Late Night ConsolingLate Night ConsolingLate Night Consoling 06/23/2004 05:10 PM shacknews.com/onearticle.x/32369 This is a GrokNews Entry: (what is grok?)Late Night ConsolingGrok Headline matches for Late Night ConsolingLate Night with VPNLate Night with VPN 12/02/2003 02:32 PM David Letterman-style, Glynn Taylor of HotSpotVPN.com released his top ten list of reasons to secure your network traffic this holiday season: 10. Your Dad won’t know what web sites you've visited. 9. You will never have to change your email settings again. 8. Your traffic is encrypted at every hotspot; free, paid or stumbled upon. 7. You can improve on WEP without buying new hardware. 6. You can keep the neighbor’s script kiddy brats out of your Internet traffic. 5. You can say you took one more step to prevent identity theft. 4. You can easily encrypt your traffic when attached to someone else’s network. 3. You can safely plug in at a hotel without other guests reading your email. 2. You can prevent "wiretaps" on your VOIP calls. 1. Your Mom won't know what web sites you’ve visited.... The Late Night TriadThe Late Night Triad 11/10/2003 11:33 PM I can't remember how I got there, but somehow I stumbled onto Jason Salavon's works page. He's got some very... Late at Night, That's NBC CrowingLate at Night, That's NBC Crowing 11/04/2003 06:26 AM Letterman Lost .. NYT today .. NYT nytimes.com/2003/11/03/business/media/03dave.html Vodkapundit - Late Night RamblingVodkapundit - Late Night Rambling 08/17/2004 08:43 PM Vodkapundit has further comments: .. [LINK] .. here vodkapundit.com/archives/006469.php Future Shock, "Late at Night"Future Shock, "Late at Night" 01/16/2004 11:02 AM Just what you wanted, break dancing Japanese geezers Still photos, live action and animation melted into a music video (streaming Quicktime) by Neo, a duo made up of Londoners Jake Knight and Ryoko Tanaka. More clips on their site. (via Jeansnow.net) Late night girl talkLate night girl talk 03/13/2003 10:24 AM Last night my friend calls me to bitch about her man (I am so the last person to even talk... HP-Apple negotiations ran late into Wed.
|
|   | ...Beside the possibility that the White House's favored Iraqi exile was an Iranian agent, that the spy chief just got canned, that the OSD is wired to polygraphs, and that the president has had to retain outside counsel in the investigation into which members of his staff burned one of the country's own spies, I'd say the place is being run like a pretty well-oiled machine. |
It does seem as though one of George Bush's chief legacies may be the complete implosion of the C.I.A. -- at a time when the nation desperately needs its services. (Bush's father served as director of the C.I.A. for many years. Is there some sort of Oedipal lunacy at work?)
So now Bush will be running on a platform of -- competence? Effectiveness in the war on terror? Isn't a war on terror first and foremost a war dependent on good intelligence? At what point can we declare this charade of Republican knowhow at an end?
If you're a pragmatist, you should be running from Bush as fast as you can, out of sheer desire to see the nation's business restored to good management. If you think in moral terms, of course, it's even worse.
My friend Charlie Varon recently e-mailed me with a pointer to a diary Wallace Shawn published in The Nation on the eve of the invasion of Iraq over a year ago -- a piece of writing I missed at the time of its publication. It's a typical slice of Shawn's brand of self-lacerating thought, which will infuriate those on the right who disagree with him, trouble those on the left who might be thought to be in his camp, and cause any reader to think hard.
Shawn has always tried, in works like "The Fever" as in this diary, to unearth the connection between the comfortable lives of Americans -- Red and Blue staters -- and the privation and suffering in other parts of the world that seems to make our comfort possible. The position is beyond bleeding-heart -- it's spurting-arteries-of-guilt liberalism. However you feel about that, it has the singular virtue of cutting through abstract cant and partisan rhetoric and talking about the particulars of real human suffering.
All of which is a roundabout way of introducing this observation by Shawn:
|   | Why are we being so ridiculously polite? It's as if there were some sort of gentlemen's agreement that prevents people from stating the obvious truth that Bush and his colleagues are exhilarated and thrilled by the thought of war, by the thought of the incredible power they will have over so many other people, by the thought of the immensity of what they will do, by the scale, the massiveness of the bombing they're planning, the violence, the killing, the blood, the deaths, the horror. |
Now, I'm sure this sounded over the top when Shawn published it in March 2003. And it may still sound over the top to you today. What a thing to say about a president! Or about any human being!
Still, it's always seemed critically important, in trying to understand the Bush administration's march of folly, to remember that its entire top leadership (with the exception of its one half-hearted multilaterist at the State Department, who nobody listens to) consists of men (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld) who never served in combat. The next level down of leadership -- the architects of the Iraq policy, men like Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle (and let's not forget Rove) -- have no record at all of any military service. For such leaders, I can't help thinking, "the violence, the killing, the blood, the deaths, the horror" must necessarily remain abstractions -- at best, matters that one can turn one's gaze away from (as the government has literally done with the taboo photos of returning military coffins), and at worst, as Shawn argued, bearers of vague quasi-sexual excitement (as we saw with the pumped-up macho display of the "Mission Accomplished" tableau, now so painfully embarrassing).
The experience of combat service doesn't inoculate a leader against making mistakes, nor does it turn more than a few people into pacifists. But surely in most cases it burns into the brain an awareness of the essential seriousness of war. And that, finally, seems to have been Bush's failure with Iraq, one that even conservative supporters of the president -- like the historian Paul Johnson in today's Wall Street Journal -- are beginning to admit.
Bush drove the nation to war and threw an army into the field without taking the enterprise seriously enough. He didn't plan, he didn't study, he didn't question, because these are things he does not do. He has told us as much. And the people he trusted to do these things for him were equally unwilling to treat the situation with the gravity it deserved, instead using it as an opportunity to settle political scores or put into motion long-hatching schemes and delusional geopolitical chess moves.
I can't help thinking that, had more people in the White House ever
been on the receiving end of a bombing raid or taken barrages of enemy
fire, this administration might have proceeded with somewhat less
criminal a level of recklessness and incompetence.
one38.org/a177/2003_11_09_archive.html#106870012541082426
track this
site | 6 links
A wee bit tired this morning. I made a quick round of my normal stops in the blogosphere last night and I happened by the Scobleiz er. Now I've met Robert in the real world and I always get something out of reading his stuff -- but it usually doesn't cost me sleep. You see what happened is Robert pointed me off to Microsof t Watch and a list of Mi crosoft bloggers with weblogs. So I thought "Wouldn't it be nice if they were all indexed". And there I was making sure they got stuffed into the system. Here's what I found:
I guess its not all that bad actually but it just seems damn silly. I hope that's not a dot net feature but I'm afraid that it is. Sigh.
Wow - UserLand plans open-source release of Frontier kernel. The kernel includes things like the UserTalk script interpreter, all the UserTalk builtin functions, the Frontier ODB and the Frontier web server.
I don't expect that it will gather as many developers as the big open source scripting languages, but it would be a worthy addition to the community. It used to be cutting-edge, and the system still has a bunch of great ideas, despite having been surpassed in various areas (speed, reliability, debuggability, popularity) by other competitors. Enough to be worth saving, for sure.
Just off the top of my head, I can think of some interesting projects to do with the Frontier source:
- remove the dependency on the GUI, so it could be run as a Windows service on NT/2K/XP (as modern server software does).
- once that's done, a UNIX port might not be so hard. Presumably it's fairly portable already, as right now it runs on two different versions of Mac OS as well as Windows.
- perhaps after those two, or perhaps first, someone could rip out UserTalk and make a standalone interpreter, so you can use it the way you might use Perl or Python at the moment.
- this is a bit of a long shot, but if you could make the UserTalk interpreter support the Python module API or something similar, a whole bunch of open source libraries (DB access, etc) would suddenly be within reach.
Anyway, that's all for now. Announcements of open-source releases usually precede the actual releases by quite a while, so don't hold your breath. When this release actually happens, though, it will be a lot of fun :-)
OK - I'll say it.
Dave Winer and Frontier were my main introductions to the web, CMS, webapps, personal publishing and open standards. Without Dave - I wouldn't be sitting here today.
I can remember Dave telling me about this guy Eric Raymond - and his Cathedral white paper. It really pissed off Dave. He had made his Frontier tool available - for free - in the early 90's and had had direct experience in dealing with people expecting a whole lot for free. Yet Dave knew that by having a strong developer community behind him - that's all that mattered.
So Dave spent a few years trying to figure this all out. He then made the decision that he HAD to charge for Frontier - or else he'd never get corporate uptake. This is just as Linux and all the open source stuff was starting.
So now jump to years later. Frontier is finally open source - but it's too late. Php and python came along, Zope, Drupal - all sorts of stuff that does exactly what Frontier and..... well let me correct myself - not EXACTLY what Frontier does - as it STILL is a revolutionary IDE - as the integrated outliner makes o-o programming actually culpable.
But there are still problems with Frontier - memory leaks aside. And it sure seems like it's five years too late. That doesn't mean folks should'nt use it. My buddy Paolo uses it for his eVectors knowledge management stuff. Radio is built on top of Friontier and gives unprecedented extensibility that I'm sure many a MT user wishes they had.
I spent years pitching Frontier as the backend solution to our front-end needs. Most people would look at me and say "Huh?" But I'm proud of Dave and Frontier and I hope that LOTS of college kids give it a try!
The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: