Supreme Court Justice Souter Assaulted (AP)

Grok Headline matches for Supreme Court Justice Souter Assaulted (AP)

Supreme Court Justice Assaulted, But
'Fine'

Supreme Court Justice Assaulted, But
'Fine' 05/01/2004 04:03 PM
Reuters via Wired News May 1 2004 7:45PM GMT

Supreme Court Justice Assaulted, But
'Fine' (Reuters)

Supreme Court Justice Assaulted, But
'Fine' (Reuters) 05/01/2004 01:20 PM
Reuters - U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter was assaulted while jogging and sustained minor injuries, a court spokesman said on Saturday.

CNN.com - Justice Souter assaulted
during jog - May 1, 2004

CNN.com - Justice Souter assaulted
during jog - May 1, 2004 05/01/2004 08:17 PM
attacked last night .. ...story link

cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/01/souter.assaulted/index.html
track this site | 4 links

Did the Justice department lie to the
Supreme Court in Padilla?

Did the Justice department lie to the
Supreme Court in Padilla? 05/14/2004 12:11 AM
http://www.isthatlegal.org/archives/2004_05_09_isthatlegal_archive.htm l#108445474417232258...

Justice Dept censors Supreme Court
ruling

Justice Dept censors Supreme Court
ruling 08/29/2004 10:41 AM
Cory Doctorow: Becky sez, "The Justice Dept. blacked out (censored) the part of a Supreme Court decision that calls into question the willy-nilly use of the vague notion of 'domestic security' to suppress dissent. Oy."

Ostensibly, they would use their powers of censorship only to remove material that truly could jeopardize US operations. But in reality, what did they do? They blacked out a quotation from a Supreme Court decision:

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect 'domestic security.' Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent."

The mind reels at such a blatant abuse of power (and at the sheer chutzpah of using national security as an excuse to censor a quotation about using national security as an excuse to stifle dissent).

Link (Thanks, Becky!)

Justice Department Censors Supreme Court
Quote

Justice Department Censors Supreme Court
Quote 08/30/2004 01:08 AM
there's nothing more public than a supreme court decision, and they still black it out

Vice President and his Supreme Court
Justice Buddy

Vice President and his Supreme Court
Justice Buddy 01/17/2004 10:47 PM
It's blatantly improper for Scalia and Cheney to buddy it up this way. But when Scalia says, as he's quoted in this story, "I do not think my impartiality could reasonably be questioned," he invites ridicule. Too bad, with Republican control of government, that it won't go any further.

Supreme Court Justice Admits That Tech
Cases Are Tough

Supreme Court Justice Admits That Tech
Cases Are Tough 12/05/2003 12:29 PM
We've had plenty of discussions about whether it causes problems that judges don't understand the technology they're making decisions about. Some people have suggested special "tech courts" with legal experts who also have a strong understanding of technology, but others think part of what's "good" about our court system is that the decisions are made by generalists who understand the law. Now, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is admitting that technology cases are particularly difficult to deal with, but doesn't necessarily think the Supreme Court should hire subject matter experts to help out on certain cases. He does think the issue requires more investigation however.

The Memory Hole > Justice Department
Censors Supreme Court Quote

The Memory Hole > Justice Department
Censors Supreme Court Quote 08/29/2004 09:46 PM
Redacted by the Justice Department .. quote from a Supreme Court ruling

thememoryhole.org/feds/justice_redaction.htm
track this site | 4 links

ONLINE EXTRA: Our readers on Supreme
court justice and Canada’s
future

ONLINE EXTRA: Our readers on Supreme
court justice and Canada’s
future 06/24/2004 04:41 AM
Canada.com - Thu Jun 24, 08:22 am GMT

Viennese court passes 3G VAT refund case
onto Court of Justice

Viennese court passes 3G VAT refund case
onto Court of Justice 08/04/2004 08:05 AM
DMeurope.com Aug 4 2004 12:04PM GMT

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit

Court mulls file sharing Hollywood and
Silicon Valley square off before Supreme
Court in case that could limit 03/30/2005 08:56 PM
CBS MarketWatch Mar 31 2005 12:31AM GMT

"MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- Chief Justice Roy
Moore was removed from office Thursday
for refusing to obey a federal court
order to move his Ten Commandments
monument from the rotunda of the state
courthouse. The Alabama Court of the
Judiciary unanimously imposed ..."

"MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- Chief Justice Roy
Moore was removed from office Thursday
for refusing to obey a federal court
order to move his Ten Commandments
monument from the rotunda of the state
courthouse. The Alabama Court of the
Judiciary unanimously imposed ..." 11/14/2003 03:32 AM

What is going on at the Supreme Court?

What is going on at the Supreme Court? 06/29/2004 11:59 AM
Thomas and Scalia are the most conservative conservative Justices. Breyer is on of the liberal Justices. (Admittedly the least liberal,…

The Supreme Court says no

The Supreme Court says no 03/24/2005 11:52 AM
The justices deny a request for an order to re-insert Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. Is this the end?

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice

Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on ice 06/29/2004 12:05 PM
In a close vote, the justices rule that a federal law designed to restrict Internet pornography violates Americans' free-speech rights.

Dems on the Supreme Court

Dems on the Supreme Court 01/11/2004 07:56 AM
So an underplayed aspect of this campaign has been how the Democratic candidates would differently select the Supreme Court. On NPR's debate , Senator Lieberman pointed to Justice Souter as a model. Congressman Kucinich plugged Justice Ginsburg. I've gotten a couple pings asking what the right answer is. Hard question for me. Of course neither Ginsburg nor Souter were on the correct side (or the right side) of Eldred, but I certainly think Justice Souter is a model justice -- serious, hard working, unburdened by ideology, prepared. I never quite get the principle that guides Justice Ginsburg's choice between activism and not, or principle and not, so I'm waiting to see the genius in that selection by President Clinton. Justice Breyer of course wrote a brilliant dissent in Eldred -- brilliant, though not effective. He was proud of the decision's embrace of economics as the standard by which the Sonny Bono Act was judged. But while I'm a fan of the result, I've been too deeply affected (scarred?) by the originalism/textaulism/fidelity theories of Scalia to be enamored of that method. In my view, perhaps the best sitting justice is a Republican appointee -- Stevens. And if candidates are looking for what makes the best the best, then it is certainly his judges' judge-like character. There's no simple line that predicts Justice Stevens' result -- certainly not a political line. And if there is any quality this Court needs, it is that -- following a line that does not seem a political line. The most impressive judges not sitting on the Supreme Court are also, um, Republicans. (What party am I again?) Judge Kozin ski is a great judge -- too young when appointed, but someone who has matured brilliantly in the job. And while his views about how to the interpret the constitution make me cringe, history will record the greatest judge of our time as Judge Posner. But I doubt that this is the time that a President from either party will pick greatness as the reason to select a Justice.

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice

US Supreme Court keeps Net porn law on
ice 07/01/2004 02:04 AM
ZDNet Australia Jul 1 2004 5:44AM GMT

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court

The porn must go on - US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 11:40 PM
For now . . .

Supreme Court to try Brand X

Supreme Court to try Brand X 03/28/2005 11:29 PM
Independent ISPs argue cable companies should be forced to lease lines, but what's really on trial is the concept of communication.

Showdown at the Supreme Court

Showdown at the Supreme Court 03/17/2005 03:27 AM
“On March 29, the entertainment and technology industries will descend upon Washington, D.C. to argue their respective sides before the Supreme Court in the landmark case of MGM v Grokster. At stake: the future of peer-to-peer technology, consumer electronics, software design, and consumer rights in the United States. In April 2003, a federal judge ruled that Streamcast Networks — the developer and distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software, and Grokster — the developer and distributor…

Direct and Related Links for 'Showdown at the Supreme Court'

Supreme Court Says COPA Unconstitutional

Supreme Court Says COPA Unconstitutional 06/29/2004 01:38 PM
"Suggesting there are less restrictive ways to protect minors from harmful Web content, the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday ruled 5-4 that the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) is a content-based restriction of free speech. The case is on its way back to a lower court for further review."

"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)"

"Urteil des Supreme Court (PDF-Version)" 06/29/2004 02:13 PM

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown

Intel, AMD In Supreme Court Showdown 04/20/2004 06:00 AM
Forbes Apr 20 2004 10:16AM GMT

Supreme Court curtails Net porn law

Supreme Court curtails Net porn law 06/29/2004 02:04 PM
CNET Jun 29 2004 3:59PM GMT

Supreme Court quashes Net porn law

Supreme Court quashes Net porn law 06/29/2004 03:19 PM
ZDNet Jun 29 2004 6:45PM GMT

Supreme Court Won't Block Gay Marriages
(AP)

Supreme Court Won't Block Gay Marriages
(AP) 05/14/2004 06:10 PM
AP - The Supreme Court refused Friday to block the nation's first state-sanctioned gay marriages from taking place next week.

Papers Please: right not to show ID goes
to Supreme Court

Papers Please: right not to show ID goes
to Supreme Court 02/17/2004 11:47 AM
A Nevada cowboy is fighting for his right not to produce ID on law-enforcement demand, and he's going all the way to the Supreme Court.

Meet Dudley Hiibel. He's a 59 year old cowboy who owns a small ranch outside of Winnemucca, Nevada. He lives a simple life, but he's his own man. You probably never would have heard of Dudley Hiibel if it weren't for his belief in the U.S. Constitution.

One balmy May evening back in 2000, Dudley was standing around minding his own business when all of a sudden, a policeman pulled-up and demanded that Dudley produce his ID. Dudley, having done nothing wrong, declined. He was arrested and charged with "failure to cooperate" for refusing to show ID on demand. And it's all on video.

On the 22nd of March 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether Dudley and the rest of us live in a free society, or in a country where we must show "the papers" whenever a cop demands them.

Link (Thanks, Bill!)

US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation

US Supreme Court sides with AMD on EU
investigation 06/22/2004 11:04 AM
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Intel may eventually have to turn 600,000 pages of documents over to EU investigators as part of a long-running inquiry into Intel's business practices in Europe.

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court

AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court 06/22/2004 05:47 AM
Chip giant must now hand over documents to EC

Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality

Supreme Court to Decide P2P Legality 03/28/2005 12:59 PM
The United States Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday a landmark case that could have far-reaching consequences for both copyright holders and the technology industry. At issue is whether two P2P network operators, Grokster and StreamCast are liable for the copyright infringement committed by their users.

U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right

U.S. Supreme Court: Public Anonymity No
Right 06/21/2004 09:55 PM

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation

Supreme Court to Consider Cable
Regulation 03/28/2005 11:56 PM
Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear opening arguments in the fight to classify what constitutes an "information service," and whether cable companies and voice over IP providers deserve to be treated differently under a separate set of government regulations.

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court

File sharing goes to the Supreme Court 03/29/2005 06:49 AM
Personal Computer World Mar 29 2005 10:51AM GMT

Supreme Court rules against Intel

Supreme Court rules against Intel 06/21/2004 10:54 AM
ZDNet Jun 21 2004 3:40PM GMT

Supreme Court hears P2P case

Supreme Court hears P2P case 03/29/2005 11:57 AM
Justices quiz attorneys for file-swapping software companies and Hollywood studios in a landmark case.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P

Supreme Court takes hard look at P2P 03/29/2005 02:25 PM
Justices voice skepticism about both sides as file-swap companies do legal battle with entertainment industry.
FAQ: Betamax--tech's favorite ruling

Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court

Web porn law blocked by US Supreme Court 06/29/2004 05:18 PM
IT Vibe Jun 29 2004 7:34PM GMT

Supreme Court blocks web porn law

Supreme Court blocks web porn law 06/29/2004 07:10 PM
Independent Jun 29 2004 9:20PM GMT
Grok Description matches for Supreme Court Justice Souter Assaulted (AP)
GrokA matches for Supreme Court Justice Souter Assaulted (AP)

Supreme Court Justice Souter Assaulted (AP)

The following phrases have been identified by the grok system as matching this entry: