stargeek
PHP news website logo.
home    PHP scripts    articles    seo tools    links    search    contact    shop    realtors


Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on Public Offerings







Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on
Public Offerings

Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on
Public Offerings
05/04/2004 01:01 AM

New York Times May 4 2004 5:48AM GMT




This is a GrokNews Entry: (what is grok?)





Similar Items

Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on Public Offerings

Grok Headline matches for Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on Public Offerings

Regulators to end interference with
public safety communication systems


Regulators to end interference with
public safety communication systems
07/10/2004 12:44 PM
Canadian Press Jul 10 2004 4:16PM GMT

Regulators amend Nextel deal to clear up
public safety interference


Regulators amend Nextel deal to clear up
public safety interference
12/24/2004 12:40 PM
SiliconValley.com Dec 23 2004 2:14AM GMT

Regulators probing Google stock grants


Regulators probing Google stock grants 08/06/2004 08:06 AM
San Francisco Chronicle Aug 6 2004 12:24PM GMT

Google IPO a sign of better offerings


Google IPO a sign of better offerings 01/02/2004 09:30 AM
Melbourne Age Jan 2 2004 8:35AM ET

Google: Regulators open inquiry into
stock issue


Google: Regulators open inquiry into
stock issue
08/16/2004 08:20 PM
SiliconValley.com Aug 16 2004 11:48PM GMT

Station Putting Pre-Empted Show On The
Web


Station Putting Pre-Empted Show On The
Web
04/07/2005 10:29 PM
In the linear world of TV, pre-empting a show is a big deal. Back in November, a producer for CBS News was fired for daring to cut into the last four minutes of CSI (during sweeps week) to announce that Yasser Arafat had died -- leading to plenty of complaints from angry CSI watchers who apparently aren't particularly concerned about world politics (at least not during prime time). CBS was forced to re-air the program a few days later. So, it's interesting to see how some TV stations are figuring out how to deal with the Pope's funeral. One Florida station has apparently decided that it will pre-empt its normal morning news program from the TV schedule to run the funeral live, but will still offer the news show on the web for those who would prefer to see it that way. While this may lead to questions of just how important the morning news program is to some people, a more interesting question is whether or not people will actually want to watch the program online, instead of on their TV (on the assumption very few people have hooked up their computers to their TV). As the E-Media Tidbits piece linked above suggests, the web and the TV aren't the same, and the show might be better off chopping up the program, and letting people download just the sections they want to watch. Either way, it's interesting that at least some TV stations are looking to the web as a way to deal with collisions in scheduling and the fact that they might have more than 24 hours of programming to deal with. With the rise of TiVo, and people watching television at times when it isn't live -- will the pre-empted TV broadcast still make as much sense in the future anyway?

Google awaits paperwork approval;
regulators open inquiry


Google awaits paperwork approval;
regulators open inquiry
08/17/2004 01:16 PM
San Francisco Chronicle Aug 17 2004 5:15PM GMT

Google, Firefox offerings shame
Microsoft


Google, Firefox offerings shame
Microsoft
04/10/2005 12:54 PM
Chicago Tribune Apr 10 2005 2:25PM GMT

Chicago Tribune/LinuxInsider: Google,
Firefox Offerings Shame Microsoft


Chicago Tribune/LinuxInsider: Google,
Firefox Offerings Shame Microsoft
04/14/2005 07:10 PM
"It's been another fruitful week on the Web's groaning sideboard of free software delicacies and services..."

Google stock offer awaits paperwork
approval; regulators open inquiry into
share issues


Google stock offer awaits paperwork
approval; regulators open inquiry into
share issues
08/17/2004 01:16 PM
San Francisco Chronicle Aug 17 2004 5:07PM GMT

Why Google shouldn't go public


Why Google shouldn't go public 05/06/2004 01:37 AM
Salon May 6 2004 5:23AM GMT

Google goes public


Google goes public 02/14/2003 02:10 PM
By Michael V. Copeland. Much has been made of the transformation of Google's name from spelling-challenged noun to grammatically questionable verb. ...

Google Going Public?


Google Going Public? 01/08/2004 08:26 PM
Ordinary investors are staying away from the markets, but now along comes Google, the world's most popular internet search engine and its talk of a initial ...

Why Google Should Go Public


Why Google Should Go Public 12/29/2003 02:51 PM
Search Engine Lowdown Dec 29 2003 1:24PM ET

For Google, Going Public Is Far From a
No-Brainer


For Google, Going Public Is Far From a
No-Brainer
04/26/2004 03:26 AM
Los Angeles Times Apr 26 2004 7:11AM GMT

Google Cleared to Go Public


Google Cleared to Go Public 08/18/2004 04:35 PM
"SEC Accepts Registration Statement".

Google to Go Public in $2.7 Bln Offering


Google to Go Public in $2.7 Bln Offering 04/29/2004 07:20 PM
AP via ABCNEWS.com Apr 29 2004 11:09PM GMT

The public face of Google


The public face of Google 08/21/2004 10:08 PM
The Scotsman Aug 22 2004 1:46AM GMT

Can Google Be Public and Private?


Can Google Be Public and Private? 05/31/2004 07:02 PM
E-Commerce Times-10 hours ago ... For all that Google has done to revive interest in technology and IPOs in recent weeks, it also has provided new fodder for a long-running debate: Is going ...

Google Goes Public at $85/share


Google Goes Public at $85/share 08/19/2004 09:45 AM

Google to go public in US$2.7b offer


Google to go public in US$2.7b offer 04/30/2004 08:35 PM
New Straits Times May 1 2004 1:03AM GMT

Google and the public good


Google and the public good 12/19/2004 03:24 PM
For those of us who are still consumers of those bundles of printed content known as books, the importance of today's news of Google's library deal is almost impossible to overstate. It's just huge.

While the Web has represented an enormous leap in the availability of human knowledge and the ease of human communication, its status as a sort of modern-day Library of Alexandria has remained suspect as long as nearly the entire corpus of human knowledge pre-Web remained locked away off-line between bound covers. "All human knowledge except what's in books" is sort of like saying "All human music except what's in scores." There's lots of good stuff there, but not the heart of things. Your Library of Alexandria is sort of a joke without, you know, the books.

Now Google, in partnership with some of the world's leading university libraries (including Stanford and Harvard), is undertaking the vast -- but not, as Brewster Kahle reminded us at Web 2.0, limitless -- project of scanning, digitizing and rendering searchable the world of books.

Google's leaders are demonstrating that their corporate mission statement -- "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful" -- is not just empty words. If you're serious about organizing the world's information, you'd better have a plan for dealing with the legacy matter of the human species' nearly three millennia of written material. So, simply, bravo for the ambition and know-how of a company that's willing to say, "Sure, we can do it."

Amazon's "look inside the book" feature provides a limited subset of this sort of data. But where Amazon has seemed mostly interested in providing limited "browsability" as a marketing tool, Google has its eye on the more universal picture. And so the first books that will be fully searchable and readable through this new project are books that are old enough to be out of copyright. The public domain just got a lot more public. (And presumably, as John Battelle suggests, we'll see a new business ecosystem spring up around providing print-on-demand physical copies of these newly digitized, previously unavailable public-domain texts.)

This is all such a Good Thing for the public itself that we may be inclined to overlook some of the more troubling aspects of the Google project. Google is making clear that, as it digitizes the holdings of university libraries, it's handing the universities their own copies of the data, to do with as they please. But apparently the Google copies of this information will be made widely available in an advertising-supported model.

For the moment, that seems fine: Google's approach to advertising is the least intrusive and most user-respectful you can find online today; if anyone can make advertising attractive and desirable, Google can.

But Google is a public company. The people leading it today will not be leading it forever. It's not inconceivable that in some future downturn Google will find itself under pressure to "monetize" its trove of books more ruthlessly.

Today's Google represents an extremely benign face of capitalism, and it may be that the only way to get a project of this magnitude done efficiently is in the private sector. But capitalism has its own dynamic, and ad-supported businesses tend to move in one direction -- towards more and more aggressive advertising.

Since we are, after all, talking about digitizing the entire body of published human knowledge, I can't help thinking that a public-sector effort -- whether government-backed or non-profit or both -- is more likely to serve the long-term public good. I know that's an unfashionable position in this market-driven era. It's also an unrealistic one given the current U.S. government's priorities.

But public investment has a pretty enviable track record: Think of the public goods that Americans enjoy today because the government chose to seed them and insure their universality -- from the still-essential Social Security program to the interstate highway system to the Internet itself. In an ideal world, it seems to me, Google would be a technology contractor for an institution like the Library of Congress. I'd rather see the company that builds the tools of access to information be an enabler of universal access than a gatekeeper or toll-taker.

The public has a big interest in making sure that no one business has a chokehold on the flow of human knowledge. As long as Google's amazing project puts more knowledge in more hands and heads, who could object? But in this area, taking the long view is not just smart -- it's ethically essential. So as details of Google's project emerge, it will be important not just to rely on Google's assurances but to keep an eye out for public guarantees of access, freedom of expression and limits to censorship.

Google to be $30B giant by going public


Google to be $30B giant by going public 07/28/2004 09:55 PM
EastDay Jul 29 2004 1:44AM GMT

Online giant Google gets set to go
public


Online giant Google gets set to go
public
04/28/2004 01:35 AM
CTV.ca Apr 28 2004 5:17AM GMT

google.public.support.general FAQ


google.public.support.general FAQ 04/10/2004 05:02 AM
google.public.support.general FAQ
http://www.geociti es.com/googlepubsupgenfaq/

This article includes answers to questions that appear especially frequently in the newsgroup google.public.support.general. It is not intended to replace Google's official FAQs and information for webmasters. Please read them if you haven't already done so:

http://www.google.com/help/ faq.html
http://www.google. com/googlegroups/help.html
http://www.google.com/webmast ers/

This will be added to the search engines section of all the Internet MiniGuides.[Thanks tp Tara ResearchBuzz]

Google to take first step towards public
offer


Google to take first step towards public
offer
04/25/2004 08:41 PM
Straits Times Apr 25 2004 11:22PM GMT

Google Expected to Go Public in 2004


Google Expected to Go Public in 2004 01/05/2004 06:51 PM
SiliconValley.com Jan 5 2004 6:21PM ET

So Google Is Almost Public. Now Comes
the Hard Part.


So Google Is Almost Public. Now Comes
the Hard Part.
08/17/2004 09:10 PM
Having taken the world by storm and on the brink of raising several billion dollars in an initial public offering, Google must prove that its success wasn't an accident.

Google to go public at 12 billion dollar
value


Google to go public at 12 billion dollar
value
01/05/2004 10:25 PM
Deepika Global Jan 5 2004 9:39PM ET

Is Public Opinion Turning Against
Google?


Is Public Opinion Turning Against
Google?
03/25/2005 01:20 AM
Addict3d.org Mar 25 2005 5:35AM GMT

Google May Delay Public Offering


Google May Delay Public Offering 02/14/2004 01:29 PM
Search Engine Lowdown Feb 14 2004 5:12PM GMT

Google Files For $2.7B Public Offering


Google Files For $2.7B Public Offering 04/30/2004 12:12 PM
asia.internet.com Apr 30 2004 4:14PM GMT

Google to go public in $2.7 b stock
offering


Google to go public in $2.7 b stock
offering
04/30/2004 04:18 PM
Deccan Herald Apr 30 2004 8:48PM GMT

As It Goes Public, Google Says It Is
Worth Up to $36 Billion


As It Goes Public, Google Says It Is
Worth Up to $36 Billion
07/26/2004 10:50 PM
New York Times Jul 27 2004 2:55AM GMT

Google, now public, comes under review
by analysts


Google, now public, comes under review
by analysts
08/20/2004 02:31 PM
Reuters Aug 20 2004 7:21PM GMT

Banks are not happy with Google going
public


Banks are not happy with Google going
public
08/21/2004 03:06 PM
Pravda Aug 21 2004 6:28PM GMT

Google hopes to go public this month


Google hopes to go public this month 07/12/2004 05:41 AM
Mad.co.uk Jul 12 2004 10:05AM GMT

Rich to Get Richer if Google Goes Public


Rich to Get Richer if Google Goes Public 04/24/2004 03:54 PM
New York Times Apr 24 2004 8:15PM GMT

Google Goes Public? The Rich Get Richer


Google Goes Public? The Rich Get Richer 04/25/2004 04:39 PM
Tiger Woods, Shaquille O'Neal and Henry A. Kissinger are among those lucky enough to own a sliver of Google.
Grok Description matches for Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on Public Offerings
GrokA matches for Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on Public Offerings

Google May Have Pre-empted Regulators on Public Offerings

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry:

















Also check out:


Grok

Ipod Porn on the
Rise

Brief Abstract of
Wikipedia's
Mesothelioma Cancer
page

Get first aid
instructions in your
cell phone

IE is crap
JSPWiki gains
podcasting support

Worm Brings Down
PC's and Networks

All-In-One Photo
Printers: Six-Color
Photo Devices Print,
Scan, And Copy Their
Way Into The Market

The iPod Comes Home
MediaEdit Pro: Video
Editor Is
Counterintuitive And
Difficult To Use

Laptop Prospects Dim
After Lawmakers
Adjourn Without
Action

Gamble on Sharon
goes awry for Bush

The New York Times
> Arts >
Darwin-Free Fun for
Creationists

Mozilla Thunderbird
0.6 Release Notes

Biodiversity
Hotspots

cold fish
The domain name says
it all

MetaFilter: Mr.
Fusion ate my baby!

What Is Fascism?
Dark Horse Comics
Gallery Update: Boba
Fett

POTF2 European Photo
Archive: Bib
Fortuna, Hammerhead
And 4-Lom

eBay Today: Vintage
And Modern Plush

Clone Wars Battle
Motion Cards

President Gets Back
on the Bus
(washingtonpost.com)

U.S. Sent
Specialists To Train
Prison Units
(washingtonpost.com)

Mideast Quartet
Tries to Revive
Tattered Road Map
(Reuters)

U.S. Specialists
Sent to Iraq to
Train Guards -Report
(Reuters)

NGrid
Anarchy Offline
Experiment (AO
Emulator)

wyneken
Science.Ars
High-flying frog
stows away in
in-flight salad
(Reuters)

Parties begin
election campaigns

Google Indexes Flash
Good Corporate
Blogging Advice

Essentials
Information
Technology
Information Library
(ITIL)

Apple airs new iPod
TV ad

Disney shareholder
wants Jobs

PlayFair to return
'soon'

OrangeWare revs
Wireless Driver to
version 3.0

iPaste gives you
quick access to
clipboard items

Synchronize! Pro X
3.4 released

120
Ferel Robot Dogs
Sniff Out Pollution

Bud Looks East
The Post's
Educational
Advantage

Sapient Rebounds
ImClone's
Buy-and-Hold Lesson

Cash, Credit,
Crudites?

Churchill Downs'
Derby Dollars

Avon's Beauteous
Quarter

Vintage Alcatel
What to Make of
Taser?

I Am Beyond Super
Sized

Siebel taps Michael
J. Lawrie as new CEO

what is grok?