Solutions Inc.
Releases FmPro
Worksheet 1.01 for
Windows - Free
Utility Sends SQL
Commands to
FileMaker 7
Databases

Reagan and Clinton
Top the Chart of
Online Research in
June

USNews.com: Shining
a light in an
extremely dark
corner (7/19/04)

Forbidden Library:
Banned And
Challenged Books

New Sony Playstation
on its way!

India to Install
High-tech Oil
Security Systems

UPDATE 1-Microsoft
warned by Japan
anti-trust watchdog

Nasdaq wins Google's
trade

Japan Watchdog Slaps
Warning on Microsoft

Google names Nasdaq
as its float
exchange

Yahoo! acquires
Oddpost for webmail
war

Japan Warns
Microsoft on
Anti-Trust

Japan warns
Microsoft for
'restrictive'
contract clause

'Minesweeping' robot
keeps carpets clean

NSW slams feds'
online betting
exchanges stance

what is grok?