PEAR::LiveUser: Architecture & Functionality
Grok Headline matches for PEAR::LiveUser: Architecture & Functionality
We Are All Connected: The Path from
Architecture to Information Architecture
We Are All Connected: The Path from
Architecture to Information Architecture
01/07/2004 06:41 PMIn this article, author Fu Tien Chiou describes a link between
traditional architecture and Information Architecture, showing how the
Information Architect uses a set of blueprints that builders --
designers and programmers -- can construct. 1217
We are all connected: The path from
architecture to information architecture
We are all connected: The path from
architecture to information architecture
11/11/2003 04:46 AMMore FTP functionality
More FTP functionality
07/15/2002 11:40 PMCNET Jul 15 2002 11:00PM ET
The New Musical Functionality...
The New Musical Functionality...
07/17/2004 08:20 AMOver the last few months webloggia has been full of discussions
about the new musical functionality that's starting to emerge around
the web. I wasn't immune from this trend - I wrote about MediaUnbound (On MediaUnbound and Recommendations
Engines) and linked to the (currently pretty awful) Music Recommendation System for
iTunes. Dan Hill has also been talking around the subject, talking
about first So
cialising mp3-based music listening and then about whether wh
ether recommendations scale. And those minxes over at 2lmc linked and commented upon the
views of people who are suggesting better ways that iTunes could handle transitions between songs. And of course the new
version of iTunes and the iTunes Music
Store also now has the user-generated iMix feature -
standard web-native functionality which allows people (and now people
in the UK, France and Germany rather than just
the US) to put mix tapes on the web where other people can rate and/or
buy them. And that's just the tip of the iceberg...
Then of course there are the staples of this new musical
functionality - from the rapidly-becoming-indispensible audioscrobbler (which uses
the flexibility and granularity of net-enabled MP3 playing devices to
create charts, lists and recommendations) through to the
self-generating radio stations like last.fm and launchcast. And then there's all
the little hook-in tools like iChatStatus (publish current listening to iChat's presence
display) and Kung-Tunes
(publish current listening to the web) that have slowly becoming
integrated into my life without my really noticing how they all hook
together, communicate, branch off and build upon each other.
All this new funtionality is emerging at the same time (or at least
starting to be adopted at the same time) because we're beginning to
see a world in which a decent number of early adopters are now
starting to do a substantial portion of their listening on digital
devices. Obviously the iPod
has been the major success story here - the definitive product that
has been encouraging people to do the necessary work to transfer their
music into more easily manipulatable digital files. But the increasing
prevelance of broadband and wireless connectivity is helping too -
becauase it's the connection of these appliances to the internet that
has created the explosion in interoperable, interconnected devices,
applications and people. Clearly, the number of people listening to
music through these channels is still tiny compared to the entire
music-consuming public. There may be many people using iPods, but
there's still an adoption path for moving all your listening
into digital jukeboxes and being perpetually connected to the internet
(ubiquitous, always-on, non-computer-centric internet in the home is
a bit of an obsession of mine
at the moment).
But this small proportion looks like it is set to grow. One of the
first questions you have to ask yourself in any organic R&D role
(which is I think how I'd characterise what I do) is am I a freak
or am I an early adopter? You have to have some sense of how much
your instincts and excitements are in tune with real people in the
world because otherwise you cannot possibly evaluate how those people
might respond to the products, concepts or propositions that you think
are exciting. In this case, it's becoming fairly clear that people who
are listening to digital music and in connected ways are very
definitely more like early adopters than they are freaks. They're
pointing in roughly the right direction. And there are now enough of
them that it's becoming more and more worth people's time ot build
little tools or widgets or applications or paradigms or appliances or
business models around them. Which in turn appears to be making the
whole area still more attractive, creating a feedback loop that is
pulling more and more people towards new ways of listening. I don't
want to sound too cheesy but I'm afraid I can't help myself - it's
pretty clear that we've reached a critical mass and that new musical
functionality is about to explode. The only question now is what will
be there when the smoke clears?
Over the next few days I'm going to write about some of the core
trends that I'm seeing in people's use of digital music, attempting to
extrapolate from some current behaviours that we're all observing
around us - concentrating on how people wish to interact and use their
music. I'm not going to spend too much time on the way some people may
wish to legislate against these desires or build around them - because
I believe for the most part that any attempt to do so will inevitably
fail. Competing models that more adequately fulfil those needs will
rise to take over in their place. The model that meets the most needs
(while having the least obvious incumberences) will probably win in
the really long-term, even if the market, commercial advantages or
monopolist practices deform it in the short to medium term.
I'll be talking about four major areas that seem to me to be
indicative of the unevenly-distributed musical functionality of the
future - (1) portability and access, (2) navigation, (3)
self-presentation and social uses of music and (4) data use and
privacy. These trends within these areas are - I believe -
representative of much larger trends across the consumption of all
text-based, audio-based and video-based media and so it might be
possible to draw conclusions beyond the consumption of music. I am
however not planning to do so. And I make no claims that these areas
of enquiry are absolute or canonical, or that there are no other areas
that I should also be investigating. All I'll argue is that these four
areas are core to the movements that we're currently seeing and that
they are each likely to play themselves out in the product designs,
interface designs and business models of the near future.
Of course what comes after that remains to be seen...
Tomorrow: The New Musical Functionality, Portability and
access...
Read the comments
Mac GEMS: Further Functionality
Mac GEMS: Further Functionality
06/28/2004 11:49 AM By Dan Frakes, Macworld (via MyAppleMenu)
Gain SSL functionality in JDK 1.3
Gain SSL functionality in JDK 1.3
01/15/2003 02:43 AMCNET Jan 15 2003 1:48AM ET
The New Muscial Functionality
The New Muscial Functionality
07/28/2004 02:53 PMClay raps it out - some more.....
Tom Coates has the first of what looks like a fantastic series
of posts on
title=http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2004/07/the_new_musical_funct
ionality.shtml
href="http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2004/07/the_new_musical_funct
ionality.shtml">the
new musical functionality, an extended musing on the distribution
of
production, reproduction, and filtering of music, covering especially
the newly
social context.
Over the next few days I’m going to write about
some of the
core trends that I’m seeing in people’s use of digital music,
attempting to
extrapolate from some current behaviours that we’re all observing
around us -
concentrating on how people wish to interact and use their music.
I’m not going
to spend too much time on the way some people may wish to legislate
against
these desires or build around them - because I believe for the most
part that
any attempt to do so will inevitably fail. Competing models that more
adequately
fulfil those needs will rise to take over in their place. […] I’ll
be talking
about four major areas that seem to me to be indicative of the
unevenly-distributed musical functionality of the future - (1)
portability and
access, (2) navigation, (3) self-presentation and social uses of music
and (4)
data use and privacy.
Among the social apps that I think relate to his thesis but which
he doesn’t
(yet) mention are:
*
href="http://www.songbuddy.com/lc/soaf">songBuddy
*
title=http://www.musicplasma.com/
href="http://www.musicplasma.com/">MusicPlasma
*
title=http://www.musicmobs.com/
href="http://www.musicmobs.com/">MusicMobs
*
href="http://webjay.org">Webjay
And, as an added flavor bonus, here’s a City of Sound post I’ve
been meaning
to blog on
title="City of sound
http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2004/05/socialising_mp3.html"
href="City of sound
http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2004/05/socialising_mp3.html">socialis
ing
listening habits, tied mostly to the features of
title=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/
href="http://www.audioscrobbler.com/">audioscrobbler, which Coates
also
regards as essential.
[Clay Shirky]
Functionality is dead
Functionality is dead
12/22/2004 01:26 AMComputer Weekly Dec 21 2004 8:32AM GMT
Design First, Functionality Later
Design First, Functionality Later
09/01/2004 05:07 PMUnfortunately, this may be taken by some as an Apple bashing post, but
it's surprising to find out that
the fancy new iMacs everyone is
talking about don't include built-in WiFi, but are simply WiFi
"ready." Apple has been such a big proponent of WiFi with their
Airport offerings that it just seems strange that this offering
wouldn't also include WiFi -- especially as it would cut down on one
more design-unfriendly wire sticking out of the machine. The article
also complains about Apple's failure to include a TV-tuner card with
TiVo like qualities. While that would have been nice, and could have
been a major selling point, it doesn't seem as egregious as forgetting
the WiFi.
FTP functionality in VB apps
FTP functionality in VB apps
07/11/2002 12:57 AMCNET Jul 11 2002 0:04AM ET
oai-pear
oai-pear
04/26/2004 07:40 AMPEAR::OAI 0.4.1 Released
The Choice Between Design and
Functionality
The Choice Between Design and
Functionality
01/13/2003 08:55 AMWebmasters continue to look for the common ground between design and
page roi production.
Add preview functionality to Blosxom
Add preview functionality to Blosxom
05/28/2004 11:14 AMA fair number of people use Blosxom, Rael Dornfest's weblog software,
for its simplicity and power, and given Movable Type's recent change
to its pricing structure, even more people may do so soon.
The major drawback, IMHO, ...
Peribit Expands WAN Functionality
Peribit Expands WAN Functionality
06/30/2004 11:28 AMThe company's new WAN optimization products offer support for greater
WAN speeds and new disks for data mirroring.
Exchange Functionality for Linux
Exchange Functionality for Linux
03/19/2003 10:25 PMBynari InsightServer is here already, and Kroupware is coming up.
New Exit Installation Functionality
New Exit Installation Functionality
06/04/2004 08:17 PMJava package functionality
Java package functionality
09/03/2002 11:37 AMCNET Sep 1 2002 10:09PM ET
10.3: Take advantage of built-in UPS
functionality
10.3: Take advantage of built-in UPS
functionality
02/10/2004 12:01 PMI've just bought a new APC UPS for my PowerMac G4. It ships with
PowerChute software, but versiontracker.com comments suggest it is not
yet Panther compatible. It seems, however that Apple has included UPS
software in Mac O...
HandyAid - New functionality for your
Palm PDA
HandyAid - New functionality for your
Palm PDA
11/14/2003 05:46 AMShocker: DVR Users Use DVR Functionality
Shocker: DVR Users Use DVR Functionality
06/17/2004 08:53 PMIt turns out, believe it or not, that people who have DVR devices like
TiVo
actually
(gasp!) dare to use them to watch TV when they want to. The
writer of this article about a study on DVR usage sounds surprised
that people who own them don't tend to watch TV programs when they
air, but prefer to wait, even if just to be able to skip commercials.
Of course, while TiVo users may
see
more ads as they fast forward through them, it does sound like
plenty of users do still end up watching ads. It's just that they're
more picky about them. 38% of users do say they fast forward through
all the ads they see, but that still leaves plenty who don't.
However, it seems pretty clear that the ads need to at least get their
attention. People are no longer passive consumers of media. That
doesn't mean that video-based ads are dead, but just that they
need to
get more creative.
Changes to Functionality in Microsoft
Windows XP SP2 v2.0
Changes to Functionality in Microsoft
Windows XP SP2 v2.0
05/05/2004 03:35 PMSimpleNote v3.0 Dispatching New
Functionality
SimpleNote v3.0 Dispatching New
Functionality
07/19/2004 03:07 AMThe Data Corporation announces the release of SimpleNote v3.0, a
software application for managing targeted digital communications.
[PRWEB Jul 19, 2004]
Release of HandyAid v1.7.2 - New
functionality for your PDA.
Release of HandyAid v1.7.2 - New
functionality for your PDA.
04/13/2004 02:27 PMDSI Announces Unicode Functionality
DSI Announces Unicode Functionality
04/06/2005 04:38 AMZDNet India Apr 6 2005 8:56AM GMT
Mac OS X and Virtual Desktop
Functionality?
Mac OS X and Virtual Desktop
Functionality?
11/04/2003 02:36 PM
Appleinsider claims that Apple will be building in Virtual Desktop
support into Mac OS X by 2004.
Appleinsider points to an Exposé hack that shrink...
PEAR Out of Beta!
PEAR Out of Beta!
01/11/2003 09:10 AM The PEAR development team is proud to announce that PEAR is finally
out of its long beta period. As of PHP 4.3, the PEAR installer is
installed by default. Unix support is considered stable, while Windows
and Darwin are still of beta-quality.
Without a pear, I improvise.
Without a pear, I improvise.
10/28/2003 11:06 PMMany application developers shy away from database abstraction tools,
in part because of the overhead and new APIs they have to learn, but
also because it's difficult for those tools to port complex
instructions and queries to each different RDBMS....
Introduction to PEAR
Introduction to PEAR
10/29/2003 02:21 AMAn introduction to PEAR with examples of using the Benchmark package.
PEAR grows up: MDB
PEAR grows up: MDB
01/12/2003 01:36 PMWe met with the author of Metabase at the International PHP Conference
2001 and we talked about the benefits of having something like
Metabase as part of the PEAR project. Shortly afterwards a discussion
began once more in the PEAR mailing list about the potential benefits
of a merge of PEAR DB and Metabase. After much discussion at my
company we decided to take up this task. After several months of hard
work we now have the first stable release of MDB. - Lukas Smith
Lukas Smith has done a fine job with MDB and finally PEAR has a decent
db abstraction library. Congrats!
"zeldman.bardot2"
PEAR::PHPUnit 1.0.2 (PHP 4)
PEAR::PHPUnit 1.0.2 (PHP 4)
09/21/2004 09:06 AMA regression testing framework for PHP 5.
PEAR::PHPUnit 2-2.0.3
PEAR::PHPUnit 2-2.0.3
09/27/2004 03:25 AMA regression testing framework for PHP 5.
PEAR::PHPUnit 2-2.0.0
PEAR::PHPUnit 2-2.0.0
07/14/2004 01:51 AMA regression testing framework for PHP 5.
Comprehensive PHP PEAR::DB
Comprehensive PHP PEAR::DB
02/10/2004 02:46 AMOverall, this is maybe a good and very helpful book if you are using,
or plan to use, the PEAR::DB package. Although it does not cover the
features that the PEAR::MDB package adds over PEAR::DB, the book may
also be helpful if you are interested in PEAR::MDB as this package
provides a compatible superset of the PEAR::DB features.
PHP's PEAR on Mac OS X
PHP's PEAR on Mac OS X
01/21/2003 10:06 PM
The PHP Extension and Application Repository (PEAR) is an online
repository of high-quality, peer-reviewed PHP classes that conform to
a rigorous coding standard. In this article, Jason Perry shows you how
to install, configure and use the PEAR Package Manager on Mac OS X
10.2
The New Musical Functionality:
Portability and access
The New Musical Functionality:
Portability and access
07/26/2004 05:41 PMThe other day I started this run of posts on the New Musical
Functionality by arguing that the behaviour of an until-recently
small group of digital music fans seemed to be now spreading into the
mainstream. I also listed four areas that seemed to me to be where the
most significant changes in consumption patterns were occurring -
areas to which I believe that anyone building sites, services or
hardware around music should be paying close attention. These four
areas were (1) portability and access, (2) navigation, (3)
self-presentation/social uses and (4) data use and privacy. Today I'm
going to concentrate briefly on the trends towards portability and
access.
This may seem like an obvious place to start, but I think it's an
important thing to get out in the open: the core difference between an
iPod and a CD Walkman isn't
audio quality. That's not to say that there isn't a differences in the
audio quality between the MP3/AAC file and CD 'originals' because - of
course - there is and it is a significant one. However, in defiance of
the normal path of technological achievements, the newer technology
does not have the advantage in reproductive fidelity. In the future
this may change (Apple's lossless
compression and increasingly cheap storage space are just two of
the reasons why), but at the moment MP3s and AACs use lossy forms of
compression and for this reason simply do not sound as good as their
CD originals. It would probably be pushing it to say that this is the
first significant change of popular audio format that actually made
the sound quality worse (vinyl fans have been criticising the CD for
that for years), but it does at least seem to be one of the first
where claims of improved sound haven't been a major selling point.
So why are these new formats and players starting to occupy the
mainstream so effectively? What is it that means people want iPods so
desperately even though they're effectively purchasing a technology
that will result in a decrease in audio quality? Again the answer is
so obvious that it hardly bears repeating - particularly given that
it's on every single bloody advert that Apple produce. The reason that
people are buying iPods is because they want 10,000 songs in their
pockets. They want access to music wherever they are in the world.
More still - they want access to all their music
everywhere. Every last bit. Every last place.
As I've said, this sounds obvious but it is important. It's
important because once we understand the need that a product is
filling, we can attempt to find other/better ways of filling it. The
iPod's current success has demonstrated that the need exists - and how
- but I would argue that in the longer term it is by no means obvious
that the need would be best served by small portable hard discs
embedded in MP3 players.
It doesn't take a lot of foresight to see the scope for development
in this area. In the short-term, the trend seems fairly clear -
storage capacity looks set to increase and/or devices look set to get
smaller. This has been the trend of almost all computing technology
over the last few decades (cf. Moore's Law for
the near-parallel phenomenon happening in processor speed). Given
these fundamental developments, there aren't an enormous numbers of
directions that these devices can go.
The first two options for future product directions around this
stuff are (1) larger capacities and (2) smaller form factors. We have
already seen movements in both of these directions (iPod Mini / 60Gb iPod coming). However, there's only so far that either
of these trends can develop.
Increased capacity ceases to be interesting at the point where
there is more capacity than data to fill it - hence the problem with
saying that newer iPods can hold 10,000 songs. There are very few
people in the world who would be capable, let alone interested, in
sourcing that much music. After listening to my music exclusively
through a computer for the last two or three years, I've still only
got 8,000 MP3s. And I'm hardly representative. If we're talking about
significant subsequent increases in capacity then there are some
pretty clear limits in place. 10,000 songs is about a month of solid
listening. 100,000 songs would be getting on for a year. 1,000,000
songs a lifetime. Somewhere between a month and lifetime, the marginal
utility of another song being on your iPod reaches zero (even assuming
that physics lets you get to that size in the first place).
Of course when we talk about capacity in terms of songs we're kind of
missing the point. From this point on, advances in capacity are more
likely to allow us to listen to
higher quality audio than they
are to increase the number of songs that people want to listen to. A
tenfold increase in portable storage would mean that a future iPod
could carry the same number of songs as a current iPod except in Apple
Lossless formats that have all the sound quality of a CD. A parallel
increase in bandwidth speeds could mean that the last few decades of
work on compression could become fundamentally redundant - much like
the techniques that meant programmers had to write whole applications
to run with 8k of RAM are now pretty much irrelevant. So this is
clearly a direction things are likely to move over the next few years.
But even this has its limits. Once you've escalated disc size ten
times there's nowhere to go in terms of audio quality - or at least,
nowhere that will make the slightest difference to most individual
consumers. So again any subsequent growth in capacity will have to be
sold in terms of an increased number of songs that could be held - and
as such the gradual diminishing marginal utility problem comes in
again. Increased capacity, therefore, has only so much of a shelf life
- can only go so far before it collapses under its own weight.
The other potential obvious future direction - as I've said above -
is to make the appliances themselves smaller. Here again there are
limits to utility. There would seem to be a size under which a device
ceases to be practical - that size being directly related to the size
of interface elements, screens and buttons, which in turn relate
directly to the size of fingers and thumbs and the limits of human
vision. Now again, you can merge this in as a direction with the
increased capacities and find a bottomed-out form factor and gradually
increase the capacity on it - and no doubt this is the main approach
that people like Apple will take over the next few years. At least
that is until physics steps in or human interest (in having
unlistenable amounts of music) begins to wane - both of which are
probably a way off, but remain definite limits to future development
in these directions.
Of course, there are certain conditions where an appliance may
usefully shrink below the size of its interface, and that's when it
shares that interface with a number of other pieces of technology.
This is the approach that the mobile phone manufacturers have taken -
as the phones became almost unmanageably small, people's attention
moved instead to enhancing functionality and adding in cameras, PDAs,
web-browsers, comms equipment, bluetooth and the like. This had the
effect of keeping the form factors at manageable sizes while still
allowing competition and product development to occur. There's
absolutely no doubt that this kind of hybridisation will be / is
already a core part of the development of portable digital music
players. Much of this hybridisation results in useful connections and
possible new products emerging from music devices that are permanently
network-enabled.
All of this previous stuff has been relatively uncontroversial -
it's no more than the immediate development along a couple of
pre-existing axes of the products we have in our stores today. The
incorporation of network-enabled devices has the capacity to change
things a lot though. This is where alternative models for fulfilling a
design for universal access and portability are likely to start
emerging more strongly. We currently seem to be moving towards a world
with greater and greater connectivity and one in which some kind of
flat-rate, always-on broad-ish band internet access is likely to be
integrated into pretty much all portable devices. This opens up other
possibilities for having access to all of your music wherever
you might be - and without actually carrying any of the files around
with you. We could be looking towards a near future in which all of
your media (and perhaps applications and information) can be held 'in
the sky' and streamed/downloaded down to whatever appliance you like
as and when required. Where this repository would live (with an ISP,
with your home server, on your TV's set top-box, on Apple's iTunes
Music store) is not immediately clear. But it's conceivable that -
given enough bandwidth and centralisation - massively redundant models
like we have at the moment where everyone has their own copy of a
music file could be replaced completely by centralised music-on-demand
services. Personally, I'm not much convinced that particular extreme
is likely - people still seem to like to own music and still think of
it as an object rather than as a service - but that's not particularly
relevant. The important aspect is simply that the same user need can
be met in different ways.
So will we move towards larger portable hard discs or towards
connected repositories explorable through massive bandwidth? Probably
the direction that we take here will depend on nothing more elegant
and interesting than financial cost. If enormous storage options were
to become enormously cheap and small, then carrying a significant hard
disc is likely to remain the preference of individual music fans. On
the other hand, if bandwidth became cheap, then we'll probably find
ourselves in a more service-driven and centralised streaming-based
world. The model that's most likely to dominate is likely to lie
somewhere in between the two - in hybridised technologies that use
hard disks as local copies of stashes of music held in more
centralised locations - using the network to syncas and when
appropriate (see note) as well as a mediator for various forms of
engagement, navigation and data-mining around and in-between
individual listeners. But more around that stuff in the next part of
this sprawling rant around the New Musical Functionality: On trends in
navigation.... (Coming Soon)
Note: Syncing becomes very important in a world with
innumerable devices and limited connectivity. On a slight tangent -
there are innumerable hybrid models where increases in portable data
collide with the ability to access data at a distance. At the desktop
level you can imagine computers running off the wired internet
creating the impression of your 'home' computer wherever you sit, and
on the portable level with large local storage being kept up-to-date
perpetually via slower trickle-fed syncing protocols.
Read the
comments
Comcast to roll DVR functionality into
set-top boxes
Comcast to roll DVR functionality into
set-top boxes
12/04/2003 01:08 PMComcast plans to compete with TiVo by offering set-top cable boxes
with built-in DVRs
Changes to Functionality in Windows XP
Service Pack 2
Changes to Functionality in Windows XP
Service Pack 2
12/13/2003 10:28 AMBasic Firewall functionality Explained
Basic Firewall functionality Explained
02/01/2005 08:34 PMPocketMac Pro 3.3: Software Supplies Mac
Functionality To Your PDA
PocketMac Pro 3.3: Software Supplies Mac
Functionality To Your PDA
08/03/2004 09:29 PMPocketMac Pro 3.3 is not the only way to get a PocketPC working with
OS X, but its e-mail and Web features (as well as its support for PIMs
other than Address Book and iCal) give it the edge. By Andy Ihnatko,
Macworld (via MyAppleMenu)
Grok Description matches for PEAR::LiveUser: Architecture & Functionality
GrokA matches for PEAR::LiveUser: Architecture & Functionality
PEAR::LiveUser: Architecture & Functionality