Lawmaker tones down anti-Gmail bill
Grok Headline matches for Lawmaker tones down anti-Gmail bill
Anti-Gmail Bill Now Allows Gmail
Anti-Gmail Bill Now Allows Gmail
05/26/2004 01:35 PMLast month there was a lot of talk about the somewhat clueless move by
a California politician to create a law that would
ban
Google's Gmail offering, despite the fact that it was completely
optional to use. It appears that enough people (probably including
those at Google itself) sat down with State Senator Liz Figueroa to
explain how email works, and have convinced her to
tone down
the bill so that it now allows Gmail. That's right, the
anti-Gmail bill now has loopholes that specifically allow Gmail. In
other words, Senator Figueroa seems to have realized just how
pointless the bill was in the first place and is trying to save face
by adjusting it so that it still seems to have a purpose: banning a
bunch of things that no one was doing, like having humans read the
content of your emails to put in advertising.
Anti-Gmail Bill Introduced
Anti-Gmail Bill Introduced
04/28/2004 10:29 AMSeth Finkelstein reports that California State Senator Liz Figueroa
has introduced her bizarre bill. Press release, Info, Text. I've
talked to several privacy advocates (and I'd like to think of myself
as a privacy advocate, as well) and I have yet to understand any
possible scenario where this bill makes sense. (If you think you can
explain it, please tell me.) Let's be clear: This bill would make
Gmail illegal. It wouldn't ask them to change some poor business
practices, it wouldn't ask them to add privacy protections, it would
just force Google to fund it some way without ads or shut it down. So
why go to this drastic step? What's the harm? As I see it, there are
three parts to Gmail: Receive your email. Every web email service does
this, and nobody has objected. Store up to a gigabyte of email. Since
this is so much more email than any other service, this could lead to
some increased privacy problems. (Google could search through your
archives at any time.) But this doesn't seem to be what people are
objecting to, and Google has said they'll try their best to keep your
email safe. Analyze your email. This seems to be what people are
objecting to. But I don't see what the problem is: Google searches
your email for key words, finds ads that match those key words, and
shows you the ads. Then it throws all the information it generated
away immediately, so no human (other than you) ever sees it. Google
doesn't store any information about how many times or to who ads were
shown. They don't store any information about what was in your emails.
And no human ever goes and looks at your emails. So what's the big
deal? How could this possibly cause a problem for anyone? I think the
real problem here is that people feel uncomfortable about ads in their
email. (I felt a bit uncomfortable at first too.) But to say there's a
privacy problem with Gmail's ad system, without spelling out what it
is, only capitalizes on people's fears. Sadly, that's exactly what
thirty-one privacy and civil liberties organizations have done. Again,
if you can explain the problem with Gmail to me, I'll take it back....
California senate approves anti-Gmail
bill
California senate approves anti-Gmail
bill
05/27/2004 06:14 PMCalifornia Senate Passes Watered Down
Anti-Gmail Bill
California Senate Passes Watered Down
Anti-Gmail Bill
05/28/2004 06:27 PMInternetWeek.com-1 hour agoThe California state Senate on Thursday
overwhelmingly passed a scaled-back bill that would place some limits
on Google's upcoming Gmail service, which has ...
Lawmaker moves to block Google's Gmail
Lawmaker moves to block Google's Gmail
04/13/2004 10:04 AMCalifornia lawmaker moves to block
Google's Gmail
California lawmaker moves to block
Google's Gmail
04/13/2004 01:58 AMSABC Apr 13 2004 6:08AM GMT
Calif. lawmaker moves to block Google's
Gmail
Calif. lawmaker moves to block Google's
Gmail
04/13/2004 01:58 PMMSNBC Apr 13 2004 6:36PM GMT
Californian lawmaker moves to block
Google's Gmail
Californian lawmaker moves to block
Google's Gmail
04/12/2004 10:05 PMThe New Zealand Herald Apr 13 2004 2:32AM GMT
Calif. Lawmaker Moves to Block Google's
Gmail (Reuters)
Calif. Lawmaker Moves to Block Google's
Gmail (Reuters)
04/12/2004 06:17 PMReuters - A California state senator on
Monday said she was drafting legislation to block Google Inc.'s
free e-mail service "Gmail" because it would place advertising
in personal messages after searching them for key words.
Yahoo! News - Calif. Lawmaker Moves to
Block Google's Gmail
Yahoo! News - Calif. Lawmaker Moves to
Block Google's Gmail
04/13/2004 03:41 PMblock Google from releasing Gmail .. What a punk-ass bitch .. drafting
legislation .. drawing up a bill ..
Yahoo
news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040412/wr_nm/tech_googl
e_dc_1
track this
site | 5 links
Ring tones not making ka-ching tones
Ring tones not making ka-ching tones
06/10/2004 10:10 PMVerizon Wireless and Sprint say more U.S. cell phone users are tapping
Net-based services such as tone downloads. But revenue still has
hang-ups.
Secure Resolutions Upgrades Their
Anti-Virus Engine to Include
Anti-Spyware, Anti-Adware, Anti-Dialers,
Anti-Hoaxes, Anti-Jokes, and
Anti-Hacking Tools
Secure Resolutions Upgrades Their
Anti-Virus Engine to Include
Anti-Spyware, Anti-Adware, Anti-Dialers,
Anti-Hoaxes, Anti-Jokes, and
Anti-Hacking Tools
06/05/2005 11:14 PMSecure Resolutions desktop security (Resolution Antivirus™)
automatically detects and eliminates all types of viruses, worms,
Trojans Horses, dialers, hoaxes, jokes, and hacking tools within a
managed desktop security solution. [PRWEB Jun 2, 2005]
CA Bill Targets Google's "Gmail"
CA Bill Targets Google's "Gmail"
05/28/2004 06:27 PMKRON4.com,CA-2 hours agoSACRAMENTO (AP) -- Google's new e-mail
service that promised to tailor ads to e-mail content would be
limited, under a bill approved by the state Senate. ...
Senate Approves Bill Concerning Gmail
Policies
Senate Approves Bill Concerning Gmail
Policies
05/27/2004 06:26 PMWebProNews,KY-1 hour ago ... Liz Figueroa (D-Ca) that limits
Gmail's ad placement procedures has been approved by the Senate by
a vote of 24-8. The bill questioned Google's intention of ...
CA Bill Restricting Google's Gmail
Passes Senate
CA Bill Restricting Google's Gmail
Passes Senate
05/28/2004 12:27 AMBeSpacific May 28 2004 4:26AM GMT
California Senate Approves Bill Curbing
Gmail
California Senate Approves Bill Curbing
Gmail
05/31/2004 08:30 PMSource: ClickZ - The California State Senate has approved a bill
putting strict curbs on e-mail providers intending to scan customer
messages for advertising and other purposes. The bill, authored by
Sen. Liz Figueroa, D-Fremont, was written in response to...
Anti-spam bill passed
Anti-spam bill passed
12/02/2003 01:49 AMThe U.S. House of Representatives passed anti-spam legislation that
provides for prison time as well as hefty fines
Anti-File Sharing Bill Changes Name,
Little Else
Anti-File Sharing Bill Changes Name,
Little Else
06/23/2004 05:34 PMLast week we wrote about the so-called
INDUC
E Act, that would outlaw inducing or even counseling someone to
infringe on copyrights. The bill was supposed to be introduced
last week, but some of the publicity around the leaded version made
the sponsors hold back a few days. If you thought they used that time
to change the bill, you were wrong. They did change the name, getting
rid of the laughable "child exploitation" part in the name, but
leaving the actual law the same. The bill is now called,
The Inducing
Infringement of Copyrights Act (IICA), which must upset those
politicians who love bill names that spell out words related to the
bill. Either way it's a dreadful and somewhat scary bill that would
clearly outlaw file sharing networks, along with VCRs and other
methods for infringing copyrights. Unfortunately, it appears to have
strong bi-partisan backing, that's looking to rush it through
Congress. If it did pass, it would be disastrous for the tech
industry which (stupidly) is supporting it in the form of the BSA and
the ESA. The RIAA is also thrilled about it. All three are missing
out on the fact that they're basically trying to kill off the best
distribution system that's ever been handed to them -- one that's been
shown to have strong promotional value. It's amazing how badly these
industries, with their pocketed politicians are shooting themselves in
the foot. This bill would make it impossible to create something like
the VCR or TiVo today. It's dangerous, it's stupid and it's going to
damage our economy if it passes.
Update:
TechLawAdvisor points out the fact that
"counsels" has been dropped from the bill.
Congress OKs anti-spam bill
Congress OKs anti-spam bill
12/09/2003 12:23 AMCNN Dec 8 2003 11:22PM ET
Anti-Spyware Bill Is Back
Anti-Spyware Bill Is Back
01/06/2005 02:38 PMAs was widely expected, Mary Bono has
reintro
duced her anti-spyware bill to Congress, where it's expected to
get approval (as it did last year, before being shut down in the
Senate). Clearly, some thought has gone into the bill, and it's not
as bad as some previously proposed anti-spyware laws. However, you
still have to wonder if it will really help. There will be provisions
in the bill that are likely to have unintended consequences, causing
problems for some software products. Meanwhile, the nastiest spyware
products will remain controlled by criminals who don't care about the
law because they don't expect to get caught. I don't think it's the
worst thing in the world, but any law should have a provision to keep
an eye out for negative unintended consequences and have a way to fix
those quickly. There should also be a way to monitor whether or not
this actually has an impact. Otherwise, it's just going to get voted
into law without any balances to make sure it doesn't do any harm,
because who wants to vote in favor of spyware?
Copyright Office pitches anti-P2P bill
Copyright Office pitches anti-P2P bill
09/02/2004 05:24 PMZDNet Sep 2 2004 9:32PM GMT
Congress approves anti-spam bill
Congress approves anti-spam bill
12/08/2003 09:29 PMCNN Dec 8 2003 8:35PM ET
Model Anti-Municipal Broadband Bill
Model Anti-Municipal Broadband Bill
12/22/2004 01:27 AM Esme Vos has uncovered (and has available for download) the model
bill for state legislatures to ban municipal broadband: The
inestimable Vos has emerged as a firebrand for fighting back the
rhetoric of incumbent teleopolies that have put out the meme that
there are unfair tax breaks and unfair advantages that a municipal
operation has over private enterprise. This ignores the subsidies
provided--estimated at over $700 per person in Pennsylvania over the
last 10 years of a failed Verizon development plan,
non-refundable--and "taxes" that telcos and cable companies are often
able to collect for their own coffers. Vos now posts the bill that
someone--she'd like to know the individual--wrote to distribute to
various legislatures under the guise of competition. Competition means
not taking money from taxpayers, charging them by overpriced tariffs
defended to the death, collecting and keeping funds intended for rural
or impoverished citizens to have universal access, and fighting for
the right to squeeze the pipes to prevent interesting competitive
services from rising. Competition does mean building neutral
infrastructure paid for by access fees that allow all comers to
compete on a level playing field to let the market determine the best
use of resources. It's strange how businesses that hate regulation in
theory love how it supports their business models. Also strange how
many folks who claim to want real markets only really want big
businesses to be able to dictate to their markets what things cost. I
looked at the innards of the Word doc that Esme posted, but the only
secret information it contains is about her computer, not any previous
computers. On Monday morning, she posted the list of board members of
the American Legislative Exchange Council, the group behind the model
legislation. Update: Sascha Meinrath calls astroturf on three
organizations, including ALEC, that are behind anti-municipal
telco/cable/telecom service bills, pointing out that their boards'
members are mostly made up of folks that more likely have their own
companies' interests at heart despite the mission statements....
Anti-DMCA bill gathers weight
Anti-DMCA bill gathers weight
06/22/2004 07:48 AMBush Signs Anti-Spam Bill
Bush Signs Anti-Spam Bill
12/17/2003 06:09 AMSpammers violating the new law could be looking at stiff fines and
even prison terms under legislation signed into law by the White
House.
Congress passes anti-spam bill
Congress passes anti-spam bill
12/09/2003 09:45 AM'Ham fisted' CAN-SPAM Act
Bush signs anti-spam bill
Bush signs anti-spam bill
12/17/2003 07:20 AMComputer Weekly Dec 17 2003 6:21AM ET
Conservative group savages anti-P2P bill
Conservative group savages anti-P2P bill
09/24/2004 05:43 PMPolitical wrangling over a copyright bill that could imperil some MP3
players heats up in the Senate before a vote next Thursday.
Senate to Decide on Anti-Spyware Bill
Senate to Decide on Anti-Spyware Bill
09/22/2004 06:33 PMAnti-spyware legislation that prohibits companies from installing
software on a computer without user consent has been approved by the
U.S. Senate Commerce Committee. Dubbed the Spy Block Act, the bill now
moves to the full Senate where it will likely be voted on before the
end of the year. The Spy Block Act requires software to provide an
uninstall option, as well as outlaws any software that transmits user
information without explicit approval.
Anti-Spyware Bill up for Vote in
Congress
Anti-Spyware Bill up for Vote in
Congress
09/22/2004 08:33 PMCongress OKs National Anti-Spam Bill
Congress OKs National Anti-Spam Bill
12/08/2003 09:29 PMAP via Daily Press Dec 8 2003 8:36PM ET
Anti-Spyware Bill Gets One Step Closer
Anti-Spyware Bill Gets One Step Closer
06/17/2004 07:33 PMDespite
strong
lobbying efforts from a number of large tech companies, a House
panel has
approv
ed an anti-spyware bill that would require any software to clearly
tell the user that it includes traffic tracking components. It would
also prohibit keystroke logging, browser/computer hijacking and ads
that can't be closed. While this (of course) won't stop the
worst
spyware offenders who don't really care about the law, it should
slow down the proliferation of annoying and sneaky adware that's
almost as bad. It's still unclear which part of the law tech
companies are upset with at this point. It does seem to be clearly
written to only focus on
"bad"
spyware.
Anti-Spyware Bill Advances in Congress
Anti-Spyware Bill Advances in Congress
06/24/2004 04:46 PMLawmakers Introduce Anti-Outsourcing
Bill
Lawmakers Introduce Anti-Outsourcing
Bill
03/06/2004 02:01 AMLawmakers introduced a bill in Congress Thursday aimed to deter U.S.
companies from outsourcing jobs overseas.
The Defending American Jobs Act of 2004, sponsored by 50 legislators,
proposes to cut federal funding from companies that lay off workers at
higher rates in the U.S. than abroad.
US anti-spyware bill clears another
hurdle
US anti-spyware bill clears another
hurdle
06/25/2004 07:06 AMZDNet UK Jun 25 2004 11:23AM GMT
Bush to sign anti-phishing bill
Bush to sign anti-phishing bill
07/15/2004 08:29 AMMandatory minumum sentences for ID theft
No One Likes California's Anti-Spyware
Bill
No One Likes California's Anti-Spyware
Bill
09/16/2004 09:18 PMIt looks like almost no one is happy with the proposed anti-spyware
legislation in California. Companies aren't happy with it because
they're afraid it may ban perfectly reasonable applications, while
privac
y groups say it's worse than no law at all since it's way too
narrowly focused. Of course, it sounds like this narrow focus is
making some of the companies that originally opposed the bill now view
it in a more favorable light.
House Panel OKs Anti-Spyware Bill
House Panel OKs Anti-Spyware Bill
06/17/2004 02:46 PMInternet News Jun 17 2004 7:22PM GMT
Congress Debates Anti-Spyware Bill
Congress Debates Anti-Spyware Bill
04/16/2005 02:44 PMGrok Description matches for Lawmaker tones down anti-Gmail bill
GrokA matches for Lawmaker tones down anti-Gmail bill
Lawmaker tones down anti-Gmail bill