Web is littered with yesterday's castoffs
Grok Headline matches for Web is littered with yesterday's castoffs
Kicking your castoffs to the virtual
curb
Kicking your castoffs to the virtual
curb
09/26/2004 11:06 PMUSA Today Sep 27 2004 3:52AM GMT
Internet littered with hate speech
Internet littered with hate speech
04/23/2004 11:13 PMSunday Times South Africa Apr 24 2004 2:20AM GMT
Internet Littered With Dead Web Sites
Internet Littered With Dead Web Sites
11/02/2003 03:12 PMAP via Daily Press Nov 2 2003 2:03PM ET
Internet littered with dead Web sites
Internet littered with dead Web sites
11/02/2003 04:16 PMAP via Seattle Post Intelligencer Nov 2 2003 2:49PM ET
"CNN.com - Internet littered with
abandoned sites - Nov. 3, 2003"
"CNN.com - Internet littered with
abandoned sites - Nov. 3, 2003"
11/05/2003 04:10 AMCNN.com - Internet littered with
abandoned sites - Nov. 3, 2003
CNN.com - Internet littered with
abandoned sites - Nov. 3, 2003
11/04/2003 06:26 AMCNN.com - Internet littered with abandoned sites .. haven't been
updated in god knows how long .. full of dead sites ..
littered
cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/11/03/deadwood.online.ap/index.h
tml
track this
site | 6 links
Is EU looking at yesterday's Microsoft?
Is EU looking at yesterday's Microsoft?
03/08/2004 11:21 PMAs the European Union considers restrictions aimed at preventing
Microsoft from unfairly using its dominance in PC OSes to gain control
of the market for multimedia software, some say the war has already
moved on.
Yesterday's outage
Yesterday's outage
04/14/2004 10:27 AMMy host's server died yesterday and didn't come back until this
morning. Sorry for the interruption. I don't know yet what will happen
to email you sent me yesterday. Apparently it's all going to arrive
soon. Sorry for the inconvenience....
Yesterday's transportation future
Yesterday's transportation future
07/28/2004 05:48 AM
Peter Davidson sez, "A wonderful Berkeley website/gallery featuring
some of the fantastic oddities and plans of futurists from the first
half of the 20th century about the far-off world of 1980! Included
are plans for a helicopter in every garage, a Mag-Lev train between LA
and NY that would only be economically feasible if every citizen of
those cities used it to commute to the other each and every day,
futuristic car designs that never came to pass, hovercraft buses, the
shape of trains to come and so on."
Link
(
Thanks, Peter!)
Followup on yesterday's editorial
Followup on yesterday's editorial
12/25/2003 11:32 AM
There's been a bunch of comment on my editorial
yesterday, most of it missing the point, widely. Candidates have to
earn my vote, and they won't if they say one thing and do another.
They don't stand a chance competing with commercial software
developers, yet that's exactly what two leading candidates are doing.
Further, the software market in America is depressed, and I think
that's partly caused by people expecting to get software for free.
A candidate who wanted to help software jobs come back to NH, a
high-tech state, could do something right now to help. No need to wait
till they're elected. And I don't agree with people who say the
candidate's job is to get elected. Sure, that's probably the way the
candidate views it. But I'm not a candidate, I'm a member of the
electorate and a taxpayer. I've yet to vote in a presidential election
that means something. I'd like to, someday. I honestly don't think
this is the year, but I'm doing my part to shift the focus to the
voters and away from 60-second TV commercials. What are you doing?
BTW, Dean is a very average candidate. His handlers ought to
tell him to answer questions frankly. He got a question about the
airplane they were using and tax dodges. He was asked if the story was
true and he said No, and didn't comment further. He said some really
nasty personal things about George Bush and John Kerry, kind of
schoolyard stuff. Not something you'd expect from a Presidential
candidate. That people are rallying around this guy gives you an idea
how desperate we are for leadership. I think we can do better, much
better.
Yesterday's Back! At Last, an I.P.O. to
Drool Over
Yesterday's Back! At Last, an I.P.O. to
Drool Over
05/01/2004 08:03 PMThe interest that Google's planned stock offering has generated is the
latest piece of evidence that investors have shrugged off one of the
worst bear markets in history.
Yesterday's Test Cases
Yesterday's Test Cases
03/31/2005 06:43 AM
Regarding yesterday's test
cases, I got quite a few comments about the second scenario, where
I propose that I become the author of Cory Doctorow's web-published
novel, offer it for sale, and seek distribution.
The uniform response was that since Cory's book is offered
under the Creative Commons attribution share-alike license, I
am not "permitted" to change the author's name, or charge for the
right to a copy. I put the word permitted in quotes, because the
responders haven't explained why Cory's work is so-protected and my
work, which is offered under a standard copyright, isn't.
In other words, the responders think there is a line. Aha!
There are some things one is not allowed to do with another person's
work. They said not only is it possible for Cory to opt-out of my
creative rip-and-burn act of 21st Century artistry, but it actually
requires Cory to opt-in! Well well well.
Does this perhaps ring a bell?
And since I haven't heard from Cory, I still wonder if it's
okay with him that I republish his work for money and claim authorship
of it, since I know he doesn't believe in opt-in or out. I
believe his philosophy is "Tough shit."
Also, I haven't heard from the EFF about the proposal that they
let me filter eff.org, replacing links, author's names, correct
spelling, and edit their copy to be more in line with the philosophy
of the entertainment industry.
Yesterday's Shocker Is Today's Must Read
Yesterday's Shocker Is Today's Must Read
09/10/2004 08:50 AMThe formerly outré, freaky and unthinkable now constitute business as
usual in popular culture. And these have become outright selling
points for books that eagerly capitalize on their kinks.
yesterday's Washington Post's editorial
yesterday's Washington Post's editorial
08/01/2004 03:07 PMPermalink
platform.blogs.com/passionofthepresent/2004/07/heartbreaki
ng_w.html
track this
site | 2 links
Fred Barnes regarding yesterday's
elections
Fred Barnes regarding yesterday's
elections
11/07/2003 05:28 AMWeekly Standard column .. Barnes: GOP On A
Roll
weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/340sisxs
.asp
track this
site | 5 links
eWeek's Vaughan-Nichols on Yesterday's
Developments
eWeek's Vaughan-Nichols on Yesterday's
Developments
03/14/2005 06:05 PMWhat yesterday's dumb sampling ruling
means
What yesterday's dumb sampling ruling
means
09/09/2004 01:04 PM
Cory Doctorow:
Yesterday, a judge in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that all
music sampling, no matter how minimal the sample, no matter how
unrecognizably transformed, is illegal without permission from the
sample-ee.
Lessig explains how the court got there and what it means:
Sampling, we're told, is piracy. But be certain to see the 19
footnotes in this relatively brief opinion, or the 28 separate quotes
the opinion includes from other peoples work. I assume the court got a
license for those.
Now that's not quite fair. The court's decision turns upon its
"literal" reading of the sound recording statute. The sound recording
statute has no de minimus exceptions, the court held. So while you are
free to copy three notes from a musical composition, you can't copy
the same three notes from a recording. So copying (so long as de
minimus) is fine; cut & paste is not. It is a "bright-line" rule
the Court has crafted: Ask permission first. (And don't worry, they
might have added. It's simple.)
So once again: life in the analog world is freer than life in the
digital world. You can do it, just don't use technology to do it
— unless, of course, your lawyer has spoken to their lawyer.
Link
"how she felt about yesterday's
pro-choice march in Washington"
"how she felt about yesterday's
pro-choice march in Washington"
04/27/2004 03:56 PMAn old general, cardboard bits,
yesterday's battle
An old general, cardboard bits,
yesterday's battle
04/26/2004 12:56 PM
90+ Vietnamese
general Vo Nguyen Giap buys 100 copies of "Vallee De La Morte", a
board game recreation of the battle of Dien Bien Phu There
actually
are 2
competing board game recreations of
t
he epic 1954 battle of Dien Bien Phu which was (by the French):
""....an attempt to interdict the enemy's
rear area, to stop the flow of supplies and reinforcements, to
establish a redoubt in the enemy's rear and disrupt his
lines," says Douglas Johnson, research professor at the U.S.
Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute. "The enemy
could then be lured into a killing ground."....Hoping to draw
Ho Chi Minh's guerrillas into a classic battle, the French began to
build up their garrison at Dien Bien Phu..." General Giap -
who led the Vietcong forces in that battle, prefers "Vallee
De La Morte". Such games are played with large multicolored
paper maps broken up into hexagonal grids, with cardboard pieces
representing military units. The rules can be
quite complex and some
wargames ( such as
Drang
Nach Osten) have thousands of pieces and take thousands of hours
to play (sometimes longer than the actual wars they simulate). More on
wargaming.
Navy of Tomorrow, Mired in Yesterday's
Politics
Navy of Tomorrow, Mired in Yesterday's
Politics
04/19/2005 03:52 AMThe price of the Navy's new ships, driven upward by old-school
politics, may scuttle the Pentagon's plans for a 21st-century armada.
Yesterday's news is tomorrow's
fish-and-chip paper
Yesterday's news is tomorrow's
fish-and-chip paper
02/01/2005 09:42 PMDan Gillmor offers a plea to newspapers to
open up their for-pay archives. He's got logic on his side but
business inertia against it. Newspapers are used to getting revenue
from their old content because third parties like Lexis/Nexis pay them
for it and then charge whopping fees to their own customers to access
the material. Those same papers are seeing classified ad revenue drain
away to the Web; I just don't see their corporate leaders choosing to
abandon this real revenue for the intangible possibility of long-term
grown in keyword advertising on open Web archives.
Is this short-sighted? You bet. Is that Lexis/Nexis revenue going
to vanish eventually anyway, as the open Web displaces it and reduces
demand for the old for-pay stuff? You bet. Will the newspapers then
lose out, long-term, as other institutions step into the vacuum on the
Web and become the "publications of record"? You bet.
This is, I think, inevitable, given the pattern in American
business that makes it nearly impossible for existing institutions to
sacrifice this quarter's revenue for riskier, long-term goals.
Newspapers as businesses are hugely conservative; they change slowly
if at all. It seems almost certain to me that over the next 30-40
years local newspapers will vanish. We'll be left with two or three
national institutions like the Times and the Journal -- they've got
their own upscale market of people willing to pay for in-depth
coverage, and they'll figure out a path to deliver it in whatever
format their readers want. For local news and information, it will be
cheaper, more efficient and more profitable to serve the public
electronically.
The economic structure that supported local newspapers is going to
migrate, is already beginning to migrate, online. And I don't
think most newspapers are nimble enough to follow. New players will
pick up that business -- and take on the mantle of providing local
news. In the course of this change we'll gain some speed and variety
and all the new possibilities of a many-to-many information world;
we'll also lose some valuable traditions. Our recycling bins, at
least, will thank us.
Dana Milbank writes in yesterday's
Washington Post
Dana Milbank writes in yesterday's
Washington Post
12/25/2003 09:08 PMDana Milbank: Under Bush, Expanding Secrecy 12/24 .. they have
chosen
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22764-2003Dec22.html
track
this site | 4 links
"Yesterday's absurd conspiracy theory
about the Bush administration has a way
of turning into today's conventional
wisdom
"Yesterday's absurd conspiracy theory
about the Bush administration has a way
of turning into today's conventional
wisdom
11/12/2003 01:16 PMOp-Ed Columnist: Support the
Troops
nytimes.com/2003/11/11/opinion/11KRUG.html
track this
site | 10 links
Grok Description matches for Web is littered with yesterday's castoffs
GrokA matches for Web is littered with yesterday's castoffs
Web is littered with yesterday's castoffs