Hit CD with copy protection may signal fan acceptance
Grok Headline matches for Hit CD with copy protection may signal fan acceptance
Now Books Can Have Copy Protection Too
Now Books Can Have Copy Protection Too
12/10/2003 03:27 AMWhile the publishing industry has always had an uneasy relationship
with the photocopier, they've pretty much accepted the fact that you
simply can't copy protect printed materials. That may be changing.
Ricoh has announced that they've created a copier that
will
block the copying of confidential documents. The way it works is
that when the original documents are printed, they need to include
special, barely visible dots, which can be understood by the copier as
copy protection. But, only on that copier. How far do you think this
idea is going to go? Here's a copier that actually offers less
functionality and requires people to do something extra when printing
out documents, while making sure that the only copiers around are
equipped with this special anti-copying technology. Otherwise, the
person who tries to copy a document and can't will simply walk down
the hall (or down the street to a Kinko's) and copy it somewhere else.
This is like putting weak copy protection on a CD and then saying
"well, the copy protection only works if you use these special CD
players."
Apple, iPod, and CD Copy Protection
Apple, iPod, and CD Copy Protection
07/20/2004 12:45 PM
CNet reports that two of the major companies responsible for Audio-CD
based copy protection methods are approaching Apple to make their CDs
compatible...
Longhorn's Copy Protection Standard
Longhorn's Copy Protection Standard
09/16/2004 03:14 PMSony to try new copy protection scheme
Sony to try new copy protection scheme
11/11/2003 03:21 PMSony will be trying out a new copy protection scheme in Germany. The
multisession CDs will contain DRM-enabled music files which can be
easily copied to a PC
Notes and Tips: CD Copy Protection
Notes and Tips: CD Copy Protection
01/27/2004 11:30 AMChris Sansom shared his experience with one of the non-standard,
copy-prevented CDs that are becoming more common.
Microsoft Unveils New Copy Protection
Microsoft Unveils New Copy Protection
05/03/2004 05:18 AMContinuing efforts by the content industry to make sure people can do
less with content than they could before, Microsoft is
releasing new copy
protection technology today. It still amazes me that an entire
industry could be so focused on preventing people from doing what they
want. In other news - just not reported yet - it's likely that plenty
of people have already figured out how to break Microsoft's new copy
protection scheme.
Copy Protection on the Velvet Revolver
CD? Ya Right!
Copy Protection on the Velvet Revolver
CD? Ya Right!
06/29/2004 01:00 AMSeems some folks at Engadget bought the CD and had no troubles
making MP3's on various components and operating systems. Good review
for those of you that actually still but CD's [Engadget
a>]
Copy Protection At The Apple Store
Copy Protection At The Apple Store
03/30/2005 12:56 AM By David Pogue, New York Times
Misleading With Statistics On Copy
Protection
Misleading With Statistics On Copy
Protection
03/19/2005 03:18 AMThis one is just bizarre. In a recent study, about copy protection, a
research firm is claiming that
"consumers are not
overwhelmingly antagonistic" towards copy protection. Even if
this was true, it wouldn't prove that copy protection is good for
business. Consumers may simply be ignorant about copy protection and
what it means for them and for future offerings. However, the
real
issue is that the actual stats don't seem to support the
conclusion at all. The study compared how many people would buy a
"copy once" CD at a lower price, and found that 33% of those who don't
rip CDs would buy the cheaper copy protected CD. That means 67% of
those who
don't copy CDs wouldn't buy a copy protected CD
even if it were noticeably cheaper. That is, even though it
provides no direct benefit to them (they don't rip, so why should they
care), they still won't buy it. That certainly makes it sound like
users are
quite antagonistic to copy protection. Even those
who it won't directly impact don't want it at a cheaper price. How
can anyone claim this means users aren't antagonistic to the idea with
a straight face when the data clearly shows the opposite?
iTunes copy protection cracked on the
Web
iTunes copy protection cracked on the
Web
12/02/2003 12:17 AM
A well-known
programmer has released an
application to the Web, which
allows users to defeat the anti-copying measures underpinning
Apple's iTunes
downloading service .
The application, QTFairUse, removes the digital rights management (
DRM ) layer from the target sound file, using a QuickTime
stream, leaving the music untouched and capable of infinite
copying.
Based on the name and Web commentary, the goal of the hack is to
promote the creator's notion of fair use . Some suspect a Windows iTunes
version is on the
way .
CD Copy Protection Case Goes to Court
CD Copy Protection Case Goes to Court
01/05/2004 08:35 AMOne More Reason Why Copy Protection
Isn't The Issue
One More Reason Why Copy Protection
Isn't The Issue
04/07/2005 12:55 PMA recurring theme over the past month or so as many folks seem to be
bringing back the "content is king" meme, is that all of these
broadcast content creation companies are completely missing the point.
On both the
inter
net and
on
mobile phones, people are using them to
communicate, not to
passively consume content. The Guardian is now running an article
from someone who just recognized this. He has a TV, so he doesn't
really want more TV content via his internet connection. He wants to
be able to
c
ommunicate with friends and family -- which means creating his own
content and sharing other content. This is the main reason why all of
these attempts at copy protection and locking up content behind walls
is misguided online. All it does is make the content that much less
valuable, because it can't be discussed and it can't be shared.
Trying to copy protect content is thinking about how to make the
internet act more like a TV -- but we already have TVs. The internet
and mobile phones are about communicating and
user generated
content. Copy protection doesn't help anyone communicate -- it just
makes it more difficult.
Sony's New Nagging Copy Protection
Sony's New Nagging Copy Protection
06/17/2005 03:38 PMSlashdot Jun 17 2005 8:03PM GMT
Game Copy Protection: It's 1994 All Over
Again
Game Copy Protection: It's 1994 All Over
Again
04/09/2004 04:09 PMCaught in the middle are regular, run of the mill consumers. By Peter
Cohen, Macworld (via MyAppleMenu)
Suing The Music Industry For Copy
Protection
Suing The Music Industry For Copy
Protection
01/05/2004 04:55 AMA Belgian consumer watchdog group, Test-Achats, is now
suing some of
the big record labels for installing copy protection on their CDs.
The article is a little unclear on what legal basis they seem to be
suing - but it sounds like it's one of two things (or possibly both):
(1) the CDs are not clearly labeled and don't play on certain
equipment, meaning that they're defective or (2) by adding copy
protection, the CD takes away the rights of users to make personal
copies. While I do think copy protection is a costly and pointless
tool used by the recording industry, I'm not sure there's much of a
case here (other than - perhaps - on the labeling issue). I don't
think there's any legal reason why the industry should be prevented
from putting copy protection on their CDs. I just think it's a bad
business decision that will add to the cost while making the product
worse for consumers. However, if the industry wants to shoot itself
in the foot, that's completely up to them.
Update: In related
news, a
consortium of big name players in the tech world are trying
to come up with a new copy protection scheme that they say will work.
It's designed to allow for limited copying and sharing, while also
taking into account the fact that most people want their content to be
portable. Of course, like every other content protection scheme it
will be broken very quickly - and thus, will only inconvenience
legitimate users.
incorporate copy protection technology
in their boxes
incorporate copy protection technology
in their boxes
09/11/2004 09:02 AMTiVo, ReplayTV Agree to Limits .. Silicon Valley Mercury
News
siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/9616558.htm
track this
site | 6 links
Year in review: Copy protection goes
mainstream
Year in review: Copy protection goes
mainstream
01/03/2004 03:37 AMHackers and critics kept up their opposition, but consumers and
businesses began accepting digital rights management.
Philips, HP copy-protection ready for
new FCC rules
Philips, HP copy-protection ready for
new FCC rules
01/05/2005 04:37 PMLAS VEGAS - Philips Electronics and Hewlett-Packard have developed a
Plus-format DVD copy-protection system that allows the recording of
digital TV broadcasts under the U.S. Federal Communications
Commission's (FCC's) broadcast-flag regulation that takes effect in
July, the companies announced Wednesday at the Consumer Electronics
Show in Las Vegas. Products that include the new technology will be
available soon.
Nokia Says Its N-Gage Copy Protection
Hacked
Nokia Says Its N-Gage Copy Protection
Hacked
11/13/2003 06:30 AMBuilding the AACS Next-Gen Copy
Protection Scheme
Building the AACS Next-Gen Copy
Protection Scheme
01/04/2005 03:26 PMEMI admits CD copy protection
compatibility problems
EMI admits CD copy protection
compatibility problems
02/13/2004 09:18 AMFix coming in April
Microsoft, Macrovision align on copy
protection
Microsoft, Macrovision align on copy
protection
02/01/2005 09:57 PMMicrosoft and copy-protection company Macrovision have struck a deal
that will add a new layer of anticopying defenses to video content
being swapped between home devices.
The two companies said that Microsoft had licensed Macrovision's
technology, which aims to stop people from making copies using analog
connections between devices, such as those that typically link a
set-top box to a television.
The deal could make it harder for consumers to make permanent copies
of TV shows and movies without permission, if they use computers
running the Windows operating system. It should also help convince
movie studios and other content producers to release their products in
new ways online, the companies said.
"We think that long term, the studios will offer more interesting
products over the Internet using this technology," said Brad Brunell,
Microsoft's general manager of intellectual-property licensing.
Sony Music Testing New Copy Protection
Sony Music Testing New Copy Protection
11/11/2003 08:13 AMRandyOo writes "According to this Reuters article, Sony Music is about
to start testing a new type of 'copy protection' in Germany. It looks
like they'll be ...
Microsoft Debuts CD Copy-Protection
Software
Microsoft Debuts CD Copy-Protection
Software
03/20/2003 01:05 PMMicrosoft has released a new digital rights software package intended
to stop unauthorized duplication of copyrighted CDs and DVDs. Called
the Windows Media Data Session Toolkit, the software is geared toward
the needs of large record labels, which claim illicit copying has
become a serious threat to the music industry.
brain-dead DVD+RW "copy protection", or
occam's coincidence?
brain-dead DVD+RW "copy protection", or
occam's coincidence?
11/18/2003 11:36 AMI have purchased two USB DVD writers - one a Freecom FX50 DVD+-RW and
the other an HP DVD300e. Both drives, after initially working, failed
to operate after burning a DVD.
A report on CD
Freaks is making me suspicious as to what is going on.
Anyone else with similar experiences, or any clues?
Company Offers Workaround for Sony's CD
Copy Protection
Company Offers Workaround for Sony's CD
Copy Protection
06/22/2005 02:17 AMA simple mechanical way for Windows users to defeat SunnComm's
MediaMaxx copy protection scheme, used widely in audio CDs produced by
Sony BMG, is being offered on request via e-mail by SunnComm itself,
the company's vice president of marketing and sales, Scott Stoegbauer,
told Tom's Hardware Guide today.
The scheme was developed by SunnComm through its MediaMaxx division in
order to prevent listeners on Windows-based PCs from easily making
copies of audio CD-based music as MP3 files. Other software currently
produced by SunnComm does enable legitimate copies to be made in
Windows Media format (WMV), which cannot be (easily) burned to CD.

News source:
Tom's Hardware GuideRead full story...Controversial StarForce Copy Protection
Creators Quizzed
Controversial StarForce Copy Protection
Creators Quizzed
08/19/2004 04:06 AMMusic Labels To Use New Copy Protection
To Prevent CD Burning
Music Labels To Use New Copy Protection
To Prevent CD Burning
06/02/2004 10:10 AMAs if anyone didn't see this one coming... The various music labels
are now experimenting with new copy protection technology on (what
they'd still like to call) CDs that would
limit the number of times you
could burn a copy of the CD. Basically, they'll now be spending
more money (which will be passed on to consumers) to make sure the
product you buy does less. Doesn't seem like the greatest of business
strategies, but the industry isn't known for its longterm thinking.
In the meantime, it will take less than a day for the real
counterfeiters to get around this technology, and the only people who
will actually be inconvenienced are people trying to burn a copy for
fair use, who will suddenly find they can't do what is perfectly legal
to do.
Copy Protection or Scumware? - Installs
Hidden Devices
Copy Protection or Scumware? - Installs
Hidden Devices
06/13/2004 07:27 AMCopy protection to extend to multiple
but limited burns
Copy protection to extend to multiple
but limited burns
06/10/2004 09:37 AMBracing for America
Group calls for copy-protection Rosetta
stone
Group calls for copy-protection Rosetta
stone
07/20/2004 02:44 PMMPEG founder looks for standards that let portable music and video
players speak the same language.
Mobile Alliance Lines Up Copy Protection
Patents
Mobile Alliance Lines Up Copy Protection
Patents
01/06/2005 06:52 AMThe Open Mobile Alliance, which has been working feverishly on a copy
protection standard for mobile phones has announced that they've
gotten past one major hurdle:
getting all the various patent
holders to pool the patents. What this means is that this
standard is likely to move forward on mobile phones, as it has pretty
widespread industry support. Of course, that doesn't mean it's really
good for anyone. While some say that this copy protection will make
companies more comfortable releasing content, that's a
total red herring. If there's demand for the content, it'll find
it's way to the device. Copy protection won't actually "protect" any
content. It will still get out there. However, it will make life
more difficult for legitimate purchasers of content who will be
annoyed to find they can't do what they want with the content. If
anything, all this announcement really means is that we'll all be
paying more, because everyone is going to have to pay royalties for
these newly pooled patents. So, let's see... the content isn't
actually protected and still gets copied for unauthorized users,
consumers have fewer rights to do what the want to do with the content
they actually acquired legitimately, and everything costs more.
Sounds useful.
Group calls for copy protection Rosetta
stone
Group calls for copy protection Rosetta
stone
07/20/2004 04:15 PMMPEG founder looks for standards that let portable music and video
players speak the same language.
Sony preps updated CD copy protection
trial
Sony preps updated CD copy protection
trial
11/11/2003 08:11 AMCarrot as well as stick this time
Microsoft Talking To The Recording
Industry About Copy Protection
Microsoft Talking To The Recording
Industry About Copy Protection
09/17/2004 02:31 PMIt looks like Cory Doctorow's talk to Microsoft about
why
copy protection is bad for everyone -- including the recording
industry, customers, and Microsoft itself -- didn't have much of an
impact. Microsoft is now
in talks with the
recording industry about how to build copy protection into their
next generation operating system to make sure you can't actually do
what you want with the music you buy. Of course, this is likely to be
an expensive waste of time that will only annoy legitimate buyers by
causing problems. The people who really want to copy music will
figure out workarounds. The large counterfeiters will already have
big workarounds, so it won't impact their business at all. The only
people impacted will be people who want to do perfectly legitimate
things with the music they bought, but find out they're blocked
because Microsoft and the recording industry doesn't trust them.
No more mister nice guy: EMI, Sony-BMG
revisit CD copy protection
No more mister nice guy: EMI, Sony-BMG
revisit CD copy protection
06/22/2005 02:47 AMLack of Fairplay
Real Networks To Launch Own Copy
Protection Store
Real Networks To Launch Own Copy
Protection Store
01/06/2004 03:13 AMClearly, we don't have enough incompatible formats for music download
stores, because Real Networks has decided they can make a real dent in
the marketplace by offering
yet another me-too music download store - but with
increased copy protection that no one supports. Thus, you can
download songs from Real, but you won't be able to play them on just
about any digital music player right now. How does this benefit
consumers? That part isn't clear.
More Stupid Copy Protection That Does
Nothing But Piss Off Legitimate Users
More Stupid Copy Protection That Does
Nothing But Piss Off Legitimate Users
07/12/2004 05:44 PMThis certainly isn't a new or unique story, but Broadband Reports has
yet another story about
ridiculous and
pointless copy protection. The copy protection scheme, called
Starforce, appears to be mainly used for protecting certain PC games
from being copied. Of course, like so many copy protection schemes it
does this by assuming all legitimate customers are criminals. Not
only that, but it installs itself without letting you know (not even
in the EULA), hides itself on your PC, slows down the PC, causes all
sorts of other problems and errors, and is nearly impossible to remove
-- even after the protected application has been removed. In other
words, it's just as bad as some adware/spyware out there -- except
that it's screwing things up for
legitimate customers who
actually went out and bought the games in question. As the article
points out, every one of those games is available in a cracked version
online, so this "copy protection" scheme doesn't actually prevent
copies. It only serves to anger legitimate customers. Why is anyone
using this product on their software?
"Belgian watchdog sues record biz over
copy protection"
"Belgian watchdog sues record biz over
copy protection"
01/04/2004 09:40 PMGrok Description matches for Hit CD with copy protection may signal fan acceptance
GrokA matches for Hit CD with copy protection may signal fan acceptance
Hit CD with copy protection may signal fan acceptance