Whither USENIX?

Grok Headline matches for Whither USENIX?

USENIX livebl0g

USENIX livebl0g 08/12/2004 01:09 PM
Mitch Wagner sez, "I've been blogging the Usenix security conference here in San Diego, including a talk by EFF counsel Cindy Cohn:"

- EFF is deeply involved in projects to ensure honesty in e-voting. In California, she said, voters have the option to choose a paper ballot. "I'd like to see a significant percentage of people choose the paper in California. this will make the case to the rest of the country that this matters."

Many voting-rights advocates are urging people to sign up for absentee ballots--problem with that is that people order absentee ballots all the time, and legislators will assume the ordering is going on for normal reasons. Only people requesting paper ballots will make a case to legislators that people don't trust e-voting machines.

- EFF is also involved in a project called TechWatch, looking for technical people who want to be involved on election day, serving as, essentially, poll watchers, to document technical snafus on Election Day. More info and sign up on VerifiedVoting.org.

"I am concerned we will have some train wrecks involving the technology. We may not be able to prevent it but we can mitigate it and, more importantly, make sure it doesn't happen again."

Link (Thanks, Mitch!)

13th USENIX Security Symposium

13th USENIX Security Symposium 11/15/2003 01:15 PM
NetLib Nov 15 2003 12:06PM ET

2004 USENIX Annual Technical Conference

2004 USENIX Annual Technical Conference 11/15/2003 01:15 PM
NetLib Nov 15 2003 12:06PM ET

Perl6 and Parrot at the NORDU Usenix
Conference

Perl6 and Parrot at the NORDU Usenix
Conference 01/16/2004 11:05 AM
jonasbn writes "Allison Randal and Dan Sugalski are both giving tutorials on Perl6 and Parrot at the upcoming NORDU Usenix Conference running from the 28th. of january to the 1st. of february in Copenhagen/Denmark, so if you are in the vicinity of ...

Usenix President - Linux Needs Better
Paper Trail

Usenix President - Linux Needs Better
Paper Trail 05/24/2004 02:31 PM

Usenix: Experts debate security through
diversity

Usenix: Experts debate security through
diversity 07/01/2004 01:42 PM
The sheer number of worms and viruses directed at Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating system and Internet Explorer browser have many in the computer industry wondering whether we would all be more secure if more users relied on alternatives to Microsoft's products.

Usenix: Novell outlines open-source
transition

Usenix: Novell outlines open-source
transition 06/29/2004 05:23 PM
Novell will make only minimal investments in its BorderManager VPN and other products in favor of open-source alternatives as it works to create a profitable blend of open- and closed-source products.

Usenix: 'Arms race' between spammers,
spam filters under way

Usenix: 'Arms race' between spammers,
spam filters under way 06/28/2004 04:24 PM
Classifying e-mail as "good" or "junk" before it's sent to be scanned by spam filters could speed up the delivery of legitimate e-mail, according to a paper presented today at the 2004 Usenix Annual Technical Conference.

NSDI '04, USENIX/ACM Symposium on
Networked Systems Design and
Implementation

NSDI '04, USENIX/ACM Symposium on
Networked Systems Design and
Implementation 11/15/2003 01:15 PM
NetLib Nov 15 2003 12:06PM ET

Usenix: Monkey see, Monkey do, Monkey
test Web site performance

Usenix: Monkey see, Monkey do, Monkey
test Web site performance 06/29/2004 05:23 PM
Google and student developers have created an open-source tool called Monkey that's used to predict the effect on Web site response times when network conditions change.
Grok Description matches for Whither USENIX?
GrokA matches for Whither USENIX?

Raja the elephant to become a father

Raja the elephant to become a father 05/20/2004 11:34 PM
AP via New Jersey Online May 21 2004 4:06AM GMT

Raja the Elephant to Become a Father
(AP)

Raja the Elephant to Become a Father
(AP) 05/20/2004 05:21 PM
AP - Seems like only yesterday he was the bouncing baby boy of the St. Louis Zoo. Now, Raja the elephant is about to become a daddy.

Breaking up J2EE

Breaking up J2EE 06/06/2002 06:00 AM
CNET Jun 5 2002 10:13PM ET

Dentata J2EE CMS

Dentata J2EE CMS 06/04/2004 07:10 PM
Dentata J2EE CMS Approved

J2EE 1.5 previewed

J2EE 1.5 previewed 04/26/2004 07:03 PM
SAN FRANCISCO -- Ease of development will be a core focus of J2EE 1.5, the follow-up to the much-heralded J2EE 1.4, a Sun Microsystems official said on Monday.

Dot-Net vs. J2EE shootout.

Dot-Net vs. J2EE shootout. 03/12/2003 11:18 PM

The shootout was a bit too long and a little too fluffy, but I enjoyed it. I took 20 pages of notes and I will probably write them up for you later but for right now, I'll just give you some quotes from the J2EE team:

Mark Fleury: The worst dog of them all is SOAP.

Sang Shin: Security is not an industry problem, it is a Microsoft problem.

Mark Fleury: C# to be the number one language in two years: you've got to be kidding me.

Mark Fleury: JBoss is a responsible, moral, and open player.

Sang Shin: Web services is like teenage sex, everybody is talking about it but nobody is doing it.

Sang Shin: My grandmother called me last night to tell me that she is doing web services.

Mark Fleury: ADO sucks, Dot-Net caching is not there.

Greg Ackerman: C# is great, very Java like.

J2EE Security

J2EE Security 12/22/2003 01:49 PM
Simon P. Chappell writes "Security is not just for the paranoid anymore. There is plenty of documented evidence to show that there are people that are out to ...

Stitching up J2EE

Stitching up J2EE 12/02/2003 01:18 AM
Help us support both your platforms, or we'll write for neither. That seems to be what ISVs have been saying to IBM and ...

Geronimo: Apache y J2EE

Geronimo: Apache y J2EE 11/18/2003 08:07 AM

J2EE 1.5 will ease development, says Sun

J2EE 1.5 will ease development, says Sun 04/27/2004 10:22 AM
Computer Weekly Apr 27 2004 2:07PM GMT

Dynamically Typed: J2EE Guy Still
Doesn't Get PHP

Dynamically Typed: J2EE Guy Still
Doesn't Get PHP 07/01/2004 08:47 AM
Dynamically Typed has a new entry concerning the past post about Friendster going PHP, and how the J2EE guy still doesn't get it.

J2EE 'grossly unreliable'

J2EE 'grossly unreliable' 12/02/2003 01:18 AM
According to a survey published by performance testing company Wily Technology, applications that run on the J2EE ...

J2EE Design Patterns

J2EE Design Patterns 12/02/2003 01:27 AM

Sun Gives Early Peek at J2EE 1.5

Sun Gives Early Peek at J2EE 1.5 05/07/2004 07:41 AM
At the Serverside Java Symposium, Sun execs say ease of development is the major theme of the Java 2 Enterprise Edition 1.5 as Sun pushes to attract more developers.

J2EE Polls Component

J2EE Polls Component 02/12/2004 03:40 PM
v2.5.1

Sun readies J2EE 1.4, app server

Sun readies J2EE 1.4, app server 11/14/2003 05:14 PM
New version will enable the use of Web services in Java applications.

Developing for Healthcare - .NET vs
J2EE?

Developing for Healthcare - .NET vs
J2EE? 12/24/2004 12:44 PM
Slashdot Dec 24 2004 12:20AM GMT

Cyanea buy should help IBM compete in
J2EE and APS

Cyanea buy should help IBM compete in
J2EE and APS 08/10/2004 09:25 PM
Computer Weekly Aug 11 2004 1:07AM GMT

Notes from the Dot-Net vs J2EE shootout

Notes from the Dot-Net vs J2EE shootout 03/15/2003 01:29 PM

Here are my notes from the TechEngage J2EE vs. Dot-Net shootout. I tried to be objective while I took these notes Wednesday and while I typed them in today. I may have made some mistakes and I may have let some of my open-source/Java bias show through. You be the judge and leave a comment if you see something that does not look right.

Opening Statements

MS [Dot-Net]: Dot-Net is a vision of XML web services enabled by the Dot-Net Framework that happens on the Windows platform. The evolution of computing goes like this: Mainframe OLTP, Client-server OLTP, N-Tier TP monitors (MTS 1997, first OTM), web applications (J2EE, Cold Fusion, Windows DNA), and finally Web Services on the Dot-Net platform. When people learn about Dot-Net they wonder where is the app server? The app server is the Dot-Net Framework, Windows 2003 Server (with load balancing and clustering), plus developer tools (like Borland Sidewinder and Together Control Center). Windows is the app server.

Sam Shim, Sun [J2EE]: Let's talk about Microsoft's contribution to the evolution of computing. Microsoft's contribution is Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. F. U. D. FUD. Let's talk about some of the FUD that Microsoft is spreading. FUD #1 is that J2EE is expensive. Don't listen to them. J2EE is free. The analysts at Gartner say that the hidden cost of Dot-Net is 40%-60% (sorry, couldn't follow this). FUD #2 is that the Dot-Net server is a product. Dot-Net server is not a product yet. Once it is released, how many bugs will it have? How many security problems?

Microsoft says that portability is not important. This is very important. Microsoft wants to lock you in. Single vendor lock-in. Lock-in is not a horrible problem when you are talking about applications like office suites, but for infrastructure, single vendor lock-in is very dangerous and expensive. Microsoft touts interoperability, but only as a bait to draw you into single vendor lock-in. They also say that J2EE is no good for web services: wrong.

FUD #4 is that Dot-Net performs better. This is only true in Microsoft funded benchmarks that are tuned in favor of Microsoft. And look at this paper about the Dot-Net Petshop, it shows that the Petshop is pure spaghetti code. Look at this method call from the Dot-Net Petshop (everybody laughs), this method has 36 arguments. Spaghetti!

FUD #5 is that Microsoft believes in standards and interoperability, but Dot-Net is not a standard. Only about 5% of Dot-Net has been submitted as a standard. None of the important stuff you need to develop app is standard: Winforms, ADO, etc. Even when Microsoft supports a standard, they always add that "Microsoft extra" that breaks compatility with other implementations of the standard. Here is a list of examples: Kerberos, etc. etc.

Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: I like Letterman and his top ten list so here is my top ten list for J2EE:
1. Openness, avoid single user lock-in
2. Web services, J2EE fully supports
3. Superior platform support, TCO, scalability, Linux
J2EE websphere reference customers (eBay)
4. Products designed to fit your needs
5. J2EE connects to what you already have
6. World class leading development tools
7. Best dev support programs
8. Partner support
9. IBM does not compete with ISVs
10. J2EE is a complete platform

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: We are free and we don't suck. JBoss supports all of the J2EE standards and helps Sun to write those standards. JBoss has a services oriented architecture, a microkernel, and a sophisticated net-boot capability. JBoss brings you unified classloading, no more ClassNotFoundExceptions. If JBoss can't find your class, then your class really can't be found.

I'm very impressed with Dot-Net. The method and class atributes support Aspect Oriented Programming. JBoss does some of the same things, adding capabilities to your classes by using attributes, dynamic proxies, and interceptors. All of this stuff can work outside of the JBoss platform too.

JBoss is the defacto standard. 150,000 downloads per month. App server market share is 48% JBoss, 28% BEA, and then the others. JBoss offers extreme stability. JBoss group is 30 people and growing fast. Some of our references customers: EA Games SIMs online is all JBoss, Playboy (I'm very proud of this), BASF, MITRE, McDonalds, etc. etc.

Richard Weeks, NetEdge [Dot-Net]: Customers use different programming languages and Dot-Net supports 40-50 different languages. Dot-Net is all about multi-language support. Those Java guys want you to rewrite all of your code, don't do it. Don't rewrite your code, get interoperability with web services. Dot-Net does not leave anything behind, you can still use your old code.

Richard Lee, Borland [Dot-Net]: Open source is good, but sometimes there is too much choice. Microsoft has learned from Java and open source and has taken the best aspects of them and has built them into Dot-Net. Borland knows how good Dot-Net is because Dot-Net made it possible for us to build products very quickly. Our Dot-Net products come out of our Rapid Application Development (RAD) group because they are so rapid. Dot-Net makes things so easy, Microsoft is not the dark side, they are our friends.

Q1: What sets your platform apart?

Sam Shim, Sun [J2EE]: Our vision has always been "the network is the computer". We have been active in open source software with Open Office, Netbeans, and Apache. J2ME is everywhere. Java is everywhere from cars, computers, and phones to rings, smart cards, etc. Java makes true end-to-end computing possible. Our innovation continues with the N1 project which promises complete virtualization of resources, ORION to solve maintenance and upgrade problems, and Madhatter to bring Linux and open source to the desktop.

Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: The things that set J2EE apart are openness, standards, and choice. The things that set Websphere apart are scalability/TCO, web services, comprehensiveness, dev support, business partner support, support for open source, and most importantly community.

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: Everybody brags about open source. At least Microsoft is honest about it. Microsoft does not like open source and they say so. Sun is very hypocritical about open source. Both Sun and Microsoft have accused JBoss of taking away the license revenue money that drives R&D. Guilty as charged! The truth is this: the big guys can't compete at the container level and that is why you hear about portal this schmortal that. SOURCE CODE is what sets us apart. The advantages of J2EE are that it is mature, free, and ubiquitous. Dot-Net on the other hand is expensive and buggy. Remember, JBoss wants to commoditize the app server and Microsoft wants to commoditize the developer.

Richard Weeks, NetEdge [Dot-Net]: Dot-Net supports both managed and unmanaged code. Dot-Net is flexible. Sometimes web service implementations don't really follow the standard and Dot-Net helps you to get around this by allowing you to tweak how it's implemented. Plus, you can call COM objects. I know BEA has some Java2COM tool, but Dot-Net's COM support is better. The SDK and the class libraries are free and there are lots of free tools, SharpDevelop for example. You don't need a big expensive app server because Dot-Net gives you choices. You can use only the small parts that you need. Use your old code, don't rewrite it.

Microsoft [Dot-Net]: Windows is the app server and Windows is not expensive. Windows Advanced Server is only $5000. Microsoft and IBM are driving the web services standards, not Sun. Windows is a standards-based integration platform and platform integration gives Dot-Net much better performance than Java. The Dot-Net developer experience is fantastic. We've got multi-language support, the best web application development environment ever in ASP.NET, ADO.NET, and a strong versioning story.

REBUTTAL: Sam Shim, Sun [J2EE]: Sun was not involved in the Web services standards because Bill Gates was playing politics. Bill made sure that Sun did not get invited. Microsoft wants royalty based licensing included in standards. Microsoft wants to charge for every packet of information and monopolize the internet.

Q2: show and tell how you support web services?

Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: Websphere supports "on demand" computing which allows you to compose your applications as reusable services.  Let's look at a demo of creating a web services using Websphere Studio (shows an AVI animation of Websphere Studio). Let's build a stock quote web service. You can build in Websphere Studio and then use a Dot-Net client to access the web service.

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: This is when I go Phbbbbtbphphppph (makes a loud farting sound with his lips). Web services is totally vendor driven and all hype, but JBoss supports it fully. We integrate Axis. I don't have much else to say. Let me ask you some questions. How many people do Java and have a Java app in production? (20 or 30 people raise their hands)  How many people do Dot-Net and have a Dot-Net app in production? (20 or 30 people raise hands)  How many people have a app that uses both Dot-Net and Java at the same time?  (nobody raises their hands)  See? This interoperability stuff is just vendor noise. You need to avoid serialization and avoid RMI and remember SOAP is the biggest dog of them all. B2B will not work. I worked with SAP once and found that these guys can't even create a common object model across one company. B2B vendors are never going to be able to create object models that cross industries.

Richard Lee, Borland [Dot-Net]: Let's use Control Center to create a web services. You just set the project type to C# and you are off.  You can add a class using UML notation and the code is generated automatically. If you change the code, the diagram changes. If you change the diagram, the code changes. You can use a wizard to make any object into a web service.

Kenny Jones, MS [Dot-Net]: Analysts say that Microsoft has the best support for Web services. We support web services through our entire product line from Office, MS SQL, and MSMQ, to BizTalk, Excel, etc. Look at you you do web services in Dot-Net Studio. You just add an attribute to your object and it becomes a web services. Let's look at how you use a web service in Dot-Net studio. You just add a "web reference" and then you have a proxy object that you can use to call a web service.

Sam Shin, Sun [J2EE]: Web services is like teenage sex: everybody talks about it but nobody is doing it. There are three phases of web services adoption: 1)  simple (now), 2) Enterprise Application Integration (beginning) and 3) Business web services (2004).  #3 is the most important and Sun will support it through J2EE, UBL, ebXML, and the Liberty Alliance.  It is very easy to create web services by exposing EJBs, here is how you do it in Netbeans (shows a wizard).

REBUTTAL: Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: the analysts are mixed on who is the leader in web services. Some say Microsoft and some say IBM. IBM does web services for many more customers than Microsoft does.

REBUTTAL:  Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: IBM is much better on standards than MS.

REBUTTAL:  Microsoft [Dot-Net]: J2EE support for web services is irrelevant. App server vendors and open source software is pushing web services much harder than Sun.

Q3: how do you support building apps for hundreds of thousands of users?

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: To support big applications you need grid computing, but grids are too expansive when you must pay for software licenses. You also need caching and JBoss has great support for caching. Don't use serialization. Use caching. Also, you need to integrate the stack within one virtual machine.  Dow Jones uses JBoss to support 10,000 clients.

Richard Lee, Borland [Dot-Net]: How do you build N-Tier apps?  You need to use modeling and code generation. You need to use Model Driven Architecture (MDA). Here is a demo of MDA in Together Control Center.

Kenny Jones, MS [Dot-Net]: We support this by the scalability of the Windows platform with load balancing, clustering, and caching built into ASP.Net that allows you to easily cache pages and portions of pages. Also with distributed session state and the ADO disconnected data set. You need technology, but you also need the knowledge and you can get teh knowledge from the MSDN program and Microsoft Patterns and Practices. Look at all of these customers who use Microsoft to support giant customer bases Merril Lynch, London stock Exchange, etc.). To summarize, the platform is scalable and the knowledge is available.

Sam Shin, Sun [J2EE]: Java has the scalability. Sun has 64-bit support in the Java VM. When will Microsoft have that? One VM can scale up to 100 processors, X RAM, and X threads. Tremendous scalability of just one Java VM. J2EE is all about scalability and reliability. J2EE vendors compete on scalability and reliability to benefit you. Dot-Net is constrained by Windows, Dot-Net is not proven, Dot-Net is single-vendor lock-in.  Why should you be the Dot-Net guinea pig?

Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: IBM has a great deal of experience in distributed computing (CORBA, Encina, etc.).  J2EE is designed for this stuff.  Remember the case studies.  Java and VMs are scalable.

REBUTTAL: Microsoft [Dot-Net]: The analysts say that portability across J2EE app servers is going to become more and more difficult. Java app servers do contain vendor lock-in features.  Java allows you to scale to bigger more expensive hardware. With Dot-Net you won't need to do that, you can stick with the hardware you already have.

REBUTTAL: Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: The EJB spec does not give you what you need to scale, you need the cache. The spec is fighting the implementation here. J2EE is not moving fast enough. We need Aspect Oriented Programming, from Xerox, where all good things emanate. Dot-Net does not have what it takes here either: ADO sucks and Dot-Net caching is not there.

Q4: explain your platform's security system?

Richard Weeks, NetEdge [Dot-Net]: Dot-Net provides code-access security. This allows you to say where what a piece of code is allowed to do. For example, if you have a consultant that you don't trust, you can lock his code down so that it does not threaten you. Encryption is built in.  ASP.Net has forms based security. No more buffer overflows because of the Dot-Net runtime. Microsoft is putting a big emphasis on integrated securty.

Kenny Jones, MS [Dot-Net]: Windows security vulnerability is a myth. Security is an industry wide problem, not Microsoft problem.  Windows has fewer CERT security advisories than Sun or Redhat. Microsoft has a serious "trustworthy computing" initiative going on.  Microsoft won the Open Hack 4.0 contest.  Let me show you how code that is downloaded from the internet is treated differently than code that lives on your hard-drive. See: this downloaded code is not allowed to run.

Sam Shim, Sun [J2EE]: Security IS a Microsoft problem. Security must be built-in from the beginning. You cannot just bolt it on as an afterthought. Look at the passport fiasco.  Microsoft's Passport identity management system was centralized, single-point-of-failure, controlled by Microsoft, and single point-of-attack. No wonder everybody hated it and it failed.  The Liberty Alliance on the other hand is a federated system, much better.  There are 52,000 viruses for Windows and the analysts say it is time to switch away from Windows based web servers. Viruses are very expensive. The ILOVEU virus costs us $1 billion dollars. NIMBDA costs $2.6 billion. Recently, Microsoft's Craig Mundie said "we've been thinking about security for almost three years now."  Microsoft has been in business for 27 years. It took them 24 years to realized that security is important.

Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: Good for Microsoft! They finally realize that security is important, but security needs to be built-in from the start.  Look at Dot-Net security: sandboxing, code-access security, not exactly novel concepts. Dot-Net security is just a copy of Java security.  IBM is cooperating with Microsoft on Web services security.

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: UNIX has had better security than Windows for many years. Security cannot be bolted on.  Java security is excellent. JBoss did JAAS security years ago, before all of the other app server vendors.  JBoss can also use interceptors to add additional security.

REBUTTAL: Sam Shin, Sun [J2EE]: Microsoft FUD #9 is that Dot-Net is secure. Dot-Net depends on COM+ which is not managed code and is therefore unsecure. C# permits unsafe and unsecure code.  Passport has already been hacked.

Closing Statements

MS [Dot-Net]: Let's take a look at what it takes to build a mobile web app, one with an adaptive UI that looks different depending on which device you use to access it. Let me cut-and-paste some code here and let's try to run it.  Oh no, the Dot-Net server is not responding (his computer appears to lock-up).  Analysts say that C# is going to be the number #1 language in two years.

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: C# to be the #1 language in two years? You're freaking kidding me. Dot-Net has some good features, but multi-language support is just cute, no more. Without portability off of the Windows platform, Dot-Net will go nowhere.

Sam Shim, Sun [J2EE]: Java is the most powerful development technology ever.  There are 3 million Java developers, 65 million Java enabled phones, 8 million lines of Java source contributed to open source, etc. etc. The development resources are all free: open source software is almost all Java, tutorials, knowledge base, community!

Greg Ackerman, IBM [J2EE]: C# is great, very Java like.  Make the rational choice (no pun intended). VB.Net has a big learning curve, even for veteran VB programmers.  C# does too, so why don't you just go directly to Java.  We will welcome you into the community. Come on out the the Websphere Users Group and the Java Users Group meetings in the Park.

Mark Fleury, JBoss [J2EE]: JBoss is a responsible, moral, and open player. Let JBoss be the standard, not Dot-Net or J2EE.

Richard Weeks, NetEdge [Dot-Net]: We keep hearing about free this and free that. Open source is not free. Support costs money.  Multi-language is not just a cute feature. Each language has it's own unique advantages and disadvantages. C# and Java are different. C# is better.

Does J2EE live up to expectations?

Does J2EE live up to expectations? 09/06/2002 10:43 PM
CNET Sep 6 2002 10:06PM ET

The LAMP alternative to J2EE or .Net

The LAMP alternative to J2EE or .Net 04/06/2005 12:14 PM
Linux, Apache, MySQL and either Perl, PHP or Python provide low-cost, open-source options.

Does J2EE live up to hype?

Does J2EE live up to hype? 09/09/2002 10:39 PM
CNET Sep 9 2002 10:11PM ET

J2EE 1.4 OKs Open Source App Server

J2EE 1.4 OKs Open Source App Server 07/19/2004 07:51 AM
Once a staunch foe of Sun's J2EE licensing requirements, JBoss is now embracing certification.

JBoss closing in on J2EE certification

JBoss closing in on J2EE certification 06/28/2004 08:05 PM
SAN FRANCISCO -- Open source software vendor JBoss, which has offered an open source Java application server sans J2EE certification, is closing in on that accreditation, according to the company?s chief executive.

Microsoft J2EE & .NET Interoperability
Toolkit

Microsoft J2EE & .NET Interoperability
Toolkit 06/09/2004 11:57 PM
Microsoft J2EE & .NET Interoperability Toolkit includes an eBook with introduction to Interoperability Technologies and sample codes.

Roundhouse J2EE Application Platform

Roundhouse J2EE Application Platform 04/15/2004 02:24 PM
Roundhouse Home Page

Sun releases first J2EE 1.4-compliant
app server

Sun releases first J2EE 1.4-compliant
app server 04/16/2004 06:28 AM
Sun Microsystems, still smarting from yet another poor financial quarter -- a $760 million loss in fiscal Q3 -- Friday announced some good news: the general availability of the first J2EE 1.4-compliant standard application server. The new server follows two key Sun development product releases in the last two weeks: the open source NetBeans 3.6 and the graphical Java Studio Creator IDE.

Adobe releases J2EE product

Adobe releases J2EE product 06/07/2004 01:54 PM
CNET Jun 7 2004 6:02PM GMT

BEA Webl0gic, J2EE Application Architect

BEA Webl0gic, J2EE Application Architect 07/09/2004 06:39 PM
Principle Application Architect (BEA, J2EE) needed in Philadelphia

.NET and J2EE Performance and
Scalability Benchmarks

.NET and J2EE Performance and
Scalability Benchmarks 06/10/2004 05:51 PM
This webcast covers .NET and J2EE Performance and Scalability Benchmarks.

Whither USENIX?

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: moazam raja j2ee