Industry Alliance Touts Authentication in Fighting Spam
Grok Headline matches for Industry Alliance Touts Authentication in Fighting Spam
Anti-Spam Technical Alliance Publishes
Industry Recommendations to Help Stop
Spam
Anti-Spam Technical Alliance Publishes
Industry Recommendations to Help Stop
Spam
06/22/2004 09:17 AMThe Anti-Spam Technical Alliance (ASTA), whose participants include
Yahoo! Inc., Microsoft Corp., EarthLink and America Online Inc., today
unveiled the result of more than a year of close collaboration by
presenting a host of detailed best practices and technical
recommendations for the entire industry in an effort to fight the
scourge of spam.
Aspace announces alliance to bolster
Crypto authentication
Aspace announces alliance to bolster
Crypto authentication
09/23/2004 08:43 AMComputer Business Review Sep 23 2004 12:27PM GMT
Symantec Brightmail Anti-Spam v6.0
delivers next-generation spam-fighting
power, control to enterprises
Symantec Brightmail Anti-Spam v6.0
delivers next-generation spam-fighting
power, control to enterprises
07/01/2004 10:20 PMSunday Times South Africa Jul 2 2004 2:42AM GMT
Gorbachev Touts Russian IT Industry
Gorbachev Touts Russian IT Industry
04/12/2005 11:20 PMThe Russian economy is rebounding, following India's lead in
outsourcing and taking a global perspective, according to the former
Soviet Union leader.
Kerry Touts His Plans For High-Tech
Industry
Kerry Touts His Plans For High-Tech
Industry
06/25/2004 05:29 PMBizReport.com Jun 25 2004 9:07PM GMT
Spam Battle Moving to Authentication
Spam Battle Moving to Authentication
05/28/2004 06:34 PMNew tools from Microsoft, Yahoo and others look to block unwanted
e-mails at the gateway.
Sender authentication failing to block
spam
Sender authentication failing to block
spam
09/01/2004 06:16 AMComputer Weekly Sep 1 2004 10:39AM GMT
FTC Shoots Down Spam Registry, Boosts
Authentication Scheme
FTC Shoots Down Spam Registry, Boosts
Authentication Scheme
06/15/2004 07:29 PMThe FTC on Tuesday told Congress that a proposed Do Not E-mail
anti-spam registry was unworkable until a universal e-mail
authentication standard was adopted.
InfraGard Membership Alliance – Metro
New York 2005 Biometric Technology
Briefing – January 18, 2005 - Biometrics
Identification and Authentication
InfraGard Membership Alliance – Metro
New York 2005 Biometric Technology
Briefing – January 18, 2005 - Biometrics
Identification and Authentication
01/06/2005 04:42 AMThe InfraGard Biometric Security Summit will be held at Ernst &
Young's Times Square Corporate Headquarters in New York, NY and is
presented by InfraGard’s Membership Alliance – Metro New York.
Invitations to attend are extended to Government and Corporate
Security Professionals and reservations for attendance can be made by
visiting the InfraGard Metro New York website at www.nym-infragard.us.
[PRWEB Jan 6, 2005]
Mobile industry must form alliance to
beat WAP scam
Mobile industry must form alliance to
beat WAP scam
06/02/2004 03:03 PMnewmediazero Jun 2 2004 6:33PM GMT
Planetwide Games Joins Forces with First
Data to Launch Authentication Product
for the Video Game Industry
Planetwide Games Joins Forces with First
Data to Launch Authentication Product
for the Video Game Industry
06/05/2005 10:52 PMThe "GameFREQ™" Security Card uses DataSIGN™ Solutions to protect
video game players and enhance transactions. [PRWEB May 19, 2005]
New Google Spam Fighting
New Google Spam Fighting
03/11/2003 01:22 AMWebmasterWorld: Good news about expired domains. ``We've also put more
of a focus on algorithmic improvements for spam issues. One resulting
improvement with this index is better handling of expired domains--the
authority for a domain will be reset when a domain expires, even
though dangling links to the expired domain are still out on the web.
We'll be rolling this change in over the next few months starting with
this index. [...] I think you'll see more emphasis at Google on
scalable algorithms rather than responding to individual spam
reports.'' Basically, when you buy a domain that previously expired,
you won't get the PageRank the old domain's owner accrued. Neat
idea....
Fighting Spam with Digital IDs
Fighting Spam with Digital IDs
12/05/2002 07:49 PMJon Udell on the pitfalls of permission-based spam filters: If we rule
out spontaneous association then we will not have...
Fighting comment spam
Fighting comment spam
02/01/2005 08:40 PMJay Allen has written a very nice document on how to fight comment
spam Jay Allen should know a thing or two about comment spam. Before
joing Six Apart he wrote the now famous MT-Blacklist plugin for
Movable Type. If...
Fighting spam on Linux
Fighting spam on Linux
07/15/2004 03:08 AMFighting spam: Opting out is in
Fighting spam: Opting out is in
06/23/2004 01:13 AMStraits Times Jun 23 2004 5:26AM GMT
Fighting spam with insults?
Fighting spam with insults?
06/01/2004 03:50 AMOne of my many domains have been used by spammers for a while.
Unfortunately its not much I can do about it, without spending a...
DoCoMo Touts Anti-Spam Tool
DoCoMo Touts Anti-Spam Tool
11/05/2003 05:55 PMUnstrung.com Nov 5 2003 3:48PM ET
Step one in comment spam fighting
Step one in comment spam fighting
11/14/2003 10:54 PMOne of the drawbacks to rolling your own weblog software is that any
time you want to add a feature you have to do it yourself.
For instance, I’ve wished a few times that I could use Jay
Allen’s
MT-Blacklist
plugin. It would make it easier to fight comment spam.
(I have very good reasons for sticking with my own weblog software.
I’m not going to change; please don’t suggest it.)
However, my software has a feature that would be cool to see in other
weblog software, so I wanted to mention it: there’s an RSS feed
that shows the last n comments, no matter which post they’re in
reply to.
This means that no comment spam appears, even in very old posts, that
I don’t see. I still have to go to the trouble of deleting
it—but it’s much better than not knowing about it.
It may be that some other weblog software packages already have this
feature. If so—cool. If yours doesn’t have this feature,
you might want to consider it. I totally rely on it myself (and not
just for fighting comment spam).
You might say—well, my weblog software does email notifications
of comments, so an RSS feed of recent comments isn’t needed.
And I’d reply—well, my software has email notifications
too. I found that I hardly ever looked at them. In amongst all the
other email noise, comments notifications don’t work that
well.
But an RSS feed for recent comments works wonderfully.
Guide for Fighting Comment Spam
Guide for Fighting Comment Spam
01/04/2005 08:15 PMCall it a late holiday gift or a great way to start the new year. In
either case, we are...
Fighting Spam with DNA Sequencing
Algorithms
Fighting Spam with DNA Sequencing
Algorithms
08/22/2004 08:18 AMThink Spam Is Tough? Try Fighting Spim
Think Spam Is Tough? Try Fighting Spim
06/08/2004 06:58 PMInternet.com Jun 8 2004 9:51PM GMT
Microsoft touts 'Sender ID' to fight
spam, scams
Microsoft touts 'Sender ID' to fight
spam, scams
08/12/2004 01:23 PMProposed tech standard would verify senders' IP addresses to cut
malicious phishing and annoying Viagra pitches.
Latest ideas for fighting spam not the
greatest
Latest ideas for fighting spam not the
greatest
03/06/2004 01:55 AMSiliconValley.com Feb 25 2004 11:47AM GMT
Spam fighting hurts legitimate business?
Spam fighting hurts legitimate business?
04/09/2004 04:10 PMFractured Realities: Fighting Against
Comment Spam
Fractured Realities: Fighting Against
Comment Spam
02/01/2005 09:14 PMIn a
new
posting over on Fractured Realities (Davey Shafik's weblog) today,
he talks more about the eternal struggle these days with that menace
of weblogs everywhere -
comment
spam.
Do We Need A Hybrid Approach To Fighting
Spam And Viruses?
Do We Need A Hybrid Approach To Fighting
Spam And Viruses?
05/07/2004 12:11 PMThere's an ongoing battle about how to best fight threats like spam
and viruses (and spyware and trojans and worms, etc...). Some think
that it should be at the network level, where an ISP or a company can
set up filters, while others believe it needs to be at the desktop.
In an interview with the CTO for MessageLabs (makers of "managed email
security products" - so you know where his bias is) he makes the
compelling case for
moving
the protection up to the network level (of course, he means using
MessageLabs' solution). His argument is that you can keep filters
much more up-to-date at the network level, even to the point of
updating them multiple times per day. It also removes the hassle of
end-users getting anywhere near some of these malicious files - some
of which use social engineering tricks to get users to do things they
shouldn't. Of course, he's only telling half the story. Blocking at
the network level is increasingly becoming a necessity, but it assumes
that users always access the internet in the same way. These days,
with laptops and things like WiFi, people access the internet from
many different places, and you don't always know who's managing the
network protection. You also don't know who might be connecting to
your local network - and what sort of nasty stuff they've already been
exposed to. It seems that a hybrid approach is going to become
increasingly important. Some have said the trend needs to move from
"scan and block" to
"comply and connect" - which may represent the hybrid approach
that things are heading towards. You allow most of the filtering to
still occur on the network, but you don't allow an individual machine
to connect to a network unless it's been shown to "comply" with
whatever security policies have been established. While more
corporate users are moving in this direction, it may be time for
residential broadband service providers to look at providing similar
solutions themselves. The issue, as always, is how much control
people are willing to give their service providers. No one wants to
be denied a connection because suddenly their ISP says they haven't
complied with some weird security aspect that the user knows they have
complied with. However, as these malicious attacks get worse, it's
likely that we're going to move closer to a world where getting on the
network is going to mean proving you're clean, while network level
machines will be required to block out the nastiest attacks.
Messenger Spam Senders Fighting Back
Against FTC
Messenger Spam Senders Fighting Back
Against FTC
12/09/2003 05:03 PMLast month the FTC decided that it was time to
crack
down on the issue of Windows Messenger spam - which had been
getting some attention lately. Messenger spam has nothing to do with
instant messaging, but with the Windows Messenger product that is used
by network admins and such to alert computer users of important things
("our network is going down for five minutes" or something like that).
Most home computers (and many work computers) have no need to have
this feature turned on - but many still do and spammers were
exploiting that. When the FTC decided to crack down they took action
against one company that had been known to send the messages every ten
minutes in some cases. It turns out the company is run by two college
kids who are now (surprisingly)
fight
ing back against the FTC. Part of the claim against them was that
their spam messages were touting software that could block these
messages. As someone points out, it's a bit like "vandals throwing
bricks through windows to sell home-security systems." The defense
from the kids is that (a) they weren't doing anything illegal by
sending out these spam messages (b) the messages did no damage and (c)
the software they were selling actually did block those messages.
Thus, they say that using messenger spam was actually a good way of
targeting customers who needed their software. Of course, they leave
out is that you don't actually need any software to turn off the
Messenger feature. Their lawyer is also painting them as "good kids"
who would never do anything harmful. They might have a case. As much
as I believe they knew exactly what they were doing in annoying the
hell out of a lot of people, it is questionable whether or not it was
illegal.
Microsoft spam-fighting proposal
rejected
Microsoft spam-fighting proposal
rejected
09/19/2004 09:40 AMCNEWS Sep 19 2004 2:14PM GMT
AOL buys Mailblocks in spam-fighting
effort
AOL buys Mailblocks in spam-fighting
effort
08/04/2004 12:59 PMAmerica Online Inc. (AOL) has snapped up Web-based e-mail company
Mailblocks Inc. in an effort to bolster its own e-mail services with
greater antispam protection, mail management, and interface
improvements, it said Wednesday.
Microsoft Details Spam Fighting Plans
Microsoft Details Spam Fighting Plans
05/05/2004 03:35 PMAlliance turns up heat on spam
Alliance turns up heat on spam
06/22/2004 03:30 PMThe Anti-Spam Technical Alliance, which includes AOL and other major
ISPs, releases a set of best practices. Among their recommendations:
Kill the "zombies."
Other News: Anti-Spam Alliance
Other News: Anti-Spam Alliance
06/23/2004 11:01 AMThe Anti-Spam Technical Alliance issues a new set of guidelines.
Community Spam Fighting Effort Faces
Heat
Community Spam Fighting Effort Faces
Heat
12/19/2004 03:37 PMPoliticians form transatlantic spam
alliance
Politicians form transatlantic spam
alliance
03/29/2005 02:11 AMZDNet Australia Mar 29 2005 6:14AM GMT
Microsoft Scores Points Against
Competitors With Spam Fighting
Initiative
Microsoft Scores Points Against
Competitors With Spam Fighting
Initiative
04/27/2004 01:15 PMZDNet Apr 27 2004 5:20PM GMT
Symantec Buys Brightmail - A Step
Towards Hybrid Spam Fighting
Symantec Buys Brightmail - A Step
Towards Hybrid Spam Fighting
05/19/2004 05:48 PMWe've talked in the past about how the ways to fight all that ails
your computer are converging. Symantec is realizing this, and has
decided to
to buy anti-spam firm Brightmail for $370
million. Symantec was already an investor in the company and owned
approximately 11%. However, it does demonstrate that a single
approach to fighting things like spam no longer makes sense. You
can't just have a network level protection system or a desktop level
protection. Increasingly, computer security requires something of a
hybrid
model - and this acquisition supports that idea.
Have People Lost A Fighting Spirit
Against Spam Or Is Pew Faking The Data
Again?
Have People Lost A Fighting Spirit
Against Spam Or Is Pew Faking The Data
Again?
04/11/2005 05:58 AMAccording to the folks at Pew (who are suffering from a
credi
bility hit these days), people
are growing accustomed to spam. It still annoys people
to no end, but it's just become so common that people have given up
thinking about it or fighting against it, and just think of it as an
annoying fact of life, like traffic. Of course, it's not really clear
that the data actually says this. Basically, this conclusion appears
to be driven by two stats: (1) people trust email less but (2) they're
not reading less email -- sort of. The study actually says 22% of
people say they are spending less time on email because of spam, which
is down from 29% the year before. However, it's a bit of a stretch to
conclude from this one data point that people are resigned to spam.
It could mean that email simply has become more important in other
aspects. Or, it could mean that most of the people who were really
annoyed by spam decreased their email usage
last year instead
of this year. The problem with the data is that you can't really
compare the rate of change this year to last year, because (obviously)
they're starting from a different position. Most importantly, this
could just be an indication that spam filters have become more
effective. It wouldn't be surprising to find out that many people
have become resigned to spam -- but the data shown here doesn't
actually seem to prove that at all.
Fighting comment spam, linking without
google juice and other reasons to use
the new href attribute
Fighting comment spam, linking without
google juice and other reasons to use
the new href attribute
02/01/2005 08:40 PMFighting blog spam, allowing linking to people you don't like without
giving them Googlejuice. The new link attribute has many applications.
Most like it, but some think its a bad idea.
Grok Description matches for Industry Alliance Touts Authentication in Fighting Spam
GrokA matches for Industry Alliance Touts Authentication in Fighting Spam
Industry Alliance Touts Authentication in Fighting Spam