Anonymous
Grok Headline matches for Anonymous
Anonymous file sharing network not so
anonymous after all?
Anonymous file sharing network not so
anonymous after all?
12/02/2003 12:12 PMAn anonymous file-sharing network, "Winny," has proven to be not so
anonymous for 2 Japanese men who were arrested for trading games and
films.
Anonymous bosh
Anonymous bosh
06/17/2005 04:50 PMIn
comments below, Scott Butki asked, "Does it seem odd - or
hypocritical to you - that the mantra at news organizations in recent
weeks has switched from 'anonymous sources are bad to use' to 'Deep
Throat was good for doing what he did and Woodstein good to use him,'
ignoring the contradiction between the two?"
Good question, and I'm sure one that many people are scratching
their heads over. What's going on here? Are anonymous sources really
the big problem they seem to be in the wake of the Dan Rather and
Newsweek/Koran controversies? On the other hand, if news organizations
get too gun-shy about anonymous sources, how will anyone ever be able
to keep reporting on the buttoned-tight Bush White House?
It's funny to watch people try to get their heads around the
apparent contradictions between "anonymous sources -- good!" and
"anonymous sources -- bad!" Really, they're only contradictions if you
treat the issue as a matter of journalistic technique (the use of
unnamed sources) rather than one about the end to which the technique
is employed. The distinction that really matters isn't between
"anonymous source" and "named source"; it's between "good source" and
"bad source." Good sources can be anonymous; bad sources can be
on-the-record. What experienced journalists and editors do is assess,
assess, assess. Make sure you're not being used. Double-check your
info. Use your sense of smell. The theory is that an on-the-record
statement is more reliable than an anonymous statement, since the
person quoted has to defend his words in public. That's a good theory,
and it often applies. But it doesn't seem to stop most public
officials from mouthing the most absurd lies, damned lies and
statistics on the record. And despite the rule-of-thumb that
on-the-record is more reliable, there are some circumstances where
unnamed sourcing is the only way to get the truth out.
One reason people are getting confused is that Woodward and
Bernstein's use of Deep Throat was a fundamentally different kind of
anonymous sourcing than we typically see in today's Beltway. Mark
Felt/Deep Throat fed information to Bob Woodward because (a) there
were profound dangers to the nation in play -- we had a president who
was, among many other outrages, ordering his political opponents
burglarized -- and (b) going to the press was the only option, because
the idea of "going to the authorities" is laughable when the
authorities are the wrongdoers and they've corrupted the system from
the top.
I'm not belittling the complexity of Felt's choice; and obviously
the man was conflicted for the rest of his life. It's never easy to be
a whistleblower, and if you're an unconventional whistleblower stuck
in a duel with All the President's Men, you've got to be careful as
well as right. Felt is certainly no pure hero, but the derision he's
received from the surviving coterie of Nixon loyalists is beneath
contempt. This old guard of die-hard Nixonians still haven't gotten it
through their heads that their former boss actually stole an election
(if it weren't for all the dirty tricks employed against Democrats in
1972, who knows where the vote would have gone?) and, left unchecked,
might well have destroyed the American system of government. Their
complaints against Felt today only demonstrate how lucky we were that
there was at least one "disloyal" Deep Throat willing to say, this
nonsense stops here.
Today's anonymous sources are, for the most part, different.
They're not risking anything by speaking up. Generally, they are
choosing to be anonymous to avoid taking a risk. They want to
float a trial balloon but don't want their name attached. They want to
undermine a political rival. They want to state something a little
politically inconvenient without leaving it on the record.
Anonymous sourcing evolved in the years since Watergate from an
extraordinary tactic for an extraordinary time into a depressingly
routine way of doing business for the political elite. The Bush
administration itself has been extravagantly dependent on the opaque
cloak of anonymity -- the "highly placed White House official" who
assures us that the war is going better, or the economy's on the mend.
This is the sort of anonymous sourcing that ombudsmen and
editorial editors and journalism pundits are right to say should be
banned. There's no need for it.
As for the Watergate tradition of anonymous sourcing: every time
there's a president who's illegally abusing power, let's hope there's
a Deep Throat ready to talk, a Woodward ready to take notes, and a Ben
Bradlee ready to run the stories. Oh, yeah -- it also helps if the
opposition party controls at least one house of Congress. Otherwise,
you could catch the President himself robbing a hotel room -- or
starting a war under false pretenses -- and it wouldn't matter.
Not So Anonymous Reviews
Not So Anonymous Reviews
02/14/2004 11:51 PMAmazon Glitch Unmasks
War of Reviewers: Amazon accidentally posted the real names of
anonymous book reviewers on their site, and in the process, revealed
that the whole user-submitted review process is garbage.
But even with reviewer privacy restored, many people say
Amazon's pages have turned into what one writer called "a rhetorical
war," where friends and family members are regularly corralled to
write glowing reviews and each negative one is scrutinized for the
digital fingerprints of known enemies.
One well-known writer admitted privately — and gleefully — to
anonymously criticizing a more prominent novelist who he felt had
unfairly reaped critical praise for years. She regularly posts
responses, or at least he thinks it is her, but the elegant rebuttals
of his reviews are also written from behind a
pseudonym.
Click here to comment on this entry
Wikis Anonymous
Wikis Anonymous
09/07/2004 04:43 AMBrian Lamb has a great article on wikis in academia in EDUCAUSE
Review. I didn't interview for the piece (otherwise would have shared
how academic communities are using Socialtext), but Brian more than
did his homework and sources from some...
a sad look at anonymous bl0gging
a sad look at anonymous bl0gging
06/29/2004 12:58 AMi've always been slightly saddened by reading mike's project, and now
i realize why
"Anonymous Lawyer"
"Anonymous Lawyer"
12/28/2004 10:49 AMSome advice to anonymous bl0ggers
Some advice to anonymous bl0ggers
04/09/2004 04:09 PMDon Park has
a good warning post on
potential XSS hacks. A typical example of these is
Haloscan, who does
provide commenting and trackback capabilities also to a number of
Finnish bloggers.
However, sometimes no clever hacking is required. Haloscan actually
provides RSS feeds of all the comments, making it really easy to
subscribe to the comments of a blog. This is cool and clever, and I
wholly applaud this. The Feed can be found at:
http://haloscan.com/members/rss.php?user=<username>
You can figure out the username by looking at the HTML source, or just
by guessing (most people use their blog names).
Up until last weekend, Haloscan also provided IP addresses in the
feeds. This meant that IF an anonymous blogger was commenting in his
own blog, it was possible to find his IP address. If the said person
would then comment on other blogs under his real name (or visit your
own blog, where you have some sort of site tracking), it was possible
to either figure out his real identity, or at least the Pinseri
account name (a known Finnish aggregator). Haloscan has now removed
this feature, so it's safe again to use it. I have not checked other
comment services whether they also have this issue.
Note that figuring out the IP address does not reveal your identity.
But if combined with other information, it may be possible to figure
out who you are. Or at least make a very educated guess.
Another issue you have to be careful with if you are an anonymous
blogger is that if someone sends you email with a link, don't click
it. If you do, something like this might appear on the recipient's log
files (let's assume the anonymous blogger has an yahoo.com mail
account, and I've sent him an email to ask to come to my weblog.)
cs65129.pp.htv.fi - - [31/Mar/2004:16:52:08 +0300]
"GET /ButtUgly/ HTTP/1.1"
200 35547
"http://us.f413.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4207_26017
7_12756_
1095_187_0_87_-1_0&YY=51786&inc=25&order=down&
amp;amp;sort=date&
pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox"
"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/124
(KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1"
Due to the referrer (mail.yahoo.com) it's rather easy to figure out
which of the hits came from your mysterious web friend. Now we know
that he lives in Helsinki and has a cable modem, and that he uses a
Mac OS X 10.3 computer. If you embed suitable Javascript on your
weblog, it is possible to figure out even some more things. If he,
however, had cut and paste the address from the mail to the address,
you get something like this:
cs65129.pp.htv.fi - - [31/Mar/2004:16:59:34 +0300]
"GET /ButtUgly/ HTTP/1.1"
200 35558
"-"
"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/124
(KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.1"
There's now a lot less evidence to tie the mysterious Yahoo user to a
specific IP address because of the missing referrer field. Yet, it is
still possible, but it will require a bit more data and logic. Of
course, if he'd wanted to be absolutely safe, he would've used a
service like Anonymizer, in which case the
line would look like this:
outgoing.anonymizer.com - - [31/Mar/2004:17:02:12 +0300]
"GET /ButtUgly/ HTTP/1.1"
200 34933 "-" "Mozilla/4.78 (TuringOS;
Turing Machine; 0.0)"
Not a lot to pinpoint you, yes?
So, a couple of practical tips, if you want to protect your online
anonymity:
- Don't click on links from web mail, cut-n-paste them to your
address bar.
- Check out all the services that you are using that none of them
is leaking information about you
- If possible, use a web proxy (like anonymizer), or only assume
your anonymous identity
...
Amazon Says No More To Anonymous Reviews
Amazon Says No More To Anonymous Reviews
07/30/2004 03:51 PMThis was mentioned earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal, but
without a non-paid source to point to, we skipped over it. However,
Amazon has apparently had enough of
authors
reviewing their own books on the site and has put in a new system
that will
require a
credit card as proof of identification before you can add a new
review to the site. Might be interesting to see what kind of impact
this has on reviews... and sales.
Complete Anonymous Web Surfing v1.2
Complete Anonymous Web Surfing v1.2
01/26/2004 06:29 PMComplete Anonymous Web Surfing is an Internet utility to hide your IP
address while you are browsing the web.IP address is your internet
identification number which is detectable by any web site that you
visit.Complete Anonymous Web Surfing is fully automatic. You don't
need to have any knowledge of setting up proxy connections. Just click
"Autopilot" and watch. [Shareware $39.00 4 Days 1012 KB]
Anonymous Comments: Some Rules
Anonymous Comments: Some Rules
02/10/2004 02:41 AMWe allow anonymous postings on this blog. If you don't want to give
your true e-mail address you are free to make one up.
I would prefer that people post under their real names, though I
understand a reluctance to give an e-mail address that shows up in a
way the spammers can easily use. We're working on a fix for that.
But we can't let people post comments and use e-mail addresses
referring to real domains to which they have no connection. That seems
to have happened here in the past several days, and other folks have
accused the anonymous commenter of being someone else -- and that
person insists he's not the one.
Airport scanners keep it anonymous
Airport scanners keep it anonymous
03/14/2005 06:23 PMZDNet Mar 14 2005 10:06PM GMT
Anonymous CVS issues resolved
Anonymous CVS issues resolved
03/13/2003 10:15 AM
UPDATE: We are pleased to announce that SourceForge have resolved the
issues with anonymous CVS access, and the selfupdate-cvs command
should work again. Further details on the downtime can be found on the
SourceForge.net site status page.
Introduction to C# Anonymous Methods
Introduction to C# Anonymous Methods
12/29/2004 06:06 AMMicrosoft MVP Patrick Smacchia shows how the new C# version 2
anonymous method functionality works and how it can be used. This
language enhancement is implemented solely via the compiler and
doesn't require changes in the IL. Of particular importance is the
ability to use local variables within anonymous methods.
Closures for anonymous storage
Closures for anonymous storage
09/22/2004 08:44 AMVia The 80/20 Solution I saw a piece of Python code by John Lam, which
he calls elegant. Now he is right to call it elegant ? he is comparing
it with his experience to implement the same in C++. But he uses a
technique which you see a lot in scripting, but which I find rather
unelegant: creation of propertynames (or attributenames) with string
manipulations. ?
AOL filter prevents anonymous email
AOL filter prevents anonymous email
01/22/2004 08:41 AMZDNet UK Jan 22 2004 12:58PM GMT
Anonymous Software Rumor Grab-Bag
Anonymous Software Rumor Grab-Bag
03/13/2003 10:15 AMWe're often sent tips anonymously that never make it the front page.
Here are three unverified software rumors that arrived at our doorstep
in an unmarked package this week.
Adobe is said to be finishing up an OS X version of Acrobat Distiller
6. The pricey conversion utility can be seen here and here, though no
word on its release date was available.
***
A purported Safari tester says that the next public release of Apple's
beta browser is targeted for the second week of March,...
Can File Sharing Really Be Made
Anonymous?
Can File Sharing Really Be Made
Anonymous?
05/07/2004 12:11 PMIt's no surprise that the creators of the latest file sharing networks
are all claiming that it makes users anonymous. Everyone expected
that to happen. The bigger question, however, is
whether or not these systems really are anonymous. The
RIAA (and plenty of others) say that it's not really possible for
anyone to be totally anonymous while file sharing - and these claims
of anonymity are a little bit suspect. The main one discussed in the
article doesn't really sound anonymous. All it does is try to confuse
the RIAA by mixing the real IP address with the IP addresses of others
on the network. What that means, though, is now the RIAA will just
accuse more innocent people because their IP address was shown
associated with someone who was sharing illegally. Of course, this
whole debate on anonymity misses the most basic point about online
anonymity: the user can be perfectly anonymous if there's no way to
associate him or her with the particular IP address they're using.
Topic: identity. Author: anonymous.
Topic: identity. Author: anonymous.
07/08/2004 02:22 PM

The
current
issue of
Digital ID
World just arrived. While reading an article about
CoreStreet, a company whose
identity technologies have
intrigued 1 me<
/a> for a while, I noticed something strangely missing from the
article: a byline.
...
"interviewed that anonymous intelligence
official"
"interviewed that anonymous intelligence
official"
06/20/2004 03:52 AMBluejacking: anonymous Bluetooth
messaging
Bluejacking: anonymous Bluetooth
messaging
11/01/2003 12:57 PMBluejacking is the art of sending a message to a nearby stranger's
Bluetooth phone, having first encoded the message as the "Name" field
of an address-book entry, i.e., "Name: I have bluejacked you, I 0wn
l0l0l0l0l." BluejackQ is a new community site for posting bluejacking
experiences.
Ellie and I were just outside a shopping centre in town and she was
searching for a victim near where we were sitting. She came up with a
contact; some Nokia, I'm not sure which one. We found out a few
minutes later that our victim (who showed an un-canny resemblance to
Alan Ford) was sitting in Starbucks with his wife.
After they'd left Starbucks, we followed the couple all over town for
about 30mins. He couldn't understand what was happening to him and was
looking around all over the place for his bluejacker! We went up and
down, around in circles, dodging his stare; quite literally, up in
lifts, down on escalators!
Link
(
via Smartmobs)
Yahoo sued over anonymous abuse
Yahoo sued over anonymous abuse
08/06/2004 02:24 AMBBC Aug 6 2004 6:48AM GMT
"Tor anonymous Internet communication
system"
"Tor anonymous Internet communication
system"
12/26/2004 04:29 AMSo Mr. Anonymous-cablenet-provider guy,
I respect the 10
So Mr. Anonymous-cablenet-provider guy,
I respect the 10
09/19/2004 03:49 PMTechTree Sep 19 2004 5:45PM GMT
Up north, anonymous reviewers revealed
Up north, anonymous reviewers revealed
02/14/2004 01:29 PMglobetechnology.com Feb 14 2004 4:06PM GMT
The Furious Rise of the Anonymous Writer
The Furious Rise of the Anonymous Writer
02/10/2004 02:35 AMChristopher Farah, Salon: I know you are but who am I? The furious
rise of the anonyblogger. Parody: You don?t?
Tor anonymous Internet communication
system
Tor anonymous Internet communication
system
12/22/2004 01:04 AMThe
Tor anonymous Internet communication
system has an oniony, user-friendly new Web site to go along with
their
EFF
funding. Besides hiding from government and big business snoops,
Tor is also great when using open wireless networks.
Send (Free) Anonymous and Masked SMS
Messages
Send (Free) Anonymous and Masked SMS
Messages
02/01/2005 08:48 PMthrillEX (Sydney) is set to launch theSMSzone.com, a service that
allows people to send free anonymous and masked SMS messages, using
the internet on the 2nd of January, 2005. [PRWEB Feb 1, 2005]
News & Features | The secret history of
Anonymous
News & Features | The secret history of
Anonymous
07/01/2004 08:50 PMSupposedly Anonymous File Sharers
Arrested
Supposedly Anonymous File Sharers
Arrested
12/02/2003 03:09 AMEver since the recording industry started cracking down on file
sharers by going after them with lawyers, new services have been
popping up promising "anonymity" for anyone who uses them. Of course,
most don't give much proof for that claim, and you might want to think
twice before believing it. Two file sharers in Japan have apparently
been
arrested, despite using a supposedly anonymous service. They
don't say how they tracked these folks down, but it's making people
wonder just how anonymous these anonymous systems really are.
"anonymous ex-Delta force officers
notwithstanding"
"anonymous ex-Delta force officers
notwithstanding"
11/02/2003 03:13 PMHandling anonymous file uploads in
ColdFusion.
Handling anonymous file uploads in
ColdFusion.
08/17/2002 02:03 AMSometimes it is necessary to allow absolute strangers to upload files
to your server through a form. When that happens you can find yourself
giving away the keys to the server. This article intends to show you
where to start with limiting the files submitted by unauthenticated
users.
Proposed legislation to jail anonymous
webmasters
Proposed legislation to jail anonymous
webmasters
02/12/2004 04:59 PM Cnet News reports that Congressman Lamar Smith of Texas - the
chairman of the Internet and Intellectual Property Subcommittee -
recently proposed the Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act which
would make giving false contact information for domain name
registration a criminal offence punishable by up to seven years in
prison. The justification according to Congressman Smith: "To
make it easier to track down miscreants. 'The government must play a
greater role in punishing those who conceal their identities online,
particularly when they do so in furtherance of a serious federal
criminal offense or in violation of a federally protected intellectual
property right.' (Wired News also has published an article on the
issue.)
anonymous instant photo-phone mobl0gging
anonymous instant photo-phone mobl0gging
12/31/2003 02:24 PMMOBOG
mobog.com
track this
site | 5 links
invisibl0g.com (beta) - Anonymous Webl0g
Publishing
invisibl0g.com (beta) - Anonymous Webl0g
Publishing
02/15/2004 07:43 AMinvisiblog.com (beta) - Anonymous Weblog
Publishinghttp://invisiblog.com/invisiblog.com lets you publish a weblog using
GPG and the
Mixmaster anonymous
remailer network. You don't ever have to reveal your identity - not
even to them. You don't have to trust them, because they will never
know who you are. This has been added to my Subject Tracer™
Information Blog
Privacy
Resources.
Internet offers fans anonymous forum
Internet offers fans anonymous forum
07/05/2004 06:09 AMAzcentral.com - Mon Jul 5, 09:09 am GMT
JBoss Caught in Anonymous Posting Scheme
JBoss Caught in Anonymous Posting Scheme
05/18/2004 05:58 PMH&R Block sues anonymous online critic
H&R Block sues anonymous online critic
11/14/2003 02:55 PMSiliconValley.com Nov 14 2003 1:43PM ET
LiveWire: in Search of Truly Anonymous
File-Sharing
LiveWire: in Search of Truly Anonymous
File-Sharing
05/08/2004 09:12 AMBoston Globe May 8 2004 1:11PM GMT
Anonymous Former Netscape Executive
Donates $4,200 to AmiZilla Project
Anonymous Former Netscape Executive
Donates $4,200 to AmiZilla Project
01/07/2004 03:07 PMGrok Description matches for Anonymous
GrokA matches for Anonymous
Anonymous