Spyware Solutions Not So Simple

Grok Headline matches for Spyware Solutions Not So Simple

How Corporations Became Culturally
Dysfunctional and Why Simple Solutions
Won't Fix Them

How Corporations Became Culturally
Dysfunctional and Why Simple Solutions
Won't Fix Them 03/30/2005 06:16 PM

The Idea: We've already been told that corporations are psychopathic. There's evidence they are also culturally dysfunctional, an inappropriate construct to do what they were designed to do, or could do. But because they're part of a complex system, there are no easy or imminent fixes. Joel Bakan's book (and film, which will be shown on the CBC next week BTW) The Corporation, argues that corporations have evolved into psychopathic entities. But their reputation is not just one of anti-social behaviour. Corporations are also seen by many as lumbering, inflexible, un-innovative creatures. I thought it might be worth exploring why this is so. Recently I've been studying and writing about the difference between complicated systems (those that lend themselves to cause-and-effect analysis) and complex systems (where there are so many variables the best you can do is look for meaningful patterns and correlations). Corporations were initially designed as a 'shell' that would allow a group of workers to collectively raise capital, add and delete members easily, and, later, to protect workers who were associated with partners who engaged in criminal, negligent or fraudulent activities from liability for those partners' actions. The concept of 'shareholding' met these requirements. The interests of shareholders, initially the workers in the organization, were subordinated to the interests of creditors -- the worker-shareholders 'shared' what was left after the corporation's debts were paid. Several consequences of 'shareholdings' were probably unanticipated. Some worker-shareholders could easily be given more shares than others, to reflect a greater time or financial commitment to the enterprise. And some workers, and even managers, could simply be treated as another class of creditor -- paid a fixed return on their 'investment' of time in the organization, but given no 'shares' in the profits at all. And if some investors were willing to take the risks, they could be given shares in return for a cash infusion in the company, even if they played no active role in the corporation at all. And since they were inessential to the operations of the company, why not allow these passive shareholders to use these shares as collateral for loans, or even trade their shares with others, creating a kind of 'stock market' that would allow the rich gentry with lots of money they could afford to lose, to gamble with each other on which of these passive shareholdings would pay 'dividends' and which would be useful only as wallpaper? The rest, as they say, is history. Corporations are no longer run for the well-being of their workers, but to maximize the profits paid to their mostly-absentee shareholders. Many corporations have no workers at all -- they are merely 'holding companies' that own shares of other corporations. Shareholders feel no responsibility to the workers, the people who generate the value of the shares, and whose wages are increasingly unconnected to the value they produce, as the value is all paid out to the shareholders. What has emerged as a result is hierarchy. Managers are hired by the shareholders to employ as few workers as possible and pay those workers as little as possible, and to provide the fewest and most inexpensive benefits and facilities possible, so that more of the profits are left for the shareholders. Managers are therefore remunerated in inverse proportion to the well-being of the workers and the communities in which they live. Disparity between the well-being of workers and that of shareholders grows without limit, with managers as the 'middle-men' to ensure that this happens and to keep workers in line. The physical slavery of early civilization, enforced by warlords and feudal fiefs, is hence replaced by economic wage-slavery, enforced by management. Not surprisingly, workers who might have otherwise been motivated to work hard out of self-interest now seek ways to do the least work possible for their wages, and counter the force of shareholders with their own self-organized bodies, unions. The education system is enlisted to convince workers not born into the privileged elite that if they work hard they too can become managers, and the hierarchy is made more multi-leveled to provide the illusion of 'progress' towards that goal. If the corporation is large enough this fraud can be perpetrated almost indefinitely, as workers spend a lifetime chasing the carrots up increasingly steep (and increasingly handsomely rewarded) steps of the ladder towards management. And some workers can even be given a token number of shares in the company, to bamboozle them into believeing that they are also real shareholders in the organization. In each industry, the largest corporations, while still feigning competitiveness, merge, acquire and otherwise band together in oligopolies, acting in the best interests of shareholders to eliminate real competition so that upstarts who share the rewards of their labour more equitably with workers and with customers can gain no foothold in the market. Advertising is introduced to provide the illusion of real choice and competition. As we all know, however, pyramid schemes are unsustainable, and this one is no exception. Given enough time, workers begin to realize that the cost of living is rising faster than their wages and that their standard of living is actually falling while that of shareholders is rising astronomically. Financial corporations, seeing an opportunity to push the crumbling pyramid a bit further, start offering huge amounts of credit to workers (using deceptive advertising to understate the cost of this credit), so that workers can 'afford' to buy ever more of the overpriced crap the corporations are producing. Corporations turn to outsourcing and offshoring in the endless quest to reduce costs so that shareholders' wealth can keep rising even though the market is saturated and debt levels are sky-high. Governments and media are bought by the now obscenely-wealthy shareholders and paid to parrot the fraud and hype of 'free' trade, 'free' markets and globalization, to even further deregulate, subsidize and undertax corporations, and to pass laws so that that corporations cannot be sued by workers but workers can be sued by corporations. If the growth stumbles, the stock market, which is now a Ponzi scheme that demands endless double-digit annual profit increases, will collapse, taking the whole economic house of cards built up around it with it. The result is that today corporations are huge, anti-democratic, unconcerned about (or even averse to) the well-being of employees and the health of the environment, market-distorting and addicted to growth. In short, they are culturally dysfunctional -- working at odds with the best interests of people. Note that there was no conspiracy here, no master plan to make the lowly medieval corporation designed to allow workers to raise capital funds collectively into today's Frankenstein monster. It has been an evolution, an emergence set in motion by unexpected consequences of the creation of the useful concept of shareholdings, and then affected over centuries by thousands of social, political, economic and cultural events and behaviours, from divine right to the New Deal, from the 19th-century error in US law that gave American and then all corporations the rights of personhood, to the end of physical slavery, the dislocation of labour in the world wars, the emancipation of women and the beginnings of the Two-Income Trap. In other words, cultural evolution is a complex system, and to the extent it gives rise to dysfunctional entities like the modern corporation we cannot expect simplistic solutions (e.g. "rein in corporate power" and "put people before profit"), as desirable as such solutions may look in theory, to work in the real world. The reason they won't work is not because 'they' have all the money and power, it's because we, the workers, as integral parts of the evolution that has given rise (usually peacefully, with the worker massacres of the robber barons and Great Depression riots being notable exceptions) to the emergence of the modern corporation, are complicit in that evolution. It couldn't have happened without us. Complex systems, we learn from history, cannot be changed quickly or simply. The anti-corporatist, anti-globalization movement has demonstrated that. There is no panacea in legislation, new economy movements, or rioting in the streets. The effects of complex systems are not simply 'problems' that can be 'solved'. Only if and when enough of us, as individual actors in this system, change our behaviours in such a way that collectively we begin to change the dynamics of the system, will those changes ripple through to the way corporations behave and the impact they have on our lives and our well-being. Barring a crisis on the scale of the Great Depression, those individual behaviour changes are unlikely to come soon, to be coordinated or even to be subject to coordinated effort. The end of slavery and the emancipation of women and the approval of the Kyoto Accord (and, as I described in yesterday's post, the end of capital punishment in Europe and Canada but not in the US) were the emergents of millions of unpredictable and individual changes in perception brought about by millions of individual events. There is good news and bad news here. The good news is that, while we are responsible for the emergence of the modern dysfunctional corporation (and all the other endemic social, political, environmental and economic ills of our time and culture), we should not feel guilty about it. Organization and activism are extremely unlikely to change these things, because they are evolutions of complex systems, not simple cause-and-effect 'problems'. Just becoming aware of these things and understanding the need for change and acting individually with modest changes in our behaviour (mostly things readers of this blog have probably already done) is really all you can do, and the effect of us individually changing our behaviours could, in time, precipitate positive change to the whole system. The whole of a complex system is nothing more, or less, than the sum of the parts. You just have to let go of the illusion that anyone is (or even could be) in control and enjoy the ride. If you'll pardon the mixed metaphor, when we reach the tipping point, the earth will move. The bad news is that it's futile to try to speed up the process. There's a reason your instincts probably told you that getting out the vote for Kerry was a worthwhile effort (it almost worked -- the tipping point was close), but protesting against globalization was not. There's a reason your instincts might have told you not to even bother voting for Kerry -- when it's time, it's time. People change slowly. That's our nature. Unfortunately, that means that with our impact on this planet being so massive and accelerating at such a phenomenal rate, it is increasingly unlikely that we can change direction quickly enough to avert catastrophe. So my new paradox is this: The more I learn about 'complex thinking' the happier I am about just blogging and talking and spreading ideas and information as my part to make the world a better place, and the less guilt-ridden I am about not doing more to 'save the world' -- and the less hopeful I am that it will save itself in time.

Microsoft Announces Availability of New
Solutions to Help Protect Customers
Against Spyware and Viruses

Microsoft Announces Availability of New
Solutions to Help Protect Customers
Against Spyware and Viruses 01/06/2005 10:08 PM
As part of its ongoing efforts to address current and emerging security threats to computer users, Microsoft Corp. today announced two new technology solutions that will provide added protection against spyware and malicious software. Customers now can download the first beta version of Microsoft® Windows® AntiSpyware, a solution that will help protect Windows users from spyware and other potentially unwanted software. In addition, the Microsoft Windows malicious software removal tool, which complements traditional antivirus technologies by removing prevalent viruses and worms from a PC, will be available beginning Jan. 11, 2005. These solutions build on the advanced security technologies and proactive protection features of Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), which help better safeguard computers from hackers, viruses and other security risks.

HEALTH CARE:
SIMPLE SOLUTIONS NO ONE WANTS TO
IMPLEMENT

HEALTH CARE:
SIMPLE SOLUTIONS NO ONE WANTS TO
IMPLEMENT 09/21/2004 12:24 PM

Canada has an enviable record of providing universal, quality health care at a reasonable price for the last half a century. But, as in every other country, our health care system is facing several strains: Soaring health care costs, driven by astronomical salaries paid to senior medical practitioners by competing private health-care providers in the US Disproportionally high usage of the health care system by Canada's exploding immigrant population Ageing population needing more health services The answer of US-worshipping Canadian neocons is two-tier health care. Why, cries John Tory, the new leader of the hapless Ontario Conservative party, shouldn't Canadians have "choice" in their health care services? This is classic conservative re-framing of public debate. "Choice" in health care means choice for those who can afford it, which means doctors who want to make obscene amounts of money (including many of the best ones) would work for the higher-paying private-tier system and the rest of us would be stuck with long waits and second-class service, just like we face in every other private sector of the economy. Fortunately, and to the chagrin of the Canadian neocons, the vast majority of Canadian's aren't buying this Orwellian deceit. Recent polls say support for a public, single-class health care system is as high as ever. So what's a civilized country to do to deal with the three great challenges of 21st century health care bulleted above? I recently listened to a talk show featuring the federal Minister of Health, discussing how these problems should be solved. Caller after caller said the same two things: Much of the work done by doctors should be transferred to paraprofessionals and to self-diagnosis and self-treatment. Much more information, expert systems and self-service equipment needs to be provided to enable this. [I spoke to two doctors who said they would love to do this, since the majority of the work they do does not require a licensed professional to do it competently -- but that the lawyers wouldn't let them do it.] There needs to be a massive shift in the health care system from treatment to preventative care. When the moderator asked the Minister whether he had learned anything from these recurring messages, he 'summarized' the discussion by saying that better measurement systems were needed to ensure hospitals were operating as efficiently as possible, and that the government was looking into ways to do public-private partnerships without allowing competition or giving up control over pricing and access. The interviewer was incredulous: Had the Minister not heard the two messages that the public had been bombarding him with for the past hour? Of course these things would be considered, he replied, but the first priority was to find ways to increase access without increasing cost. His deafness to these two obvious solutions to the malaise of the system was astonishing. What one listener of this talk show said about neoncons' true motivation for wanting two-tier health care was also telling: "The reason rich politicians want a two class system is that they're embarrassed to have to wait in line for health services the same as 'ordinary' Canadians, when their US business colleagues can jump the queue so easily and have their company write off the extra cost as a business expense. They're also embarrassed that, to jump the queue, they have to fly to the US and pay out of their own pocket". So in fact there is a choice for the very rich to jump the queue: Pay for treatment in the private US system. Is Canada's health care system the best in the world? Far from it. Health care in Canada's cities is much better than in rural areas. The bureaucracy in much of the system (notably the blood collection system and the 'walk-in' clinics) is suffocating, and needlessly so. And because of its zeal to protect jobs in the system, Canada, which ranks first in the world in per-capita patents of medical technology, ranks forty-first in the world in the use of modern medical technology in its hospitals (MRI equipment is as scarce as gold, for example). But it's still an excellent system, and one that a two-class health care system won't improve, at least for 95% of the population. If only the politicians and bureaucrats only had the intelligence and vision to listen to the Wisdom of Crowds and make the two changes (more paraprofessional/self-care, and more prevention instead of treatment) that the public is already starting to make themselves, our system would be the best in the world. Oh -- a word about prescription drug costs: You may have heard that many Americans come up to Canada to buy prescription drugs much cheaper than they can buy them in the US. Now, US municipal and state governments are fighting for the right to buy their drugs from Canada, too (and Kerry wants them to have this right). The funny thing is, the companies selling them are essentially all the same companies, since the Canadian pharmaceutical industry is dominated by the same handful of global corporations as the US industry. Why do these companies charge more in the US than the rest of the world for the same drugs? Not, as the neocons and the pharma industry are telling Americans, because Canadian drugs are inferior (perhaps, it is implied, dangerously so) -- they are the identical drugs. They sell them for higher prices in the US because they can. Drug companies charge as much as the market will bear, and in the bloated US health care system where if you have enough money you can buy anything, the market will bear a lot. In the rest of the world money available for drugs is much less, so to sell their products pharma companies lower prices by 30, 50, even 70%, and still make a good margin. This is a case where globalization threatens to backfire on some of the corporations that most benefit from it. Couldn't happen to a nice bunch of guys.

TruStar Solutions(SM) Partners with
Resume Mirror to Provide Superior Resume
Management Solutions. Companies Tteam to
Offer High-Value Solutions

TruStar Solutions(SM) Partners with
Resume Mirror to Provide Superior Resume
Management Solutions. Companies Tteam to
Offer High-Value Solutions 03/17/2005 03:02 AM
TruStar Solutions, the leader in creating exceptional hiring strategies, has partnered with Resume Mirror, the premier supplier of resume extraction and searching software components. The partnership will allow TruStar Solutions to include Resume Mirror's technology in the development of world-class customized recruiting solutions. [PRWEB Mar 17, 2005]

TruStar Solutions(SM) Partners with
Resume Mirror to Provide Superior Resume
Management Solutions - Companies Team to
Offer High-Value Solutions

TruStar Solutions(SM) Partners with
Resume Mirror to Provide Superior Resume
Management Solutions - Companies Team to
Offer High-Value Solutions 03/19/2005 03:13 AM
TruStar Solutions, the leader in creating exceptional hiring strategies, has partnered with Resume Mirror, the premier supplier of resume extraction and searching software components. The partnership will allow TruStar Solutions to include Resume Mirror's technology in the development of world-class customized recruiting solutions. [PRWEB Mar 17, 2005]

Yahoo's Offers New Anti-Spyware Tool...
That Actually Finds Spyware

Yahoo's Offers New Anti-Spyware Tool...
That Actually Finds Spyware 08/05/2004 03:50 AM
It appears that Yahoo heard the backlash loud and clear a few months back when they released an anti-spyware tool that just so happened to skip over adware from Yahoo partners. The latest version, built on PestPatrol's technology will now default to notifying users of both "spyware" and what they consider to be "adware" and then give the user the choice of what to do. I haven't tested the product yet, but it sounds like they're moving in the right direction. It still makes you wonder what they were thinking in offering a purposely crippled offering. People know what spyware is, and telling them that spyware isn't spyware doesn't change how people feel about it. It also doesn't make them look kindly back at the company that provided them with the bogus anti-spyware tool in the first place.

Adobe Systems Becomes 5,000th Company to
Deploy Solutions from Email Solutions
Provider Lyris

Adobe Systems Becomes 5,000th Company to
Deploy Solutions from Email Solutions
Provider Lyris 06/17/2005 07:20 PM
[PRWEB Jun 8, 2005]

RF Code and InfoWave Solutions Announce
Strategic Partnership Agreement for RFID
Integration Solutions

RF Code and InfoWave Solutions Announce
Strategic Partnership Agreement for RFID
Integration Solutions 05/31/2004 02:00 PM
RF Code, Inc., a leading developer of Auto-ID data collection middleware and Active RFID technologies, today announced a Strategic Partnership with InfoWave Solutions, a provider of RFID integration services and value-extraction software. The alliance will provide customers with fully integrated RFID solutions that extract maximum value from their investment. [PRWEB May 28, 2004]

Junction Solutions Announces Vertical
Market Success for Microsoft Business
Solutions - Axapta

Junction Solutions Announces Vertical
Market Success for Microsoft Business
Solutions - Axapta 07/07/2004 09:40 AM
Junction Solutions, a leading provider of Microsoft-based business software applications and services, today announced a number of new clients signed in June of 2004 for Microsoft Business Solutions - Axapta and Junction's newly released Axapta for Direct to Consumer. These clients include Diamondback Tactical, Phoenix, AZ; Frankford Candy & Chocolate, Philadelphia, PA; and Ouray Sportswear, Englewood, CO. Junction continues to expand its customer base by delivering innovative Microsoft solutions for discrete and process manufacturers, multi-channel retailers, and wholesale distributors. "We are pleased that our clients have selected Microsoft Axapta and Junction Solutions to meet their critical business and technology needs," stated Brian Carpizo, President of Junction Solutions. "Contributing to our success was the continued acceptance of our new vertical solutions. Junction is experiencing growing interest our Direct to Consumer product as well as our upcoming Process Manufacturing release."

Spyware Company Sues Utah Over
Anti-Spyware Law

Spyware Company Sues Utah Over
Anti-Spyware Law 04/13/2004 03:42 PM

Yahoo's Famed Anti-Spyware App Allows
Spyware From Partners

Yahoo's Famed Anti-Spyware App Allows
Spyware From Partners 06/02/2004 10:10 AM
We didn't write about Yahoo's new "anti-spyware" toolbar that they announced last week, because it seemed to receive plenty of hype, and there were no real reviews of how it worked. There are so many so-called anti-spyware applications out there that don't actually stop spyware and adware for fear of upsetting marketing companies or out of worries that actually stopping spyware may make some applications stop working (upsetting the user), that we figured Yahoo's anti-spyware app (hype and all) probably wouldn't be much to bother with. It certainly looks like that may be the case. eWeek is now reporting that Yahoo tries to dance the careful dance of not upsetting certain companies who threate n to sue people who call their application spyware. Of course, the situation is even more complex because Claria (who you probably know as Gator - despite their attempt to change their name to shake that spyware label) is also a partner of Yahoo. So, it's really not surprising that the default setting for Yahoo's anti-spyware app won't actually remove services like Gator or WhenU. Instead, Yahoo's spyware remover claims these programs are "adware" and will only remove them if you click and extra check box each time you run the program. In other words, once again, you can't trust a provider of anti-spyware software, because they're playing both sides of the fence: partnering with providers on the one hand, and then offering weak removal products on the other. If Yahoo were serious about removing spyware from the computers of users they would refuse to partner with companies that used surreptitious tactics to be installed on computers. Instead, they want to look good to users in the front, while letting in spyware/adware from partners through the backdoor.

AOL Offers Spyware Stopper... Just After
They Started Offering Spyware

AOL Offers Spyware Stopper... Just After
They Started Offering Spyware 04/22/2004 02:36 AM
Just a few weeks after saying that they're going to start bundling spyware/adware with their instant messenger product, AOL announces their latest anti-spyware application. While we've been complaining about anti-spyware from ISPs that just points out the spyware, AOL claims that this version will disable (though not delete) the spyware. I wonder if it will catch the spyware that AOL installs themselves.

Simple and Secure isn't so Simple

Simple and Secure isn't so Simple 09/02/2004 09:24 PM

Garage Storage Cabinets by SLIDE-LOK
Opens its Washington State Dealer
Network Welcoming Garage Solutions,
Serving the City of Seattle, Washington
and Storage Organizing Solutions Serving
Bellevue, Shoreline, Washington and the
Surrounding Area – Become a Professional
Garage Storage Dealer as SLIDE-LOK
Continues Seeking Applications from the
United States and Canada

Garage Storage Cabinets by SLIDE-LOK
Opens its Washington State Dealer
Network Welcoming Garage Solutions,
Serving the City of Seattle, Washington
and Storage Organizing Solutions Serving
Bellevue, Shoreline, Washington and the
Surrounding Area – Become a Professional
Garage Storage Dealer as SLIDE-LOK
Continues Seeking Applications from the
United States and Canada 06/22/2004 02:47 AM
SLIDE-LOK Garage Storage Cabinets Opens its Washington State Dealer Network Welcoming Garage Solutions serving Seattle, and Storage Organizing Solutions serving Bellevue, Shoreline, Washington, and the surrounding area – Become a Professional Garage Storage Dealer as SLIDE-LOK Continues Seeking Applications from the United States and Canada. SLIDE-LOK Dealers include Storage, and Organizing Solution Providers that Focus on Cabinetry, Carpentry, Closets, Flooring, Furniture, Home Security as well as the Home, the Office, and the Garage. Garage and Storage Professionals in these fields are encouraged to apply to join the fastest growing dealer network in the US - SLIDE-LOK – The Original Name In Garage Storage Cabinets. [PRWEB Jun 22, 2004]

Spyware

Spyware 06/16/2004 11:30 AM
Personal Computer World Jun 16 2004 3:31PM GMT

What you should know about spyware

What you should know about spyware 04/26/2004 06:19 AM

Spyware vs. spyware

Spyware vs. spyware 08/30/2004 03:50 PM
Even as many online marketing companies struggle to comply with recent federal legislation governing unsolicited commercial e-mail -- spam to you and me -- new state and federal legislation addresses another online blight: spyware. From California to Washington, D.C., lawmakers are lining up for the chance to smack down this bothersome byproduct of online commerce.

Spyware: Where's the fix?

Spyware: Where's the fix? 04/20/2004 04:52 PM
ZDNet Apr 20 2004 9:47PM GMT

AAA Spyware C.O.P. v10.0

AAA Spyware C.O.P. v10.0 11/13/2003 12:22 PM
This product will scan your P.C. for spyware and adware, notifying you of the infected files, as well as the spyware or adware name. After registering you may use spyware cop as an adware and spyware remover, deleting the infected files and programs. [Shareware $19.95 990 KB]

The Top Ten Spyware

The Top Ten Spyware 03/22/2005 04:23 PM

According to Webroot Inc. and listed in the Inquirer, here are the top ten spyware and adware threats based on detection as well as potential impact.

1. CoolWebSearch
2. Gator
3. 180 search asst.
4. ISTbar/AUpdate
5. Transponder
6. Internet optimizer
7. BlazeFind
8. Hot as Hell
9. Advance Keylogger
10. TIBS Dialer

Read how each works at the Inquirer Website.

See how Spyware has taken over a PC

See how Spyware has taken over a PC 05/28/2004 10:46 AM

Want to see what a little program that is full of spyware can do to your system check out this Windows Task Manager. Makes me say ouch. Oh and guess what program it was, the freeware version of Kazaa [ Dave Winer]

Simple NMS

Simple NMS 06/25/2004 12:26 AM
Welcome!

Mac-OSA-Simple-1.03

Mac-OSA-Simple-1.03 03/13/2003 06:03 PM

Mac-OSA-Simple-1.02

Mac-OSA-Simple-1.02 03/13/2003 10:14 AM

LJ-Simple-0.09

LJ-Simple-0.09 12/18/2003 10:42 AM

SVK-Simple-0.02

SVK-Simple-0.02 04/15/2005 10:13 AM

"Its very simple"

"Its very simple" 12/16/2003 08:58 AM

Pod-Simple-2.06

Pod-Simple-2.06 05/08/2004 12:38 AM

SVK-Simple-0.01

SVK-Simple-0.01 04/15/2005 10:13 AM

Pod-Simple-2.05

Pod-Simple-2.05 11/05/2003 10:52 AM

Simple CSS 1.03

Simple CSS 1.03 02/16/2004 04:03 PM
A free and easy-to-use CSS authoring tool that supports the CSS2 standard.

LJ::Simple 0.08

LJ::Simple 0.08 12/18/2003 09:24 AM
A simple Perl API to LiveJournal.

Simple-QOS

Simple-QOS 05/29/2004 12:25 PM
[05/29/2004] Alpha Release

LJ-Simple-0.08

LJ-Simple-0.08 12/18/2003 10:42 AM

LJ-Simple-0.11

LJ-Simple-0.11 04/14/2004 10:30 AM

PDF-FDF-Simple-0.03

PDF-FDF-Simple-0.03 08/10/2004 06:37 AM

RDF-Simple-0.15

RDF-Simple-0.15 08/12/2004 12:44 AM

PDF-FDF-Simple-0.02

PDF-FDF-Simple-0.02 05/21/2004 09:48 AM

RDF-Simple-0.13

RDF-Simple-0.13 05/24/2004 05:26 PM

Grok Description matches for Spyware Solutions Not So Simple
GrokA matches for Spyware Solutions Not So Simple

Spyware Solutions Not So Simple

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: