AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

Grok Headline matches for AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown 04/20/2004 06:00 AM
Forbes Apr 20 2004 10:16AM GMT

Supreme Court rules against Intel

Supreme Court rules against Intel 06/21/2004 10:54 AM
ZDNet Jun 21 2004 3:40PM GMT

U.S. Supreme Court Revisiting Intel, AMD
Spat

U.S. Supreme Court Revisiting Intel, AMD
Spat 11/11/2003 06:58 AM
SiliconValley.Internet.com Nov 11 2003 6:29AM ET

Supreme Court to hear Intel-AMD case

Supreme Court to hear Intel-AMD case 11/11/2003 08:11 AM
ZDNet Nov 11 2003 7:39AM ET

Intel vs. AMD Hits Supreme Court Docket

Intel vs. AMD Hits Supreme Court Docket 04/20/2004 08:56 PM
Internet.com Apr 21 2004 0:50AM GMT

Intel, Top Rival Set for Supreme Court
Showdown

Intel, Top Rival Set for Supreme Court
Showdown 04/20/2004 12:18 AM
Boston Globe Apr 20 2004 4:13AM GMT

Intel, rival set for Supreme Court
showdown

Intel, rival set for Supreme Court
showdown 04/20/2004 03:09 AM
Houston Chronicle Apr 20 2004 7:09AM GMT

Intel, top rival AMD set for Supreme
Court showdown

Intel, top rival AMD set for Supreme
Court showdown 04/20/2004 04:51 PM
Experts said a ruling in favor of AMD could add new evidence to a European Commission investigation into complaints that Intel threatened to retaliate against computer makers that use AMD chips.

Supreme Court to hear Intel, AMD case

Supreme Court to hear Intel, AMD case 04/20/2004 07:11 AM
ZDNet Apr 20 2004 11:58AM GMT

Supreme Court disagrees with Intel on EU
probe

Supreme Court disagrees with Intel on EU
probe 06/21/2004 10:50 AM
European regulators can be privy to chipmaker's confidential documents in antitrust investigation.

Supreme Court to hear Intel, AMD
document dispute

Supreme Court to hear Intel, AMD
document dispute 04/20/2004 12:45 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday from Intel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) about whether Intel should be forced to send documents from its legal disputes with Intergraph Corp. to the European Commission in support of a complaint filed by AMD.

AMD and Intel Document Case Heads To
Supreme Court

AMD and Intel Document Case Heads To
Supreme Court 04/20/2004 01:48 AM
AMD Zone Apr 20 2004 6:04AM GMT

Intel, Top Rival Set for Supreme Court
Showdown (Reuters)

Intel, Top Rival Set for Supreme Court
Showdown (Reuters) 04/21/2004 03:37 AM
Reuters - The bitter rivalry between the two biggest makers of computer microprocessors is set to reach the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, in a case that could determine the fate of a European antitrust probe.

Supreme court rules EC can receive
confidential Intel documents

Supreme court rules EC can receive
confidential Intel documents 06/22/2004 10:44 AM
Computer Weekly Jun 22 2004 2:12PM GMT

US Supreme Court to settle AMD-Intel
secrecy dispute in Europe

US Supreme Court to settle AMD-Intel
secrecy dispute in Europe 11/10/2003 11:12 PM
Now the Supreme Court has agreed to step in to clarify if and when US-based companies might be forced to reveal internal, secret documents to investigative entities from foreign countries.

Israel's court defeats film ban

Israel's court defeats film ban 08/31/2004 06:25 AM
Israel's High Court defeats a second bid to ban a documentary about Israel's invasion of Jenin refugee camp.

Intel defeats Intergraph claims

Intel defeats Intergraph claims 02/12/2004 04:07 AM
ZDNet UK Feb 12 2004 8:40AM GMT

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit 03/30/2005 08:56 PM
CBS MarketWatch Mar 31 2005 12:31AM GMT

The Supreme Court says no

The Supreme Court says no 03/24/2005 11:52 AM
The justices deny a request for an order to re-insert Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. Is this the end?

What is going on at the Supreme Court?

What is going on at the Supreme Court? 06/29/2004 11:59 AM
Thomas and Scalia are the most conservative conservative Justices. Breyer is on of the liberal Justices. (Admittedly the least liberal,…

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice 06/29/2004 12:05 PM
In a close vote, the justices rule that a federal law designed to restrict Internet pornography violates Americans' free-speech rights.

Supreme Court to try Brand X

Supreme Court to try Brand X 03/28/2005 11:29 PM
Independent ISPs argue cable companies should be forced to lease lines, but what's really on trial is the concept of communication.

Dems on the Supreme Court

Dems on the Supreme Court 01/11/2004 07:56 AM
So an underplayed aspect of this campaign has been how the Democratic candidates would differently select the Supreme Court. On NPR's debate , Senator Lieberman pointed to Justice Souter as a model. Congressman Kucinich plugged Justice Ginsburg. I've gotten a couple pings asking what the right answer is. Hard question for me. Of course neither Ginsburg nor Souter were on the correct side (or the right side) of Eldred, but I certainly think Justice Souter is a model justice -- serious, hard working, unburdened by ideology, prepared. I never quite get the principle that guides Justice Ginsburg's choice between activism and not, or principle and not, so I'm waiting to see the genius in that selection by President Clinton. Justice Breyer of course wrote a brilliant dissent in Eldred -- brilliant, though not effective. He was proud of the decision's embrace of economics as the standard by which the Sonny Bono Act was judged. But while I'm a fan of the result, I've been too deeply affected (scarred?) by the originalism/textaulism/fidelity theories of Scalia to be enamored of that method. In my view, perhaps the best sitting justice is a Republican appointee -- Stevens. And if candidates are looking for what makes the best the best, then it is certainly his judges' judge-like character. There's no simple line that predicts Justice Stevens' result -- certainly not a political line. And if there is any quality this Court needs, it is that -- following a line that does not seem a political line. The most impressive judges not sitting on the Supreme Court are also, um, Republicans. (What party am I again?) Judge Kozin ski is a great judge -- too young when appointed, but someone who has matured brilliantly in the job. And while his views about how to the interpret the constitution make me cringe, history will record the greatest judge of our time as Judge Posner. But I doubt that this is the time that a President from either party will pick greatness as the reason to select a Justice.

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice 07/01/2004 02:04 AM
ZDNet Australia Jul 1 2004 5:44AM GMT

Showdown at the Supreme Court

Showdown at the Supreme Court 03/17/2005 03:27 AM
“On March 29, the entertainment and technology industries will descend upon Washington, D.C. to argue their respective sides before the Supreme Court in the landmark case of MGM v Grokster. At stake: the future of peer-to-peer technology, consumer electronics, software design, and consumer rights in the United States. In April 2003, a federal judge ruled that Streamcast Networks — the developer and distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software, and Grokster — the developer and distributor…

Direct and Related Links for 'Showdown at the Supreme Court'

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 11:40 PM
For now . . .

Why the Supreme Court will hear Grokster

Why the Supreme Court will hear Grokster 08/22/2004 07:30 AM
Cory Doctorow: Over on Lessig's blog, Tim Wu has enumerated 10 reasons that the Supreme Court is likely to hear the Grokster case:

1. These is a stated legal conflict on the Sony standard as between the 7th and 9th Circuits;
2. The 7th and 9th Circuits disagree (albeit in partially in dicta) on the relevance of willful blindness to secondary liability;
4. The Court has these matters in hand: it has granted cert. in many similar cases historically (Sony, 1980s, White-Smith (the Piano Roll case) 1909, Teleprompter and Fortnightly (Cable / Broadcast, 1960s & 1970s);
5. The Court has a vague sense that some far-out stuff is going on in the field of “Computer Law” that maybe it should check out;
6. Law clerks use KaZaA & BitTorrent to plan basketball games;
7. Stevens and Breyer deeply dig this stuff;
8. Scalia likes anything having to do with property;
9. Souter got his first computer last week.

