Cliex32.dll Error 126 Error in Wnmanual.log

Grok Headline matches for Cliex32.dll Error 126 Error in Wnmanual.log

HotFix Watch: Win32 Error = 1072 error
appears after you change the SMS 2.0
Service account of a secondary site

HotFix Watch: Win32 Error = 1072 error
appears after you change the SMS 2.0
Service account of a secondary site 12/28/2004 07:03 PM

Advanced Error Handling: Writing an
Error Handling Class

Advanced Error Handling: Writing an
Error Handling Class 11/10/2003 11:25 PM
If you're tired of the default error handler and want to have complete control over default error messages, you should write your own error handling class. Writing your own handler will enable you to change the way php handles your error messages, and allows you to create your own error types. With this class you will be able to send error messages to a log file, or send error reports via email.

PXE-E51 Error

PXE-E51 Error 08/14/2004 05:23 PM

Error

Error 08/10/2004 02:34 PM

livejournal.com/tools/memadd.bml?journal=jmhm&itemid=959603
track this site | 2 links

404 error

404 error 01/14/2003 02:28 PM

I found this funny 404 error message on SDForum's Web site:

Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted. Requested operation requires a current record.

Error-Wait-0.05

Error-Wait-0.05 12/27/2003 06:42 PM

404 ERROR - Ultrashock.com

404 ERROR - Ultrashock.com 12/14/2003 06:49 AM
usable 404 page

ultrashock.com/404
track this site | 4 links

Error-Wait-0.02

Error-Wait-0.02 11/16/2003 04:50 AM

More on XML Error Handling

More on XML Error Handling 01/22/2004 02:56 AM

I thought I'd respond to a few of the comments I received:

Many people suggested that there be a built-in validator in the browser that could show the errors to the developer. The validators basically break down into two types: obtrusive validators and unobtrusive validators.

If the validator is unobtrusive, then I would argue that it won't receive sufficient usage to make a difference. If the browser doesn't impose a penalty of some kind, then there will be no incentive for the author to correct mistakes.

I can see the value of an obtrusive validator, as long as the obtrusive part was only checking well-formedness (i.e., really basic mistakes).

(2) Some people pointed out that my own blog was not valid. I have two responses to that:

(a) I am not arguing for perfectly valid XML documents. I am arguing for well-formed XML documents. There is a difference. I think asking that the page be well-formed is setting the bar fairly low. For example, one of the current errors on this blog is that I have two elements with the same id. While this makes the blog invalid, it does not have any effect on the blog being well-formed. At least I don't think it does. :)

(b) I'm illustrating a point, namely that I have no reason to make the blog valid, given that browsers will display the blog anyway.

(3) People complained that I wasn't serving up XHTML. I can't actually serve up XHTML if I want the blog to be displayable in all browsers, including Safari, which still has sufficient issues with XHTML that I can't make that switch yet.

(4) My comments on HTML error handling were largely misinterpreted.

Some people thought I was attacking WinIE for its permissive handling of HTML. I was not, and I'm glad others appreciated that fact. Back in the 90s WinIE had to emulate the permissive error handling of the then-dominant browser Netscape. They had no choice if they wanted Web sites to be viewable as the designer intended. They were in the same position then that Safari is in now.

Nor am I suggesting that WinIE should become less tolerant of malformed HTML, or that they are at fault for not doing so. That is simply not a logical conclusion to have drawn from my previous comments. You can't take a Web site (even a malformed one) that works a certain way and suddenly refuse to render it or even render it radically differently than before.

For HTML, this issue was resolved long ago in favor of permissive error handling and recovery, and no modern browser is to blame for that situation.

Others said a browser that handles malformed HTML is better than one that does not, and if Safari doesn't handle all this malformed HTML, then it's simply not as capable a browser.

What amused me about this comment is that there is no definition of what it means to handle malformed HTML. As long as a browser shows you something and doesn't crash, it has handled the malformed HTML. What people don't understand is that you don't simply have to handle the malformed HTML. You have to handle it in exactly the same way as the Web browser that the site author designed for.

If you do not, you'll end up with different renderings of the same page, which as I said before, constitute the largest set of rendering differences between Web browsers. Perfect emulation is what makes error recovery so difficult. If you allow grossly malformed pages, then most XML on the Web will end up being grossly malformed (as is the case with HTML today).

Once you have a Web full of grossly malformed XML, there will be one dominant browser that designers will check to see if the site looks ok. They will then make assumptions that other browsers will recover from the malformation errors in precisely the same way and will simply assume that it is the fault of the other browsers if they don't.

Right now it is the responsibility of alternate browsers to emulate the dominant browser's error recovery strategies, but there's simply no reason to do that for XML as well.

VBScript Error with FTM

VBScript Error with FTM 09/02/2004 02:43 AM

XML Error Reporting II

XML Error Reporting II 01/22/2004 03:30 PM

Responding to comments in the previous blog entry:

(1) Some people thought this was a hacked expat. Darin actually switched Safari over to libxml2, so the error messages you're seeing (as well as the ability to continue parsing) are all built in to libxml2.

(2) Do you think it's better to show the page only up to the first error or to try to display the entire page (with the understanding that what follows the first error could be very badly mangled)?

(3) Often there are a lot of meaningless errors after the first. I could put a cap on the number of displayed errors to deal with this problem or just not worry about it. What do people think?

(4) Those of you who suggested drawers for errors, remember a drawer is a UI element in Safari and not WebKit. This feature should just work out of the box for WebKit clients, so I'm inclined not to use drawers or sheets, but to just display the errors at the top of the page.

XML Error Reporting III

XML Error Reporting III 01/24/2004 02:50 PM

Thanks to those of you who answered my question regarding how much of an invalid page should be rendered. It turns out that the XML spec is clear on this issue, and that I must stop building up the page DOM after the first fatal error is encountered.

With that in mind I now tell libxml to continue the processing, but I start ignoring all of the callbacks. That way I get a list of all the errors, but properly stop the DOM tree buildup after the first error.

For those of you who suggested that WebKit needs some sort of error reporting API, I agree, and if it had one, these errors would obviously be reported to it. However, these errors still have to be reported aggressively so that WebKit clients can't mask these mistakes.

I don't believe in showing a sheet or a dialog as an intermediate step prior to displaying a rendering of the page. The reason I dislike this idea is that this error reporting is primarily a Web developer feature, and they're just going to want to load the page, see the errors, maybe correct some CSS at the same time, and then reload with changes until the error report has been eliminated.

The end user isn't ever going to see this report, since anyone who makes an invalid XML file right now ends up with something that won't display in any browser. Thus it seems to me that the report should be easy to access (in terms of # of clicks), always visible, and included with the page rendering.

I have polished the look of the report a bit based off suggestions. Here's another screenshot.

SMS FAQ: Error Code 53

SMS FAQ: Error Code 53 06/24/2004 09:38 PM

Spot the Error

Spot the Error 02/10/2004 02:45 AM
Cleaned up eh? (hint: line 28)...

Error in fink-0.22.0

Error in fink-0.22.0 08/21/2004 12:30 PM
The fink-0.22.0 package manager, which was available briefly in the unstable tree this past week, had a bug which prevents further updating via rsync. If you installed this version of fink, you can recover by running the command fink install fink-0.21.2-1 which will downgrade fink to the version in the stable tree, and subsequently running fink selfupdate If for any reason those commands don't work, go to the fink file release page at sourceforge and download the file fink-0.22.1.tar.gz . Unpack this file with tar xfz fink-0.22.1.tar.gz , and then from within the fink-0.22.1 directory, run the command ./inject.pl The fink team apologizes for the error, and thanks the user community for bringing it to our attention quickly.

Database Error

Database Error 05/07/2004 06:10 AM

Margins of Error

Margins of Error 07/20/2004 09:16 AM
Wider margins should be greeted with wider smiles.

Access Error

Access Error 05/24/2004 04:33 AM
General Says Sanchez Rejected Her Offer to Give Address to Iraqis About Abuses

c.moreover.com/click/here.pl?r157808591
track this site | 3 links

Error in SMS RTM Documentation

Error in SMS RTM Documentation 05/28/2004 05:06 AM

Error In Downloading

Error In Downloading 11/14/2003 09:47 PM
Record, tech industries battle to make music pay off. By Russ Britt and Steve Gelsi (CBS MarketWatch via MyAppleMenu)

Error-Wait-0.01

Error-Wait-0.01 11/03/2003 05:54 PM

Error-Wait-0.03

Error-Wait-0.03 11/16/2003 04:50 AM

On "Feedbag Error 17"...

On "Feedbag Error 17"... 10/29/2003 12:10 AM

A couple of days ago I noticed that I couldn't add Azeem Azhar to my iChat AV contacts list. I kept getting returned "Feedbag Error 17" which seemed entirely unexpected and unpleasantly phrased. Was I a feedbag? Had iChat eaten Azeem? The mind boggled.

After several hours of consideration, another option occurred to me. Perhaps iChat was trying to protect me from excessive contact with Azeem! Maybe my beautiful new Pantherised beast was being defensive! "No, Tom!" It was going, "He's bad news! He'll tell you that you work in Marketing again and you'll get all cross and defensive and make that ludicrous speech about being an artisan! Please! Please! Let me protect you from the embarrassment!" At which point, I assumed, feedbag laptop decided to chow-down on poor Mr Azhar's AIM name with fierce hungry vengeance. I touted this theory around a few of my friends. General consensus, "It's not a bug, it's a feature!"

Well now I know that I'm not alone and that it's nothing personal, Mr Azhar! My Powerbook loves you and iChat loves you and all I had to do was throw away a couple of my childhood friends who - frankly - are never online anyway and kind of sucked at web stuff. In the end the problem was all caused by having too many friends - apparently AIM can only handle 150 contacts - at least that is according to Mssrs. Unsanity, Rael and Webb.

But it occurs to me that there's something slightly suspicious about all of this. A couple of days ago I tried searching for information about this error message, but it was nowhere. There was literally no information. Today, there's a search result returned, and posts about the subject on three separate weblogs. So what's happened? Is it a new error message or is it just we've all hit the limit at the same time? Or has the number of buddies available changed? I smell a mystery!

Read the comments

Read error

Read error 11/02/2003 05:25 PM
CNET Asia Nov 2 2003 4:29PM ET

A possible fix for an iTunes 4.8 error
400

A possible fix for an iTunes 4.8 error
400 06/22/2005 02:23 AM
If you recently upgraded iTunes, you may have problems authenticating, viewing your cart, or shopping. There are two errors which have been occuring recently. The first seems to be 502, I believe, and this appears to be resol...

Blue Or Red? Error Or Not?

Blue Or Red? Error Or Not? 04/05/2005 04:18 AM
More variation mongers, but this time it's legit - though a little bass ackwards, or is it?

Error Handler

Error Handler 04/16/2005 11:27 PM
Support now available

How Would You Handle a $1,000,000 Coding
Error?

How Would You Handle a $1,000,000 Coding
Error? 07/19/2004 11:48 PM

IEXPLORE.EXE (JSPROXY.DLL) Error

IEXPLORE.EXE (JSPROXY.DLL) Error 08/28/2004 02:27 AM

MOF Error - Class has Instances

MOF Error - Class has Instances 08/22/2004 08:53 PM

iTunes 4.8's Movie Error

iTunes 4.8's Movie Error 06/22/2005 02:01 AM

By Christopher Breen, Macworld

Error handling in Web applications

Error handling in Web applications 12/02/2002 01:17 PM

UN-friendly error messages in IIS

UN-friendly error messages in IIS 08/28/2004 04:16 AM

LinuxWorld.com.au: Error reporting in
PHP (Pt. 1)

LinuxWorld.com.au: Error reporting in
PHP (Pt. 1) 07/22/2004 07:57 AM
In Part one of the "Error reporting in PHP" series from LinuxWorld.com.au, they give a (very) brief overview of what error erporting is, how to configure it, and how to make your own, more useful errors.

explaining margin of error

explaining margin of error 08/19/2004 07:18 PM
and debunking the myth of a "statistical tie"

SCO's first trial--an error

SCO's first trial--an error 07/22/2004 11:13 AM
ZDNet Jul 22 2004 3:45PM GMT

Error crítico en el protocolo 802.11

Error crítico en el protocolo 802.11 05/15/2004 08:40 AM

XP SP2 Error: The page cannot be
displayed

XP SP2 Error: The page cannot be
displayed 08/10/2004 12:00 AM
Tech-Recipes Aug 10 2004 3:13AM GMT

JScript Error in Web Console

JScript Error in Web Console 04/19/2004 08:18 AM

Grok Description matches for Cliex32.dll Error 126 Error in Wnmanual.log
GrokA matches for Cliex32.dll Error 126 Error in Wnmanual.log

Cliex32.dll Error 126 Error in Wnmanual.log

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: