How Google Can Do Good with IPO
Grok Headline matches for How Google Can Do Good with IPO
Calling Nurse Google Patients are taking
advantage of health Web sites - some
good, some not so good
Calling Nurse Google Patients are taking
advantage of health Web sites - some
good, some not so good
06/05/2005 11:44 PMGadsdentimes.com - Sun Jun 5, 12:53 pm GMT
Site Maps : Is Good Enough for
Google.com, Good Enough For Me?
Site Maps : Is Good Enough for
Google.com, Good Enough For Me?
10/30/2003 10:22 AMThe Good God Google
The Good God Google
04/19/2005 09:28 AMglobetechnology.com Apr 19 2005 1:38PM GMT
How good is Google?
How good is Google?
10/31/2003 11:41 AMChina Daily Oct 31 2003 11:01AM ET
Is Google good for you?
Is Google good for you?
12/25/2003 11:19 PMBill Thompson at BBC World Service asks the question Is Google good
for you? He talks about how Google has become more commercial, and
claims...
"How good is Google?"
"How good is Google?"
11/01/2003 09:48 PMGoogle IPO good to go
Google IPO good to go
08/17/2004 07:45 AMNbr.co.nz - Tue Aug 17, 10:25 am GMT
Google: Good to the Last Geek?
Google: Good to the Last Geek?
04/02/2005 01:03 PMProving that some Google employees are rich enough to waste tons of
time, the search giant posted an elaborate April Fool’s site
Friday touting a new line of thirst-quenching drinks dubbed Google
Gulp (Beta) with Auto-Drink (Limited Release). “At Google our
mission is to organize the world’s information and make it
useful and accessible to our users,” the San Francisco-based
search giant said on the site. “But any piece of
information’s usefulness derives, to a…
Direct and Related Links for 'Google: Good
to the Last Geek?'
Google and the public good
Google and the public good
12/19/2004 03:24 PMFor those of us who are still consumers of those bundles of printed
content known as books, the importance of today's news of
Google's
library deal is almost impossible to overstate. It's just
huge.
While the Web has represented an enormous leap in the availability
of human knowledge and the ease of human communication, its status as
a sort of modern-day Library of Alexandria has remained suspect as
long as nearly the entire corpus of human knowledge pre-Web remained
locked away off-line between bound covers. "All human knowledge except
what's in books" is sort of like saying "All human music except what's
in scores." There's lots of good stuff there, but not the heart
of things. Your Library of Alexandria is sort of a joke without, you
know, the books.
Now Google, in partnership with some of the world's leading
university libraries (including Stanford and Harvard), is undertaking
the vast -- but not, as Brewster
Kahle reminded us at Web 2.0, limitless -- project of scanning,
digitizing and rendering searchable the world of books.
Google's leaders are demonstrating that their corporate mission
statement -- "to organize the world's information and make it
universally accessible and useful" -- is not just empty words. If
you're serious about organizing the world's information, you'd better
have a plan for dealing with the legacy matter of the human species'
nearly three millennia of written material. So, simply, bravo for the
ambition and know-how of a company that's willing to say, "Sure, we
can do it."
Amazon's "look inside the book" feature provides a limited subset
of this sort of data. But where Amazon has seemed mostly interested in
providing limited "browsability" as a marketing tool, Google has its
eye on the more universal picture. And so the first books that will be
fully searchable and readable through this new project are books that
are old enough to be out of copyright. The public domain just got a
lot more public. (And presumably, as John Battelle
suggests, we'll see a new business ecosystem spring up around
providing print-on-demand physical copies of these newly digitized,
previously unavailable public-domain texts.)
This is all such a Good Thing for the public itself that we may be
inclined to overlook some of the more troubling aspects of the Google
project. Google is making clear that, as it digitizes the holdings of
university libraries, it's handing the universities their own copies
of the data, to do with as they please. But apparently the Google
copies of this information will be made widely available in an
advertising-supported model.
For the moment, that seems fine: Google's approach to advertising
is the least intrusive and most user-respectful you can find online
today; if anyone can make advertising attractive and desirable, Google
can.
But Google is a public company. The people leading it today will
not be leading it forever. It's not inconceivable that in some future
downturn Google will find itself under pressure to "monetize" its
trove of books more ruthlessly.
Today's Google represents an extremely benign face of capitalism,
and it may be that the only way to get a project of this magnitude
done efficiently is in the private sector. But capitalism has its own
dynamic, and ad-supported businesses tend to move in one direction --
towards more and more aggressive advertising.
Since we are, after all, talking about digitizing the entire body
of published human knowledge, I can't help thinking that a
public-sector effort -- whether government-backed or non-profit or
both -- is more likely to serve the long-term public good. I know
that's an unfashionable position in this market-driven era.
It's also an unrealistic one given the current U.S. government's
priorities.
But public investment has a pretty enviable track record: Think of
the public goods that Americans enjoy today because the government
chose to seed them and insure their universality -- from the
still-essential Social Security program to the interstate highway
system to the Internet itself. In an ideal world, it seems to me,
Google would be a technology contractor for an institution like the
Library of Congress. I'd rather see the company that builds the tools
of access to information be an enabler of universal access than a
gatekeeper or toll-taker.
The public has a big interest in making sure that no one business
has a chokehold on the flow of human knowledge. As long as Google's
amazing project puts more knowledge in more hands and heads, who could
object? But in this area, taking the long view is not just smart --
it's ethically essential. So as details of Google's project emerge, it
will be important not just to rely on Google's assurances but to keep
an eye out for public guarantees of access, freedom of expression and
limits to censorship.
How good is Google News?
How good is Google News?
11/05/2003 06:25 AMCyberJournalist.net Nov 5 2003 5:37AM ET
Lehman Says Google Looks Good
Lehman Says Google Looks Good
04/05/2005 12:10 PMTheStreet.com Apr 5 2005 3:46PM GMT
Why Google News Is a *Good* Thing
Why Google News Is a *Good* Thing
09/30/2002 01:19 AM8 Reasons Why Google News Is a *Good* Thing
Dave writes how he's not impressed by Google News. Exact post:
Google PR sends a message that they have a new News service. Maybe
I'm slow this morning, or maybe I'm spoiled, but what's the big deal.
I thought they already had this. My personal aggregator is better, it
shows me what I'm interested in, it's not one size fits all. Help me
figure this out. I'm sure there's something innovative here, I just
don't see it.
Permalink
From a technical perspective I'm not sure that there is a lot that's
new here. I still think this is huge though:
My aggregator is just that mine -- I heavily tilt it in favor of tech
/ blogging / highly ecclectic stuff. I don't get general purpose
"What's Going On" news -- and, sure, that's my fault. So what? A
personal aggregator is always or at least often going to be this way.
Google is giving me a much more balanced viewpoint. That's huge.
Google is integrating foreign and U.S. feeds into one composite
display. Given that there are differences in how U.S. media report
stories versus foreign media, this makes it very apparent and that's
good. The U.S. media is not always right.
The user interface is highly functional -- I could easily see my Mom
using Google News. I couldn't see her using a "traditional"
aggregator be it Radio, AmphetaDesk, Drupal or another.
The concept of aggregation is fundamentally important and one of the
very real contributions that UserLand made to us all. Still
aggregation doesn't mean squat beyond a small group of folks. Google
News will introduce the concept very widely.
Everything is very clearly time stamped i.e. "55 minutes ago".
It's not going to get confused when someone re-edits a url they've
already posted so the same thing shows up as new repeatedly.
A Caveat. Google's reputation is such that I feel that they did a
good job of picking the news sources which is particularly important
for foreign information. When I caught the Indonesian bombing news
this morning, I trusted the sources that Google chose to show me since
they're from Google. Now that may be naive and perhaps it is but a
lot of us will do that.
They aren't relying on XML feeds so they aren't dependent on news
sources that lack feeds like Voice of America. And while there are
lots of ways to build these, it's generally non-trivial.
Google News isn't going to replace my aggregator any time soon but it
is a good tool that I can see myself using regularly.
Visit Google News
"BBC NEWS | Technology | Is Google good
for you?"
"BBC NEWS | Technology | Is Google good
for you?"
12/23/2003 09:30 AMGoogle promises all good things
Google promises all good things
05/01/2004 02:03 AMninemsn May 1 2004 5:43AM GMT
BBC NEWS | Technology | Is Google good
for you?
BBC NEWS | Technology | Is Google good
for you?
12/23/2003 06:11 AMpeople are addicted to Google .. Is Google good for you? .. This BBC
Piece ..
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3334531.stm
track this
site | 4 links
'Sensis good enough to rival Google,
Yahoo'
'Sensis good enough to rival Google,
Yahoo'
07/11/2004 08:40 PMSydney Morning Herald Jul 12 2004 0:31AM GMT
Google Tries To Offer Distinction
Between Good And Bad Spyware
Google Tries To Offer Distinction
Between Good And Bad Spyware
05/19/2004 12:03 PMGoogle has been a bit worried that new spyware legislation will
include things that could make their IE toolbar (and possibly other
new Google doodads) illegal. Realizing that the debate doesn't seem
to be going anywhere, they've tried to put together a list of
generally accepted
practices of what companies shouldn't do in creating software that
may be considered spyware. While some may disagree with some of the
points on the list, it probably is a good thing to get it written down
just as a starting point for debate.
Google stock process a good deal
Google stock process a good deal
08/21/2004 05:45 AMDenverpost.com - Sat Aug 21, 08:23 am GMT
Google Gives Good News About Expired
Domains
Google Gives Good News About Expired
Domains
03/11/2003 01:22 AM"..we've also put more of a focus on algorithmic improvements for spam
issues. One resulting improvement with this index is better handling
of expired domains..."
Google defines good manners for adware
Google defines good manners for adware
05/19/2004 11:56 AMThe search giant, in a new set of guidelines, says that software
should follow common-sense rules of politeness: It should admit what
it's doing, permit itself to be disabled and refrain from leaking
private data.
Google good-vibes IPO hits sour note
Google good-vibes IPO hits sour note
08/08/2004 07:05 AMArab Times Aug 8 2004 10:29AM GMT
Google listing a good time to recall
dotbombs
Google listing a good time to recall
dotbombs
05/10/2004 03:05 AMBusiness Report May 10 2004 7:02AM GMT
Dare Obasanjo Gives some good advice to
Google/Blogger
Dare Obasanjo Gives some good advice to
Google/Blogger
05/13/2004 12:29 PMThanks to Scoble for the link Dare makes some great points that I
think a significant number of us are...
Google Good. Me use Google.
Google Good. Me use Google.
05/17/2004 06:15 PMI had lunch today with a former Yahoo (Ray) and a few coworkers.
That's odd for me because I usually eat lunch at my desk while
catching up in NetNewsWire. Among the various things we talked about
was the way Google add features that are useful to a very small
fraction of their users. For example, the fact that I can plug N304GT
into Google to lookup my glider's record in the FAA Aircraft
Registration Database is cool. (The fact...
""I'd just like to get together with a
guy from time to time just to -- just to
play. I'd like him to be, uh, in very
good shape, flat stomach, good chest,
good arms, well-hung, cut, uh, just get
naked, play, see what happens, nothing
real heavy ..."
""I'd just like to get together with a
guy from time to time just to -- just to
play. I'd like him to be, uh, in very
good shape, flat stomach, good chest,
good arms, well-hung, cut, uh, just get
naked, play, see what happens, nothing
real heavy ..."
08/31/2004 08:45 PMGood idea and a good service. Can anyone
say how can I register to gmail, and if
attchment size is large then
Good idea and a good service. Can anyone
say how can I register to gmail, and if
attchment size is large then
07/13/2004 01:33 AMTechTree Jul 13 2004 5:44AM GMT
KILLER, COWARD, CON-MAN GOOD RIDDANCE,
GIPPER ...MORE PROOF ONLY THE GOOD DIE
YOUNG
KILLER, COWARD, CON-MAN GOOD RIDDANCE,
GIPPER ...MORE PROOF ONLY THE GOOD DIE
YOUNG
06/08/2004 05:47 AMKILLER, COWARD, CON-MAN GOOD RIDDANCE, GIPPER ... MORE PROOF ONLY THE
GOOD DIE YOUNG .. How People View The Dead Is Shaped By Personal
Experiences .. Greg Palast on the Reagan "Legacy" 6/7 .. And
another
gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=336&row=0
track this
site | 9 links
Does A Good Game Make A Good Movie Idea?
Does A Good Game Make A Good Movie Idea?
04/24/2004 04:00 PMStrengthen The Good: Strengthening The
Good: The Gulf Coast Community
Foundation Of Venice Hurricane Charley
Disaster Relief Fund
Strengthen The Good: Strengthening The
Good: The Gulf Coast Community
Foundation Of Venice Hurricane Charley
Disaster Relief Fund
08/23/2004 06:46 AMStrengthen The Good: The Gulf Coast Community Foundation Of Venice
Hurricane Charley Disaster Relief
Fund
strengthenthegood.com/archives/2004/08/strengthening_t.html
track
this site | 3 links
Good enough for the White House, but not
good enough for the bedroom.
Good enough for the White House, but not
good enough for the bedroom.
05/17/2004 11:55 PM
"The sacred institution of marriage should not
be redefined by a few activist judges," said the President who was
appointed by five activist Supreme Court Justices.
The man who, between the two major candidates in 2000, got the fewer
amount of votes went on to affirm that "all Americans have a
right to be heard in this debate."
What's good for General Motors is good
for America
What's good for General Motors is good
for America
03/23/2005 10:53 PM
GM in trouble: "If you erased the
company name from the balance sheet and showed it to a forensic
accountant, the recommended treatment would probably be to seek
protection from creditors by filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. "
GM's troubles are as much a result of the
exploding costs of health
care as they are due to the company's
dropping market
share. In
Canada increasing
health care costs (PDF with many
charts) are taking a greater and greater share of
government expenditures. In the US
it's hurting big employers and
regular people.
But either way the problem doesn't seem likely to get better any time
soon.
Unitarianism: good enough for two
presidents, not good enough for Texas
Unitarianism: good enough for two
presidents, not good enough for Texas
05/19/2004 02:47 AMThe state of Texas has denied Unitarians tax-exempt religious status
because the church "does not have one system of belief." As Julia
notes, Presidents
John Adams and John Quincy Adams were sufficiently convinced of the
Unitarians' religiosity that they actually
were Unitarians.
Never before -- not in this state or any other -- has a government
agency denied Unitarians tax-exempt status because of the group's
religious philosophy, church officials say. Strayhorn's ruling clearly
infringes upon religious liberties, said Dan Althoff, board president
for the Denison congregation that was rejected for tax exemption by
the comptroller's office.
Link
(
via Electrolite)
When it comes to wireless security, good
enough is simply not good
When it comes to wireless security, good
enough is simply not good
09/17/2004 10:38 AMGood Intentions don't always equal good
results
Good Intentions don't always equal good
results
04/18/2004 05:43 PMIt would seem that in my life when I intend to do something that is
when everything will surely do...
Good Teeth, Good Health
Good Teeth, Good Health
05/24/2004 08:17 PMThese two books deal with teeth from different angles.
Shark Tank: What good is a good name if
you can't use it?
Shark Tank: What good is a good name if
you can't use it?
06/05/2005 10:55 PMIt's the late 1970s, and this pilot fish works as a teller for a big
regional bank. That means he's all too familiar with a recurring
problem generated by the techs at headquarters.
Top Ten Ideas of '04: "What Once Was
Good--or Good Enough--No Longer Is."
Top Ten Ideas of '04: "What Once Was
Good--or Good Enough--No Longer Is."
01/04/2005 04:46 AM"Decline in quality caused by staying the same: In the commentary and
opinion category, standards have gone up because of competition from
the blogs and other venues, especially the political mags. Compare 10
minutes of scrolling with Atrios to 10 minutes with a Richard Cohen
column."
Good for you, good for Microsoft - here
comes WinXP SP2
Good for you, good for Microsoft - here
comes WinXP SP2
05/13/2004 12:14 PMYou know it makes sense...
Picture quality is not very much good.
LCD is also not good
Picture quality is not very much good.
LCD is also not good
09/16/2004 05:48 AMTechTree Sep 16 2004 9:03AM GMT
Grok Description matches for How Google Can Do Good with IPO
GrokA matches for How Google Can Do Good with IPO
How Google Can Do Good with IPO