And most importantly,

10. The Court loves to be the center of attention, and this would make it so.

Link

NFL Asks Supreme Court to Bar Clarett
(AP)

NFL Asks Supreme Court to Bar Clarett
(AP) 04/22/2004 10:42 AM
AP - The NFL urged the Supreme Court on Thursday to keep Maurice Clarett out of this weekend's draft because the dispute over his eligibility is unsettled.

Australian Supreme Court Looks At
Copyright Law

Australian Supreme Court Looks At
Copyright Law 09/14/2004 12:29 PM
The Supreme Court in Australia is now taking a look at their version of the DMCA to see if people have the right to modify hardware they've bought or to make backup copies of digital media they purchased. In the old, pre-digital world, when you bought a product, it was yours to do whatever you wanted with it. However, thanks to recent law changes, any product that involves a digital component seems much closer to a rental agreement, where the company that "sold" you the product retains some sort of rights. For obvious reasons, many people think this is unfair. In this particular case, Sony went after a mod-chip trader, claiming that the mod-chips he offered for the Playstation violated copyright law by letting users play copied games, thereby violating anti-circumvention rules in Australian law. It really becomes a question of whether or not certain companies have the right to have their business models protected by regulations, rather than forcing them to keep up with the changing marketplace.

Supreme Court hears P2P case

Supreme Court hears P2P case 03/29/2005 11:57 AM
Justices quiz attorneys for file-swapping software companies and Hollywood studios in a landmark case.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court 03/29/2005 06:49 AM
Personal Computer World Mar 29 2005 10:51AM GMT

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on hold

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on hold 06/29/2004 05:18 PM
San Jose Mercury News Jun 29 2004 7:45PM GMT

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P 03/29/2005 02:25 PM
Justices voice skepticism about both sides as file-swap companies do legal battle with entertainment industry.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

Supreme Court quashes Net porn law

Supreme Court quashes Net porn law 06/29/2004 03:19 PM
ZDNet Jun 29 2004 6:45PM GMT

Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court

Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 05:18 PM
IT Vibe Jun 29 2004 7:34PM GMT

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation 03/28/2005 11:56 PM
Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear opening arguments in the fight to classify what constitutes an "information service," and whether cable companies and voice over IP providers deserve to be treated differently under a separate set of government regulations.

US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation

US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation 06/22/2004 11:04 AM
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Intel may eventually have to turn 600,000 pages of documents over to EU investigators as part of a long-running inquiry into Intel's business practices in Europe.

Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality

Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality 03/28/2005 12:59 PM
The United States Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday a landmark case that could have far-reaching consequences for both copyright holders and the technology industry. At issue is whether two P2P network operators, Grokster and StreamCast are liable for the copyright infringement committed by their users.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases 03/31/2005 09:11 AM
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
http://www.landmarkcases.org/

There is always a great demand for educational materials regarding the most important US Supreme Court Cases and this website is an outgrowth of that sustained interest. Developed by Street Law and the Supreme Court Historical Society, this website was developed in order to provide teachers with a full range of resources and activities regarding such cases. The general teaching strategies offered here include political cartoon analysis, moot court, continuum exercises, and website evaluation. Some of the cases covered here include Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona. The site also offers some detailed explanations of important related concepts, such as federalism, national supremacy, and judicial review. Additional, the site provides background summaries of each case and pertinent discussion questions for a variety of reading levels and abilities. This has been added to Legal Resources 2005 Internet MiniGuide. [From The Scout Report, Copyright Internet Scout Project 1994-2004. http://scout.wisc.edu/]
Grok Description matches for AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court
GrokA matches for AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: