US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU investigation

Grok Headline matches for US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU investigation

Supreme Court Sides With Death Row
Inmate (AP)

Supreme Court Sides With Death Row
Inmate (AP) 05/24/2004 08:15 PM
AP - The Supreme Court ruled for the first time Monday that a death row inmate can pursue a last-ditch claim that lethal injection is unconstitutionally cruel.

Supreme Court Sides With H.M.O.'s on
Patient Suits

Supreme Court Sides With H.M.O.'s on
Patient Suits 06/21/2004 02:13 PM
The Supreme Court ruled that H.M.O.'s enjoy broad protections from medical malpractice suits brought by patients.

Supreme Court Sides With HMO's on
Patient Suits

Supreme Court Sides With HMO's on
Patient Suits 06/21/2004 12:14 PM
The Supreme Court said today that patients who claim their HMOs wouldn't pay for needed medical care cannot sue for big malpractice damages.

Supreme Court Justices Grill Both Sides
at Copyright Hearing

Supreme Court Justices Grill Both Sides
at Copyright Hearing 03/31/2005 12:15 AM
Electronic Frontier Foundations Mar 31 2005 4:09AM GMT

Supreme Court Partially Sides With Bush
on American Detainee Case

Supreme Court Partially Sides With Bush
on American Detainee Case 06/28/2004 09:50 AM

Court Sides With Oracle

Court Sides With Oracle 09/09/2004 11:51 PM

Oracle wins right to pursue rival: PeopleSoft may have played their last hand:

Ellison and Henley wasted no time in firing off a letter to PeopleSoft's board, requesting a meeting to hammer out a deal, potentially the largest tech merger since Hewlett-Packard and Compaq Computer in 2002.

We started covering this a long time ago. Back then (14 months ago), I said:

t's worth saying that when this story broke, I thought it was just another egotistical Larry Ellison thing — something he did off the top of his head just for giggles, ego, and to shake up the competition. He's something of a dashing playboy-type guy, and this would fit.

But more and more, it seems that he's not kidding and he's going to take PeopleSoft in whatever way he can. Money is on his side, time is on his side, and I believe the only thing that will stop the deal are the anti-trust considerations.

Looks like I was pretty close to the truth.

Click here to comment on this entry

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit 03/30/2005 08:56 PM
CBS MarketWatch Mar 31 2005 12:31AM GMT

Court Sides With Ala. Death Row Inmate
(AP)

Court Sides With Ala. Death Row Inmate
(AP) 05/24/2004 11:11 AM
AP - The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that a convicted Alabama killer can pursue an appeal claiming lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment in his case.

Federal Court Sides With VoIP Companies

Federal Court Sides With VoIP Companies 12/29/2004 06:14 PM
AP via Daily Press Dec 29 2004 8:39PM GMT

Federal Court Sides With VoIP Companies
(AP)

Federal Court Sides With VoIP Companies
(AP) 12/29/2004 04:22 PM
AP - A Minnesota agency may not regulate calls through cyberspace as it does calls through traditional phone lines, a federal appeals court ruled.

2 Sides Do Battle in Court on Whether
E.P.A. Should Regulate Carbon Dioxide

2 Sides Do Battle in Court on Whether
E.P.A. Should Regulate Carbon Dioxide 04/09/2005 03:55 AM
A federal appeals court heard arguments in a five-year battle over whether the E.P.A. has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from motor vehicles.

Court sides with palmOne in Xerox patent
suit

Court sides with palmOne in Xerox patent
suit 05/21/2004 11:17 PM

Federal Appeals Court Sides With VoIP
Providers

Federal Appeals Court Sides With VoIP
Providers 12/29/2004 06:06 PM

High Court Sides with Cheney on Energy
Papers (Reuters)

High Court Sides with Cheney on Energy
Papers (Reuters) 06/24/2004 09:38 AM
Reuters - The U.S. Supreme Court set aside on Thursday a ruling that Vice President Dick Cheney must produce records of the energy task force he headed in 2001 or give a detailed explanation of what was withheld and why.

High court sides with Cheney on records
of energy task force meetings

High court sides with Cheney on records
of energy task force meetings 06/24/2004 11:46 AM

High court sides with Cheney on records
of energy task force meetings
(USATODAY.com)

High court sides with Cheney on records
of energy task force meetings
(USATODAY.com) 06/25/2004 05:32 AM
USATODAY.com - The U.S. Supreme Court refused Thursday to force Vice President Cheney to turn over secret details about an energy task force. (Related information:Excerpts from the justices)

What is going on at the Supreme Court?

What is going on at the Supreme Court? 06/29/2004 11:59 AM
Thomas and Scalia are the most conservative conservative Justices. Breyer is on of the liberal Justices. (Admittedly the least liberal,…

The Supreme Court says no

The Supreme Court says no 03/24/2005 11:52 AM
The justices deny a request for an order to re-insert Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. Is this the end?

Dems on the Supreme Court

Dems on the Supreme Court 01/11/2004 07:56 AM
So an underplayed aspect of this campaign has been how the Democratic candidates would differently select the Supreme Court. On NPR's debate , Senator Lieberman pointed to Justice Souter as a model. Congressman Kucinich plugged Justice Ginsburg. I've gotten a couple pings asking what the right answer is. Hard question for me. Of course neither Ginsburg nor Souter were on the correct side (or the right side) of Eldred, but I certainly think Justice Souter is a model justice -- serious, hard working, unburdened by ideology, prepared. I never quite get the principle that guides Justice Ginsburg's choice between activism and not, or principle and not, so I'm waiting to see the genius in that selection by President Clinton. Justice Breyer of course wrote a brilliant dissent in Eldred -- brilliant, though not effective. He was proud of the decision's embrace of economics as the standard by which the Sonny Bono Act was judged. But while I'm a fan of the result, I've been too deeply affected (scarred?) by the originalism/textaulism/fidelity theories of Scalia to be enamored of that method. In my view, perhaps the best sitting justice is a Republican appointee -- Stevens. And if candidates are looking for what makes the best the best, then it is certainly his judges' judge-like character. There's no simple line that predicts Justice Stevens' result -- certainly not a political line. And if there is any quality this Court needs, it is that -- following a line that does not seem a political line. The most impressive judges not sitting on the Supreme Court are also, um, Republicans. (What party am I again?) Judge Kozin ski is a great judge -- too young when appointed, but someone who has matured brilliantly in the job. And while his views about how to the interpret the constitution make me cringe, history will record the greatest judge of our time as Judge Posner. But I doubt that this is the time that a President from either party will pick greatness as the reason to select a Justice.

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice 07/01/2004 02:04 AM
ZDNet Australia Jul 1 2004 5:44AM GMT

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice 06/29/2004 12:05 PM
In a close vote, the justices rule that a federal law designed to restrict Internet pornography violates Americans' free-speech rights.

Supreme Court to try Brand X

Supreme Court to try Brand X 03/28/2005 11:29 PM
Independent ISPs argue cable companies should be forced to lease lines, but what's really on trial is the concept of communication.

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 11:40 PM
For now . . .

Showdown at the Supreme Court

Showdown at the Supreme Court 03/17/2005 03:27 AM
“On March 29, the entertainment and technology industries will descend upon Washington, D.C. to argue their respective sides before the Supreme Court in the landmark case of MGM v Grokster. At stake: the future of peer-to-peer technology, consumer electronics, software design, and consumer rights in the United States. In April 2003, a federal judge ruled that Streamcast Networks — the developer and distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software, and Grokster — the developer and distributor…

Direct and Related Links for 'Showdown at the Supreme Court'

Supreme Court hears P2P case

Supreme Court hears P2P case 03/29/2005 11:57 AM
Justices quiz attorneys for file-swapping software companies and Hollywood studios in a landmark case.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown 04/20/2004 06:00 AM
Forbes Apr 20 2004 10:16AM GMT

Supreme Court rules against Intel

Supreme Court rules against Intel 06/21/2004 10:54 AM
ZDNet Jun 21 2004 3:40PM GMT

Supreme Court Case Previews Now
Available

Supreme Court Case Previews Now
Available 12/22/2004 01:27 AM
The Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School is now offering free previews of high-provile Supreme Court cases before the are argued and ruled on. The previews are available...

Supreme Court to hear P2P case

Supreme Court to hear P2P case 12/19/2004 03:46 PM
The biggest P2P case will be heard before the Supreme Court, and more hangs in the balance than just the development of P2P-technologies.

Supreme Court blocks web porn law

Supreme Court blocks web porn law 06/29/2004 07:10 PM
Independent Jun 29 2004 9:20PM GMT

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation 03/28/2005 11:56 PM
Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear opening arguments in the fight to classify what constitutes an "information service," and whether cable companies and voice over IP providers deserve to be treated differently under a separate set of government regulations.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases 03/31/2005 09:11 AM
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
http://www.landmarkcases.org/

There is always a great demand for educational materials regarding the most important US Supreme Court Cases and this website is an outgrowth of that sustained interest. Developed by Street Law and the Supreme Court Historical Society, this website was developed in order to provide teachers with a full range of resources and activities regarding such cases. The general teaching strategies offered here include political cartoon analysis, moot court, continuum exercises, and website evaluation. Some of the cases covered here include Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona. The site also offers some detailed explanations of important related concepts, such as federalism, national supremacy, and judicial review. Additional, the site provides background summaries of each case and pertinent discussion questions for a variety of reading levels and abilities. This has been added to Legal Resources 2005 Internet MiniGuide. [From The Scout Report, Copyright Internet Scout Project 1994-2004. http://scout.wisc.edu/]

Papers Please: right not to show ID goes
to Supreme Court

Papers Please: right not to show ID goes
to Supreme Court 02/17/2004 11:47 AM
A Nevada cowboy is fighting for his right not to produce ID on law-enforcement demand, and he's going all the way to the Supreme Court.

Meet Dudley Hiibel. He's a 59 year old cowboy who owns a small ranch outside of Winnemucca, Nevada. He lives a simple life, but he's his own man. You probably never would have heard of Dudley Hiibel if it weren't for his belief in the U.S. Constitution.

One balmy May evening back in 2000, Dudley was standing around minding his own business when all of a sudden, a policeman pulled-up and demanded that Dudley produce his ID. Dudley, having done nothing wrong, declined. He was arrested and charged with "failure to cooperate" for refusing to show ID on demand. And it's all on video.

On the 22nd of March 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether Dudley and the rest of us live in a free society, or in a country where we must show "the papers" whenever a cop demands them.

Link (Thanks, Bill!)

U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right

U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right 06/21/2004 09:55 PM

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court 06/22/2004 05:47 AM
Chip giant must now hand over documents to EC

Online Exclusive: Supreme Court

Online Exclusive: Supreme Court 09/27/2004 07:30 AM
Dailybusinessreview.com - Mon Sep 27, 10:54 am GMT

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P 03/29/2005 02:25 PM
Justices voice skepticism about both sides as file-swap companies do legal battle with entertainment industry.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court 03/29/2005 06:49 AM
Personal Computer World Mar 29 2005 10:51AM GMT

NFL Asks Supreme Court to Bar Clarett
(AP)

NFL Asks Supreme Court to Bar Clarett
(AP) 04/22/2004 10:42 AM
AP - The NFL urged the Supreme Court on Thursday to keep Maurice Clarett out of this weekend's draft because the dispute over his eligibility is unsettled.
Grok Description matches for US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU investigation
GrokA matches for US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU investigation

US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU investigation

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: