Convert-Binary-C-0.48

Grok Headline matches for Convert-Binary-C-0.48

Convert-Binary-C-0.53

Convert-Binary-C-0.53 05/25/2004 05:55 PM

Convert-Binary-C-0.55

Convert-Binary-C-0.55 08/22/2004 05:23 PM

Convert-Binary-C-0.54

Convert-Binary-C-0.54 07/01/2004 05:43 AM

Convert-Binary-C-0.52

Convert-Binary-C-0.52 05/25/2004 12:39 AM

Convert-Binary-C-0.56

Convert-Binary-C-0.56 09/19/2004 05:41 AM

Update: Wanted Unix Command Line Binary
to Convert Windows Icon Files to PNG

Update: Wanted Unix Command Line Binary
to Convert Windows Icon Files to PNG 03/13/2003 11:29 AM

Update: Wanted Unix Command Line Binary to Convert Windows Icon Files to PNG

The title really says it all.  Either this means something to you or it doesn't.  It must handle 24 bit icon files.  Example File.  Any thoughts?

Note: if this means nothing to you then no worry.

More in a bit.

Binary Boy v1.94

Binary Boy v1.94 05/17/2004 03:15 PM
Download files from multiple news servers or from other users. Subject cache speeds up searches and preserves bandwidth. NZB support. Browse manually or schedule a search to collect files while you sleep. Hyper-Threading compatible. Search using single words, wildcards or AND, OR and NOT logic. Apply custom search rules to each newsgroup. Decode damaged or incomplete mpg movies for previewing. yEnc, MIME, QP-Lite, etc. [Shareware $29.95 30 Days 768 KB]

Binary XML

Binary XML 10/28/2003 11:07 PM

Mig uel comments on the "Binary XML" postings from Omri and Dare, pointing out that only two standards would probably be needed (one for size, one for speed) to cover the majority of scenarios.  I think this is correct, but in my opinion it's not the number of encodings that is a problem, but simply the existence of any "standard" encoding beyond XML 1.0.

If you can remember just five short years ago, it was once a major decision for IT developers to choose what encoding to persist and send their data:

• Should it be fixed-width or delimited?
• Should it be delimited with tabs or commas?  What about quotes?
• Should it be binary or text?  ASN.1? DXF? IGES?

Every system used a different encoding technique, and every time you wanted to interop you had to write a parser.  Most of us have written at least a few parsers for formats like IGES, W3C Log File, and so on.  How much money was wasted by people writing parsers?

Now fast-forward to 2003.  When a system developer thinks about persisting and sharing data, she automatically thinks "XML".  In 90% of cases, XML is the obvious choice and no debate occurs.  Do you think that this happens because XML is a superior format based on size, speed, or any othe technical criteria compared to the options available in 1998?  Of course not!  XML is the obvious choice because programmers are lazy, many parsers are freely available, and it's "good enough" for most uses.  The fact that XML is ubiquitous leads to plenty of parsing options being available, and more parsing options and tools leads to greater ubiquity.  Developers can use XML in most cases and be confident that everyone else in the world will be able to parse out their data with trivial effort.  Developers can argue about data schemas now instead of wasting time bickering about parser code and syntaxes.  This is a huge contribution!

The thing that many people fail to understand, though, is that none of this virtuous cycle could exist if XML parsers were not trustworthy.  XML depends on the fact that well-formed XML can be processed by any parser, and non-wellformed XML can be processed by none.  People deploy XML because they know it will "just work" no matter which parser is being used.  People deploy XML because they know it will work no matter whether it is IBM or Microsoft in favor that week.  Nothing about XML matters more than this promise matters.

So, consider what happens when we introduce some new encodings which are not wellformed XML 1.0, but we call them "XML" anyway.  When Jane in the IT department configures her EDI software to send an "XML" file to a partner, and the partner's machine rejects it, who is to blame?  Jane will claim that "my vendor says that XML 1.0bin is a W3C spec, so your vendor is non-standard", while the partner will claim "my vendor accepts XML 1.0 so your vendor is non-standard".  In fact, it is quite likely that vendors with multiple XML-enabled products would end up in situations where their own products failed to communicate with one another.  Note that this danger exists with any variations from XML 1.0, and not just "binary XML".

Reasonable people might argue that this is OK, and that IT pros will simply have to learn to distinguish between the four different incompatible types of XML (XML 1.0, XML 1.1, XMLfast, XMLsmall) and will have to manage the compatibility mismatches between all of their systems.  But that starts to look a lot like 1998 to me.  Developers will bicker about which XML to use, and will have to switch parsers based on the choice of data format.  Systems will have to offer and consume multiple formats and negotiate formats between one another.  I have a good memory, and I remember how badly things used to suck.  Having a solid, reliable "obvious choice" like XML 1.0 means freedom from pain for millions of developers.  Let's please don't mess with that too hastily.

Parse-Binary-0.06

Parse-Binary-0.06 02/17/2004 06:25 PM

Binary Converter

Binary Converter 01/05/2004 01:28 PM
Pardon my dust...

Tree-Binary-0.01

Tree-Binary-0.01 08/12/2004 06:18 AM

SendDiff 1.0 (Binary)

SendDiff 1.0 (Binary) 08/18/2004 01:12 AM
A script that provides notification about any change in a CVS repository.

binary-clock 0.5

binary-clock 0.5 09/08/2004 12:30 PM
A console-based binary clock.

Tree-Binary-0.04

Tree-Binary-0.04 08/31/2004 05:19 PM

Parse-Binary-0.08

Parse-Binary-0.08 09/08/2004 10:35 AM

SendDiff 1.2 (Binary)

SendDiff 1.2 (Binary) 09/01/2004 09:55 AM
A script that provides notification about any change in a CVS repository.

SendDiff 1.3 (Binary)

SendDiff 1.3 (Binary) 09/08/2004 10:59 AM
A script that provides notification about any change in a CVS repository.

Parse-Binary-0.05

Parse-Binary-0.05 02/16/2004 06:41 PM

Parse-Binary-0.04

Parse-Binary-0.04 02/15/2004 11:45 PM

Parse-Binary-0.03

Parse-Binary-0.03 02/14/2004 06:32 PM

Binary DB insertion using PHP

Binary DB insertion using PHP 10/02/2002 01:58 PM

Parse-Binary-0.02

Parse-Binary-0.02 02/13/2004 06:37 PM

Binary Vortex v2.8

Binary Vortex v2.8 04/25/2004 07:17 PM
BinaryVortex pulls down pictures from Usenet Newsgroups. It is fast, efficient, reliable and easy to use. You can be up and running with BinaryVortex after typing in only a few simple setup options. [Shareware $19.95 30 days 779 KB]

Binary Search

Binary Search 02/21/2003 01:09 AM
Programmers can be so damned stupid sometimes. Take me for example. I've been working to optimize and adjust some code at work. I can't tell you what it does but I can tell you that it's too slow and uses...

Parse-Binary-0.01

Parse-Binary-0.01 02/13/2004 06:37 PM

windowmaker Binary Clock 0.3

windowmaker Binary Clock 0.3 01/22/2004 06:22 PM
A binary clock as window maker applet.

"Iraq did not have such binary shells"

"Iraq did not have such binary shells" 05/23/2004 03:21 PM

Binary diff utility 1.0.4

Binary diff utility 1.0.4 02/15/2004 02:30 PM
A diff & patch utility for binary files.

Use Cases: XML Binary Characterization

Use Cases: XML Binary Characterization 07/28/2004 04:28 PM
2004-07-28: The XML Binary Characterization Working Group has released the First Public Working Draft of XML Binary Characterization Use Cases. Presenting documented examples, the draft will help to decide if standardized and optimized serialization can be used to improve the generation, parsing, transmission and storage of XML-based data. Comments are welcome. Visit the XML home page. (News archive)

Binary Neurons For Dummies

Binary Neurons For Dummies 07/31/2004 10:33 PM
Binary neurons are one of the most basic forms of computational intelligence, so much so that they are quite often described as being logic systems, and not intelligent at all.  Either way, I will now teach you how to building and use a neuron in a simple environment.

Linux: the GPL and Binary Modules

Linux: the GPL and Binary Modules 12/08/2003 04:38 AM

OpenBSD binary patches

OpenBSD binary patches 05/05/2004 07:56 PM
An alternative and convenient way for patching OpenBSD systems when sufficient resources are not available for patching the source tree.

Binary Waltz, Play On

Binary Waltz, Play On 02/10/2004 02:49 AM
Robin Berjon argues that work at the W3C on binary XML must press on, in order to avoid the proprietary chaos that will result from a lack of standards in this area.

What's wrong with binary logic?

What's wrong with binary logic? 01/08/2004 07:59 PM

I've been accused of using binary logic and am still having a very difficult time understanding the problem with it. Anne Galloway's blog has very high quality readership so I am fascinated by the discussion, but I still need some help understanding. Anne, I hate to highjack the comments section on your blog entry, but I have a feeling I'm still missing a very important point.

I am turning off comments on the this item on my blog. If you have thoughts, please post them in context on Anne's blog.

Binary Killed the XML Star?

Binary Killed the XML Star? 11/19/2003 08:11 PM
The results of the W3C's workshop on binary XML are less than satisfactory, says Kendall Clark. He also covers a recent and pertinent conversation on XML-DEV about SAX interfaces to binary formats.

XML, SOAP and Binary Data

XML, SOAP and Binary Data 02/26/2003 07:51 PM
This white paper discusses the architectural issues encountered when using opaque non-XML data in XML applications, including (but not limited to) Web services and SOAP.

Binary distribution moves

Binary distribution moves 03/13/2003 10:15 AM
The Fink binary distribution has moved to a new location. All Fink users wishing to use the binary distribution will have to make sure they are using the new binary distribution (many of you already are using it, maybe without even noticing). If you want to know how to switch and why we do this, read more here..

Don't reuse binary installer

Don't reuse binary installer 03/13/2003 10:15 AM
Users are cautioned to use the binary installer for Fink 0.4.1 only once on a given machine. Due to an apparent bug in Apple's Installer.app program, attempting a second installation on the same machine can result in permissions being altered in the machine's root directory, in some cases leaving the machine in a non-bootable state. If Installer.app presents you with an "Upgrade" button rather than an "Install" button when installing Fink 0.4.1, do not proceed any further! A new version of the binary installer for Fink 0.4.1 became available on November 5. The new version avoids the problem of the machine not booting, but even with the new version, users are advised to only "Install", not "Upgrade." (You can recognize the new version by its filesize of 12582912 bytes, while the old version had a filesize of 10541112 bytes.)

windowmaker Binary Clock 0.1

windowmaker Binary Clock 0.1 03/15/2003 07:42 PM
A binary clock as window maker applet.
Grok Description matches for Convert-Binary-C-0.48
GrokA matches for Convert-Binary-C-0.48

Convert-Binary-C-0.48

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: