Eight-year American telephone tangle may end in Supreme Court

Grok Headline matches for Eight-year American telephone tangle may end in Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Sides With Bush
on American Detainee Case

Supreme Court Partially Sides With Bush
on American Detainee Case 06/28/2004 09:50 AM

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit 03/30/2005 08:56 PM
CBS MarketWatch Mar 31 2005 12:31AM GMT

South African telephone monopoly to go
ahead with lay-offs despite court ban
(AFP)

South African telephone monopoly to go
ahead with lay-offs despite court ban
(AFP) 08/16/2004 12:27 PM
AFP - South African fixed line monopoly Telkom vowed to go ahead with plans to cut 4,000 jobs despite a court injunction forcing the state-run enterprise to seek agreement with the unions.

What is going on at the Supreme Court?

What is going on at the Supreme Court? 06/29/2004 11:59 AM
Thomas and Scalia are the most conservative conservative Justices. Breyer is on of the liberal Justices. (Admittedly the least liberal,…

The Supreme Court says no

The Supreme Court says no 03/24/2005 11:52 AM
The justices deny a request for an order to re-insert Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. Is this the end?

Dems on the Supreme Court

Dems on the Supreme Court 01/11/2004 07:56 AM
So an underplayed aspect of this campaign has been how the Democratic candidates would differently select the Supreme Court. On NPR's debate , Senator Lieberman pointed to Justice Souter as a model. Congressman Kucinich plugged Justice Ginsburg. I've gotten a couple pings asking what the right answer is. Hard question for me. Of course neither Ginsburg nor Souter were on the correct side (or the right side) of Eldred, but I certainly think Justice Souter is a model justice -- serious, hard working, unburdened by ideology, prepared. I never quite get the principle that guides Justice Ginsburg's choice between activism and not, or principle and not, so I'm waiting to see the genius in that selection by President Clinton. Justice Breyer of course wrote a brilliant dissent in Eldred -- brilliant, though not effective. He was proud of the decision's embrace of economics as the standard by which the Sonny Bono Act was judged. But while I'm a fan of the result, I've been too deeply affected (scarred?) by the originalism/textaulism/fidelity theories of Scalia to be enamored of that method. In my view, perhaps the best sitting justice is a Republican appointee -- Stevens. And if candidates are looking for what makes the best the best, then it is certainly his judges' judge-like character. There's no simple line that predicts Justice Stevens' result -- certainly not a political line. And if there is any quality this Court needs, it is that -- following a line that does not seem a political line. The most impressive judges not sitting on the Supreme Court are also, um, Republicans. (What party am I again?) Judge Kozin ski is a great judge -- too young when appointed, but someone who has matured brilliantly in the job. And while his views about how to the interpret the constitution make me cringe, history will record the greatest judge of our time as Judge Posner. But I doubt that this is the time that a President from either party will pick greatness as the reason to select a Justice.

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice 07/01/2004 02:04 AM
ZDNet Australia Jul 1 2004 5:44AM GMT

Supreme Court to try Brand X

Supreme Court to try Brand X 03/28/2005 11:29 PM
Independent ISPs argue cable companies should be forced to lease lines, but what's really on trial is the concept of communication.

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice 06/29/2004 12:05 PM
In a close vote, the justices rule that a federal law designed to restrict Internet pornography violates Americans' free-speech rights.

Showdown at the Supreme Court

Showdown at the Supreme Court 03/17/2005 03:27 AM
“On March 29, the entertainment and technology industries will descend upon Washington, D.C. to argue their respective sides before the Supreme Court in the landmark case of MGM v Grokster. At stake: the future of peer-to-peer technology, consumer electronics, software design, and consumer rights in the United States. In April 2003, a federal judge ruled that Streamcast Networks — the developer and distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software, and Grokster — the developer and distributor…

Direct and Related Links for 'Showdown at the Supreme Court'

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 11:40 PM
For now . . .

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation 03/28/2005 11:56 PM
Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear opening arguments in the fight to classify what constitutes an "information service," and whether cable companies and voice over IP providers deserve to be treated differently under a separate set of government regulations.

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court 03/29/2005 06:49 AM
Personal Computer World Mar 29 2005 10:51AM GMT

Supreme Court Won't Block Gay Marriages
(AP)

Supreme Court Won't Block Gay Marriages
(AP) 05/14/2004 06:10 PM
AP - The Supreme Court refused Friday to block the nation's first state-sanctioned gay marriages from taking place next week.

Lessig on Supreme Court justices

Lessig on Supreme Court justices 01/11/2004 07:54 AM

Larry gives his opinion of the Supreme Court justices like a sommelier describing a collection of fine wines.

Web Guide to U.S. Supreme Court Research

Web Guide to U.S. Supreme Court Research 12/25/2003 07:52 PM
Web Guide to U.S. Supreme Court Research
http://www.l lrx.com/features/supremectwebguide.htm

Gail Partin's thorough and up-to-date guide provides annotated links to the most reliable, substantive sites for U.S. Supreme Court research. Her focus is predominantly on information that is freely or inexpensively available on the Internet.

Supreme Court blocks web porn law

Supreme Court blocks web porn law 06/29/2004 07:10 PM
Independent Jun 29 2004 9:20PM GMT

Supreme Court Says COPA Unconstitutional

Supreme Court Says COPA Unconstitutional 06/29/2004 01:38 PM
"Suggesting there are less restrictive ways to protect minors from harmful Web content, the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday ruled 5-4 that the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) is a content-based restriction of free speech. The case is on its way back to a lower court for further review."

Supreme Court Backs Disabilities Act

Supreme Court Backs Disabilities Act 05/17/2004 03:00 PM
In previous cases, the high court has repeatedly limited the effect of the Americans With Disabilities Act, so today's outcome was unexpected.

Online Exclusive: Supreme Court

Online Exclusive: Supreme Court 09/27/2004 07:30 AM
Dailybusinessreview.com - Mon Sep 27, 10:54 am GMT

Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court

Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 05:18 PM
IT Vibe Jun 29 2004 7:34PM GMT

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown 04/20/2004 06:00 AM
Forbes Apr 20 2004 10:16AM GMT

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on hold

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on hold 06/29/2004 05:18 PM
San Jose Mercury News Jun 29 2004 7:45PM GMT

NFL Asks Supreme Court to Bar Clarett
(AP)

NFL Asks Supreme Court to Bar Clarett
(AP) 04/22/2004 10:42 AM
AP - The NFL urged the Supreme Court on Thursday to keep Maurice Clarett out of this weekend's draft because the dispute over his eligibility is unsettled.

Australian Supreme Court Looks At
Copyright Law

Australian Supreme Court Looks At
Copyright Law 09/14/2004 12:29 PM
The Supreme Court in Australia is now taking a look at their version of the DMCA to see if people have the right to modify hardware they've bought or to make backup copies of digital media they purchased. In the old, pre-digital world, when you bought a product, it was yours to do whatever you wanted with it. However, thanks to recent law changes, any product that involves a digital component seems much closer to a rental agreement, where the company that "sold" you the product retains some sort of rights. For obvious reasons, many people think this is unfair. In this particular case, Sony went after a mod-chip trader, claiming that the mod-chips he offered for the Playstation violated copyright law by letting users play copied games, thereby violating anti-circumvention rules in Australian law. It really becomes a question of whether or not certain companies have the right to have their business models protected by regulations, rather than forcing them to keep up with the changing marketplace.

Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality

Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality 03/28/2005 12:59 PM
The United States Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday a landmark case that could have far-reaching consequences for both copyright holders and the technology industry. At issue is whether two P2P network operators, Grokster and StreamCast are liable for the copyright infringement committed by their users.

Supreme Court to hear P2P case

Supreme Court to hear P2P case 12/19/2004 03:46 PM
The biggest P2P case will be heard before the Supreme Court, and more hangs in the balance than just the development of P2P-technologies.

"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)"

"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)" 06/29/2004 02:13 PM

Supreme Court curtails Net porn law

Supreme Court curtails Net porn law 06/29/2004 02:04 PM
CNET Jun 29 2004 3:59PM GMT

Supreme Court Case Previews Now
Available

Supreme Court Case Previews Now
Available 12/22/2004 01:27 AM
The Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School is now offering free previews of high-provile Supreme Court cases before the are argued and ruled on. The previews are available...

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases 03/31/2005 09:11 AM
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
http://www.landmarkcases.org/

There is always a great demand for educational materials regarding the most important US Supreme Court Cases and this website is an outgrowth of that sustained interest. Developed by Street Law and the Supreme Court Historical Society, this website was developed in order to provide teachers with a full range of resources and activities regarding such cases. The general teaching strategies offered here include political cartoon analysis, moot court, continuum exercises, and website evaluation. Some of the cases covered here include Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona. The site also offers some detailed explanations of important related concepts, such as federalism, national supremacy, and judicial review. Additional, the site provides background summaries of each case and pertinent discussion questions for a variety of reading levels and abilities. This has been added to Legal Resources 2005 Internet MiniGuide. [From The Scout Report, Copyright Internet Scout Project 1994-2004. http://scout.wisc.edu/]

Supreme Court quashes Net porn law

Supreme Court quashes Net porn law 06/29/2004 03:19 PM
ZDNet Jun 29 2004 6:45PM GMT

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P 03/29/2005 02:25 PM
Justices voice skepticism about both sides as file-swap companies do legal battle with entertainment industry.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right

U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right 06/21/2004 09:55 PM

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court 06/22/2004 05:47 AM
Chip giant must now hand over documents to EC

Supreme Court rules against Intel

Supreme Court rules against Intel 06/21/2004 10:54 AM
ZDNet Jun 21 2004 3:40PM GMT

US Supreme Court delays decision on P2P

US Supreme Court delays decision on P2P 06/22/2005 01:58 AM
There won't be a ruling today from the Supreme Court in the MGM v. Grokster case, but we will have one in the next 10 days.

Supreme Court hears P2P case

Supreme Court hears P2P case 03/29/2005 11:57 AM
Justices quiz attorneys for file-swapping software companies and Hollywood studios in a landmark case.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

Papers Please: right not to show ID goes
to Supreme Court

Papers Please: right not to show ID goes
to Supreme Court 02/17/2004 11:47 AM
A Nevada cowboy is fighting for his right not to produce ID on law-enforcement demand, and he's going all the way to the Supreme Court.

Meet Dudley Hiibel. He's a 59 year old cowboy who owns a small ranch outside of Winnemucca, Nevada. He lives a simple life, but he's his own man. You probably never would have heard of Dudley Hiibel if it weren't for his belief in the U.S. Constitution.

One balmy May evening back in 2000, Dudley was standing around minding his own business when all of a sudden, a policeman pulled-up and demanded that Dudley produce his ID. Dudley, having done nothing wrong, declined. He was arrested and charged with "failure to cooperate" for refusing to show ID on demand. And it's all on video.

On the 22nd of March 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether Dudley and the rest of us live in a free society, or in a country where we must show "the papers" whenever a cop demands them.

Link (Thanks, Bill!)
Grok Description matches for Eight-year American telephone tangle may end in Supreme Court
GrokA matches for Eight-year American telephone tangle may end in Supreme Court

Eight-year American telephone tangle may end in Supreme Court

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: