ATI R420 Benchmarks Leaked
Grok Headline matches for ATI R420 Benchmarks Leaked
Prescott benchmarks leaked
Prescott benchmarks leaked
01/28/2004 10:17 AMBenchmarks? We don't need no stinking
benchmarks...
Benchmarks? We don't need no stinking
benchmarks...
04/01/2005 09:09 AMInsi
de the Pentagon. Hilarious. News is finally
leaking out how the US warplan for Iraq lacked (until
recently) specific benchmarks. Rapid changes in course can
be characterized as flexibility if those changes are slaved to defined
objectives. If those objectives don't exist, it's chaos.
Of course, these new benchmarks are classified. This
means that they are effectively useless in this conflict. In
order to fight a decentralized insurgency, decision making must be
pushed down to the lowest levels. Every soldier in Iraq should
know what these objectives are so they can adapt their effort to
accomplish them.
The top U.S. officer in Iraq, Army
Gen. George Casey, lately has been garnering plaudits behind the
scenes from his military and civilian colleagues for adding measurable
benchmarks to his campaign plan, a classified document in which a
commander typically delineates security objectives and how subordinate
units will attain them. But some officials say the nearly two-year
delay in laying out clear and realistic security goals in a single
military plan has taken a toll on the Iraqi stability and
reconstruction effort.
R420 Pics?
R420 Pics?
12/31/2003 09:40 AMATI launches R420
ATI launches R420
05/04/2004 09:21 AMRadeon X800 Pro, XT Platinum Edition launch this month
R420 Shows up at IDF
R420 Shows up at IDF
02/19/2004 10:10 AMNew Pic of ATi's R420
New Pic of ATi's R420
04/24/2004 07:31 AMATI Radeon R420 Roadmap
ATI Radeon R420 Roadmap
04/13/2004 06:03 AMNew R420/423 info - From Anandtech
New R420/423 info - From Anandtech
04/09/2004 04:07 PMATI R420 slips from April to May
ATI R420 slips from April to May
04/23/2004 05:32 AMEven as piccies appear on Web
ATI: R420 Ruby Demo
ATI: R420 Ruby Demo
05/01/2004 09:03 AMNew R420 Info Direct From ATi
New R420 Info Direct From ATi
04/26/2004 11:52 AMATi R420 & R423 Specifications
ATi R420 & R423 Specifications
04/21/2004 04:45 AMNV40 & R420, Performance Testing
NV40 & R420, Performance Testing
06/26/2004 06:15 AMA Journey Across the Ocean: Shaders and
R420
A Journey Across the Ocean: Shaders and
R420
05/10/2004 10:04 AMATI R420 to ship late Q1 2004
ATI R420 to ship late Q1 2004
12/19/2003 11:26 AMTaiwanese sources claim
ATI R420 Release Date Pushed Back
ATI R420 Release Date Pushed Back
04/23/2004 10:46 AMATI to mass produce R420 graphics chip
in 1Q
ATI to mass produce R420 graphics chip
in 1Q
12/19/2003 11:55 AMATI's 2004 Plans Unveiled: R420/423
Specs Inside
ATI's 2004 Plans Unveiled: R420/423
Specs Inside
02/13/2004 10:35 AMFirst DBX Benchmarks
First DBX Benchmarks
02/05/2003 12:19 PMExcellent! John Lim did some benchmarking with ADOdb and DBX. Before
this, I was a bit worried that the reason people are not using DBX is
because it is slow. We now have some proof that it isn't. Now we know
that there is no technical reason not to position DBX as a standard
PHP DB wrapper.
Breaking Down The Benchmarks
Breaking Down The Benchmarks
09/22/2004 06:17 PM By James Galbraith, Macworld (via MyAppleMenu)
iMac 1.8 Ghz G5 Benchmarks
iMac 1.8 Ghz G5 Benchmarks
09/15/2004 03:47 PM
Thanks to one of our readers, we have some early benchmark results on
a 20" 1.8 Ghz G5 iMac.
Cinebench results:CINEBENCH 2003 v1
*******************...
Geforce 6 Go Benchmarks
Geforce 6 Go Benchmarks
09/12/2004 04:25 PMiMac G5 Benchmarks
iMac G5 Benchmarks
09/24/2004 06:23 PM By James Galbraith, Macworld (via MyAppleMenu)
New TPC benchmarks are on the horizon
New TPC benchmarks are on the horizon
09/21/2004 08:14 AMComputer Business Review Sep 21 2004 12:44PM GMT
Unofficial ATI R4++ Benchmarks
Unofficial ATI R4++ Benchmarks
04/23/2004 08:33 PMHyperthreading Benchmarks
Hyperthreading Benchmarks
01/13/2003 03:51 AMThere's an excellent article on IBM DeveloperWorks that presents a
performance analysis of the 2.4 and 2.5 kernel's hyperthreading
support. Good stuff. I look forward to the enhanced scheduler in 2.5.
Perhaps it's one of the few reasons we need...
Interactive Benchmarks
Interactive Benchmarks
07/11/2004 08:38 AMAMD A64 90nm Benchmarks
AMD A64 90nm Benchmarks
07/11/2004 06:35 AMParser benchmarks
Parser benchmarks
05/14/2004 03:25 PMAnd finally I end this marathon blogging session with another one
of our PeepAgg team members - Chris Schmidt.
Chris did the FOAF module for LiveJournal and is now working on
getting PeepAgg into Drupal.
:-)
Here's his post....
ApacheBe
nch testing of XML Parsing. So, I've been working on a project
called PeopleAggregator,
and we've been talking about integrating with a lot of different
platforms, among them Drupal. (For
the record, this is completely unrelated to the MT stuff that went on
today. I may write on that later, but really, everyone else has said
what I would in a million different ways.) Anyway, we were talking
about RAP and
how it's too bulky and slow to work for what we need.
So, we
got a guy on the team - Joel De Gan, who's working on the PeoplesDNS project for us, and he
offered to write us a parser. This is going to be a replacement for
RAP, for those of us who can't deal with the slowness of
RAP.
Now, I don't know much about RAP. And I don't know much
about PHP, or parsing XML, or really anything - I pick up the bits I
need to know as I go along. So I'm just kind of standing on the
sidelines, but today, I got a demo of what Joel's parser can
do.
LiveJournal FOAF files are typically big. Mine is no
exception - over 100 friends, random contact data, etc. All in all, a
40KB document about me. I want to parse this data. So I attempt to
using both RAP and Joel's parser.
To alleviate network traffic
conditions, I copy the file I want locally. To simulate the action of
opening a file and reading it, I did keep it on the webserver, so I
will admit there may be some kind of bias in that, but I used the
exact same method to open the file in both cases (fopen) so I don't
think that's an issue that would cause any major difference. I also
disabled all printed output.
Anyway, I used this file to check
the parsers. Using ab (apache benchmarking utility - fetches a page a
bunch of times and tells you how long it took). Using a 50 request
check, I got averages on the two parsing utilities:
Joel De
Gan's XML parser, parses data into a multileveled array as displayed
at http://crschmidt.net/parse/
parse.php (source
available):
Requests per second: 11.25 [#/sec]
(mean)
Time per request: 88.92 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:
88.92 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
(Full
Stats)
RAP, parses into RDF models. (source, + RAP. The
parser isn't actually here):
Requests per second: 1.35 [#/sec]
(mean)
Time per request: 739.82 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:
739.82 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
(Full Stats)
So,
we've got a parser that to a guy like me seems simpler to use
(advanced data structures are part of the limited experience I did get
from LiveJournal), is lightweight (one file, as opposed to 256 in
RAP), and faster by an order of magnitude.
That, to me, sounds
like a winner. Props to Joel for his great work. His next step is to
implement OWL capabilities into RDF parsing, and that's going to kick
even more ass. As Eric said at one point about this: "Be still my
beating heart." By crschmidt@livejournal.com.
[Christopher
Schmidt]
phpEverywhere: More About the Benchmarks
phpEverywhere: More About the Benchmarks
11/19/2003 09:18 AMA little while back, we mentioned some of the benchmarking that
phpEverywhere was doing with one of
the new suites, and now, with some solid results behind them, they've
posted a graph
of the results.
PowerMac G5 2.5GHz Benchmarks
PowerMac G5 2.5GHz Benchmarks
07/02/2004 07:36 PM
One user provides some of the first benchmarks from Apple's newest top
end PowerMac - the dual 2.5GHz model. While Apple introduced the dual
2.5GHz P...
Doom 3 Benchmarks: ATI vs. Nvidia
Doom 3 Benchmarks: ATI vs. Nvidia
08/10/2004 05:42 PMDoom 3 is finally upon us. Whatever you think of the game, there's no
denying the amazing technology behind it. We put 14 modern GPUs to the
test on what will surely be one of the most important standard
benchmarks for the year to come.
Socket 939 on SIS 755FX (benchmarks)
Socket 939 on SIS 755FX (benchmarks)
05/25/2004 11:33 AMATI Response on Doom 3 Benchmarks
ATI Response on Doom 3 Benchmarks
07/24/2004 09:47 AMEarly Doom 3 Benchmarks @ GD
Early Doom 3 Benchmarks @ GD
08/03/2004 06:12 PMNew DOOM3 Benchmarks Coming Soon
New DOOM3 Benchmarks Coming Soon
07/24/2004 04:28 PMGeForce FX 5500 Benchmarks
GeForce FX 5500 Benchmarks
02/12/2004 12:52 PMLinux Database Benchmarks
Linux Database Benchmarks
12/31/2004 08:53 PMSQLite Database Speed
Comparison: If you ever wanted to know which Linux database option
was the fastest, the guys over at SQLite have done some tests. No
surprises: SQLite wins, MySQL is
second, with PostgreSQL
trailing the pack.
Note to Access users: MySQL
can do 25,000 inserts in two seconds. SQLite can do it in less than
one second. While Access is great for desktop work, I shudder to
think how it would stack up in this test.
I'd be interested to see where Firebird
fits in this scale.
First GeForceFX 5700 GO benchmarks!
First GeForceFX 5700 GO benchmarks!
11/10/2003 11:34 PMGrok Description matches for ATI R420 Benchmarks Leaked
GrokA matches for ATI R420 Benchmarks Leaked
ATI R420 Benchmarks Leaked
