XML Data-Binding: Comparing Castor to .NET
Grok Headline matches for XML Data-Binding: Comparing Castor to .NET
Learn about ASP.NET data binding
Learn about ASP.NET data binding
01/26/2004 07:10 AMCNET Jan 26 2004 11:23AM GMT
JiBX - XML Data Binding for Java
JiBX - XML Data Binding for Java
04/30/2004 11:58 AMBeta 3b release
Spotlight on the Longhorn SDK: Avalon
Data Binding
Spotlight on the Longhorn SDK: Avalon
Data Binding
06/11/2004 09:04 PMData binding is a core piece in Avalon, Longhorn's new user interface
stack. This overview in the Longhorn SDK introduces the core topics
and shows you the raw power and flexibility that data binding
provides.
Introducing "Longhorn" for Developers:
Chapter 5: Data Binding
Introducing "Longhorn" for Developers:
Chapter 5: Data Binding
02/14/2004 09:21 AMLearn how to use data binding to move data from practically any .NET
object to your user interface and back again without writing any
procedural code.
Avoid Java-XML data binding headaches
(ZDNet UK)
Avoid Java-XML data binding headaches
(ZDNet UK)
09/18/2002 03:29 PMLonghorn Foghorn: Crazy About Avalon
Data Binding
Longhorn Foghorn: Crazy About Avalon
Data Binding
06/26/2004 09:31 AMChris Sells continues his discussion on Avalon and introduces data
binding into his Longhorn based Solitaire application.
The W3C RDF Data Access Working Group
has published the first public working
draft of SPARQL Variable Binding
The W3C RDF Data Access Working Group
has published the first public working
draft of SPARQL Variable Binding
01/02/2005 11:31 AMxmlhack Jan 2 2005 1:45PM GMT
Book review: Java & XML Data Binding
(Java Pro)
Book review: Java & XML Data Binding
(Java Pro)
08/26/2002 08:32 AMCastor links.
Castor links.
03/11/2003 09:43 AM
Roller uses the Castor
persistence framework. FreeRoller can be very slow.
Are the two things related? I have no real empirical evidence (yet) to
prove a link, but I did find an interesting link of a different sort
in my referer logs this morning to a blog entry by (Roller user)
Matthew Porter. Back in December 2002, Matthew chose
Hibernate instead of Castor
for the
Java Lobby Community
Port (JLCP) project. Here's why:
Persiste
nt Framework Choice for JLCP: Castor was not chosen for two
primary reasons. The first is the lack of development of Castor in
the past year. In addition, one the tests we performed at DMI, Castor
was significantly slower
than other PFs- to the point where it was intolerable. The first
reason
and recent tests led me to believe that the situation regarding speed
had not changed.
Also, an interesting link was posted in a comment on my Long
Transactions post yesterday. This is a pretty interesting article:
O/R Mapping with Castor JDO in the Real World:
Castor holds up to its promises in simple testing and trial runs.
However, it has proven to fall short in some practical issues with our
application of about twenty-five data classes and as many tables. Most
of our problems come from the need to hold onto objects across
transactions and perform complex updates.
I'm tempted to rewrite the Roller backend using Hibernate just for the
hell of it, but I really should to do some profiling of Roller to see
where the problem lies, don't you think? I guess I could do a 30-day
eval of OptimizeIT or JProbe, but I would be happy to hear your
recommendations for free and/or open source profiling tools. Got any?
Castor Plug-in for Eclipse
Castor Plug-in for Eclipse
09/15/2004 11:17 PMCastor Plug-in for Eclipse v2.0.0 released
Allen: 'We Drank Some Castor Oil'
Allen: 'We Drank Some Castor Oil'
04/30/2004 02:00 AMBusiness Week Apr 30 2004 6:16AM GMT
Castor and Pollux walking naked, side by
side, past Kafka
Castor and Pollux walking naked, side by
side, past Kafka
01/05/2005 06:52 PM
Guy Davenport is dead. The
irrealist
a> w
riter,
tra
nslator of Archilochus, friend of modernists, and influential
teacher has joined
Hugh
Kenner in whatever lies beyond this mortal coil. More links at
today's
wood s lot, where I learned the sad news.
Java Binding for SDL
Java Binding for SDL
12/29/2004 08:15 PMsdljava 0.9.0 released
Perl6-Binding-0.601
Perl6-Binding-0.601
05/23/2004 12:27 AMXML to Java Binding
XML to Java Binding
05/19/2004 08:58 AMUnder New Management
Java RDF Binding
Java RDF Binding
12/18/2003 02:14 AMJRDF 0.2 Released
Perl6-Binding-0.5
Perl6-Binding-0.5
12/17/2003 04:55 AMPerl6-Binding-0.6
Perl6-Binding-0.6
05/23/2004 12:27 AMBinding your Preferences in Cocoa
Binding your Preferences in Cocoa
05/07/2004 01:56 AMOne of the easiest ways to get started with Cocoa Bindings is to
manage preferences in an application. This article will show you how
to using Cocoa Bindings in a step-by-step fashion to eliminate the
glue code that goes with implementing preferences. At the same time,
we hope that the step-by-step format guides you to your own "ah-ha"
moment.
Implement Java-XML binding
Implement Java-XML binding
10/11/2002 07:56 AMCNET Oct 7 2002 10:03PM ET
Implement Java-XML binding
Implement Java-XML binding
10/08/2002 07:10 AMCNET Oct 7 2002 10:03PM ET
Notes and Tips: Pre-binding
Notes and Tips: Pre-binding
08/12/2004 11:27 AMTim Seufert explains why Apple's latest security update appeared to
affect unrelated programs.
ColdFusion DataGrid and Binding
ColdFusion DataGrid and Binding
02/07/2005 01:56 AMUse the new Rich Flash Forms feature to create interactive form
controls that are not available in ordinary HTML.
NetInfo binding by DHCP
NetInfo binding by DHCP
01/07/2004 04:32 PMJust a quickie. All the Apple documents on NetInfo explain how to set
up OS X Server to provide NetInfo information as part of the DHCP
response/service. But if you already have a DHCP service on your
network, the DHCP option...
Comparing Linux and AIX
Comparing Linux and AIX
07/22/2004 04:43 AMLinux can learn valuable lessons from its elder cousins in the
enterprise, the proprietary Unixes from the likes of IBM, Sun, and HP.
Those operating systems, in turn, can learn some lessons from Linux.
Comparing the features of the more enterprise-ready Linux distros with
AIX, one of the leading proprietary Unixes, helps identify some of
those lessons.
Comparing Databases
Comparing Databases
11/13/2002 04:56 AMGenerally speaking, there are four different types of databases
available on Linux: key/value, relational, object-oriented, and XML.
Each has strengths and weaknesses. When choosing a database you should
consider whether it:
- Can handle simultaneous access from multiple users
- Can be easily accessed from programs written in different
languages (especially object-oriented languages)
- Can handle large amounts of data
- Can ensure that multiple operations either all happen at once, or
not at all ("transactions")
- Can perform complicated searches ("queries")
"zeldman.50001"
Nebula1-Erlang Binding alpha 1
Nebula1-Erlang Binding alpha 1
01/22/2004 02:20 PM3D game development in Erlang through the Nebula-Device Engine.
gtk2hs: A Gtk2 binding for Haskell
gtk2hs: A Gtk2 binding for Haskell
11/19/2003 02:44 AMgtk2hs 0.9.4 released
"akin to a legally binding document"
"akin to a legally binding document"
06/14/2004 05:47 PMSVG's XML Binding Language (sXBL)
SVG's XML Binding Language (sXBL)
09/01/2004 03:54 PM2004-09-01: Through joint efforts, the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)
Working Group and the CSS Working Group have released the First Public
Working Draft of SVG's XML Binding Language (sXBL). The sXBL language
defines the presentation and interactive behavior of elements outside
the SVG namepace. A future version may extend XBL to any markup. Visit
the SVG and CSS home pages. (News archive)
Foster Dad Sentenced for Binding
Children
Foster Dad Sentenced for Binding
Children
01/24/2004 05:00 PMReuters via Wired News Jan 24 2004 8:30PM GMT
Comparing PEAR DB to ADOdb
Comparing PEAR DB to ADOdb
11/17/2002 10:47 PMPEAR DB is the default database
abstraction
library for PEAR. ADOdb is a high end database
abstraction
library modelled on Microsoft's ADO that is also very popular.
1.
Feature Comparison
Where we try to put you to sleep by showing you the similarities
between PEAR DB and ADOdb
2.
Features Missing from PEAR DB
Now we try to wake you up with some teasers
3.
Criticisms of ADOdb
Read what other people are moaning and complaining about
"zeldman.57"
Comparing and replacing strings
(XML.com)
Comparing and replacing strings
(XML.com)
06/06/2002 12:03 PMComparing MySQL performance
Comparing MySQL performance
03/14/2005 05:31 PMWith the introduction of the 2.6 Linux kernel, FreeBSD-5-STABLE,
Solaris 10, and now NetBSD 2.0, you might be wondering which of them
offers superior database performance. In my previous article, I
discussed the tools I chose to test these venerable operating systems
and the methodology by which they were tested. The result is this
MySQL performance comparison between OpenBSD 3.6; NetBSD 2.0; FreeBSD
5.3 and 4.10; Solaris Express (build 69); and Linux 2.4 and 2.6
(Gentoo-based). Read on for the results.
Comparing and Replacing Strings
Comparing and Replacing Strings
06/06/2002 06:00 AMIn this month's Transforming XML column, Bob DuCharme gives us the ins
and outs of string munging in XSLT, including string equality
comparisons and search-and-replace operations.
Comparing Mac OSX Performance to Linux
Comparing Mac OSX Performance to Linux
11/05/2002 02:13 PMAs good as Mac OS X is for desktops and laptops, one wonders if the
FreeBSD inside is not too restricted by the Apple jacket around it to
also make for an efficient, secure and fast server OS.
Apple is now busy convincing the world that Apples make also for
excellent server appliances in the handy U1 format, thanks to OS X.
That new product is called Apple Xserve. Many potential buyers are,
however, asking themselves if OS X—given its recent introduction—is
ready today to handle their critical apps.
That's why I decided to take one of these sleek Xserve boxes and test
run it both under OS X and under Linux. -- Moshe Bar
"zeldman.orso"
comparing Per Se and the French Laundry
comparing Per Se and the French Laundry
05/25/2004 08:55 PMhow do you say "yummy" in french?
Comparing Codecs for 2004
Comparing Codecs for 2004
01/02/2005 07:02 AMComparing Python to Java
Comparing Python to Java
11/18/2002 12:57 PMJava was designed to be an incremental step up from C++, with the
rationale that for the price of a small bit of efficiency, you gained
a huge amount in terms of simplicity, ease of development,
maintainability, and portability. Python on the other hand "turns all
the knobs to 10." It offers a beautifully simple, clean design that
can result in programs that are extremely clear, easy to maintain and
very quick to develop.
"tri" In my mind, what is true of Python holds true for PHP also.
Furthermore I can train a C or Javascript programmer to code in
proficiently PHP in 2 days. I cannot say the same for Python. Python
enjoys a certain intellectual cachet among the digirati, but I think
PHP is the better language, especially when PHP's support for threads
and unicode is fixed.
"zeldman.oo8"
Grok Description matches for XML Data-Binding: Comparing Castor to .NET
GrokA matches for XML Data-Binding: Comparing Castor to .NET
XML Data-Binding: Comparing Castor to .NET