PC or TV (or both?)PC or TV (or both?)PC or TV (or both?) 07/08/2004 01:54 PM OK - so here's a debate that's been raging - which is what I believe is a metaphor for much of the "consumer-based", Home LAN issues we all face moving forward. Summarized: - some say that cheap, consumer-based eletcronics will always be a better solution for the 'digitaql convergence' we all want and expect. The problem is that TV based interfaces (or even PDAs or otehr weird-non-PC interfaces) can't do what PCs do. - or do you use the PC as the most logical, appropriate tool for editing, managing and maintaining your media and devices, digital lifestyle, personal publishing social networking, communications and mobile gateways kind of work? Guess which sceanrio I'm in favor of? Though I dig the TiVO interface (which is clearly the best PVR UI out there) - folks have GOT to realize that they'll never equal the PC and Gates and Microsoft know that. This weird Media Center hybrid is just a short term patch. The long term scenario is that you have BOTH TVs and PCs on a LAN and they should both do what they're good at. period. Here's Matt's
post that inspired this rant......
In both sets of tests, the Media Center Edition PCs prove to be a bit buggy and crash-prone, and the reviewers eventually give the final nods to TiVo with its bulletproof simple design and reliability. Michael Gartner, a media analyst and a big fan of MCE, counters with the mention of all the cool things you can do with a recorded show on a PC: archive it to DVD, stream it with other computers on your network, and copy it to a portable device. What it all comes down to is how you want to view and consume media. For most folks, they just want a dependable box that will do what they say. In a way, it's a lot like a helpful robot. You say "tape all the Sopranos you find" and you expect it to do your bidding. If you want to do more, you'll have to hack around a bit or throw some parts and free software to build your own, but a minority of folks seem to go to such lengths. That's what came out of a recent discussion of building your own PVR on MetaFilter, where even hardcore geeks admitted that it was much cheaper to just buy a tivo, set it, and forget it, when compared to the parts list and nuturing that a linux-based PVR requires. I think that's the bottom line to all of this talk. If owners want to burn stuff to DVD or watch shows on their laptop while traveling, it's probably worth using MCE or MythTV, even though it costs more and they might crash from time to time. But for the vast majority, an $80 TiVo box will serve their needs, can be trusted, and hopefully if TiVo can get their "TiVo ToGo" features released soon, you'll be able to do many of the things that MCE boasts as advantages. [Matt Haughey via PVRBlog]This is a GrokNews Entry: (what is grok?)PC or TV (or both?)Grok Headline matches for PC or TV (or both?)Grok Description matches for PC or TV (or both?) GrokA matches for PC or TV (or both?) PC or TV (or both?)The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: |
Also check out: |