You raise some great points and they haven't gone unnoticed
over here. I wanted to respond with something sooner, but last
week was nuts and I'm just digging out now...
To recap, you recommend that we;
Ditch the reseller route.
Launch a branded hosting service* that competes head-on with
Typepad, offering more features at a slightly lower cost. Leverage
your robust scalability. MT's home-brew Perl implementation is
probably hurting them right now.
Offer Blogware to institutions at a reasonable price that
undercuts MT 3.0 significantly. Every company has an intranet. Run it
on Blogware.
Add friends/ communities for user lock-in through social
means.
Promote it! Why on earth was there no announcement on
Boingboing when Blogware was launched? You need a marketing guy. Hire
somebody like Jason Kottke to spread the word online. Or Cory
Doctorow. Actually Doctorow would be ideal because he travels a lot
and has a high profile.
Hire some professional designers. Add some curves, some
shading, some oomph. Right now it looks like a bunch of geeks cooked
something up. This will make a BIG difference in standing out.
Let me peg these off in semi-reverse order...
6. Designers. Tucows has always needed some of that oomph. Point
well taken. We will improve as time passes. I would say that we are
more interested in function than form right now. Not to the point of
creating an insuffereable user experience but rather that the function
of the application needs to be driven by useful features and not
pretty widgets. Pretty widgets can be built over time as we iterate on
the UI. You think this looks like it was designed by a bunch of geeks?
Boy do I wish that I had screen caps of our first alpha ;)
I actually think of all the
'anti-design, Kottke school or thought, bow down to Jakob Nielsen
lo-fi UI's out there - Blogware is the best. But I'm a
broadband sort fo guy and believe in color, shape and form.
Maybe one day we'll get away from straw sipping, dial-up
mentality.
4. Social networking stuff. We recently implemented the start of
this. Its not fully baked, nor am I happy with it fully yet. But the
start is there. Now it just needs some care, feeding and weeding to
make it really sing. You can sign up and check it out at http://www.blogware.com/users
I'd love to get your feedback and suggestions for
improvements.
This is my greatest area of
concern. Wer'e dealing with similar situations with Drupal, Word
Press and Typepad - how much social network is 'enough' for Blog
tools. Many people ask me this question.
Blogware supports a formal concept of a
friend, while TypePad has turned blogroll associations into
friends. Anil tells me Typepad is going through some changes
here - so we'll have to see what comes out. Not sure what Matt
Mullenweg is doing for friends, but I know he's putting in
FOAF.
So what do I think is the right level
fo 'friendship' to put into blogging tools?
Well first of all - all blog tools and
all software in general should adopt basic FOAF 'About me' pages,
which not only display basic profile info to viewers, but also enable
simple export of that profile. The real issue is whether or not
teh blogging tool supports importing FOAF and friends - at
all.
I say What software
ISN'T about people? Why WOULDN'T you want a built-in,
on-line comunity to support themselves, to help you promote your tool,
to keep your customers happy?
Just so we're clear on my view.
:-)
5/3/2/1. Ditch the resellers/launch a hosted version/offer to
specific verticals/promote it...
Never gonna happen.
I knew he was gonna say this - and he's
brilliant in his explanation fo it - read on.....
Here's why: Internet services
providers represent the most powerful distribution channel on the
internet. No single company can compete with the marketing muscle of
30,000
ISPs** who sit right in front of end-users and assist them in
making critical technology choices and guide them as they dive into
the internet - usually for the first time. No other channel can put
you in front of individuals and the Fortune 500 simultaneously and no
channel can better address the fickle needs of their local markets in
a more appropriate fashion.
To get a better sense of this, take a look at our track record with
domain names. In 1997, we were (according to the most liberal
definitions) #85 in the domain name registration market. Today we are
solidly #2 and we've been there for a couple of years. How did we get
here? We dealt exclusively with internet services providers to the
exclusion of all other market opportunities and we nailed their
service requirements. By choosing and sticking to our distribution
model very early in the game (some would argue that it chose us) we
were able to focus on very specific attributes of our products and
processes and build some truly excellent structures around everything.
In other words, because we weren't trying to be all things to all
customers, we were able to do some very amazing things with some very
specific customer segments. And they responded in spades.
Our resellers kick serious ass in the
market place. This because the Tucows way of doing things gives
them the luxury of being able to focus on very specific and
important things. Think of every other blogging company out there.
They each have to a) be technical experts, b) be sales experts and c)
be marketing experts just to one unit to a customer. Now take a look
at the symbiotic nature of the relationship between Tucows and its
direct customers. Our resellers have to be sales & marketing
experts and develop strong customer service skills and Tucows has to
focus on maintaining world-class technical services. Who would you bet
on, the jack-of-all-trades or the team of specialists?
The downside to this approach is that it lacks the glitz and glam
that retail oriented services employ. You will never see a full out PR
blitz from Tucows and Blogware will never be a household
name. All wasted money. Remember, we're not the marketing brains
in this relationship. We're the technical muscle.
I actually slightly disagree here - but
only in scope and target audience. It's important to build the
Tucows brand with the insider crowd - so when someone says "gee I'd
love to private label and brand my own blogging tool" - they go to
Tucows.
Does that mean that our resellers are idly sitting by doing
nothing? Nope. Right now, they are working on developing the right
messages to direct at very specific markets - some are doing the
institutional angle, some are going after telecommunications firms,
others are targetting specific home-user verticals and others still
looking to make quick wins at the expense of those with existing
market share... And what I've seen so far looks great. Think of this
as true "end-to-end marketing" Marketing at the edges. Clue-train
compatible distribution. Teamwork. Focus. Whatever you call it, it
works.
For us, this isn't a question of strategy. We're
fully committed to our wholesale distribution model and we're fully
committed to the blogging market. More importantly, Tucows is fully
committed to winning in this market and we are doing what we need to
do to make it happen. Heads-down, block-and-tackle,
stick-on-the-ice, wholly tactical execution. Execution of our plan to
give our resellers what they need to continue to kick ass in
their chosen commercial pursuits. When they win, we've won.
What Ross isn't saying is that Tucows
has been and will continue to support open standards and help make new
ones happen.
There's also some other exciting news
about Tucows - which we'll be disclosing within a month or so.
These guys are major players in our world - be nice to
them!
*Blogware is a hosted application, not a
standalone tool. "Branded", well that's another matter entirely. We
chose the name "Blogware" because it is the most generic expression
that could be used to describe "weblog management tool". Is that our
brand? Nah. It's just a convenient label we use to refer to the
product. The first thing our resellers do is rip this tag off and
replace it with their own....
**(For the sake of this entry, ISPs should be
read as "ISPs/Web hosting companies". I use the term "internet
services providers" in its truest sense - those companies that provide
internet services...)
It has been an extremely busy week on Blogwareland. The project is
really firing on all cyclinders and I'm starting to get pretty excited
about the upcoming release. Most of my time has been devoted to staff
training. We took 30 or so staffers through hands-on with the service
in a lab environment and the feedback has been great. I really enjoyed
taking everyone through the in's and out's of Blogware and the weblog
market and it is great to see the rest of the team over here finally
starting to understand why I'm so excited by Blogware and the weblog
opportunity. The blogosphere can be a tough thing to grok for one
person - getting 150 people on the same page is even harder ;)
I finally got the nerve up to steal a
page out of Doc Searls playbook
and go outside of the "bullet-snore-click-snore" structure that
Powerpoint forces on Office users. I've had the pleasure of seeing Doc
"present" a few times and he's really taught me that 60 slides in 60
minutes is only bad if the content is bad...
The dev team is also totally in the zone. A bunch of new features
coming out this week and a few bug fixes as well. I can see v1.0 just
over the horizon...
Something old, something new,
something boring and nothing blue...
Something Old...
Comment Notifications v2.0! Weblog publishers
getting comment notifications is old hat. Now, authenticated readers
can also choose to receive comment notifications on a per article, per
category or on a site-wide basis. Publishers also get to choose
whether or not this feature is even available to their readers.
Something New...
Import/Export. Publishers can now get the
important content out of their old weblogs and into their shiny new
Blogware weblog. Also, the Export feature makes your Blogware content
just that much more portable - great peace of mind. Import initially
supports only MT imports with support for the Blogger, Radio and other
formats shortly.
Something Boring...
Bug fixes. Yawn. ;) Publishers will notice that the webstats are
much snappier now - we realized a ton of performance increases with
some of these new fixes.
Nothing Blue...
No, I meant it - there was nothing blue. Well, just this. Literally.
So what's the big take away? It has been impossible for me to keep
up with my email this week. If you've sent me a message and I haven't
gotten back to you, rest assured, I still love you - its just that I'm
currently 300 messages behind where I should be - and
that's after 4 hours of catch up. Problem is, I'm not going to
get through it all today - marketing needs sign-off on virtually
everything that they've been working on for Blogware this afternoon
and unless I wade into it, they are going to hunt me down and kill me
- probably with a bad PowerPoint presentation or something ;)
Blogware users got a small preview of version 1.0 this week with
the release of our new Address Book and Friends functionality.
The Ad
dress Book is a pretty cool mechanism that provides Blogware
Publishers with some pretty nifty tools for managing the relationships
between users and content.
The other new function, Friend
s, is a simple tool that allows users to connect with one
another and will act as the basis for a bunch of cool new services as
we move forward.
Play around with them and let me know what you think (keeping in
mind that this is "pre-release preview beta not-finished yet"
stuff....) [Random
A> Bytes]
I got to be friend #1. Ah the joys of being an 'outside
friend'. One more win for the FOAFnet.
Ross Mayfield is blogging
from the Red Herring Conference. Sounds like VCs are coming back. Not
sure yet that's a good thing. There's a paradigm shift coming (heck,
even if you don't believe in Microsoft's vision, look at Sun's or
Apple's -- all computing platforms are going to see rapid innovation
over the next few years. Yet the VCs don't seem to care and don't seem
to be building companies to take advantage of the coming shifts.
Here, ask yourself, do you see anything about RSS in his notes?
Anything about the Tablet PC? Anything about new 3D OS's (how about
new kinds of video games, new kinds of business apps? Is PowerPoint
and Excel really going to be how business is done 20 years from now?
Those are three things that are seeing huge changes right now. Today.
Not five years from now. Yet the VCs are off funding Friendster.
Any wonder why there's tons of empty buildings in downtown Palo
Alto?
MoviePod: Geoff Ross Is High
MoviePod: Geoff Ross Is High05/13/2004 07:55 AM http://www.geoffrossisfamous.com/infodump/index.php">Ah, youth. It's
big thinking, like the meandering, centerless kind NYU film student
Geoff Ross has done about a method for digital music distribution
called MoviePod MovieBox, that makes a great case for why college kids
should stop smoking pot. Geoff wants to build a digital film
distribution system...
Ross on Family Tech Support12/28/2004 03:40 PM Ross provides his simple recommendations for the annual family tech
support ritual otherwise known as the end of year holidays. In
summary: Get 'em a Mac with OS X on it Get 'em broadband: it's fast
and nearly always on Get 'em Firefox, 'cause IE is bad for your
security Get 'em a good start page like My Yahoo or Google Get 'em on
Web Mail like Yahoo Mail or GMail Get 'em on Flickr if they want to
share...
Diana Ross gets two days in jail
Diana Ross gets two days in jail02/10/2004 02:55 AM Singer Diana Ross receives a brief jail term after pleading "no
contest" to a drink driving charge.
Ross Mayfield has written up some results from our usage
of Socialtext's Wiki during our 1UP.com development process.
I was the main guy using the thing, so I got to put Socialtext's
product and services through the paces. In fact at this point -
I'm working with five SocialText workspaces.
So all you knowledge management, workgroup wonks out there (Ray
Ozzie eat your heart out) take a
read.
DAVID GEST + DIANA ROSS?
DAVID GEST + DIANA ROSS?02/19/2004 06:10 PM I am picturing an MJ sandwich on wedding night, if you know what i'm
saying, and i think you do
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross dies
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross dies08/27/2004 01:37 PM I interviewed Dr. Kübler-Ross some time in the mid 1970s for an
article for Maclean's in Canada. At the time, she had gone beyond her
"five stages of dying" meme and was fully into proving that there's
life after death by documenting weird coincidences and poorly
substantiated tales. I was disappointed because, although I am
agnostic about life after death, her methodology was anecdotal and
seemed to me to be aiming at supporting a position she merely wanted
to believe. And yet, she did something remarkable. Deeply impressed by
her work helping Nazi refugees and by a visit to the...
That's the headline that comes to mind when I read Bill Gates' most famous recent speech. It's like, blah blah networking
blah blah storage blah blah tablets, blah blah RFID, blah blah
templates, blah blah RSS, blah blah spam, blah blah MSDN... Huh?
wtf? Rewind....
That RSS item launches the longest section of the speech: seven
paragraphs that read to me like they were ghosted by Ross Mayfield. I just went to
Ross's blog and he quote
s five of those same 'graphs. Coincidence?
Personally the whole market is missing the boat -- Microsoft
included.
The money is in corporate knowledge management systems. Microsoft's
is Sharepoint. But,
let's look at social software. Weblogging has succeeded for five very
specific reasons:
1) It's easy to publish a weblog. OK, Sharepoint has
that.
2) Weblogs are discoverable. Just visit weblogs.com and discover some that
were published minutes ago. Sharepoint doesn't have that.
3) Weblogs are social. Most weblog software has a public
referer log (here's mine). That's important for two reasons. a) Cause
I can see who is talking about me and b) a newcomer to my sphere of
influence can instantly see who is talking about me and how much
traffic they are sending me (ie they can see who the "big fish" are in
my neighborhood). Sharepoint doesn't do this.
4) Weblogs let me point to specific microcontent. Translation:
permalinks. Sharepoint doesn't do that.
5) Good Weblog tools build syndication, er RSS, feeds
automatically. Sharepoint doesn't do that (although someone built an
add-on tool to do that).
One tool nailed all this stuff: UserLand's Manila. But, let's be
honest. How many companies are gonna convert all their intranet data
over to a system from a company with a couple of employees? I was
director of marketing and tried fighting that fight.
But, I am totally convinced of the need for a new kind of knowledge
management system (er, corporate weblogging tool) for corporations.
Yet the VCs and Microsoft's own execs aren't funding major research
into this stuff. Sharepoint is the evidence.
Keep in mind: I'm a hard-core Sharepoint user now. It's a good
product. Its team just doesn't know that it's only missing three
things before it's a great one.
Ross Mayfield's Webl0g: Disney Enterprise Webl0gs and Wikis
ross.typepad.com/blog/2004/02/disney_enterpri.html track this
site | 5 links
Blogging Camp Wellstone: Day One, Jim Ross on Creating a Campaign Plan and Budget
Blogging Camp Wellstone: Day One, Jim Ross on Creating a Campaign Plan and Budget12/17/2004 06:41 PM The first speaker in the Working on a Campaign series was Jim Ross, a
San Francisco political consultant. He seemed like a strange choice at
first. He did some early work for Representative, now Senator John
Breaux of Louisiana, famous for his statement "My vote can't be
bought, but it can be rented". Ross has successfully managed the
conservative (for San Francisco at least) side of many San Francisco
ballot issues, such as Gavin Newsom's Care Not Cash initiative, and he
was the campaign manager for Gavin Newsom's successful bid for Mayor.
It doesn't take much googling to find some pretty impassioned
opponents of Jim Ross. His introduction earned him some (polite)
hostility from a couple of the San Francisco political activists
present. Last quarter, he was the biggest money maker among San
Francisco political consultants. Upon reflection, perhaps all those
are reasons why Camp Wellstone invited him to speak. He is a very
successful campaign consultant. Clearly, he knows something about
winning elections. It was also a great introduction to the trade or
profession of campaign management -- more on that later. Here are my
notes of Jim Ross' talk, Creating a Campaign Plan and Budget: Step
one, before you do anything, before you decide to run, is to do your
research. You wouldn't believe how many candidates come to see me and
ask me to work on their campaign without having done the most basic
research. The first questions to answer are: How many registered
voters in the district? What is the typical turnout? How have
challengers done against incumbents in the past? How much money was
spent in last election? What are the issues voters care about? If you
don't know what voters care about, do you have the money to do
polling? In some states, you can get a lot of public polling
information for free. The [Pew Foundation ???, California Foundation
??? missed what sources he stated] ... do polls on what people care
about. Research past winning candidates. How did they win? Copy their
strategies. Don't worry about being creative, worry about winning.
Resources: Time Spend your time raising money or reaching people. Time
is the finite resource. People Overhead (Staff) is the most expensive
thing in a campaign. Money Unless you can self-fund, you need to raise
money. Howard Dean proved that liberal candidates can raise money.
Small races, how you raise money:...
Ross-Simons boosts average ticket, gains new customers with payment option